Discussion. The role of peripheral nerve surgery in diabetic limb salvage

Cost-Effectiveness of Lower Extremity Nerve Decompression Surgery in the Prevention of Ulcers and Amputations: A Markov Analysis

BACKGROUND

The costs and health effects associated with lower extremity complications in diabetes mellitus are an increasing burden to society. In selected patients, lower extremity nerve decompression is able to reduce symptoms of neuropathy and the concomitant risks of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations. To estimate the health and economic effects of this type of surgery, the cost-effectiveness of this intervention compared to current nonsurgical care was studied.

METHODS

To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of lower extremity nerve decompression over a 10-year period, a Markov model was developed to simulate the onset and progression of diabetic foot disease in patients with diabetes and neuropathy who underwent lower extremity nerve decompression surgery, compared to a group undergoing current nonsurgical care. Mean survival time, health-related quality of life, presence or risk of lower extremity complications, and in-hospital costs were the outcome measures assessed. Data from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study were used as current care, complemented with information from international studies on the epidemiology of diabetic foot disease, resource use, and costs, to feed the model.

RESULTS

Lower extremity nerve decompression surgery resulted in improved life expectancy (88,369.5 life-years versus 86,513.6 life-years), gain of quality-adjusted life-years (67,652.5 versus 64,082.3), and reduced incidence of foot complications compared to current care (490 versus 1087). The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was -€59,279.6 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, which is below the Dutch critical threshold of less than €80,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

CONCLUSIONS

Decompression surgery of lower extremity nerves improves survival, reduces diabetic foot complications, and is cost saving and cost-effective compared with current care, suggesting considerable socioeconomic benefit for society.

(Cost-)effectiveness of lower extremity nerve decompression surgery in subjects with diabetes: the DeCompression (DECO) trial-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The peripheral nerves of patients with diabetes are often pathologically swollen, which results in entrapment at places of anatomical narrowing. This results in nerve dysfunction. Surgical treatment of compression neuropathies in the lower extremities (lower extremity nerve decompression (LEND)) results in relief of symptoms and gain in peripheral nerve function, which may lead to less sensory loss (short term) and less associated detrimental effects including foot ulceration and amputations, and lower costs (long term). The aim of the DeCompression trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and (cost-)effectiveness of surgical decompression of compressed lower extremity nerves (LEND surgery) compared with patients treated with conventional (non-surgical) care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A stratified randomised (1 to 1) controlled trial comparing LEND surgery (intervention) with conventional non-surgical care (control strategy) in subjects with diabetes with problems of neuropathy due to compression neuropathies in the lower extremity. Randomisation is stratified for participating hospital (n=11) and gender. Patients and controls have the same follow-up at 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 48 months. Participants (n=344) will be recruited in 12 months and enrolled in all affiliated hospitals in which they receive both the intervention or conventional non-surgical care and follow-up. Outcome assessors are blinded to group assignment.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

disease-specific quality of life (Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire-Diabetic Neuropathy).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

health-related quality of life (EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D5L), 36-item Short Form (SF-36)), plantar sensation (Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Test Battery), incidence of ulcerations/amputations, resource use and productivity loss (Medical Cost Questionnaire, Productivity Cost Questionnaire) during follow-up. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be estimated on the basis of the collected empirical data and a cost-utility model.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been granted by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Utrecht University Medical Center (reference: NL68312.041.19v5, protocol number: 19-335/M). Dissemination of results will be via journal articles and presentations at national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NetherlandsTrial Registry NL7664.

Optimization of Surgical Outcome in Lower Extremity Nerve Decompression Surgery

BACKGROUND

There is still debate regarding whether the surgical release of entrapped lower extremity nerves reduces complaints of associated neuropathy and results in gain of sensory function. The aim of this study was to investigate which factors are associated with a favorable surgical outcome, by follow-up of patients previously participating in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The authors evaluated the 5-year follow-up of diabetic patients previously participating in the Lower Extremity Nerve Entrapment Study (LENS). Visual analogue pain scores, satisfaction, complaints, quality of life (i.e., 36-Question Short-Form Health Survey and EuroQol 5 Dimensions instrument), sensory function, and incident ulceration and amputation were assessed. Differences between patients who underwent unilateral versus bilateral decompressions were investigated.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of the original 42 LENS participants were measured, of which eight patients underwent additional decompression of the contralateral leg, after 12-month LENS follow-up. At 5 years, bilateral surgical patients (n = 8) had significantly lower pain scores and higher quality of life compared with unilateral surgical patients (n = 23), were younger, had a lower age when diagnosed with diabetes, and had a lower body mass index at baseline. Pain scores of the additional decompressed leg decreased in a manner similar to that of the initial decompressed leg during follow-up. Patients with severe preoperative sensory loss did worse; 41.2 percent of the LENS Follow-Up Study subjects underwent or considered undergoing contralateral surgery.

CONCLUSION

The authors' results suggest that the beneficial effects of lower extremity nerve decompression surgery are reserved for a select group of patients, of which preoperative nerve damage, age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index are important effect modifiers.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Reconsidering nerve decompression: an overlooked opportunity to limit diabetic foot ulcer recurrence and amputation

Nerve decompression for relief of subjective diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy pain and numbness has been labeled of "unknown" benefit. Objective outcomes in treatment and prevention of diabetic foot complications are reviewed. There is growing evidence that plantar foot ulceration and recurrence in high-risk feet are minimized with this operation. Avoiding neuropathic and neuroischemic ulcer wounds should theoretically reduce amputations and perhaps mortality risk. Protective effects are hypothesized to act via relief of neuro-vascular entrapment, thereby improving neurally modulated tissue homeostasis factors. Nerve decompression deserves considerable research attention to understand its role in limiting foot complications. Its apparent benefits challenge the paradigm that diabetic neuropathy is a purely length-dependent axonopathy and may necessitate appreciation of superimposed nerve entrapment as an significant operant factor.