An Analysis of the Experiences of 62 Patients with Moderate Complications after Full-Face Fat Injection for Augmentation:

Combination of Dermal fat Grafting and Frontalis Suspension Using Polytetrafluoroethylene Sheet for Blepharoptosis With a Deep Sulcus

ABSTRACT

The frontalis suspension procedure is a common surgical method for patients with severe blepharoptosis. While frontalis suspension is a very effective method, the transplant material may be visualized after surgery in patients with a deep sulcus and severe blepharoptosis. To prevent this complication, we performed a combination of dermal fat grafting and frontalis suspension using a polytetrafluoroethylene sheet in 5 patients (6 eyelids). We followed-up the patients for at least 6 months postoperatively (mean: 6.8 months) and observed no transplant material visualization or occurrence of infection. The mean pre- and postoperative margin reflex distance-1 was -3.75 (-5 to -2) and 2.10 (1-3), respectively. Bulky upper eyelids were observed 6 months postoperatively in 1 patient (2 eyelids). None of the patients underwent reoperation. In conclusion, the combination of frontalis suspension using a polytetrafluoroethylene sheet and dermal fat grafting for severe blepharoptosis and a deep upper eyelid sulcus was effective in preventing visualization of the transplant material.

Volumetric Analysis of Fat Injection by Computerized Tomography in Orthognathic Surgery: Preliminary Report on a Novel Volumetric Analysis Process for the Quantification of Aesthetic Results

BACKGROUND

Integrated approaches to orthognathic surgery should include accurate volumetric evaluation of the skull and soft tissues. In patients with dentofacial deformities, the most frequent aesthetic deficits are attributable to an underdevelopment of hard and soft tissues. Traditional osteotomic procedures often fail to guarantee a stability of soft tissues over time. For this reason, in selecting a surgical strategy, the surgeon should consider not only traditional osteotomies, but also soft-tissue improving procedures, such as lipofilling. Preoperative surgical planning systems, such as the Virtual surgical planning (VSP) protocol, are based mainly on skeletal movement prediction. Quantitative estimation of soft-tissue modifications is not part of common clinical practice. Most commonly, the evaluation of soft-tissue modifications after orthognathic procedures is instead performed by clinical qualitative means.The purpose of this study was to describe a novel computed tomography (CT)-based volumetric analysis process for the quantification of injected autologous adipose tissue in patients who have undergone simultaneous orthognathic and lipofilling procedures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent combined orthognathic surgery and lipofilling from June 2016 to May 2017 for malocclusion with functional and aesthetic impairments. Preoperative planning included clinical evaluation and virtual osteotomy planning according to the VSP protocol. The volume of fat to be injected was estimated clinically by comparing virtual renderings with preoperative clinical photographs. The surgical technique involved Le Fort I and sagittal split mandibular osteotomies, combined with autologous fat injection in the malar and perioral regions. Postoperative evaluation was performed with a novel imaging process based on CT image segmentation to quantify the exact volume of injected fat. Skeletal stability was also evaluated at 3 months.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were enrolled in the study, all females, with a mean age of 24.5 years (range, 18-36 years). The mean difference between the fat tissue injected and that quantified postoperatively was 6.01 cm. All patients had clinically satisfactory facial convexity, with complete restoration of the cheekbone contour, at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

This study introduces a novel CT-image based technique to quantitatively assess the contribution of injected fat to the postoperative soft-tissue volume increase after combined orthognathic surgery with autologous lipofilling. In the future, this CT-based volumetric analysis technique could be the gold standard for evaluating facial lipofilling outcomes, and for assessing clinical aesthetic outcomes based on the injected volume of fat.

Periorbital Lipogranuloma after Facial Autologous Fat Injection and Its Treatment Outcomes

Purpose

To investigate periorbital lipogranuloma cases that developed after autologous fat injection and to determine various treatment outcomes from these cases.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 27 patients who presented with periocular mass (final diagnosis of lipogranuloma) and had history of facial autologous fat injection. The collected data included information on patient sex, age, clinical presentation, number and site of fat injections, interval between injections, duration from injection to symptom onset, fat harvesting site, use of cryopreservation, and treatment outcome.

Results

The most common presenting symptom was palpable mass (92.6%), followed by blepharoptosis and eyelid edema. The mean time from injection to symptom onset was 13.6 ± 29.2 months (range, 2 to 153 months). Patients were managed by intralesional triamcinolone injection (six patients) and surgical excision (three patients); 18 patients were followed without treatment. Among the six patients who underwent intralesional triamcinolone injection, five showed complete resolution, and one showed partial resolution. Among the 18 patients who were followed without management, three showed spontaneous resolution over a 5-month follow-up period.

Conclusions

Lipogranuloma can develop in the eyelid after autologous fat injection into the face. Both surgical excision and intralesional triamcinolone injection yield relatively good outcomes. Simple observation can be a good option because spontaneous resolution can occur in a subset of patients.