How “Successful” Is Calvarial Reconstruction Using Frozen Autologous Bone?:

Subgaleal drains may be associated with decreased infection following autologous cranioplasty: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Autologous bone is often the first choice in cranioplasty following a decompressive craniectomy. However, infection is a common complication, with reported rates up to 25%. While the incidence and management of infection are well documented, the risk factors associated with infection remain less clear. The current study aims to identify predictors of infection risk following autologous cranioplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty using cryopreserved autologous bone flaps between 2010 and 2020. Patient demographics and factors related to both surgeries and infection rates were recorded from patient records. Logistic regressions were conducted to determine which factors were implicated in the development of infection.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 126 patients underwent autologous cranioplasty. A total of 10 patients (7.9%) developed an infection following reconstruction, with half resulting in implant failure. We did not identify any significant risk factors for infection. Regression analysis identified placement of subgaleal drain following cranioplasty as a protective factor against the development of infection (OR: 0.16, p = 0.007). On average, drains remained in for 3 days, with no difference between the length of drains for those with infection vs. those without (p = 0.757).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates an infection rate of 7.9% in patients who receive an autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy, which is consistent with previous data. Half (4%) of patients who experienced an infection ultimately required removal of the implant. While it is common practice for neurosurgeons to use drains to prevent hematomas and fluid collections, we found that subgaleal drain placement following cranioplasty was associated with decreased infection, thus demonstrating another benefit of a commonly used tool.

Early Challenges in the Implementation of Automated CranialRebuild Freeware for Generation of Patient-Specific Cranial Implant Using Additive Manufacturing: A Pilot Project in Review

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a significant global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where access to medical resources is limited. Decompressive craniectomy (DHC) is a common procedure to alleviate elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) following TBI, but the cost of subsequent cranioplasty can be prohibitive, especially in resource-constrained settings. We describe challenges encountered during the beta-testing phase of CranialRebuild 1.0, an automated software program tasked with creating patient-specific cranial implants (PSCIs) from CT images. Two pilot clinical teams in the Philippines and Ukraine tested the software, providing feedback on its functionality and challenges encountered. The constructive feedback from the Philippine and Ukrainian teams highlighted challenges related to CT scan parameters, DICOM file arrays, software limitations, and the need for further software improvements. CranialRebuild 1.0 shows promise in addressing the need for affordable PSCIs in LMICs. Challenges and improvement suggestions identified throughout the beta-testing phase will shape the development of CranialRebuild 2.0, with the aim of enhancing its functionality and usability. Further research is needed to validate the software's efficacy in a clinical setting and assess its cost-effectiveness.

Autologous Cranioplasty with Bone Flap Preserved in Conventional Freezers: An Adequate Option in Low Resource Settings

BACKGROUND

Autologous cranioplasty has been used for decades and is the gold standard treatment in patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy (DC). One of the most common methods to store the cranial bone flap is cryopreservation at very low temperatures (-70 to -80°). The only way to achieve these low temperatures is by using special freezers which are not always available in all medical facilities, especially in low-resource centers. This paper describes our experience with the storage of cranial bone flaps in freezers of conventional refrigerators.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients treated with autologous cranioplasty, operated between 2015 and 2020. The cranial bone flap was stored at -18°C in the freezer of conventional refrigerators. Complications and outcomes were analyzed and compared with reports of patients in whom ultra-low temperature freezers were used for bone flap preservation.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included. The average follow-up period was 33 months. Trauma was the most common cause of DC, followed by stroke. The mean age was 36.7. Aseptic bone flap resorption was observed in 4 cases (16%). No cases of infection were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of freezers from conventional refrigerators may be an acceptable alternative for the preservation of the cranial bone flap in facilities where special freezers are not available. The rate of aseptic bone necrosis and infections observed in this paper was similar to the incidence of these complications reported in studies where ultra-low temperatures were used.

Toward global availability of low-cost, patient-specific cranial implants: creation and validation of automated CranialRebuild freeware application

PURPOSE

Financial restrictions limit the options for hermetically precise, patient-specific cranial implants (PSCIs) after decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) in low-income countries. Use of image segmentation, modeling software, and 3D printers has lowered costs associated with PSCIs. However, requirements of time and technical expertise have prevented widespread utilization. Our objective was to create a fully automated software algorithm that is able to generate a virtual model (.STL) of a negative of an implant using CT imaging following DHC.

METHODS

A freeware algorithm (CranialRebuild) was constructed with the following capabilities: (1) after the upload of digital imaging and communications in medicine files, the normal side is analyzed in reference to the side of DHC, (2) Boolean subtraction is used to obtain a virtual image of the desired implant, and (3) a two-piece virtual model (.STL) of the PSCI mold is generated. In four cadaveric specimens, a standard DHC was performed. Post-DHC CT imaging was used to obtain a .STL of the negative of the implant, which was then printed using poly-lactic acid (PLA). Methylmethacrylate cement was used to generate a PSCI from the mold. The PSCIs were implanted into the index specimens; cosmesis was subjectively evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Two specimens were graded as 4/5, indicating that minor post-processing modification was needed for optimal cosmesis. Two specimens were graded as 3/5, indicating that optimal cosmesis could be obtained following moderate post-processing modification.

CONCLUSIONS

CranialRebuild can be used to create hermetically precise PSCIs at a fraction of the price of third-party vendors. Validation of this technology has significant implications for the accessibility of customized cranial implants worldwide.

Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Merlon Shape: Novel Fixation of Artificial Bone for Cranioplasty

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty is a surgical procedure widely performed for repairing cranial defects caused by external decompression surgery for cerebrovascular disease or traumatic brain injury. We devised a new cranioplasty method using artificial bone made up of ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene, with serrated wings on the edge. We named this newly designed artificial bone as Merlon shape.

OBJECTIVE

To describe our initial experience with the Merlon shape and evaluate its usefulness and safety in cranioplasty.

METHODS

The serrated wings of the Merlon shape were preoperatively designed for solid fixation and improving cosmetic results by reducing the thickness of the artificial bone. We evaluated 25 patients who underwent cranioplasty with the Merlon shape between December 2018 and December 2021. The causes of bone defects in these patients (male: 9, female: 16; median age: 62 years) were subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 14), cerebral infarction (n = 8), and traumatic brain injury (n = 3).

RESULTS

There were no postoperative adverse events such as infection, bone resorption, implant exposure, or graft sinking in 24 patients during an average follow-up period of 19 months. One patient experienced acute epidural hemorrhage and required reoperation.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report on the use of the ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene Merlon shape. Our initial 4-year case series showed good outcomes with this method.

Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy-a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Optimal reconstruction materials for cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy (DC) remain unclear. This systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis compares cosmetic outcomes and complications of autologous bone grafts and alloplasts used for cranioplasty following DC.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception until April 2021. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis was used to compare pooled outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of autologous bone to combined alloplasts. A frequentist network meta-analysis was subsequently conducted to compare multiple individual materials.

RESULTS

Of 2033 articles screened, 30 studies were included, consisting of 29 observational studies and one randomized control trial. Overall complications were statistically significantly higher for autologous bone compared to combined alloplasts (RR = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.14-2.13), hydroxyapatite (RR = 2.60, 95%CI = 1.17-5.78), polymethylmethacrylate (RR = 1.50 95%CI = 1.08-2.08), and titanium (Ti) (RR = 1.56 95%CI = 1.03-2.37). Resorption occurred only in autologous bone (15.1%) and not in alloplasts (0.0%). When resorption was not considered, there was no difference in overall complications between autologous bone and combined alloplasts (RR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.75-1.34), nor between any individual materials. Dehiscence was lower for autologous bone compared to combined alloplasts (RR = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.19-0.79) and Ti (RR = 0.34, 95%CI = 0.15-0.76). There was no difference between autologous bone and combined alloplasts with respect to infection (RR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.56-1.30), migration (RR = 1.36, 95%CI = 0.63-2.93), hematoma (RR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.53-1.79), seizures (RR = 0.83, 95%CI = 0.29-2.35), satisfactory cosmesis (RR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.71-1.08), and reoperation (RR = 1.66, 95%CI = 0.90-3.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone resorption is only a consideration in autologous cranioplasty compared to bone substitutes explaining higher complications for autologous bone. Dehiscence is higher in alloplasts, particularly in Ti, compared to autologous bone.

Post-traumatic hydrocephalus may be associated with autologous cranioplasty failure, independent of ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a common procedure used for the treatment of intracranial hypertension. Once brain swelling has subsided, a cranioplasty is performed to restore cosmesis and protection to the brain. While using the patient's autologous bone flap is often the first choice in cranioplasty, this procedure is frequently complicated by bone flap resorption and infection. This study seeks to identify predictors of autologous cranioplasty failure.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and autologous cranioplasty. Patient demographics and factors related to both surgeries and failure rates were recorded from patient records. Logistic regressions were conducted to determine which factors were implicated in autologous cranioplasty failure.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 127 patients underwent autologous cranioplasty. Overall, 18 (14.2%) patients experienced autologous cranioplasty failure. Regression analysis identified development of post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) following DC (OR: 3.26, p = 0.043), presence of neurological deficits following DC (OR: 4.88, p = 0.025), and reoperation prior to CP (OR 3.0, p = 0.049) as significant predictors of autologous cranioplasty failure. Of the 16 patients who developed PTH following DC, 9 received a VP shunt. The rate of flap failure was similar across the 9 PTH patients who received a shunt and the 7 PTH patients who did not receive a shunt (33% vs. 57% failure rate, respectively, p = 0.341).

CONCLUSION

Autologous cranioplasty is a reasonably successful procedure with a flap failure rate of 14.2%. We identified PTH, persistent neurological deficits, and reoperation prior to cranioplasty as significant predictors of autologous cranioplasty failure. Interestingly, the presence of VP shunt did not impact the odds of flap failure.

Ten-Year Institutional Experience to Predict Risk of Calvarial Bone Flap Loss Using Long-Term Outcome Data

BACKGROUND

Calvarial bone flap (CBF) loss is a common complication following craniotomy and subsequent skull reconstruction can be challenging. Defining predictors of CBF failure not only improves patient outcomes but reduces the need for complex reconstruction often requiring plastic surgery consultation. As CBF failure can occur many years following craniotomy, this study aimed to determine risk factors of CBF loss using long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent craniotomy with CBF reinsertion between 2003 and 2013 at a tertiary academic institution. Patients were included if demographics, comorbidities, and long-term outcomes were available. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the odds of CBF failure, defined as permanent removal for bone flap-related issues. The median follow-up was 6.9 years (interquartile range: 1.8-10.8 y).

RESULTS

There were 222 patients who met inclusion criteria and underwent craniotomy with CBF reinsertion, primarily for tumor resection or intracranial pressure relief. CBF failure occurred in 76 (34.2%) patients. Up to 4 CBF reinsertions were performed in both failure and nonfailure groups. The risks of CBF loss increased with each additional CBF elevation by 17-fold (P<0.001), male sex by 3-fold (P=0.005), and tumor etiology by 3-fold (P=0.033) (C-index=0.942).

CONCLUSIONS

Each CBF reinsertion dramatically increases the risk of CBF loss. This finding may optimize patient selection and surgical planning. Early multidisciplinary discussions between plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons may avoid multiple CBF elevations and prevent the adverse sequela of high-risk calvarial reconstruction efforts.

Evidence of linear bone flap resorption in patients undergoing autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: A 3D Slicer segmented analysis of serial CT images

OBJECTIVES

Autologous cranioplasty (CP) following decompressive craniectomy (DC) carries risk of bone flap resorption (BFR). The current literature offers limited information regarding the natural progression of BFR, and the rate at which it occurs. We aim to characterize the progression of BFR over time and elucidate risk factors for accelerated BFR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent DC and autologous CP. Serial computed tomography (CT) images were used to quantify degree of BFR over time. Risk factors included age, diabetes, smoking status, flap fragmentation, defect size, and DC-CP time interval. Chi-square analyses and Student's t-tests were performed to examine differences between patients who experienced BFR and those who did not.

RESULTS

Overall, 82% of patients demonstrated evidence of clinically relevant resorption on CT. On average, the bone flap decreased in volume by 36.7% within the first year, with a linear loss in volume after multiple years of follow-up. Individuals who developed greater BFR were significantly younger (43 ± 17 vs. 56 ± 12, p=0.022), had a lower incidence of diabetes (5.9% vs. 43%, p=0.037), and had more bone flap fragments (1.4 ± 0.67 vs. 1.00 ± 0, p <0.001) than those who did not.

CONCLUSION

Resorption following CP with cryopreserved bone appears to progress in a fairly linear and continuous fashion over time. Using serial CT images, we found a resorption rate of 82% at our institution. We identified several possible risk factors for resorption, including flap fragmentation, younger age, and absence of diabetes.

Favourable long-term recovery after decompressive craniectomy: the Northern Finland experience with a predominantly adolescent patient cohort

PURPOSE

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is an effective treatment of intracranial hypertension. Correspondingly, the procedure is increasingly utilised worldwide. The number of patients rendered vegetative following surgery has been a concern-a matter especially important in children, due to long anticipated lifetime. Here, we report the long-term outcomes of all paediatric DC patients from an 11-year period in a tertiary-level centre that geographically serves half of Finland.

METHODS

We identified all patients younger than 18 years who underwent DC in the Oulu University Hospital between the years 2009 and 2019. Outcomes and clinicoradiological variables were extracted from the patient records.

RESULTS

Mean yearly prevalence of brain injury requiring DC was 1.34/100 000 children-twenty-four patients underwent DC during the study period and 21 (88%) survived. The median age of the patients was 16.0 years, and the median preoperative GCS was 5.0 (IQR 5.0). Fifteen patients (63%) had made a good recovery (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale ≥ 7). Of the surviving patients, two (9.5%) had not returned to school. After traumatic brain injury (n = 20), the Rotterdam CT score (mean 3.0, range 1 to 5) was not associated with mortality, poor recovery or inability to continue school (p = 0.13, p = 0.41, p = 0.43, respectively). Absent basal cisterns were associated with mortality (p = 0.005), but not with poor recovery if the patient survived DC (p = 0.81). Hydrocephalus was associated with poor recovery and inability to continue school (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Most of our patients made a favourable recovery and were able to continue school. No late mortality was observed. Thus, even in clinically and radiologically severely brain-injured children, decompressive craniectomy appears to yield favourable outcomes.

Two-center validation of the Oulu resorption score for bone flap resorption after autologous cranioplasty

OBJECTIVE

Autologous bone has been the gold standard of cranioplasty materials for decades. Unique to autologous cranioplasty, bone flap resorption is a poorly understood and unclearly defined complication. Even further, it has been unclear, whether the resorption process eventually stabilizes over time. Thus, the sufficient follow-up period after autologous cranioplasty is unknown. The Oulu Resorption Score (ORS) is a straight-forward classification system for the radiological interpretation of bone flap resorption. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the reliability of the ORS using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and to assess the temporal progression of the resorption process.

METHODS

We identified 108 consecutive autologous cranioplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2018 in two tertiary referral centers. All 365 head CT scans the patients had undergone were evaluated using the ORS in a blinded, independent two-center setting. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were calculated. The ORS was applied to study the temporal progression of the resorption process.

RESULTS

The intra-observer reliability of the ORS was excellent (ICC 0.94, 95%CI 0.93-0.95). Inter-observer reliability was good-to-excellent (ICCs 0.87 and 0.89, 95%CIs 0.84-0.89 and 0.87-0.91, respectively). In scatterplot smoothing analyses, the progression of bone flap resorption appeared to stabilize 12-24 months after cranioplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

ORS is the only validated radiological tool for the standardized analysis of bone flap resorption after autologous cranioplasty. Evaluated using the ORS, the resorption process seemed to stabilize during the first two postoperative years after cranioplasty, suggesting that the sufficient follow-up time after autologous cranioplasty is two years.

Decision-Making in Adult Cranial Vault Reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Define and classify different types of cranial defects 2. Compare both autologous and alloplastic options for reconstruction 3. Develop an optimal approach for cranial vault reconstruction in various clinical scenarios.

SUMMARY

Defects of the cranium result from various causes, including traumatic loss, neurosurgical intervention, skull tumors, and infection. Cranial vault reconstruction aims to restore both the structural integrity and surface morphology of the skull. To ensure a successful outcome, the choice of appropriate cranioplasty reconstruction will vary primarily based on the cause, location, and size of the defect. Other relevant factors that must be considered include adequacy of soft-tissue coverage, presence of infection, and previous or planned radiation therapy. This article presents an algorithm for the reconstruction of various cranial defects using both autologous and alloplastic techniques, with a comparison of their advantages and disadvantages.

Complications of cranioplasty in relationship to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite being a common procedure, cranioplasty (CP) is associated with a variety of serious, at times lethal, complications. This study explored the relationship between the initial injury leading to decompressive craniectomy (DC) and the rates and types of complications after subsequent CP. It specifically compared between traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and patients undergoing CP after DC for other indications.A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases using PRISMA guidelines was performed to include case-control studies, cohorts, and clinical trials reporting complication data for CP after DC. Information about the patients' characteristics and the rates of overall and specific complications in TBI and non-TBI patients was extracted, summarized, and analyzed.A total of 59 studies, including the authors' institutional experience, encompassing 9264 patients (4671 TBI vs. 4593 non-TBI) met the inclusion criteria; this total also included 149 cases from our institutional series. The results of the analysis of the published series are shown both with and without our series 23 studies reported overall complications, 40 reported infections, 10 reported new-onset seizures, 13 reported bone flap resorption (BFR), 5 reported post-CP hydrocephalus, 10 reported intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 8 reported extra-axial fluid collections (EFC). TBI was associated with increased odds of BFR (odds ratio [OR] 1.76, p < 0.01) and infection (OR 1.38, p = 0.02). No difference was detected in the odds of overall complications, seizures, hydrocephalus, ICH, or EFC.Awareness of increased risks of BFR and infection after CP in TBI patients promotes the implementation of new strategies to prevent these complications especially in this category of patients.

Security and reliability of CUSTOMBONE cranioplasties: A prospective multicentric study

BACKGROUND

Repairing bone defects generated by craniectomy is a major therapeutic challenge in terms of bone consolidation as well as functional and cognitive recovery. Furthermore, these surgical procedures are often grafted with complications such as infections, breaches, displacements and rejections leading to failure and thus explantation of the prosthesis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cumulative explantation and infection rates following the implantation of a tailored cranioplasty CUSTOMBONE prosthesis made of porous hydroxyapatite. One hundred and ten consecutive patients requiring cranial reconstruction for a bone defect were prospectively included in a multicenter study constituted of 21 centres between December 2012 and July 2014. Follow-up lasted 2 years.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients included in the study was 42±15 years old (y.o), composed mainly by men (57.27%). Explantations of the CUSTOMBONE prosthesis were performed in 13/110 (11.8%) patients, significantly due to infections: 9/13 (69.2%) (p<0.0001), with 2 (15.4%) implant fracture, 1 (7.7%) skin defect and 1 (7.7%) following the mobilization of the implant. Cumulative explantation rates were successively 4.6% (SD 2.0), 7.4% (SD 2.5), 9.4% (SD 2.8) and 11.8% (SD 2.9%) at 2, 6, 12 and 24 months. Infections were identified in 16/110 (14.5%): 8/16 (50%) superficial and 8/16 (50%) deep. None of the following elements, whether demographic characteristics, indications, size, location of the implant, redo surgery, co-morbidities or medical history, were statistically identified as risk factors for prosthesis explantation or infection.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides relevant clinical evidence on the performance and safety of CUSTOMBONE prosthesis in cranial procedures. Complications that are difficulty incompressible mainly occur during the first 6 months, but can appear at a later stage (>1 year). Thus assiduous, regular and long-term surveillances are necessary.

The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review

The use of autologous bone flap for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy is a widely used strategy that allows alleviating health expenses. When the patient has recovered from the primary insult, the cranioplasty restores protection and cosmesis, recovering fluid dynamics and improving neurological status. During this time, the bone flap must be stored, but there is a lack of standardization of tissue banking practices for this aim. In this work, we have reviewed the literature on tissue processing and storage practices. Most of the published articles are focused from a strictly clinical and surgical point of view, paying less attention to issues related to tissue manipulation. When bone resorption is avoided and the risk of infection is controlled, the autograft represents the most efficient choice, with the lowest risk of complication. Otherwise, depending on the degree of involvement, the patient may have to undergo new surgery, assuming further risks and higher healthcare costs. Therefore, tissue banks must implement protocols to provide products with the highest possible clinical effectiveness, without compromising safety. With a centralised management of tissue banking practices there may be a more uniform approach, thus facilitating the standardization of procedures and guidelines.

Cranioplasty: A Comprehensive Review of the History, Materials, Surgical Aspects, and Complications

Cranioplasty is a common neurosurgical procedure performed to reconstruct cranial defects. The materials used to replace bone defects have evolved throughout history. Cranioplasty materials can be broadly divided into biological and synthetic materials. Biological materials can be further subdivided into autologous grafts, allografts, and xenografts. Allografts (bony materials and cartilage from cadavers) and xenografts (bony materials from animals) are out of favor for use in cranioplasty because of their high rates of infection, resorption, and rejection. In autologous cranioplasty, either the cranial bone itself or bones from other parts of the body of the patient are used. Synthetic bone grafts have reduced the operation time and led to better cosmetic results because of the advancement of computer-based customization and three-dimensional printing. Aluminum was the first synthetic bone graft material used, but it was found to irritate neural tissue, induce seizures, and dissolve over time. Acrylic, in the form of methyl methacrylate, is the most widely used material in cranioplasty. Hydroxyapatite is a natural component of bone and is believed to enhance bone repair, resulting in decreased tissue reactions and promoting good osteointegration. Polyetheretherketones are light and nonconductive and do not interfere with imaging modalities. The complication rates of cranioplasty are high, and surgical site infection is the most common complication. The effect of cranioplasty timing on cognitive function remains debatable. However, the timing of cranioplasty is independent of neurologic outcomes. In this article, the history, materials, complications, and evolution of current practices used in cranioplasty are comprehensively reviewed.

The impact of implant material and patient age on the long-term outcome of secondary cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury

Background

Secondary cranioplasty (CP) is considered to support the neurological recovery of patients after decompressive craniectomy (DC), but the treatment success might be limited by complications associated to confounders, which are not yet fully characterized. The aim of this study was to identify the most relevant factors based on the necessity to perform revision surgeries.

Methods

Data from 156 patients who received secondary CP following DC for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) between 1984 and 2015 have been retrospectively analyzed and arranged into cohorts according to the occurrence of complications requiring surgical intervention.

Results

Cox regression analysis revealed a lower revision rate in patients with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants than in patients with autologous calvarial bone (ACB) implants (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.0, p = 0.04). A similar effect could be observed in the population of patients aged between 18 and 65 years, who had a lower risk to suffer complications requiring surgical treatment than individuals aged under 18 or over 65 years (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.9, p = 0.02). Revision rates were not influenced by the gender (p = 0.88), timing of the CP (p = 0.53), the severity of the TBI (p = 0.86), or the size of the cranial defect (p = 0.16).

Conclusions

In this study, the implant material and patient age were identified as the most relevant parameters independently predicting the long-term outcome of secondary CP. The use of PMMA was associated with lower revision rates than ACB and might provide a therapeutic benefit for selected patients with traumatic cranial defects.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-020-04243-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors

Objective

One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to higher costs. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict the development of ABFR.

Methods

In this study, 303 CP surgeries performed between 2002 and 2017 were examined retrospectively to identify factors predicting the occurrence of ABFR. A number of these factors (e.g., time lapse between decompressive craniectomy (DC) and CP, bone-flap size, specific laboratory signs, and the reason for the original DC) were analyzed as possibly influencing the risk of developing ABFR.

Results

ABFR of an autologous bone flap that subsequently required a CP with synthetic skull implants occurred in 10 of 303 patients (3.0%). CP timing and patients' Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) (p = 0.008; p = 0.012) were identified as significant factors with an impact on the development of ABRF. Age did not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows a clear trend. The younger the age, the more likely it was that an ABFR would develop.

Conclusion

The risk of ABFR lessens the longer the period of time elapsed between DC and CP. Age does not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows that there is a clear trend.

Bone Flap Changes after Cranioplasty Using Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps: A Three-Dimensional Volumetric Reconstruction Study

PURPOSE

Bone flap resorption (BFR) after cranioplasty with an autologous bone flap (ABF) is well known. However, the prevalences and degrees of BFR remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate changes in ABFs following cranioplasty and to investigate factors related with BFR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients who underwent cranioplasty with frozen ABF between January 2007 and December 2016. Brain CT images of these patients were reconstructed to form three-dimensional (3D) images, and 3D images of ABF were separated using medical image editing software. ABF volumes on images were measured using 3D image editing software and were compared between images in the immediate postoperative period and at postoperative 12 months. Risk factors related with BFR were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The volumes of bone flaps calculated from CT images immediately after cranioplasty ranged from 55.3 cm³ to 175 cm³. Remnant bone flap volumes at postoperative 12 months ranged from 14.2% to 102.5% of the original volume. Seventy-five patients (77.3%) had a BFR rate exceeding 10% at 12 months after cranioplasty, and 26 patients (26.8%) presented severe BFR over 40%. Ten patients (10.3%) underwent repeated cranioplasty due to severe BFR. The use of a 5-mm burr for central tack-up sutures was significantly associated with BFR (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Most ABFs after cranioplasty are absorbed. Thus, when using frozen ABF, patients should be adequately informed. To prevent BFR, making holes must be kept to a minimum during ABF grafting.

Is Three-Dimensional Virtual Planning in Cranial Reconstruction for Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skull a Feasible Option?

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common type of malignant skin disorder. An uncommon feature is local bony invasion, as can rarely be seen in lesions on the scalp. The optimal treatment strategy in these rare cases is still under debate.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this case report is to present a 1-stage three-dimensional planned surgical resection and reconstruction of a cSCC with bony invasion into the scalp and to discuss the alternative options and potential pitfalls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A patient diagnosed with rT4N0M0 cSCC of the scalp underwent a cranial resection and reconstruction in 1 stage. With the use of computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing a patient-specific implant (PSI) of poly (ether ether ketone) was manufactured. After the PSI was inserted, it was covered with a latissimus dorsi muscle and a split-thickness skin graft.

RESULTS

Intraoperatively the resection template generated an accurate resection and accurate and fast placement of the PSI. The reconstruction had a clinical satisfactory esthetic result, but was hampered by the development of a small wound dehiscence was observed over the postoperative course.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional planned resection and reconstruction for composite defects of the skull after resection of a cSCC of the scalp with bony invasion may lead to an accurate and predictable resection and accurate and fast placement of the PSI. However, patient specific characteristics should be considered to assess potential risks and benefits before opting for this one-stage treatment strategy.

Factors related to failure of autologous cranial reconstructions after decompressive craniectomy

PURPOSE

Cranioplasty is customary after decompressive craniectomy. Many different materials have been developed and used for this procedure. The ideal material does not yet exist, while complication rates in cranioplasties remain high. This study aimed to determine factors related to autologous bone flap failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this two-center retrospective cohort study, 276 patients underwent autologous bone cranioplasty after initial decompressive craniectomy between 2004 and 2014. Medical records were reviewed regarding patient characteristics and factors potentially related to bone flap failure. Data were analyzed using univariable and multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

Independent factors related to overall bone flap failure were: duration of hospitalization after decompressive craniectomy [OR: 1.012 (95%CI: 1.003-1.022); p = 0.012], time interval between decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty [OR: 1.018 (95%CI: 1.004-1.032); p = 0.013], and follow-up duration [OR: 1.034 (95%CI: 1.020-1.047); p < 0.001]. In patients with bone flap infection, neoplasm as initial diagnosis occurred significantly more often (29.2% vs. 7.8%; RD 21.3%; 95%CI 8.4 -38.3%; NNH 5; 95%CI 3 -12) and duration of hospitalization after decompressive craniectomy tended to be longer (means 54 vs. 28 days, MD 26.2 days, 95%CI -8.6 to 60.9 days). Patients with bone flap resorption were significantly younger (35 vs. 43 years, MD 7.7 years, 95%CI 0.8-14.6 years) and their cranial defect size tended to be wider than in patients without bone flap resorption (mean circumference 39 vs. 37 cm; MD 2.4 cm, 95% CI -0.43-5.2 cm) and follow-up duration was significantly longer (44 vs. 14 months, MD 29 months, 95%CI 17-42 months).

CONCLUSION

A neoplasm as initial diagnosis, longer hospitalization after decompressive craniectomy, larger time interval between decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty, and longer follow-up duration are associated with a higher risk of failure of autologous bone flaps for cranioplasty. Patients with these risk factors may be better served with an early recovery program after decompressive surgery or an alloplastic material for cranioplasty.

Functional and aesthetic evaluation after cranial reconstruction with polymethyl methacrylate prostheses using low-cost 3D printing templates in patients with cranial defects secondary to decompressive craniectomies: A prospective study

Background:

Cranial reconstruction surgery is a procedure used as an attempt to reestablish the cranial bone anatomy. This study evaluates the symptomatic and aesthetic improvement of patients with cranial defects secondary to decompressive craniectomies after cranial reconstruction with customized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) prostheses. Secondly, we aim to divide our experience in the production of these prostheses with a low-cost method.

Methods:

A prospective study was carried out with patients submitted to cranioplasty at the Hospital da Restauração between 2014 and 2017. A total of 63 cranioplasties were performed using customized PMMA prosthesis produced by 3D impression molds. All patients underwent a functional and aesthetic evaluation questionnaire in the preoperative period and in the sixth postoperative month.

Results:

Sixty-three patients underwent cranioplasty with a mean age of 33 years, ranging from 13 to 58 years, 55 males and 8 females. The mean area of the defect was 147 cm². The mean postoperative follow-up of the patients was 21 months, ranging from 6 to 33 months. Fifty-five patients attended the 6-month postoperative consultation. All patients presented symptomatic improvement after reconstruction of the skull. The infection rate was 3.2%, 4.8% of extrusion, 1.6% of prosthesis fracture, 7.9% of extradural hematoma, 17.4% of reoperation, 5% of wound dehiscence, and 4.8% of removal of the prosthesis.

Conclusion:

Cranioplasty, with a customized PMMA prosthesis, improved the symptoms and aesthetic appearance of all operated patients. The use of prototypes to customize cranial prostheses facilitated the operative technique and allowed the recovery of a cranial contour very close to normal.

Subcutaneous bone flap storage after emergency craniectomy: cost-effectiveness and rate of resorption

OBJECTIVEDecompressive craniectomy is used for uncontrolled intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury and malignant hemispheric stroke. Subcutaneous preservation of the autologous bone flap in the abdomen is a simple, portable technique but has largely been abandoned due to perceived concerns of resorption. The authors sought to characterize their experience with subcutaneous preservation of the bone flap and cranioplasty.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective single-institution review of subcutaneous preservation of the autologous bone flap after decompressive craniectomy from 2005 to 2015. The primary outcome was clinically significant bone resorption, defined as requiring a complete mesh implant at the time of cranioplasty, or delayed revision. The outcome also combined cases with any minor bone resorption to determine predictors of this outcome. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine the risk factors for predicting resorption. A cost comparison analysis was also used via the 2-sided t-test to compare the cost of cranioplasty using an autologous bone flap with standard custom implant costs.RESULTSA total of 193 patients with craniectomy were identified, 108 of whom received a cranioplasty. The mean time to cranioplasty was 104.31 days. Severe resorption occurred in 10 cases (9.26%): 4 were clinically significant (2 early and 2 late) and 6 demonstrated type II (severe) necrosis on CT, but did not require revision. Early resorption of any kind (mild or severe) occurred in 28 (25.93%) of 108 cases. Of the 108 patients, 26 (24.07%) required supplemental cranioplasty material. Late resorption of any kind (mild or severe) occurred in 6 (5.88%) of 102 cases. Of these, a clinically noticeable but nonoperative deformity was noted in 4 (3.92%) and minor (type I) necrosis on CT in 37 (37%) of 100. Bivariate analysis identified fragmentation of bone (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.03-14.8), shunt-dependent hydrocephalus (OR 7.97, 95% CI 1.57-40.46), and presence of post-cranioplasty drain (OR 9.39, 95% CI 1.14-1000) to be significant risk factors for bone resorption. A binary logistic regression optimized using Fisher's scoring determined the optimal multivariable combination of factors. Fragmentation of bone (OR 5.84, 95% CI 1.38-28.78), diabetes (OR 7.61, 95% CI 1.37-44.56), and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus (OR 9.35, 95% CI 1.64-56.21) were found to be most predictive of resorption, with a C value of 0.78. Infections occurred in the subcutaneous pocket in 5 (2.60%) of the 193 cases and after cranioplasty in 10 (9.26%) of the 108 who underwent cranioplasty. The average cost of cranioplasty with autologous bone was $2156.28 ± $1144.60 (n = 15), and of a custom implant was $35,118.60 ± $2067.51 (3 different sizes; p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONSCraniectomy with autologous bone cranioplasty using subcutaneous pocket storage is safe and compares favorably to cryopreservation in terms of resorption and favorably to a custom synthetic implant in terms of cost. While randomized data are required to definitively prove the superiority of one method, subcutaneous preservation has enough practical advantages with low risk to warrant routine use for most patients.

Cranioplasty Using Autologous Bone versus Porous Polyethylene versus Custom-Made Titanium Mesh : A Retrospective Review of 108 Patients

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the cosmetic outcome and complications after cranioplasty (CP) due to three different implant materials, and analyze the mean implant survival and cumulative survival rate based on these results.

Methods

We reviewed 108 patients retrospectively who underwent CP between January 2014 and November 2016. Autologous bone (AB; 45 patients) and synthetic materials with porous polyethylene (PP; 32 patients) and custom-made 3-dimensional printed titanium mesh (CT; 31 patients) were used as implants.

Results

Regardless of implanted materials, more than 89.8% of the CP patients were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome. No statistically significant difference was observed among the three groups. The overall postoperative complication rates of each group were 31.1% in the AB group, 15.6% in the PP group and 3.2% in the CT group. The CT group showed lower complication rates compared with AB and PP groups (χ²-test : AB vs. PP, p=0.34; AB vs. CT, p=0.00; PP vs. CT, p=0.03). The AB and PP groups demonstrated a higher post-CP infection rate (11.1% and 6.3%) than the CT group (3.2%). However, no significant difference in the incidence of post-CP infection was observed among the three groups. The PP and CT groups demonstrated a higher mean implant survival time and cumulative survival rate than the AB group at the last follow-up (p<0.05).

Conclusion

In comparison with AB and PP, cranioplasty with CT shows benefits in terms of lower post-CP complication, less intraoperative bleeding loss, shorter operation time and in-hospital stay. The PP and CT groups showed higher implant survival time and cumulative survival rate compared with the AB group.

A randomised controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty: long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term outcomes of patients who had been randomly allocated to receive primary titanium cranioplasty or autologous bone graft following decompressive craniectomy.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients had been previously enrolled and randomised to receive either their own bone graft or a primary titanium cranioplasty. Functional and cosmetic outcomes had previously been assessed at 1-year following the cranioplasty procedure. Hospital records and the Picture Archiving communication system were reviewed to determine how many patients had cranioplasty failure or associated complications such as seizures beyond 1 year-with a minimum of 24-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Amongst the 31 patients in the titanium group (one patient had died), no patients had a partial or complete cranioplasty failure at 12 months follow-up and there had been no failures beyond 12 months. Amongst the 31 patients who had an autologous cranioplasty (one patient had died), 7 patients had complete resorption of the autologous bone such that it was adjudged a complete failure at 12-month follow-up. Five of these patients had had titanium augmentation and two patients declined further surgery. Both of these patients requested cranial augmentation for functional and cosmetic reasons subsequent to the 12-month follow-up. Another patient who had previously been noted to have moderate resorption at 12 months presented 1 year later with progressive bone flap resorption and also required subsequent augmentation for functional and cosmetic reasons. When follow-up was extended to a minimum of 24 months, use of titanium instead of autologous bone for primary cranioplasty resulted in a significant reduction in the number of patients who required rescue cranioplasty (0 vs 25%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.1-42.1%; p = 0.001). In addition, there were significantly less total hospital healthcare costs in those patients randomised to the titanium arm of the trial (difference = A$9999, 95%CI 2231-17,768; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone resorption continued to occur beyond 12 months after autologous cranioplasty; use of primary titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy reduced the number of reoperations needed and the associated long-term total hospital costs.

Cranioplasty with autogenous bone flaps cryopreserved in povidone iodine: a long-term follow-up study

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term therapeutic efficacy of cranioplasty with autogenous bone flaps cryopreserved in povidone iodine and explore the risk factors for bone resorption. METHODS Clinical data and follow-up results of 188 patients (with 211 bone flaps) who underwent cranioplasty with autogenous bone flaps cryopreserved in povidone-iodine were retrospectively analyzed. Bone flap resorption was classified into 3 types according to CT features, including bone flap thinning (Type I), reduced bone density (Type II), and osteolysis within the flaps (Type III). The extent of bone flap resorption was graded as mild, moderate, or severe. RESULTS Short-term postoperative complications included subcutaneous or extradural seroma collection in 19 flaps (9.0%), epidural hematoma in 16 flaps (7.6%), and infection in 8 flaps (3.8%). Eight patients whose flaps became infected and had to be removed and 2 patients who died within 2 years were excluded from the follow-up analysis. For the remaining 178 patients and 201 flaps, the follow-up duration was 24-122 months (mean 63.1 months). In 93 (46.3%) of these 201 flaps, CT demonstrated bone resorption, which was classified as Type I in 55 flaps (59.1%), Type II in 11 (11.8%), and Type III in 27 (29.0%). The severity of bone resorption was graded as follows: no bone resorption in 108 (53.7%) of 201 flaps, mild resorption in 66 (32.8%), moderate resorption in 15 (7.5%), and severe resorption in 12 (6.0%). The incidence of moderate or severe resorption was higher in Type III than in Type I (p = 0.0008). The grading of bone flap resorption was associated with the locations of bone flaps (p = 0.0210) and fragmentation (flaps broken into 2 or 3 fragments) (p = 0.0009). The incidence of bone flap collapse due to bone resorption was higher in patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt implantation than in those who did not (p = 0.0091). CONCLUSIONS Because of the low incidence rates of infection and severe bone resorption, the authors conclude that cranioplasty with autogenous bone flaps cryopreserved in povidone-iodine solution is safe and effective. The changes characteristic of bone flap resorption became visible on CT scans about 2 months after cranioplasty and tended to stabilize at about 18 months postoperatively. The bone resorption of autogenous bone flap may be classified into 3 types. The rates of moderate and severe resorption were much higher in Type III than in Type I. The grade of bone flap resorption was associated with bone flap locations. Fragmented bone flaps or those implanted in patients treated with VP shunts may have a higher incidence of bone flap collapse due to bone resorption.

Complications After In Vivo and Ex Vivo Autologous Bone Flap Storage for Cranioplasty: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

The most common bone flap storage strategies after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant intracranial hypertension include freezer cryopreservation (CP) and subcutaneous abdominal implantation (AP). Numerous series have reported on patient outcomes after cranioplasty in terms of infection, cosmesis, and resorption. This meta-analysis compares published outcomes of bone flap CP and subcutaneous storage with respect to efficacy and complication risk in patients undergoing cranioplasty after hemicraniectomy.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PubMed-searchable studies that included bone flap storage methods and outcome data for cranioplasties performed between 1975 and 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 48 studies including 5346 patients were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 4096 underwent cranioplasty with an autologous flap. Mean bone flap storage times for CP and AP flaps were 69.9 and 69.7 days. Mean follow-up time for CP and AP flaps was 16.9 and 16.5 months. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing CP with subcutaneous storage of bone flaps with respect to percentage of patients developing infection (7.3% vs. 7.1%), percentage of patients needing revision surgery (15.9% vs. 7.6%), and percentage of patients experiencing resorption (9.7% vs. 7.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest and most robust review comparing published outcomes of CP and subcutaneous storage of bone flaps in patients who have undergone decompressive hemicraniectomy. This review found no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes (infection, resorption, reoperation) when comparing storage methods for bone flap preservation. This study suggests that both strategies may be used safely and successfully.

Volume of Brain Herniation in Patients with Ischemic Stroke After Decompressive Craniectomy

BACKGROUND

Decompressive craniectomy procedures are performed in patients with malignant intracranial hypertension. A bone flap is removed to relieve pressure. Later, a second operation is performed to reconstruct the skull after brain swelling has resolved. This surgical treatment would be improved if it were possible to perform a single operation that decompressed the brain acutely and eliminated the need for a second operation. To design a device and procedure that achieve this objective, it is essential to understand how the brain swells after a craniectomy procedure.

METHODS

We identified 20 patients with ischemic stroke who underwent a decompressive hemicraniectomy operation. Skull defect morphology and postoperative brain swelling were measured using computed tomography scan data. Additional intracranial volume created by placing a hypothetical cranial plate implant offset from the skull surface by 5 mm was measured for each patient.

RESULTS

The average craniectomy area and brain herniation volume was 9999 ± 1283 mm² and 30.48 ± 23.56 mL, respectively. In all patients, the additional volume created by this hypothetical implant exceeded the volume of brain herniation observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show that a cranial plate with a 5-mm offset accommodates the brain swelling that occurs in this patient population.

Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been used for many years in the management of patients with elevated intracranial pressure and cerebral edema. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating the clinical and cost effectiveness of DC in trauma and stroke. While DC has demonstrable efficacy in saving life, it is accompanied by a myriad of non-trivial complications that have been inadequately highlighted in prospective clinical trials. Missing from our current understanding is a comprehensive analysis of all potential complications associated with DC. Here, we review the available literature, we tabulate all reported complications, and we calculate their frequency for specific indications. Of over 1500 records initially identified, a final total of 142 eligible records were included in our comprehensive analysis. We identified numerous complications related to DC that have not been systematically reviewed. Complications were of three major types: (1) Hemorrhagic (2) Infectious/Inflammatory, and (3) Disturbances of the CSF compartment. Complications associated with cranioplasty fell under similar major types, with additional complications relating to the bone flap. Overall, one of every ten patients undergoing DC may suffer a complication necessitating additional medical and/or neurosurgical intervention. While DC has received increased attention as a potential therapeutic option in a variety of situations, like any surgical procedure, DC is not without risk. Neurologists and neurosurgeons must be aware of all the potential complications of DC in order to properly advise their patients.

Low Incidence of Bone Flap Resorption After Native Bone Cranioplasty in Adults

OBJECTIVE

Cranioplasty via use of the patient's autologous bone is performed often after craniectomy procedures. Bone resorption remains a matter of concern in patients with native bone cranioplasty. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of native bone resorption in adults and review associated factors that may increase the risk of resorption.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study that assessed consecutive patients who had cranioplasty via use of the patient's native bone flap. A total of 114 patients were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic and operative data.

RESULTS

The mean age was 51.2 years. The main indications for initial craniectomy included subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in 50.9%, intracerebral hemorrhage in 17.5%, ischemic stroke in 14.9%, and trauma in 13.2% of patients. Mean interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty was 6 months. Mean follow-up after cranioplasty was 25 months. Bone resorption occurred in 3 patients (2.7%): at 6 months in a 30-year-old woman who presented with SAH followed by decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty 3.5 months later; at 19 months in a 67-year-old female patient who presented with intracerebral hemorrhage followed by decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty 6 months later; and at 9 months in a 50-year-old man who presented with SAH followed by craniectomy for clip ligation and cranioplasty 3 months later. Two of these patients underwent replacement of the native flap with synthetic material.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of autologous bone flap resorption in adult patients undergoing cranioplasty is low even after a mean interval for cranioplasty of 6 months.

A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty

OBJECTIVE Autologous bone is usually used to reconstruct skull defects following decompressive surgery. However, it is associated with a high failure rate due to infection and resorption. The aim of this study was to see whether it would be cost-effective to use titanium as a primary reconstructive material. METHODS Sixty-four patients were enrolled and randomized to receive either their own bone or a primary titanium cranioplasty. All surgical procedures were performed by the senior surgeon. Primary and secondary outcome measures were assessed at 1 year after cranioplasty. RESULTS There were no primary infections in either arm of the trial. There was one secondary infection of a titanium cranioplasty that had replaced a resorbed autologous cranioplasty. In the titanium group, no patient was considered to have partial or complete cranioplasty failure at 12 months of follow-up (p = 0.002) and none needed revision (p = 0.053). There were 2 deaths unrelated to the cranioplasty, one in each arm of the trial. Among the 31 patients who had an autologous cranioplasty, 7 patients (22%) had complete resorption of the autologous bone such that it was deemed a complete failure. Partial or complete autologous bone resorption appeared to be more common among young patients than older patients (32 vs 45 years old, p = 0.013). The total cumulative cost between the 2 groups was not significantly different (mean difference A$3281, 95% CI $-9869 to $3308; p = 0.327). CONCLUSIONS Primary titanium cranioplasty should be seriously considered for young patients who require reconstruction of the skull vault following decompressive craniectomy. Clinical trial registration no.: ACTRN12612000353897 ( anzctr.org.au ).

Efficacy and Versatility of the 3-D Titanium Mesh Implant in the Closure of Large Post-Craniectomy Osseous Defects, and its Therapeutic Role in Reversing the Syndrome of the Trephined: Clinical Study of a Case Series and Review of Literature

INTRODUCTION

An ideal cranioplasty material is one which adequately restores calvarial continuity, contour and esthetics, provides adequate cerebral protection, is biocompatible and corrosion resistant, lightweight yet strong, easy to manipulate and possesses long term stability. The 3-D Titanium mesh implant fulfills most of these criteria, and offers certain added advantages, as exemplified in this case series. Four patients with post craniectomy osseous defects of varying sizes and at different locations of the calvarium were studied. In addition to the obvious cosmetic deformity, the patients also exhibited various subjective and objective features of neurosensory and motor deficits characteristic of the motor trephine syndrome (MTS), that often develops secondary to large cranial defects.

OBJECTIVE

There have been no documented reports so far on the effect of Titanium mesh cranioplasty on features of the MTS in patients with large cranial defects. It was the objective of this study to see if any specific therapeutic goals such as reversal of the neurological deterioration and sensorimotor deficits associated with the syndrome could be achieved by performing Titanium mesh cranioplasty to reconstruct the missing part of the cranial shield in these patients. Any added benefits of using 3-D Titanium mesh as a cranioplasty material were also recorded.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cranial defects in all four patients were reconstructed using different dimensions of Titanium mesh implants. Two of the cases were early cranioplasties (performed within 3 months of craniectomy) and two were late cranioplasties (performed after 3 months of craniectomy), one of them even being a previous autologous bone flap cranioplasty failure. The patients were followed up for a period ranging from 3 to 4 years and observed carefully for cosmetic, functional and neurological improvements following the cranioplasty.

RESULTS

There was achieved gratifying cosmetic correction of the cranial deformities, and remarkable functional recovery from the sensorimotor deficits, reversal of the neurological deterioration as well as resolution of most of the symptoms of MTS in all the four patients, following the Titanium mesh cranioplasty. Many added benefits were noted, such as quick post operative recovery, absence of any early or late complications and a ready means to aspirate any epidural collections, if they developed post operatively, through the mesh structure of the implant.

CONCLUSION

Apart from the cosmetic, functional and protective roles, Titanium mesh cranioplasty demonstrated a definite therapeutic role in all the cases presented, making it preferable to even replacement with natural bone (either re-implanted excised autologous bone flaps, or cortico-cancellous bone autografts). It is an extremely safe and reliable alternative to autografts, and is even preferable to them, especially when the size of the cranial defect is large.

The Incidence of Neurologic Susceptibility to a Skull Defect

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is a measureable change in neurologic function after cranioplasty.

METHODS

This is a prospective single-surgeon, single-center study. Fifty patients who required a cranioplasty procedure were assessed neurologically within 72 hours before and 7 days after surgery. The assessment tools were the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Cognitive assessment report (Cognistat). The scores for both assessments were calculated and then compared before and after surgery.

RESULTS

FIM assessment was performed on all fifty patients, and a Cognistat assessment was performed on 47 patients. Most improvements were seen in the Cognistat scores; however, there appeared to be no specific areas in which there was consistent improvement. There were substantial improvements in the Cognistat assessment in 9 patients. One patient had a much-improved FIM assessment (improved from 18 to 34), but a Cognistat assessment was not possible because of poor neurologic function. These results suggested that improvements after cranioplasty were more likely to occur in the domain of cognitive function than motor function, although overall these results did not reach statistically significance. Bifrontal (vs. unilateral) cranioplasty, timing between decompression and cranioplasty, and age of the patients did not appear to affect the postoperative FIM scores, after we adjusted for preoperative FIM scores and surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A small but significant number of patients appear to improve clinically after cranioplasty. Neurologic susceptibility to a skull defect may be more common than had been appreciated previously.

The feasibility of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer

OBJECT Commercially available, preformed patient-specific cranioplasty implants are anatomically accurate but costly. Acrylic bone cement is a commonly used alternative. However, the manual shaping of the bone cement is difficult and may not lead to a satisfactory implant in some cases. The object of this study was to determine the feasibility of fabricating molds using a commercial low-cost 3D printer for the purpose of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants. METHODS Using data from a high-resolution brain CT scan of a patient with a calvarial defect posthemicraniectomy, a skull phantom and a mold were generated with computer software and fabricated with the 3D printer using the fused deposition modeling method. The mold was used as a template to shape the acrylic implant, which was formed via a polymerization reaction. The resulting implant was fitted to the skull phantom and the cranial index of symmetry was determined. RESULTS The skull phantom and mold were successfully fabricated with the 3D printer. The application of acrylic bone cement to the mold was simple and straightforward. The resulting implant did not require further adjustment or drilling prior to being fitted to the skull phantom. The cranial index of symmetry was 96.2% (the cranial index of symmetry is 100% for a perfectly symmetrical skull). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that it is feasible to produce patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer. Further studies are required to determine applicability in the clinical setting. This promising technique has the potential to bring personalized medicine to more patients around the world.

Outcomes of cranioplasty with synthetic materials and autologous bone grafts

OBJECTIVE

Using current surgical methods, cranioplasty is associated with a high complication rate. We analyzed if there are preexisting medical conditions associated with complications and compared the effect of different implant materials on the degree of complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent cranioplasty for cranial bone defects during the period 2002-2012 was conducted, and 100 consecutive cranioplasty procedures that met eligibility criteria were identified. Patients were analyzed in 4 groups, which were created based on the cranioplasty material: autograft (n = 20), bioactive fiber-reinforced composite (n = 20), hydroxyapatite (n = 31), and other synthetic materials (n = 29). Survival estimates were constructed with Kaplan-Meier curves, and the differences between categorical variable levels were determined using a log-rank test. Multiple comparisons were adjusted using a Šidák correction.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up time of 14 months (interquartile range 3-39 months), 32 of 100 patients (32.0%) developed at least 1 complication. A minor complication occurred in 13 patients (13.0%), whereas 19 patients (19.0%) developed a major complication, which required reoperation or removal of the implant. In the autograft subgroup, 40.0% of patients required removal of the cranioplasty. The 3-year survival of the autograft subgroup was lower compared with other subgroups of synthetic materials. In hydroxyapatite and bioactive fiber-reinforced composite groups, fewer complications were observed compared with the autograft group.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, synthetic materials for cranial bone defect reconstruction exhibit more promising outcomes compared with autograft. There were differences in survival rates among synthetic materials.

Autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in the trauma setting

BACKGROUND

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is an option for the treatment of increased intracranial pressure resulting from an acute neurological insult, including insults caused by trauma. When the brain swelling has receded, the skull is reconstructed with a wide choice of materials, each with its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost, cosmetic appearance, biocompatibility, implant strength and complication rate. Autologous cranioplasty (AC), where the patient's own bone flap is stored and reutilised, is common in many countries. No outcome studies have, however, been published on this technique for traumatic injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted including all AC operations performed following DC due to traumatic brain injury. All operations were performed in one institution during a 4-year time period. Results were analysed for complication rates.

RESULTS

44 cases were included. The mean time from craniotomy to cranioplasty was 86 (95% CI: 63-109) days. Complications severe enough to warrant readmission or further surgery were found in 13 cases (30%). No statistically significant predictor of complication from cranioplasty was detected. The complication rate was similar to published data on cranioplasty using artificial prosthetic materials.

CONCLUSIONS

AC in the trauma setting is a valid treatment option with a complication rate that seems no worse than other alternatives.

Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: the relationship between surgical complications and the prediction of an unfavourable outcome

OBJECT

To assess the impact that injury severity has on complications in patients who have had a decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study included all patients who underwent a decompressive craniectomy following severe TBI at the two major trauma hospitals in Western Australia from 2004 to 2012. All complications were recorded during this period. The clinical and radiological data of the patients on initial presentation were entered into a web-based model prognostic model, the CRASH (Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head injury) collaborators prediction model, to obtain the predicted risk of an unfavourable outcome which was used as a measure of injury severity.

RESULTS

Complications after decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI were common. The predicted risk of unfavourable outcome was strongly associated with the development of neurological complications such as herniation of the brain outside the skull bone defects (median predicted risk of unfavourable outcome for herniation 72% vs. 57% without herniation, p=0.001), subdural effusion (median predicted risk of unfavourable outcome 67% with an effusion vs. 57% for those without an effusion, p=0.03), hydrocephalus requiring ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (median predicted risk of unfavourable outcome 86% for those with hydrocephalus vs. 59% for those without hydrocephalus, p=0.001), but not infection (p=0.251) or resorption of bone flap (p=0.697) and seizures (0.987). We did not observe any associations between timing of cranioplasty and risk of infection or resorption of bone flap after cranioplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical complications after decompressive craniectomy including herniation of the brain outside the skull bone defects, subdural effusion, and hydrocephalus requiring ventriculo-peritoneal shunt were more common in patients with a more severe form of TBI when quantified by the CRASH predicted risk of unfavourable outcome. The CRASH predicted risk of unfavourable outcome represents a useful baseline characteristic of patients in observational and interventional trials involving patients with severe TBI requiring decompressive craniectomy.

Neurological susceptibility to a skull defect

BACKGROUND

There continues to be considerable interest in the use of decompressive craniectomy in the management of neurological emergencies. The procedure is technically straightforward; however, it is becoming increasingly apparent that it is associated with significant complications. One complication that has received relatively little attention is the neurological dysfunction that can occur due to the absence of the bone flap and the subsequent distortion of the brain under the scalp as cerebral swelling subsides. The aim of this narrative review was to examine the literature available regarding the clinical features described, outline the proposed pathophysiology for these clinical manifestations and highlight the implications that this may have for rehabilitation of patients with a large skull defect.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE database (1966 to June 2012). The following keywords were used: Hemicraniectomy, decompressive craniectomy, complications, syndrome of the trephined, syndrome of the sinking scalp flap, motor trephined syndrome. The bibliographies of retrieved reports were searched for additional references.

RESULTS

Various terms have been used to describe the different neurological signs and symptoms with which patients with a skull defect can present. These include; syndrome of the trephined, posttraumatic syndrome, syndrome of the sinking scalp flap, and motor trephined syndrome. There is, however, considerable overlap between the conditions described and a patient's individual clinical presentation.

CONCLUSION

It is becoming increasingly apparent that certain patients are particularly susceptible to the presence of a large skull defect. The term "Neurological Susceptibility to a Skull Defect" (NSSD) is therefore suggested as a blanket term to describe any neurological change attributable to the absence of cranial coverage.