Catching Fire: Are Operating Room Fires a Concern in Orthopedics?

Patient Morbidity due to Sterile Zone Fire Outbreak during an Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery: A Case Report

Operating room fires are considered 'never events'; they are uncommon but can prove to be potentially damaging to the humans involved and the expensive operating room instrumentation. Research indicates that significant knowledge gaps exist in orthopaedic community relating to fire prevention, fire safety and fire management. A 24-year-old male patient with clavicle fracture was planned for surgical fixation. A nerve block procedure was performed. Skin preparation was done with 10% betadine scrub and surgical spirit. The surgical team performed skin incision, and superficial dissection was carried out using electrocautery. A fire broke out, and on noticing the fumes, saline was poured, drapes were removed and the authors observed charring of deeper linen and skin damage. A superficial thermal burn, greenish blue in colour (7 x 1.5 cms) located 1-1.5 cms above the surgical incision was evident (see Fig. 4). The event was later explained to the patient. The surgical scar was healthy, and burn margins became defined and darkish green blue. Dressing was done with megaheal ointment. The burn healed in 4 weeks. As these events are rare, a specific action protocol has not been orchestrated. With newer reports coming in, orthopaedic associations should work out a sustainable plan of action to minimize the occurrence of these events and the damage incurred. Training of orthopaedic and anaesthesia team and operating room personnel remains the most important step in countering a fire event, as more the helping hands, the better is the outcome. Maintaining a high vigil ensures timely action response to maintain patient safety and counter adverse events effectively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01264-7.

Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Never events (NEs) are patient safety incidents that are preventable and so serious they should never happen. To reduce NEs, several frameworks have been introduced over the past two decades; however, NEs and their harms continue to occur. These frameworks have varying events, terminology and preventability, which hinders collaboration. This systematic review aims to identify the most serious and preventable events for targeted improvement efforts by answering the following questions: Which patient safety events are most frequently classified as never events? Which ones are most commonly described as entirely preventable?

METHODS

For this narrative synthesis systematic review we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central and CINAHL for articles published from 1 January 2001 to 27 October 2021. We included papers of any study design or article type (excluding press releases/announcements) that listed NEs or an existing NE framework.

RESULTS

Our analyses included 367 reports identifying 125 unique NEs. Those most frequently reported were surgery on the wrong body part, wrong surgical procedure, unintentionally retained foreign objects and surgery on the wrong patient. Researchers classified 19.4% of NEs as 'wholly preventable'. Those most included in this category were surgery on the wrong body part or patient, wrong surgical procedure, improper administration of a potassium-containing solution and wrong-route administration of medication (excluding chemotherapy).

CONCLUSIONS

To improve collaboration and facilitate learning from errors, we need a single list that focuses on the most preventable and serious NEs. Our review shows that surgery on the wrong body part or patient, or the wrong surgical procedure best meet these criteria.

Orthopaedic Operating Room Fire Risks: FDA Database and Literature Review

»

Inadvertent activation of electrosurgical device was more likely to result in patient burns and harm.

»

There are significant knowledge gaps in the orthopaedic surgery community relating to fire prevention, fire safety, and fire management.

»

Arthroplasty was the most common procedure with reported fire events.

»

It is the responsibility of the orthopaedic surgeon to understand the risks of surgical fire in the operating room and implement actions to reduce those risks.

Operating Room Fire During Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Impaction

A fire in the operating room is a rare but potentially deadly occurrence. We present an operating room fire during an elective total knee arthroplasty with an unclear ignition source. Flames were visualized originating from the excess bone cement while impacting the tibial component. The electrocautery device was not in use during impaction and was in a plastic sheath at the head of the bed. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an operating room fire involving bone cement not caused by an electrocautery device.