1
|
Tsamasiotis C, Fiard G, Bouzat P, François P, Fond G, Boyer L, Boussat B. From Reporting to Improving: How Root Cause Analysis in Teams Shape Patient Safety Culture. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2024; 17:1847-1858. [PMID: 39072187 PMCID: PMC11277907 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s466852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Given the increasing focus on patient safety in healthcare systems worldwide, understanding the impact of Continuous Quality Improvement Programs (QIPs) is crucial. QIPs, including Morbidity and Mortality Conferences (MMCs) and Experience Feedback Committees (EFCs), have been identified as effective strategies for enhancing patient safety culture. These programs engage healthcare professionals in the identification and analysis of adverse events to foster a culture of safety (ie the product of individual and group value, attitudes, and perceptions about quality and safety). This study aimed to determine whether patient safety culture differed regarding care provider participation in MMCs and EFCs activities. Methods A cross-sectional web-only survey was conducted in 2022 using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) among 4780 employees at an 1836-bed, university-affiliated hospital in France. We quantified the mean differences in the 12 HSOPS dimension scores according to MMCs and EFCs participation, using Cohen d effect size. We performed a multivariate analysis of variance to examine differences in dimension scores after adjusting for background characteristics. Results Of 4780 eligible employees, 1457 (30.5%) participated in the study. Among the respondents, 571 (39.2%) participated in MMCs or EFCs activities. Participants engaged in MMCs or EFCs reported significantly higher scores in six out of twelve HSOPS dimensions, particularly in "Nonpunitive response to error", "Feedback and communication about error", and "Organizational learning" (Overall effect size = 0.14, 95% confidence interval = 0.11 to 0.17, P<0.001). Notably, involvement in both MMCs and EFCs was associated with higher improvements in patient safety culture compared to non-participation or singular involvement in either program. However, certain dimensions such as "Staffing", "Hospital management support", and "Hospital handoffs and transition" showed no significant association with MMCs or EFCs participation, highlighting broader systemic challenges. Conclusion The study confirms the positive association between participation in MMCs or EFCs and an enhanced culture of patient safety, emphasizing the importance of such programs in fostering an environment conducive to learning, communication, and nonpunitive responses to errors. While MMCs or EFCs are effective in promoting certain aspects of patient safety culture, addressing broader systemic challenges remains crucial for comprehensive improvements in patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Tsamasiotis
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Grenoble-Alps University Hospital; Laboratory TIMC-IMAG, UMR 5525 Joint Research Unit, National Center for Scientific Research, Faculty of Medicine, Grenoble Alps University, Grenoble, France
| | - Gaelle Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Pierre Bouzat
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble, University Grenoble Alpes; INSERM U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Patrice François
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Grenoble-Alps University Hospital; Laboratory TIMC-IMAG, UMR 5525 Joint Research Unit, National Center for Scientific Research, Faculty of Medicine, Grenoble Alps University, Grenoble, France
| | - Guillaume Fond
- AP-HM, Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine - La Timone Medical Campus, UR3279: Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center (CEReSS), Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Boyer
- AP-HM, Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine - La Timone Medical Campus, UR3279: Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center (CEReSS), Marseille, France
| | - Bastien Boussat
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Grenoble-Alps University Hospital; Laboratory TIMC-IMAG, UMR 5525 Joint Research Unit, National Center for Scientific Research, Faculty of Medicine, Grenoble Alps University, Grenoble, France
- O’Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thompson C, James K, Chin-Bailey C, Nevins DH, Thompson E, Thame M. Psychometric Properties of the Hospital Survey of Patient Safety Culture in Type A Hospitals in Kingston and St. Andrew, Jamaica. JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/09720634221114548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This study sought to examine the internal consistency reliability and underlying factor structure of the Agency of Health Research on Quality Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (AHRQ HSOPSC) in two large acute care hospitals in a developing country setting (Jamaica). A cross-sectional study was done among 328 doctors and nurses. Reliability (internal consistency) analysis was done for each of the 12 composites and the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients were reported. Principal axis factor analysis (PA) using Varimax rotation was done to identify the underlying factor structure. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient was ≥ 0.60 in ten composites. ‘Overall perception of patient safety’ and ‘staffing’ had Cronbach’s Alpha values of 0.585 and 0.553 respectively. A ten-factor solution (34 items) with factor loading of ≥ 0.40 is the best model fit, and composites are now named ‘handoff and transitions/information exchange,’ ‘communication/feedback,’ ‘frequency of events reported,’ ‘management support for patient safety,’ ‘teamwork in unit,’ ‘non-punitive response to errors,’ ‘overall perception of patient safety,’ ‘supervision/management expectations and actions promoting patient safety,’ ‘organizational learning - continuous improvement’ and ‘staffing’. The AHRQ HSOPSC is generally reliable in this developing country setting and the ten-factor structure is consistent with suggested modifications for the emergent AHRQ HSOPSC Version 2 tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camelia Thompson
- Department of Community Health and Psychiatry, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
| | - Kenneth James
- Department of Community Health and Psychiatry, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
| | - Cameal Chin-Bailey
- Department of Community Health and Psychiatry, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
| | - Desmalee Holder Nevins
- Department of Community Health and Psychiatry, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
| | - Elon Thompson
- Department of Community Health and Psychiatry, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
| | - Minerva Thame
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bellier A, Chaffanjon P, Krupat E, Francois P, Labarère J. Cross-cultural adaptation of the 4-Habits Coding Scheme into French to assess physician communication skills. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230672. [PMID: 32298278 PMCID: PMC7161987 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Four Habits Coding Scheme (4-HCS) is a standardized instrument designed to assess physicians’ communication skills from an external rater’s perspective, based on video-recorded consultations. Objective To perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the 4-HCS into French and to assess its psychometric properties. Methods The 4-HCS was cross-culturally adapted by conducting forward and backward translations with independent translators, following international guidelines. Four raters rated 200 video-recorded medical student consultations with standardized patients, using the French version of the 4-HCS. We examined the internal consistency, factor structure, construct validity, and reliability of the 4-HCS. Results The mean overall 4-HCS score was 76.44 (standard deviation, 12.34), with no floor or ceiling effects across subscales. The median rating duration of rating was 8 min (range, 4–19). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 for the overall 4-HCS, ranging from 0.72 to 0.88 across subscales. In confirmatory factor analysis, goodness-of-fit statistics did not corroborate the hypothesized 4-habit structure. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in two dimensions, with the merging of three conceptually related habits into a single dimension and substantial cross-loading for 15 out of 23 items. Median average absolute-agreement intra-class correlation coefficient estimates were 0.74 (range, 0.68–0.84) and 0.85 (range, 0.76–0.91) for inter- and intra-rater reliability of habit subscales, respectively. Conclusion The French version of the 4-HCS demonstrates satisfactory internal consistency but requires the use of two independent raters to achieve acceptable reliability. The underlying factor structure of the original US version and cross-cultural adaptations of the 4-HCS deserve further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Bellier
- Quality of Care Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
- School of Medicine, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
- Computational and Mathematical Biology Team, TIMC-IMAG, UMR 5525, CNRS, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
- CIC 1406, INSERM, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Edward Krupat
- Center for Evaluation, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Patrice Francois
- Quality of Care Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - José Labarère
- Quality of Care Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
- School of Medicine, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
- Computational and Mathematical Biology Team, TIMC-IMAG, UMR 5525, CNRS, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
- CIC 1406, INSERM, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Waterson P, Carman EM, Manser T, Hammer A. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026896. [PMID: 31488465 PMCID: PMC6731893 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To carry out a systematic review of the psychometric properties of international studies that have used the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC). DESIGN Literature review and an analysis framework to review studies. SETTING Hospitals and other healthcare settings in North and South America, Europe, the Near East, the Middle East and the Far East. DATA SOURCES A total of 62 studies and 67 datasets made up of journal papers, book chapters and PhD theses were included in the review. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Psychometric properties (eg, internal consistency) and sample characteristics (eg, country of use, participant job roles and changes made to the original version of the HSPSC). RESULTS Just over half (52%) of the studies in our sample reported internal reliabilities lower than 0.7 for at least six HSPSC dimensions. The dimensions 'staffing', 'communication openness', 'non-punitive response to error', 'organisational learning' and 'overall perceptions of safety' resulted in low internal consistencies in a majority of studies. The outcomes from assessing construct validity were reported in 60% of the studies. Most studies took place in a hospital setting (84%); the majority of survey participants (62%) were drawn from nursing and technical staff. Forty-two per cent of the studies did not state what modifications, if any, were made to the original US version of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS While there is evidence of a growing worldwide trend in the use of the HSPSC, particularly within Europe and the Near/Middle East, our review underlines the need for caution in using the instrument. Future use of the HSPSC needs to be sensitive to the demands of care settings, the target population and other aspects of the national and local healthcare contexts. There is a need to develop guidelines covering procedures for using, adapting and translating the HSPSC, as well as reporting findings based on its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Waterson
- Human Factors and Complex Systems Group, Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Eva-Maria Carman
- Trent Simulation and Clinical Skills Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tanja Manser
- University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern, Olten, Switzerland
| | - Antje Hammer
- Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Healthcare Professional's Perception of Patient Safety Measured by the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ScientificWorldJournal 2018; 2018:9156301. [PMID: 30104917 PMCID: PMC6076892 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9156301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Revised: 05/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the culture of patient safety in studies that employed the hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPS) in hospitals around the world. Method We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and SciELO. Two researchers selected studies and extracted the following data: year of publication, country, percentage of physicians and nurses, sample size, and results for the 12 HSOPS dimensions. For each dimension, a random effects meta-analysis with double-arcsine transformation was performed, as well as meta-regressions to investigate heterogeneity, and tests for publication bias. Results 59 studies with 755,415 practitioners surveyed were included in the review. 29 studies were conducted in the Asian continent and 11 in the United States. On average studies scored 9 out of 10 methodological quality score. Of the 12 HSOPS dimensions, six scored under 50% of positivity, with “nonpunitive response to errors” the lowest one. In the meta-regression, three dimensions were shown to be influenced by the proportion of physicians and five by the continent where survey was held. Conclusions The HSOPS is widely used in several countries to assess the culture of patient safety in hospital settings. The culture of culpability is the main weakness across studies. Encouraging event reporting and learning from errors should be priorities in hospitals worldwide.
Collapse
|