Dolutegravir inhibits HIV-1 Env evolution in primary human cells

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimen is related with a limited HIV-1 V3 loop evolution in clinical practice

Integrase-strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are known to rapidly reduce HIV-1 plasma viral load, replication cycles, and new viral integrations, thus potentially limiting viral evolution. Here, we assessed the role of INSTIs on HIV-1 V3 evolution in a cohort of 89 HIV-1-infected individuals starting an INSTI- (N = 41, [dolutegravir: N = 1; elvitegravir: N = 3; raltegravir: N = 37]) or a non-INSTI-based (N = 48) combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), with two plasma RNA V3 genotypic tests available (one before [baseline] and one during cART). V3 sequences were analysed for genetic distance (Tajima-Nei model) and positive selection (dN/dS ratio). Individuals were mainly infected by B subtype (71.9%). Median (interquartile-range, IQR) plasma viral load and CD4 + T cell count at baseline were 4.8 (3.5-5.5) log₁₀ copies/mL and 207 (67-441) cells/mm³, respectively. Genetic distance (median, IQR) between the V3 sequences obtained during cART and those obtained at baseline was 0.04 (0.01-0.07). By considering treatment, genetic distance was significantly lower in INSTI-treated than in non-INSTI-treated individuals (median [IQR]: 0.03[0.01-0.04] vs. 0.05[0.02-0.08], p = 0.026). In line with this, a positive selection (defined as dN/dS ≥ 1) was observed in 36.6% of V3 sequences belonging to the INSTI-treated group and in 56.3% of non-INSTI group (p = 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed the independent correlation of INSTI-based regimens with a lower probability of both V3 evolution (adjusted odds-ratio: 0.35 [confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.88], p = 0.027) and positive selection (even if with a trend) (adjusted odds-ratio: 0.46 [CI 0.19-1.11], p = 0.083). Overall, this study suggests a role of INSTI-based regimen in limiting HIV-1 V3 evolution over time. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Driving HIV-1 into a Vulnerable Corner by Taking Advantage of Viral Adaptation and Evolution

Anti-retroviral therapy (ART) is crucial for controlling human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection. Recently, progress in identifying and characterizing highly potent broadly neutralizing antibodies has provided valuable templates for HIV-1 therapy and vaccine design. Nevertheless, HIV-1, like many RNA viruses, exhibits genetically diverse populations known as quasispecies. Evolution of quasispecies can occur rapidly in response to selective pressures, such as that exerted by ART and the immune system. Hence, rapid viral evolution leading to drug resistance and/or immune evasion is a significant barrier to the development of effective HIV-1 treatments and vaccines. Here, we describe our recent investigations into evolutionary pressure exerted by anti-retroviral drugs and monoclonal neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) on HIV-1 envelope sequences. We also discuss sensitivities of HIV-1 escape mutants to maraviroc, a CCR5 inhibitor, and HIV-1 sensitized to NAbs by small-molecule CD4-mimetic compounds. These studies help to develop an understanding of viral evolution and escape from both anti-retroviral drugs and the immune system, and also provide fundamental insights into the combined use of NAbs and entry inhibitors. These findings of the adaptation and evolution of HIV in response to drug and immune pressure will inform the development of more effective antiviral therapeutic strategies.

The M184I/V and K65R nucleoside resistance mutations in HIV-1 prevent the emergence of resistance mutations against dolutegravir

OBJECTIVE

Recommended treatments for newly diagnosed HIV-positive individuals now focus on the integrase strand transfer inhibitors, raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG) and dolutegravir (DTG). In treatment-naive individuals, cases of RAL-based and EVG-based virological failure, although rare, are associated with the occurrence of resistance mutations in integrase and/or reverse transcriptase coding sequences. In such cases, common resistance substitutions in reverse transcriptase that were associated with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors included M184I/V and K65R and these occurred together with various mutations in integrase. In some instances, these mutations in reverse transcriptase preceded the emergence of mutations in integrase. In contrast, no resistance substitutions in either integrase or reverse transcriptase have been observed to date in viruses isolated from treatment-naive individuals who experienced treatment failure with DTG-based regimens.

DESIGN

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of the M184I/V and K65R substitutions in reverse transcriptase on the ability of HIV-1 to become resistant against RAL, EVG or DTG.

METHODS

We performed tissue culture selection experiments using reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant viruses containing resistance substitutions at positions K65R, M184I or M184V in the presence of increasing concentrations of RAL, EVG or DTG and monitored changes in integrase sequences by genotyping.

RESULTS

Selections using EVG and RAL led to the emergence of resistance mutations in integrase. In contrast, only the wild-type virus was able to acquire resistance mutations for DTG.

CONCLUSION

Resistance mutations against nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors antagonized the development of HIV-1 resistance against DTG but not RAL or EVG.

Clinical benefit of dolutegravir in HIV-1 management related to the high genetic barrier to drug resistance

This manuscript reviews the reasons why Integrase inhibitors should now routinely constitute a part of first line antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV disease. The use of these drugs that are generally well tolerated has resulted in far less drug resistance than was the case with most other categories of antiviral compounds. In addition, the integrase inhibitor family of drugs has been less prone to the problem of transmitted drug resistance which is due to a wide variety of substitutions in the HIV genome that can be sexually transmitted from one person to another. However, the use of integrase inhibitors in first line therapy may unfortunately not soon happen in developing country settings where non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors continue to be a mainstay of initial therapy, primarily for reasons of cost. As long as this situation continues, problems of drug resistance and transmitted drug resistance will be common in such settings. Current evidence also suggests that the use of dolutegravir as a first line integrase inhibitor may limit development of drug resistance to an extent that exceeds the use of other members of this family of drugs. This may be due to particular patterns of resistance involving dolutegravir, whereby the mutations that are associated with resistance against this compound may actually diminish both HIV replication capacity as well as integrase enzymatic activity in a far-reaching and unique manner. This gives potential hope that the use of dolutegravir in first line therapy could actually form part of the long-sought goal of attainment of a functional cure for HIV disease.

Development of a G118R mutation in HIV-1 integrase following a switch to dolutegravir monotherapy leading to cross-resistance to integrase inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

Dolutegravir shows a high barrier to resistance with no previously reported cases of acquired integrase mutations during first-line therapy. In this study, rapid development of the G118R mutation arose following a switch from first-line elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine to dolutegravir monotherapy. The G118R mutation also arose in a treatment-experienced patient switched to dolutegravir monotherapy. The genetic basis for G118R selection and potential phenotypic outcome was ascertained.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Genotypic analysis was performed on patients with virological failure (<1000 copies/mL) on dolutegravir-containing regimens. The Los Alamos database was queried for glycine codon 118 polymorphisms. Cell culture selections and phenotypic drug susceptibility assays assessed resistance via the G118R pathway.

RESULTS

We report on two patients who developed viral failure while on dolutegravir monotherapy. Both patients had been on a current or previous regimen containing integrase inhibitors. Virological failure (<1000 copies/mL) emerged early within 2 months following the dolutegravir switch. The appearance of G118R in these two cases and subtype C and CRF02_AG in vitro selections were related to a rare GGA natural polymorphism at codon 118 (1.5% prevalence), facilitating a GGA to AGA transition. Cell culture selections were used to assess the in vitro progression of the G118R pathway leading to cross-resistance to all integrase inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although resistance to dolutegravir is typically rare, genetic polymorphisms and monotherapy can facilitate the acquisition of G118R.

Might dolutegravir be part of a functional cure for HIV?

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has greatly decreased HIV-related morbidity and mortality. However, HIV can establish viral reservoirs that evade both the immune system and ART. Dolutegravir (DTG) is a second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) related to the first-generation INSTIs raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG). DTG shows a higher genetic barrier to the development of HIV-1 resistance than RAL and EVG. More interestingly, clinical resistance mutations to DTG in treatment-naïve patients have not been observed to date. This review summarizes recent studies on strategies toward a cure for HIV, explores resistance profiles of DTG, and discusses how DTG might help in finding a functional cure for HIV.

The dolutegravir R263K resistance mutation in HIV-1 integrase is incompatible with the emergence of resistance against raltegravir

OBJECTIVE

Although the integrase inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) has demonstrated greater resilience than other antiretroviral drugs at withstanding the emergence of HIV-1 resistance mutations, such substitutions can develop, albeit rarely, in treatment-experienced integrase inhibitor-naïve individuals. The most common substitution in integrase under those circumstances is R263K whereas another substitution that was selected against DTG in tissue culture was G118R. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of these DTG-specific resistance substitutions on the ability of HIV-1 to become resistant against either of two other integrase inhibitors, raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG).

DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed tissue culture selection experiments using DTG-resistant viruses containing integrase substitutions at positions R263K, H51Y/R263K, E138K/R263K, G118R and H51Y/G118R in the presence of increasing concentrations of either RAL or EVG. Changes in integrase sequences were monitored by genotyping.

RESULTS

The presence of the R263K substitution delayed the emergence of resistance against RAL whereas the simultaneous presence of either the H51Y or E138K secondary substitutions in combination with R263K somewhat mitigated this inhibitory effect. In contrast, resistance against EVG appeared earlier than in wild-type virus in viruses containing the R263K and E138K/R263K DTG-associated resistance substitutions.

CONCLUSION

The DTG-resistant R263K substitution antagonized the development of HIV-1 resistance against RAL while partially facilitating the occurrence of resistance against EVG.

The R263K substitution in HIV-1 subtype C is more deleterious for integrase enzymatic function and viral replication than in subtype B

OBJECTIVES

Dolutegravir is an integrase strand-transfer inhibitor that has shown unprecedented robustness against the emergence of HIV drug-resistant strains in treatment-naive individuals. The R263K substitution in integrase was identified through culture selection as a resistance-associated substitution for dolutegravir and was recently detected in two treatment-experienced participants in the SAILING clinical trial, who experienced dolutegravir-based treatment failure, one of whom was infected by a subtype C virus. The objective of this study was to characterize the R263K substitution in HIV-1 subtype C integrase.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We used cell-free strand transfer assays and tissue culture experiments to characterize the R263K substitution in HIV-1 subtype C integrase in comparison with subtype B.

RESULTS

Cell-free biochemical assays showed that the R263K substitution diminished subtype C integrase strand-transfer activity by decreasing the affinity of integrase for target DNA. Similarly, both viral infectiousness and replication capacity were reduced by the R263K substitution in tissue culture. Decrease in enzyme activity and viral infectiousness exceeded 35 and 50%, respectively - significantly more than in HIV-1 subtype B. R263K in HIV-1 subtype C also conferred low levels of resistance against dolutegravir and high levels of cross-resistance against elvitegravir, but not raltegravir.

CONCLUSIONS

The R263K substitution is more deleterious to integrase strand-transfer activity and viral infectiousness in HIV-1 subtype C than in subtype B. Our results suggest that cross-resistance may prevent treatment-experienced individuals who are experiencing treatment failure with dolutegravir from being subsequently treated with elvitegravir.

Resistance against Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors and Relevance to HIV Persistence

Drug resistance prevents the successful treatment of HIV-positive individuals by decreasing viral sensitivity to a drug or a class of drugs. In addition to transmitted resistant viruses, treatment-naïve individuals can be confronted with the problem of drug resistance through de novo emergence of such variants. Resistant viruses have been reported for every antiretroviral drug tested so far, including the integrase strand transfer inhibitors raltegravir, elvitegravir and dolutegravir. However, de novo resistant variants against dolutegravir have been found in treatment-experienced but not in treatment-naïve individuals, a characteristic that is unique amongst antiretroviral drugs. We review here the issue of drug resistance against integrase strand transfer inhibitors as well as both pre-clinical and clinical studies that have led to the identification of the R263K mutation in integrase as a signature resistance substitution for dolutegravir. We also discuss how the topic of drug resistance against integrase strand transfer inhibitors may have relevance in regard to the nature of the HIV reservoir and possible HIV curative strategies.

Dolutegravir maintains a durable effect against HIV replication in tissue culture even after drug washout

OBJECTIVES

Of the currently approved HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), dolutegravir has shown greater efficacy than raltegravir at suppressing HIV-1 replication in treatment-experienced individuals. Biochemical experiments have also shown that dolutegravir has a longer dissociative half-life when bound to HIV integrase than does raltegravir. In order to study the intracellular efficacy of various INSTIs, we asked whether drug removal from INSTI-treated HIV-1-infected cells would result in different times to viral rebound. In addition, we assessed the role of the R263K substitution within the integrase ORF that is associated with low-level resistance to dolutegravir.

METHODS

HIV-infected MT-2 cells were treated with dolutegravir, raltegravir or a third experimental INSTI (MK-2048) and the drugs were washed out after varying times. Viral replication was monitored by measuring reverse transcriptase (RT) activity in the culture fluids.

RESULTS

We observed a significantly slower increase in RT activity after the removal of dolutegravir compared with raltegravir or MK-2048. The incubation time before the drug was removed also had an impact on the level of RT activity independently of the drug and virus used. The R263K substitution did not significantly impact on levels of RT activity after drug washout, suggesting that dolutegravir remained tightly bound to the integrase enzyme despite the presence of this mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the residency time of INSTIs on integrase is a key factor in the activity of these drugs and that the anti-HIV activity of dolutegravir persists more effectively than that of other INSTIs after drug washout.