The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on tibiofemoral motion during step-up and step-down in healthy adults

Objective Clinical Measurement Tools for Functional Evaluation of the Surgical Patient

Following knee surgery, clinicians have traditionally used visually rated or time-based assessments of lower extremity movement quality to measure surgical outcomes, plan rehabilitation interventions, and measure success. These methods of assessment are prone to error and do not fully capture a patient's inefficient movement patterns post surgery. Further, currently available systems which objectively measure kinematics during these tasks are expensive and unidimensional. For these reasons, recent research has called for the development of objective and low-cost precision rehabilitation tools to improve clinical measurement of movement tasks. The purpose of this article is to highlight two such tools and their applications to knee surgery. The systems highlighted within this article are the Mizzou Point-of-Care Assessment System (MPASS) and the Mizzou Knee Arthrometer Testing System (MKATS). MPASS has demonstrated high levels of agreement with the gold-standard Vicon system in measuring kinematics during sit-to-stand (R > 0.71), lateral step-down (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.55, apart from ankle flexion), and drop vertical jump tasks (ICC > 0.62), as well as gait (R > 0.87). MKATS has been used to quantify differences in tibiofemoral motion between groups during lateral step-down, step-up-and-over, and step-up/step-down tasks. Objective measurement of clinical tasks using portable and inexpensive instruments, such as the MPASS and MKATS, can help clinicians identify inefficient movement patterns and asymmetries which may damage and wear down supporting structures within the knee and throughout the kinetic chain causing pain and discomfort. Identifying these issues can help clinicians to plan interventions and measure their progress at a lower cost than currently available systems. The MPASS and MKATS are useful tools which have many applications to knee surgery.

Serial Subtraction Alters Lateral Step-down Tibiofemoral Kinematics in Healthy Adults

This study evaluated the effects of two types of cognitive dual-tasking on three-dimensional knee kinematics during the lateral step-down. 19 healthy individuals (22.05±1.61 yrs., 173.92±9.21 cm, 67.99±12.65 kg) participated in this study. Participants completed 5 repetitions of a lateral step-down task for each leg and each testing condition (control, Stroop, and serial subtraction by seven). An electromagnetic motion sensor was attached to the femur via compression clamp placed about the medial and lateral epicondyles. Another sensor was attached 2 cm below the ipsilateral tibial tuberosity. A custom MATLAB algorithm located the knee joint axis of rotation from dynamic knee flexion and extension. Discrete kinematics at peak flexion were used in this study. Paired samples t-tests were used to compare average frontal, transverse, and sagittal plane knee position at maximum flexion between conditions for each leg. No significant differences were found for either limb between control and Stroop conditions. Comparisons revealed significant differences in frontal and transverse plane knee angles at peak flexion between the control and serial subtraction by seven conditions. These findings indicate serial subtraction by seven requires different cognitive processing abilities which may cause greater interference with some aspects of motor control.