1
|
Klooster IT, Kip H, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Crutzen R, Kelders S. A systematic review on eHealth technology personalization approaches. iScience 2024; 27:110771. [PMID: 39290843 PMCID: PMC11406103 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of personalization of eHealth technologies, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding its application. This systematic review aims to bridge this gap by identifying and clustering different personalization approaches based on the type of variables used for user segmentation and the adaptations to the eHealth technology and examining the role of computational methods in the literature. From the 412 included reports, we identified 13 clusters of personalization approaches, such as behavior + channeling and environment + recommendations. Within these clusters, 10 computational methods were utilized to match segments with technology adaptations, such as classification-based methods and reinforcement learning. Several gaps were identified in the literature, such as the limited exploration of technology-related variables, the limited focus on user interaction reminders, and a frequent reliance on a single type of variable for personalization. Future research should explore leveraging technology-specific features to attain individualistic segmentation approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Ten Klooster
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Kip
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Stichting Transfore, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Crutzen
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia Kelders
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shiner CT, Li I, Millard M, Mahoney AEJ. Chronic health conditions and disability are prevalent among community users of a digital mental health service: a scoping survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2024:1-10. [PMID: 39126196 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2389208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
Objectives: Digital interventions can offer accessible and scalable treatment for chronic conditions, though often focus separately on physical or mental health. People accessing digital health services may live with multiple conditions or experience overlapping symptoms. This study aimed to describe the breadth and characteristics of chronic health conditions and self-reported disability among routine users of a digital mental health service, and to examine related motivations to engage with digital mental health interventions. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of adults registered with a digital mental health service in the Australian community (THIS WAY UP) was conducted. Participant demography, chronic health conditions, self-reported disability and motivations for accessing digital treatment were collected and analyzed descriptively. Results: 366 participants responded (77% female, mean age 50 ± 15 years). 71.6% of participants (242/338) reported ≥1 chronic health condition and one-third reported multimorbidity (112/338, 33.1%). Chronic pain, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders were most common. 26.9% of respondents (90/334) reported a disability, most commonly physical disabilities. 95% of those with chronic conditions reported negative mental health effects and 46% reported heightened interest in digital mental health treatments because of their condition. Primary motivations for digital service use were receiving a recommendation from a health professional and service accessibility. Discussion: People who access digital mental health services in routine care report high rates of heterogenous chronic illness and related disability. There is interest in accessible digital treatments to support mental health at scale among people who live with varied chronic conditions and disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine T Shiner
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Rehabilitation, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian Li
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Millard
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison E J Mahoney
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Johnson E, Corrick S, Isley S, Vandermeer B, Dolgoy N, Bates J, Godfrey E, Soltys C, Muir C, Vohra S, Tandon P. Mind-body internet and mobile-based interventions for depression and anxiety in adults with chronic physical conditions: A systematic review of RCTs. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2024; 3:e0000435. [PMID: 38261600 PMCID: PMC10805319 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
This review summarizes the effectiveness of scalable mind-body internet and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) on depression and anxiety symptoms in adults living with chronic physical conditions. Six databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL) were searched for randomized controlled trials published from database inception to March 2023. Mind-body IMIs included cognitive behavioral therapy, breathwork, meditation, mindfulness, yoga or Tai-chi. To focus on interventions with a greater potential for scale, the intervention delivery needed to be online with no or limited facilitation by study personnel. The primary outcome was mean change scores for anxiety and depression (Hedges' g). In subgroup analyses, random-effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates based on personnel support level, intervention techniques, chronic physical condition, and survey type. Meta-regression was conducted on age and intervention length. Fifty-six studies met inclusion criteria (sample size 7691, mean age of participants 43 years, 58% female): 30% (n = 17) neurological conditions, 12% (n = 7) cardiovascular conditions, 11% cancer (n = 6), 43% other chronic physical conditions (n = 24), and 4% (n = 2) multiple chronic conditions. Mind-body IMIs demonstrated statistically significant pooled reductions in depression (SMD = -0.33 [-0.40, -0.26], p<0.001) and anxiety (SMD = -0.26 [-0.36, -0.17], p<0.001). Heterogeneity was moderate. Scalable mind-body IMIs hold promise as interventions for managing anxiety and depression symptoms in adults with chronic physical conditions without differences seen with age or intervention length. While modest, the effect sizes are comparable to those seen with pharmacological therapy. The field would benefit from detailed reporting of participant demographics including those related to technological proficiency, as well as further evaluation of non-CBT interventions. Registration: The study is registered with PROSPERO ID #CRD42022375606.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Johnson
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Shaina Corrick
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Serena Isley
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Ben Vandermeer
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Naomi Dolgoy
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Science, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Jack Bates
- Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Elana Godfrey
- Faculty of Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Cassidy Soltys
- Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Conall Muir
- Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Sunita Vohra
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Puneeta Tandon
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cardol CK, Meuleman Y, van Middendorp H, van der Boog PJ, Hilbrands LB, Navis G, Sijpkens YW, Sont JK, Evers AW, van Dijk S. Psychological Distress and Self-Management in CKD: A Cross-Sectional Study. Kidney Med 2023; 5:100712. [PMID: 37753249 PMCID: PMC10518713 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not receiving dialysis, including kidney transplant recipients, often experience difficulties regarding self-management. An important barrier for adherence to self-management recommendations may be the presence of psychological distress, consisting of depressive and anxiety symptoms. We investigated relationships between psychological distress and adherence to self-management recommendations. Study Design Cross-sectional online questionnaire data as part of the E-GOAL study. Setting & Participants Patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 20-89 mL/min/1.73 m2) were recruited from April 2018 to October 2020 at 4 hospitals in The Netherlands and completed online screening questionnaires. Exposures Psychological distress, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms. Outcomes Dietary adherence, physical activity, medication adherence, smoking, body mass index, and a CKD self-management index (ie, the sum of 5 binary indicators of nonadherence to the recommended self-management factors). Analytical Approach Adjusted multivariable regression and ordinal logistic regression analyses. Results In our sample (N = 460), 27.2% of patients reported psychological distress, and 69.8% were nonadherent to 1 or more recommendations. Higher psychological distress was significantly associated with poorer dietary adherence (βadj, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.04), less physical activity (βadj, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.22 to -0.03), and lower medication adherence (βadj, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.24 to -0.05), but not with smoking and body mass index. Findings were similar for depressive symptoms, whereas anxiety was only associated with poorer dietary and medication adherence. Every 1-point higher psychological distress was also associated with a higher likelihood of being nonadherent to an accumulating number of different recommendations (adjusted OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07). Limitations Cross-sectional design, possible residual confounding, and self-report. Conclusions Many people with CKD experience psychological distress, of whom most have difficulties self-managing their CKD. Given the relationship between psychological distress and adherence to CKD self-management recommendations, behavioral interventions are needed to identify and treat psychological distress as a potential barrier to CKD self-management. Plain-Language Summary This online questionnaire study investigated relationships between psychological distress and self-management among 460 people with chronic kidney disease. Over a quarter of them reported mild-to-severe psychological distress. Alarmingly, 4 out of 5 patients with psychological distress were also nonadherent to 1 or more self-management recommendations, and higher levels of psychological distress were associated with poorer dietary and medication adherence and lower physical activity. Moreover, patients who suffered from moderate-to-severe distress were relatively more often nonadherent to 3 or more recommendations compared with patients with no or mild distress symptoms. So, it seems that psychological distress can be a barrier for self-management. To support patients in managing chronic kidney disease, researchers and health professionals should not overlook patients' mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinderella K. Cardol
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette Meuleman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Luuk B. Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjan Navis
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvo W.J. Sijpkens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center Bronovo, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob K. Sont
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea W.M. Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Leiden University, TU Delft, and Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dijk
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Leiden University, TU Delft, and Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E-GOAL Study Group
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center Bronovo, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Leiden University, TU Delft, and Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|