1
|
Wu S, Yin Q, Wu L, Wu Y, Yu N, Yan J, Bian Y. Establishing a trigger tool based on global trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in obstetric inpatients in China. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:72. [PMID: 38225629 PMCID: PMC10789046 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10449-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women belong to the special population of drug therapy, and their physiological state, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are significantly different from the general population. Drug safety during pregnancy involves two generations, which is a hot issue widely concerned in the whole society. Global Trigger Tool (GTT) of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) has been wildly used as a patient safety measurement strategy by several institutions and national programs, and the effectiveness had been demonstrated. But only one study reports the use of GTT in obstetric delivery until now. The aim of the study is to establish triggers detecting adverse drug events (ADEs) suitable for obstetric inpatients on the basis of the GTT, to examine the performance of the obstetric triggers in detecting ADEs experienced by obstetric units compared with the spontaneous reporting system and GTT, and to assess the utility and value of the obstetric trigger tool in identifying ADEs of obstetric inpatients. METHODS Based on a literature review searched in PubMed and CNKI from January of 1997 to October of 2023, retrospective local obstetric ADEs investigations, relevant obstetric guidelines and the common adverse reactions of obstetric therapeutic drugs were involved to establish the initial obstetric triggers. According to the Delphi method, two rounds of expert questionnaire survey were conducted among 16 obstetric and neonatological physicians and pharmacists until an agreement was reached. A retrospective study was conducted to identity ADEs in 300 obstetric inpatient records at the Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from June 1 to September 30, 2018. Two trained junior pharmacists analyzed the first eligible records independently, and the included records reviewed by trained pharmacist and physician to identify ADEs. Sensitivity and specificity of the established obstetric triggers were assessed by the number of ADEs/100 patients and positive predictive value with the spontaneous reporting system (SRS) and GTT. Excel 2010 and SPSS22 were used for data analysis. RESULTS Through two rounds of expert investigation, 39 preliminary triggers were established that comprised four modules (12 laboratory tests, 9 medications, 14 symptoms, and 4 outcomes). A total of 300 medical records were reviewed through the obstetric triggers, of which 48 cases of ADEs were detected, with an incidence of ADEs of 16%. Among the 39 obstetric triggers, 22 (56.41%) were positive and 11 of them detected ADEs. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 36.36%, and the number of ADEs/100 patients was 16.33 (95% CI, 4.19-17.81). The ADE detection rate, positive trigger rate, and PPV for the obstetric triggers were significantly augmented, confirming that the obstetric triggers were more specific and sensitive than SRS and GTT. CONCLUSION The obstetric triggers were proven to be sensitive and specific in the active monitoring of ADE for obstetric inpatients, which might serve as a reference for ADE detection of obstetric inpatients at medical institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shuangliu District, Chengdu, China
| | - Qinan Yin
- Department of Pharmacy, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Personalized Drug Therapy Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Liuyun Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Personalized Drug Therapy Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yue Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Personalized Drug Therapy Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Nan Yu
- Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Junfeng Yan
- Department of Pharmacy, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
- Personalized Drug Therapy Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| | - Yuan Bian
- Department of Pharmacy, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
- Personalized Drug Therapy Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eggenschwiler LC, Rutjes AWS, Musy SN, Ausserhofer D, Nielen NM, Schwendimann R, Unbeck M, Simon M. Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273800. [PMID: 36048863 PMCID: PMC9436152 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adverse event (AE) detection is a major patient safety priority. However, despite extensive research on AEs, reported incidence rates vary widely. Objective This study aimed: (1) to synthesize available evidence on AE incidence in acute care inpatient settings using Trigger Tool methodology; and (2) to explore whether study characteristics and study quality explain variations in reported AE incidence. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods To identify relevant studies, we queried PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and three journals in the patient safety field (last update search 25.05.2022). Eligible publications fulfilled the following criteria: adult inpatient samples; acute care hospital settings; Trigger Tool methodology; focus on specialty of internal medicine, surgery or oncology; published in English, French, German, Italian or Spanish. Systematic reviews and studies addressing adverse drug events or exclusively deceased patients were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Our main outcome of interest was AEs per 100 admissions. We assessed nine study characteristics plus study quality as potential sources of variation using random regression models. We received no funding and did not register this review. Results Screening 6,685 publications yielded 54 eligible studies covering 194,470 admissions. The cumulative AE incidence was 30.0 per 100 admissions (95% CI 23.9–37.5; I2 = 99.7%) and between study heterogeneity was high with a prediction interval of 5.4–164.7. Overall studies’ risk of bias and applicability-related concerns were rated as low. Eight out of nine methodological study characteristics did explain some variation of reported AE rates, such as patient age and type of hospital. Also, study quality did explain variation. Conclusion Estimates of AE studies using trigger tool methodology vary while explaining variation is seriously hampered by the low standards of reporting such as the timeframe of AE detection. Specific reporting guidelines for studies using retrospective medical record review methodology are necessary to strengthen the current evidence base and to help explain between study variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa C. Eggenschwiler
- Institute of Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anne W. S. Rutjes
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sarah N. Musy
- Institute of Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dietmar Ausserhofer
- Institute of Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- College of Health Care-Professions Claudiana, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy
| | - Natascha M. Nielen
- Institute of Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - René Schwendimann
- Institute of Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Patient Safety Office, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maria Unbeck
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Simon
- Institute of Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang N, Pan LY, Chen WY, Ji HH, Peng GQ, Tang ZW, Wang HL, Jia YT, Gong J. A Risk-Factor Model for Antineoplastic Drug-Induced Serious Adverse Events in Cancer Inpatients: A Retrospective Study Based on the Global Trigger Tool and Machine Learning. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:896104. [PMID: 35847000 PMCID: PMC9277092 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.896104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to apply a machine learning method to evaluate the risk factors associated with serious adverse events (SAEs) and predict the occurrence of SAEs in cancer inpatients using antineoplastic drugs. A retrospective review of the medical records of 499 patients diagnosed with cancer admitted between January 1 and December 31, 2017, was performed. First, the Global Trigger Tool (GTT) was used to actively monitor adverse drug events (ADEs) and SAEs caused by antineoplastic drugs and take the number of positive triggers as an intermediate variable. Subsequently, risk factors with statistical significance were selected by univariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis. Finally, using the risk factors after the LASSO analysis as covariates, a nomogram based on a logistic model, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), categorical boosting (CatBoost), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), light-gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM), random forest (RF), gradient-boosting decision tree (GBDT), decision tree (DT), and ensemble model based on seven algorithms were used to establish the prediction models. A series of indicators such as the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and the area under the PR curve (AUPR) was used to evaluate the model performance. A total of 94 SAE patients were identified in our samples. Risk factors of SAEs were the number of triggers, length of stay, age, number of combined drugs, ADEs occurred in previous chemotherapy, and sex. In the test cohort, a nomogram based on the logistic model owns the AUROC of 0.799 and owns the AUPR of 0.527. The GBDT has the best predicting abilities (AUROC = 0.832 and AUPR = 0.557) among the eight machine learning models and was better than the nomogram and was chosen to establish the prediction webpage. This study provides a novel method to accurately predict SAE occurrence in cancer inpatients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ni Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- School of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ling-Yun Pan
- Department of Pharmacy, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Wan-Yi Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Huan-Huan Ji
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| | - Gui-Qin Peng
- Department of Pharmacy, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Zong-Wei Tang
- Department of Pharmacy, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Hui-Lai Wang
- Department of Information Center, The University Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- *Correspondence: Yun-Tao Jia, ; Hui-Lai Wang, ; Jun Gong,
| | - Yun-Tao Jia
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- School of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- *Correspondence: Yun-Tao Jia, ; Hui-Lai Wang, ; Jun Gong,
| | - Jun Gong
- Department of Information Center, The University Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- *Correspondence: Yun-Tao Jia, ; Hui-Lai Wang, ; Jun Gong,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parrinello V, Grasso E, Saglimbeni G, Patanè G, Scalia A, Murolo G, Lachman P. Assessing the development and implementation of the Global Trigger Tool method across a large health system in Sicily. F1000Res 2019; 8:263. [PMID: 32595936 PMCID: PMC7308947 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.18025.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) has proposed a new method, the Global Trigger Tool (IHI GTT), to detect and monitor adverse events (AEs) and provide information to implement improvement. In 2015, the Sicilian Health System adopted IHI GTT to assess the number, types and severity levels of AEs. The GTT was implemented in 44 of 73 Sicilian public hospitals and 18,008 clinical records (CRs) were examined. Here we present the standardized application of the GTT and the preliminary results of 14,706 reviews of CRs. Methods: IHI GTT was adapted, developed and implemented to the local context. Reviews of CRs were conducted by 199 professionals divided into 71 review teams consisting of three individuals: two of whom had clinical knowledge and expertise, and a physician to authenticate the AE. The reviewers entered data into a dedicated IT-platform. All 44 of the public hospitals were included, with approximately 300,000 yearly inpatient admissions out of a population of approximately 5 million. In total, 14,706 randomized CRs of inpatients from medicine, surgery, obstetric and ICU wards, from June 2015 to June 2018 were reviewed. Results: In 975 (6.6%) CRs at least one AE was found. Approximately 20,000 patients of the 300,000 discharged each year in Sicily have at least one AE. In 5,574 (37.9%) CRs at least one trigger was found. A total of 1,542 AEs were found. The analysis of ROC curve shows that the presence of two triggers in a CR indicates with high probability the presence of an AE. The most frequent type of AE was in-hospital related infection. Conclusions: The GTT is an efficient method to identify AEs and to track improvement of care. The analysis and monitoring of some triggers is important to prevent AEs. However, it is a labor-intensive method, particularly if the CRs are paper-based.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Parrinello
- U.O. Qualità e Rischio Clinico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, 95129, Italy
| | - Elena Grasso
- U.O. Qualità e Rischio Clinico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, 95129, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Saglimbeni
- U.O. Qualità e Rischio Clinico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, 95129, Italy
| | - Gabriella Patanè
- U.O. Qualità e Rischio Clinico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, 95129, Italy
| | - Alma Scalia
- U.O. Qualità e Rischio Clinico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, 95129, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Murolo
- Servizio 8 "Qualità, Governo Clinico e Sicurezza del Paziente", Assessorato della Salute, Regione Siciliana, Palermo, 90145, Italy
| | - Peter Lachman
- International Society for Quality in Healthcare, Dublin, D02NY63, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|