Considering the Appropriateness of the Factor Analytic Operationalization of Allostatic Load

The association between allostatic load and cognitive function: A systematic and meta-analytic review

Previous research suggests that high allostatic load (AL), a biological indicator of physiological dysregulation due to chronic stress, is associated with poor cognitive functioning. To date, no studies have systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the strength and consistency of this relationship. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic and meta-analytic review of studies that have investigated the association between AL and performance on standardized cognitive tests among adults aged 18 years and older. A total of 18 studies were retained for review. Meta-analyses revealed a significant cross-sectional association between higher AL and poor global cognition (r = -0.08, p <  0.001) and executive function (r = -0.07, p =  0.02), but not memory (r = -0.07, p =  0.10). Due to variation in statistical methods used, longitudinal meta-analyses were not performed. Qualitative review of the literature suggests that AL algorithm, physiological systems and individual biomarkers included in the AL index, and sample age may be key moderators of the AL-cognition relationship. Although the magnitude of reported associations is small, findings support AL as a robust indicator of cognitive function among adults. Study limitations and future directions are discussed.

Apolipoprotein E genotype does not moderate the associations of depressive symptoms, neuroticism and allostatic load with cognitive ability and cognitive aging in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936

OBJECTIVES

In this replication-and-extension study, we tested whether depressive symptoms, neuroticism, and allostatic load (multisystem physiological dysregulation) were related to lower baseline cognitive ability and greater subsequent cognitive decline in older adults, and whether these relationships were moderated by the E4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene. We also tested whether allostatic load mediated the relationships between neuroticism and cognitive outcomes.

METHODS

We used data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (n at Waves 1-3: 1,028 [M age = 69.5 y]; 820 [M duration since Wave 1 = 2.98 y]; 659 [M duration since Wave 1 = 6.74 y]). We fitted latent growth curve models of general cognitive ability (modeled using five cognitive tests) with groups of APOE E4 non-carriers and carriers. In separate models, depressive symptoms, neuroticism, and allostatic load predicted baseline cognitive ability and subsequent cognitive decline. In addition, models tested whether allostatic load mediated relationships between neuroticism and cognitive outcomes.

RESULTS

Baseline cognitive ability had small-to-moderate negative associations with depressive symptoms (β range = -0.20 to -0.17), neuroticism (β range = -0.27 to -0.23), and allostatic load (β range = -0.11 to 0.09). Greater cognitive decline was linked to baseline allostatic load (β range = -0.98 to -0.83) and depressive symptoms (β range = -1.00 to -0.88). However, APOE E4 allele possession did not moderate the relationships of depressive symptoms, neuroticism and allostatic load with cognitive ability and cognitive decline. Additionally, the associations of neuroticism with cognitive ability and cognitive decline were not mediated through allostatic load.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that APOE E4 status does not moderate the relationships of depressive symptoms, neuroticism, and allostatic load with cognitive ability and cognitive decline in healthy older adults. The most notable positive finding in the current research was the strong association between allostatic load and cognitive decline.