Use of AlloDerm for Correction of Symmastia:

Congenital and Acquired Symmastia: Experience from 100 Cases Treated

BACKGROUND

Symmastia, first defined by Spence et al. in 1984, is a medical condition characterized by the convergence of breast tissues in the midline, resulting in the absence of adhesion between the skin and subcutaneous tissue over the presternal area. It can be either congenital or acquired. Currently, there is no universally accepted treatment for symmastia. This study presents a surgical approach and preoperative and postoperative care for the correction of symmastia.

METHODS

Between January of 2014 and December of 2020, a surgical technique was performed on 100 patients, including 59 with congenital symmastia and 41 with acquired symmastia. The technique involved creating a thin skin flap and attaching it to the sternum to reconstruct the intermammary V-shaped region.

RESULTS

All patients in both groups underwent subglandular implant placement, with textured/polyurethane prostheses used in 97% of cases. Three cases did not use any implants. In the corrective surgery, patients received smaller, round implants, following the steps of the surgical approach devised by the author. The median satisfaction scores were high in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical approach described in this study is a safe, one-time procedure with a low risk of complications and high patient satisfaction. The technique is reproducible and provides consistent outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Surgical treatment of symmastia: A systematic review of techniques, outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

The term "symmastia" defines a confluence across the mid-sternal line of the breast mounds and subsequent loss of adhesion between sternum and pre-sternal skin. This condition can be congenital or, more frequently, iatrogenic. Despite the number of different treatments published in literature, no systematic review or surgical techniques classification has been attempted in literature. There is, therefore, a concrete need to elucidate surgical options and propose a treatment algorithm, improving surgical practice and patient's care.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to collect and evaluate the published evidence on surgical procedures to correct symmastia deformities (both congenital and acquired) in order to clearly overview possible treatments and outcomes related to this surgery, providing a surgical classification guide as well.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, PubMed database was queried for papers describing symmastia surgical treatment, along with operative indications, outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

In this review, 23 articles and 118 patients were finally included. Four main categories of treatment were identified: dermo-sternal adhesions, capsulorrhaphy, neopocket creation, and muscle repair. Symmastia correction was achieved and satisfactory in 108 of patients, despite varying techniques. Globally, recurrence was the most frequent complication, reported in the 8.5% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Symmastia represent a difficult condition to treat and recurrence is a common problem. Because of the low number of patients involved in the studies, it is difficult to make conclusions as to the superiority of one technique over another. However, this review, collecting comprehensively for the first time the surgical knowledge over this topic, could guide the surgeon to choose the best surgical treatment based on nowadays evidence.

Techniques to Repair Implant Malposition after Breast Augmentation: A Review

BACKGROUND

Implant malposition is a complication of breast augmentation that adversely affects aesthetic outcomes. It is one of the most common reasons for revisionary aesthetic breast surgery yet there is a lack of peer reviewed literature dedicated to the management of this complication.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this article was to summarize the malposition literature, review the types and causes of this complication, and evaluate the strengths and weakness of procedures aimed at addressing it.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed using the PubMed database. Articles describing surgical techniques for correction of implant malposition, as well as outcome data for patients undergoing revision with described techniques, were included. Articles describing revisionary surgery following breast reconstruction were excluded. A series of cases are presented to illustrate techniques discussed.

RESULTS

Search criteria resulted in 763 articles. Title and abstract review followed by application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in a total of 21 clinical studies from 1988 to 2014 that were included in this review. All studies included in this study were of level IV or V evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the overall low level of evidence in the literature regarding secondary breast augmentation, a thorough understanding of the corrective techniques presented will allow surgeons to make the most informed judgments. Weighing the strengths and weakness of these surgical techniques in the context of each patient will allow surgeons to develop the most appropriate treatment strategy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4: Therapeutic.

Secondary augmentation-mastopexy: indications, preferred practices, and the treatment of complications

Increasing the volume of the breast while simultaneously decreasing the skin envelope equates to surgery involving opposing forces. Increasing patient demand and the evolving perceptions of surgeons have led to the growing popularity of the combined augmentation-mastopexy operation. In turn, secondary augmentation-mastopexies and revisional surgeries of primary augmentation-mastopexies also have increased in popularity. In this article, the authors describe indications for secondary augmentation-mastopexy, techniques for performing this combined procedure safely and effectively, adjunctive procedures, potential pitfalls, and the treatment of complications.