Preoperative Site Marking: Are We Adhering to Good Surgical Practice?

Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Never events (NEs) are patient safety incidents that are preventable and so serious they should never happen. To reduce NEs, several frameworks have been introduced over the past two decades; however, NEs and their harms continue to occur. These frameworks have varying events, terminology and preventability, which hinders collaboration. This systematic review aims to identify the most serious and preventable events for targeted improvement efforts by answering the following questions: Which patient safety events are most frequently classified as never events? Which ones are most commonly described as entirely preventable?

METHODS

For this narrative synthesis systematic review we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central and CINAHL for articles published from 1 January 2001 to 27 October 2021. We included papers of any study design or article type (excluding press releases/announcements) that listed NEs or an existing NE framework.

RESULTS

Our analyses included 367 reports identifying 125 unique NEs. Those most frequently reported were surgery on the wrong body part, wrong surgical procedure, unintentionally retained foreign objects and surgery on the wrong patient. Researchers classified 19.4% of NEs as 'wholly preventable'. Those most included in this category were surgery on the wrong body part or patient, wrong surgical procedure, improper administration of a potassium-containing solution and wrong-route administration of medication (excluding chemotherapy).

CONCLUSIONS

To improve collaboration and facilitate learning from errors, we need a single list that focuses on the most preventable and serious NEs. Our review shows that surgery on the wrong body part or patient, or the wrong surgical procedure best meet these criteria.

What interventions are performed in daily practice to prevent surgical site infections in neurosurgical patients? Findings from an explorative survey

Aim

The primary aim of the study was to describe the perioperative care ensured on a daily basis to prevent surgical site infection in Italian neurosurgeries; the secondary aim was to explore surgical site infections 30 days after the surgical procedures.

Methods

Patients cared for in 16 neurosurgical units who (a) were ≥18 years of age, (b) underwent neurosurgical procedures, and (c) were willing to participate in the study were taken into account.

Results

A total of 383 patients were included. A preoperative shower was performed in 332 cases (86.7%), shaving in 318 (83%) cases, and antibiotic prophylaxis was administered in 293 (76.5%) cases. Surgical site disinfection was performed mainly with povidone–iodine (344; 89.8%). A surgical site dressing was applied in 376 (98.2%) cases and was changed on average after 37.8h for shaved and 39h for non-shaved patients. Postoperative shampooing was performed only in 74 (19.3%) cases. Surgical site infection at 30 days occurred in three (0.8%) patients. Discussion and conclusions: Perioperative care aimed at preventing surgical site infections is variable across Italian neurosurgical units. More studies aimed at developing evidence capable of supporting decision-making processes in neurosurgery care are strongly recommended.