The Role of Prediagnosis Audiovestibular Dysfunction Versus Distress, Illness-Related Cognitions, and Behaviors in Predicted Ongoing Dizziness Handicap

Perceived illness consequences predict the long-term course of handicap in patients with vertigo and dizziness beyond vestibular abnormality

OBJECTIVE

Vertigo and dizziness (VD) affect one third of the population during their lifetime. VD patients are oftentimes severely handicapped. One current study showed that illness perceptions, emotional as well as behavioral responses to illness were associated with VD-related handicap at 3-months follow-up. However, no study has yet investigated this association for a period longer than six months. This study aimed to investigate long-term associations of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors with VD-related handicap.

METHODS

In a naturalistic longitudinal study design, n = 161 patients with VD were examined at baseline, at 6-months follow-up, and at 12-months follow-up. Participants underwent neurological and psychiatric examinations as well as comprehensive psychological assessments using self-report questionnaires.

RESULTS

During the study period VD-related handicap decreased significantly (Cohen's d = .35, p < .001). Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors remained without significant change during the study period. Vestibular testing as well as the type of diagnosis were not associated with changes in VD-related handicap. Changes in perceived illness consequences (ß = .265, p < .001), depression (ß = .257, p < .001), and anxiety (ß = .206, p = .008) significantly predicted the course of VD-related handicap over 12 months, while the presence vs. absence of vestibular abnormality did not.

CONCLUSION

Our results extend findings that cognitive and emotional factors including perceived illness consequences, depression, and anxiety are associated with the long-term course of VD-related handicap and may provide therapeutic targets to improve long-term outcomes in patients with VD.

Development and validation of the dizziness fear-avoidance behaviours and beliefs inventory for patients with vestibular disorders

The purpose of this study is to present the development and analysis of the factorial structure and psychometric properties of a new self-administered questionnaire (Dizziness Fear-Avoidance Behaviours and Beliefs Inventory (D-FABBI)) designed to measure fear-avoidance behaviors and cognitions related to dizziness disability. A mixed-method design combining a qualitative study with an observational and cross-sectional study was employed to develop (content validity) and psychometrically validate (construct validity, reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity) a new instrument. A total of 198 patients with vestibular disorders (acute vestibular syndrome (AVS), 23.2%; chronic vestibular syndrome (CVS), 35.4%; and episodic vestibular syndrome (EVS) 41.4%) were recruited. Sociodemographic characteristics, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and D-FABBI were evaluated. The final version of the D-FABBI consists of 17 items distributed across two subscales: activities of daily living fear-avoidance and movement fear-avoidance. The D-FABBI showed high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.932; 95% CI [0.91-0.94]) and so did the subscales (Cronbach α > 0.8). The exploratory structural equation model and confirmatory factor analysis provided better fit results, with a comparative fit index and root mean square error of approximation values of 0.907 to 0.081. No floor or ceiling effects were identified. There was a positive, significant, and moderate-strong magnitude correlation with the total DHI (r = 0.62) and low-moderate with respect to the HADS depression (r = 0.35) and HADS anxiety subscales (r = 0.26). The patients with CVS had a higher D-FABBI score than those with AVS or EVS. The D-FABBI appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the fear-avoidance behaviors and cognition related to dizziness disability of patients with vestibular disorders.

The Cognitive and Behavioural Responses to Symptoms Questionnaire (CBRQ): Development, reliability and validity across several long-term conditions

OBJECTIVES

Cognitive and behavioural responses to symptoms can worsen or maintain the severity of symptoms across long-term conditions (LTCs). Although the Cognitive and Behavioural Responses Questionnaire (CBRQ) has been used in research, its original development and psychometric properties as a transdiagnostic measure have not been reported. Our aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the CBRQ and a recently proposed short version, across different LTCs.

DESIGN

Psychometric validation study.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the factor structure of the CBRQ in two datasets from the CBRQ's original development; (chronic fatigue syndrome, N = 230; and multiple sclerosis, N = 221) and in additional groups: haemodialysis (N = 174), inflammatory bowel disease (N = 182) and chronic dizziness (N = 185). Scale reliability and construct validity were assessed. The factor structure of the shortened CBRQ (CBRQ-SF) was also assessed.

RESULTS

CFA revealed that a 7-or 8-factor structure had generally appropriate fit supporting the originally proposed 7 factors (Fear avoidance, Damage beliefs, Catastrophising, Embarrassment avoidance, Symptom focusing, All-or-nothing behaviour and Avoidance/Resting behaviour). Omega coefficients indicated satisfactory internal reliability. Correlations with related constructs suggested construct validity. The scale appeared sensitive to change. The CBRQ-SF also displayed good psychometric quality, with a better model fit than the CBRQ.

CONCLUSIONS

The CBRQ and the shortened version were shown to be reliable and valid at assessing a range of cognitive and behavioural responses to symptoms, highlighting the multi-symptom, transdiagnostic properties of this questionnaire. Further research is necessary to determine the test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the CBRQ and CBRQ-SF and a thorough evaluation of the content validity of the items.

[Application of computerized cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness]

Objective:A computerized cognitive behavioral therapy intervention program was constructed for patients with persistent postural-perception dizziness（PPPD） and its effects on dizziness symptoms, negative emotions and balance function were investigated. Methods:A randomized controlled trial design was used to select 86 patients with PPPD who were seen in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from July 2020 to July 2021. Randomly assigned to the control group（43 patients） and the experimental group（43 patients）. The control group was routinely treated with medication and vestibular rehabilitation, while the experimental group underwent computerized cognitive behavioral therapy for a total of 9 sessions over 8 weeks; their dizziness symptoms（DHI）, negative affect（GAD-7, PHQ-9） and balance function（BBS） were compared at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks later. Results:After 4 and 8 weeks of intervention, the improvement of dizziness symptoms and negative mood in both groups had a between-group effect, time effect, and interaction effect（P<0.05）. The improvement of balance function had only a time effect and interaction effect（P<0.05）, and no difference in between-group effect was seen（P>0.05）. Conclusion:Computerized cognitive behavioral therapy can be used as an adjunctive treatment to alleviate patients' dizziness, negative affect, and balance function, but no additional benefit has been seen in terms of balance function improvement.

The INVEST trial: a randomised feasibility trial of psychologically informed vestibular rehabilitation versus current gold standard physiotherapy for people with Persistent Postural Perceptual Dizziness

BACKGROUND

Persistent postural perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a common and disabling functional neuro-vestibular disorder. We aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy informed vestibular rehabilitation (INVEST intervention) designed for persistent dizziness.

METHODS

A two-armed parallel groups randomised feasibility study of INVEST vs. a time-matched gold standard vestibular rehabilitation (VRT) control. Participants with PPPD were recruited from a specialist vestibular clinic in London, UK. Participants were individually randomised using a minimisation procedure with allocation concealment. Measures of feasibility and clinical outcome were collected and assessed at 4 months.

RESULTS

Forty adults with PPPD were randomised to six sessions of INVEST (n = 20) or gold standard VRT (n = 20). Overall, 59% of patients screened met the inclusion criteria, of which 80% enrolled. Acceptability of INVEST, as assessed against the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA), was excellent and 80% adhered to all 6 sessions. There were small to moderate treatment effects in favour of INVEST across all measures, including dizziness handicap, negative illness perceptions, symptom focussing, fear avoidance, and distress (standardised mean difference [SMD]g = 0.45; SMDg = 0.77; SMDg = 0.56; SMDg = 0.50, respectively). No intervention-related serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results give strong support for the feasibility of a full-scale trial. Both arms had high rates of recruitment, retention, and acceptability. There was promising support of the benefits of integrated cognitive-behavioural therapy-based vestibular rehabilitation compared to gold standard vestibular rehabilitation. The study fulfilled all the a-priori criteria to advance to a full-scale efficacy trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN10420559.

What Predicts Improvement of Dizziness after Multimodal and Interdisciplinary Day Care Treatment?

Background: Vertigo and dizziness are common in community-dwelling people and can be treated in specialized multidisciplinary settings. To develop tailored interventions, however, we have to explore risk factors for favorable and unfavorable outcomes. Methods: We prospectively investigated patients with chronic vertigo and dizziness subjected to our 5-day multimodal and interdisciplinary day care treatment in the Center for Vertigo and Dizziness of Jena University Hospital, Germany. The Vertigo Severity Scale (VSS), the Body Sensations Questionnaire (BSQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ), the Mobility Inventory (MI), and the burden and intensity of dizziness (using a visual analogue scale) were assessed at baseline (n = 754) and after 6 months (n = 444). In addition, 14 Likert-scaled questions were used to quantify the change in personal attitude and behavior towards the complaints after 6 months. Results: Dizziness-related burden and intensity improved with a large effect size. The largest improvement was seen in the attitudes towards dizziness, the understanding of somatic causes, and the perceived ability to influence dizziness. However, the ability to work and to carry out professional activity was improved to a lesser extent. The overall improvement of dizziness was associated with the absence of a depressive mood, a short duration of vertigo, a lower VSS, a lower perceived intensity of vertigo, and distinct vertigo diagnoses, namely Meniere’s disease, vestibular migraine, vestibular neuritis, vestibular paroxysmia, and vestibular schwannoma. Worsening of dizziness/vertigo was associated with depressive symptoms, permanent vertigo, distinct vertigo diagnoses (central vertigo, multisensory deficit), and a higher perceived burden due to vertigo. Conclusion: The six-month outcome of patients with dizziness presented to a specialized outpatient clinic appears to be favorable. Nevertheless, people with the abovementioned risk factors at baseline have less benefit and probably need adapted and tailored vertigo interventions to improve long-term outcome.

Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) in Patients With Dizziness

HYPOTHESIS

The Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) will be a valid and reliable combined measure of depression and anxiety in people with vertigo and dizziness.

BACKGROUND

Co-occurrence of depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms are common. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) measure symptoms of depression and anxiety respectively, although measuring them separately may be suboptimal in people who have illness-related distress. There is some evidence that these scales can be combined in long-term conditions resulting in the PHQ-ADS, but validity is yet to be determined in people with vertigo and dizziness.

METHODS

Two separate datasets from a tertiary vestibular clinic were analyzed where the PHQ-ADS was completed at initial clinical assessment (n = 624) and while on a waiting list (n = 185). A cross-sectional design was used to examine the factor structure (confirmatory factor analysis), internal consistency (omega index), and construct validity (Pearson correlation coefficient) of the PHQ-ADS. Construct validity was determined against the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI).

RESULTS

A bi-factor PHQ-ADS model had good fit to the data (χ2 = 397.163, 249.763; comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.954, 0.919; Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.938, 0.892; root mean squared error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.076, 0.098). The general distress factor explained 81 to 85% of the common variance between items. There were moderate to large significant positive correlations between the PHQ-ADS and DHI.

CONCLUSION

The PHQ-ADS appears to have good structural validity in patients with vertigo and dizziness. Clinicians and researchers can use this scale where a composite psychological measure is desired.

Protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study of psychologically informed vestibular rehabilitation for people with persistent dizziness: INVEST trial

Background

Dizziness is a common complaint that often persists and leads to disability and distress. Several cognitive and behavioural responses may contribute to the neurobiological adaptations that maintain persistent vestibular symptoms. This paper will present the protocol of a two-arm parallel group feasibility randomised controlled trial designed to determine whether a fully powered efficacy trial is achievable by examining the feasibility of recruitment, acceptability and potential benefits of an integrated cognitive behavioural therapy and vestibular rehabilitation (CBT-VR) treatment for people with persistent dizziness.

Methods

Forty adult patients will be recruited from a tertiary vestibular clinic with persistent movement–triggered dizziness for 3 months or longer who have moderate–high levels of dizziness handicap. Participants will be 1:1 randomised, using a minimisation procedure, to six sessions of either CBT-VR (intervention arm) or VR only (control arm). Measures will be collected at baseline and 4 months post randomisation. The primary feasibility outcomes include descriptive data on numbers meeting eligibility criteria, rates of recruitment, numbers retained post randomisation, treatment adherence and an acceptability questionnaire. Treatment effects on self-report outcomes will be estimated to determine that 95% confidence intervals for the effects are consistent with anticipated effects and minimum clinically important differences, and to provide information needed for the power calculation of an efficacy trial. A nested qualitative study will be conducted post-intervention (intervention group only) to explore the acceptability of the intervention and identify any areas in need of improvement.

Discussion

If a trial of CBT-VR is feasible, acceptability data will be used to enhance the intervention if needed and refine the multicentre RCT protocol. Future studies will need to consider the training required for other physiotherapists to deliver the intervention.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN 10420559

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00896-y.