Exploratory Investigation of a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Intervention and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Odor Sensitivity

Mind over chronic pain: A meta-analysis of cognitive restructuring in chronically ill adults

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis synthesizes research on the impact of cognitive restructuring on chronic pain intensity, aiming to integrate diverse methodologies and findings while evaluating potential moderators.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, JSTOR, Sage, Social Science Research Network, PsycArticles, ScienceDirect, and Education Resources Information Center) until July 2023. Studies involving adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with chronic conditions who underwent cognitive restructuring to reduce chronic pain intensity, were included. Eligible studies compared this intervention with a control group. We excluded studies incorporating cognitive restructuring within broader interventions, lacking statistical data, or not written in English. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).

RESULTS

After reviewing 18,312 studies, we selected 11 studies published between 1991 and 2022, involving 693 participants with chronic conditions. A significant large overall effect size was found (d = 0.94, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.40). Moderation analyses revealed significant differences based on sex and study quality, with effects less pronounced among females and more substantial in higher-quality studies.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations such as statistical instability due to a small number of studies in certain moderator categories and methodological variability, this meta-analysis highlights the robust effects of cognitive restructuring on chronic pain intensity. The findings are valuable for guiding power calculations and future research expectations. Clinically, these results support the significant effect of cognitive restructuring in both individual and group settings, regardless of age, particularly when facilitated by teams that include psychologists.

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity/Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance: A Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Management

Patients with multiple chemical sensitivity, now called idiopathic environmental intolerance, frequently present to clinical immunologists and allergists for diagnosis and treatment. Patients report a plethora of respiratory and multisystem problems attributed to a wide variety of unrelated, otherwise non-noxious, triggers. They may go to extreme, often seemingly bizarre lengths to avoid contact with everyday exposures and may become housebound, unable to work or function socially. Often beginning with exposure to odors, triggers can multiply to involve foods, clothing, medications, and even electromagnetic radiation. The condition cannot be explained by IgE-mediated or other immune processes, and clinical immunologists and allergists may feel unprepared to care for such patients. In this article, a paradigm to understand the probable mechanisms underlying this condition and a practical approach to diagnosis and management will be presented.

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: It's time to catch up to the science

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is a complex medical condition associated with low dose chemical exposures. MCS is characterized by diverse features and common comorbidities, including fibromyalgia, cough hypersensitivity, asthma, and migraine, and stress/anxiety, with which the syndrome shares numerous neurobiological processes and altered functioning within diverse brain regions. Predictive factors linked to MCS comprise genetic influences, gene-environment interactions, oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, cell dysfunction, and psychosocial influences. The development of MCS may be attributed to the sensitization of transient receptor potential (TRP) receptors, notably TRPV1 and TRPA1. Capsaicin inhalation challenge studies demonstrated that TRPV1 sensitization is manifested in MCS, and functional brain imaging studies revealed that TRPV1 and TRPA1 agonists promote brain-region specific neuronal variations. Unfortunately, MCS has often been inappropriately viewed as stemming exclusively from psychological disturbances, which has fostered patients being stigmatized and ostracized, and often being denied accommodation for their disability. Evidence-based education is essential to provide appropriate support and advocacy. Greater recognition of receptor-mediated biological mechanisms should be incorporated in laws, and regulation of environmental exposures.

Top-Down Cortical Control of Acute and Chronic Pain

Acute pain has an evolutionary role in the detection of physical harm and the response to it. In some cases, however, acute pain can impair function and lead to other morbidities. Chronic pain, meanwhile, can present as a psychopathological condition that significantly interferes with daily living. Most basic and translational pain research has focused on the molecular and cellular mechanisms in the spinal and peripheral nervous systems. In contrast, the brain plays a key role in the affective manifestation and cognitive control of pain. In particular, several cortical regions, such as the somatosensory cortex, prefrontal cortex, insular, and anterior cingulate cortex, are well known to be activated by acute pain signals, and neurons in these regions have been demonstrated to undergo changes in response to chronic pain. Furthermore, these cortical regions can project to a number of forebrain and limbic structures to exert powerful top-down control of not only sensory pain transmission but also affective pain expression, and such cortical regulatory mechanisms are particularly relevant in chronic pain states. Newer techniques have emerged that allow for detailed studies of central pain circuits in animal models, as well as how such circuits are modified by the presence of chronic pain and other predisposing psychosomatic factors. These mechanistic approaches can complement imaging in human studies. At the therapeutic level, a number of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions have recently been shown to engage these top-down control systems to provide analgesia. In this review, we will discuss how pain signals reach important cortical regions and how these regions in turn project to subcortical areas of the brain to exert profound modulation of the pain experience. In addition, we will discuss the clinical relevance of such top-down pain regulation mechanisms.