The dolutegravir R263K resistance mutation in HIV-1 integrase is incompatible with the emergence of resistance against raltegravir

N-Substituted Bicyclic Carbamoyl Pyridones: Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors that Potently Inhibit Drug-Resistant HIV-1 Integrase Mutants

HIV-1 integrase (IN) is an important molecular target for the development of anti-AIDS drugs. A recently FDA-approved second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) cabotegravir (CAB, 2021) is being marketed for use in long-duration antiviral formulations. However, missed doses during extended therapy can potentially result in persistent low levels of CAB that could select for resistant mutant forms of IN, leading to virological failure. We report a series of N-substituted bicyclic carbamoyl pyridones (BiCAPs) that are simplified analogs of CAB. Several of these potently inhibit wild-type HIV-1 in single-round infection assays in cultured cells and retain high inhibitory potencies against a panel of viral constructs carrying resistant mutant forms of IN. Our lead compound, 7c, proved to be more potent than CAB against the therapeutically important resistant double mutants E138K/Q148K (>12-fold relative to CAB) and G140S/Q148R (>36-fold relative to CAB). A significant number of the BiCAPs also potently inhibit the drug-resistant IN mutant R263K, which has proven to be problematic for the FDA-approved second-generation INSTIs.

The G118R plus R263K Combination of Integrase Mutations Associated with Dolutegravir-Based Treatment Failure Reduces HIV-1 Replicative Capacity and Integration

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment with antiretroviral regimens containing integrase strand transfer inhibitors such as dolutegravir (DTG) and bictegravir (BIC) offers high levels of protection against the development of drug resistance mutations. Despite this, resistance to DTG and BIC can occur through the development of the R263K integrase substitution. Failure with DTG has also been associated with the emergence of the G118R substitution. G118R and R263K are usually found separately but have been reported together in highly treatment-experienced persons who experienced treatment failure with DTG. We used cell-free strand transfer and DNA binding assays and cell-based infectivity, replicative capacity, and resistance assays to characterize the G118R plus R263K combination of integrase mutations. R263K reduced DTG and BIC susceptibility ~2-fold, in agreement with our previous work. Single-cycle infectivity assays showed that G118R and G118R plus R263K conferred ~10-fold resistance to DTG. G118R alone conferred low levels of resistance to BIC (3.9-fold). However, the G118R plus R263K combination conferred high levels of resistance to BIC (33.7-fold), likely precluding the use of BIC after DTG failure with the G118R plus R263K combination. DNA binding, viral infectivity, and replicative capacity of the double mutant were further impaired, compared to single mutants. We propose that impaired fitness helps to explain the scarcity of the G118R plus R263K combination of integrase substitutions in clinical settings and that immunodeficiency likely contributes to its development.

Different Pathways Conferring Integrase Strand-Transfer Inhibitors Resistance

Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) are currently used as the most effective therapy in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. Raltegravir (RAL) and Elvitegravir (EVG), the first generation of INSTIs used successfully in clinical treatment, are susceptible to the emergence of viral resistance and have a high rate of cross-resistance. To counteract these resistant mutants, second-generation INSTI drugs have been developed: Dolutegravir (DTG), Cabotegravir (CAB), and Bictegravir (BIC). However, HIV is also able to develop resistance mechanisms against the second-generation of INSTIs. This review describes the mode of action of INSTIs and then summarizes and evaluates some typical resistance mutations, such as substitution and insertion mutations. The role of unintegrated viral DNA is also discussed as a new pathway involved in conferring resistance to INSTIs. This allows us to have a more detailed understanding of HIV resistance to these inhibitors, which may contribute to the development of new INSTIs in the future.

Raltegravir-Induced Adaptations of the HIV-1 Integrase: Analysis of Structure, Variability, and Mutation Co-occurrence

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has several proteins of therapeutic importance, many of which are currently used as drug targets in antiretroviral therapy. Among these proteins is the integrase, which is responsible for the integration of the viral DNA into the host genome - a crucial step for HIV-1 replication. Given the importance of this protein in the replication process, three integrase inhibitors are currently used as an option for antiretroviral therapy: Raltegravir, Elvitegravir, and Dolutegravir. However, the crescent emergence of mutations that cause resistance to these drugs has become a worldwide health problem. In this study, we compared the variability of each position of the HIV-1 integrase sequence in clinical isolates of Raltegravir-treated and drug-naïve patients by calculating their Shannon entropies. A co-occurrence network was created to explore how mutations co-occur in patients treated with Raltegravir. Then, by building tridimensional models of the HIV-1 integrase intasomes, we investigated the relationship between variability, architecture, and co-occurrence. We observed that positions bearing some of the major resistance pathways are highly conserved among non-treated patients and variable among the treated ones. The residues involved in the three main resistance-related mutations could be identified in the same group when the positions were clustered according to their entropies. Analysis of the integrase architecture showed that the high-entropy residues S119, T124, and T125, are in contact with the host DNA, and their variations may have impacts in the protein-DNA recognition. The co-occurrence network revealed that the major resistance pathways N155H and Q148HR share more mutations with each other than with the Y143R pathway, this observation corroborates the fact that the N155H pathway is most commonly converted into Q148HRK than into Y143RCH pathway in patients' isolates. The network and the structure analysis also support the hypothesis that the resistance-related E138K mutation may be a mechanism to compensate for mutations in neighbor lysine residues to maintain DNA binding. The present study reveals patterns by which the HIV-1 integrase adapts during Raltegravir therapy. This information can be useful to comprehend the impacts of the drug in the enzyme, as well as help planning new therapeutic approaches.

HIV-1 strains belonging to large phylogenetic clusters show accelerated escape from integrase inhibitors in cell culture compared with viral isolates from singleton/small clusters

Objectives: Viral phylogenetics revealed two patterns of HIV-1 spread among MSM in Quebec. While most HIV-1 strains (n = 2011) were associated with singleton/small clusters (cluster size 1–4), 30 viral lineages formed large networks (cluster size 20–140), contributing to 42% of diagnoses between 2011 and 2015. Herein, tissue culture selections ascertained if large cluster lineages possessed higher replicative fitness than singleton/small cluster isolates, allowing for viral escape from integrase inhibitors.

Methods: Primary HIV-1 isolates from large 20+ cluster (n = 11) or singleton/small cluster (n = 6) networks were passagedin vitro in escalating concentrations of dolutegravir, elvitegravir and lamivudine for 24–36 weeks. Sanger and deep sequencing assessed genotypic changes under selective drug pressure.

Results: Large cluster HIV-1 isolates selected for resistance to dolutegravir, elvitegravir and lamivudine faster than HIV-1 strains forming small clusters. With dolutegravir, large cluster HIV-1 variants acquired solitary R263K (n = 7), S153Y (n = 1) or H51Y (n = 1) mutations as the dominant quasi-species within 8–12 weeks as compared with small cluster lineages where R263K (n = 1/6), S153Y (1/6) or WT species (4/6) were observed after 24 weeks. Interestingly, dolutegravir-associated mutations compromised viral replicative fitness, precluding escalations in concentrations beyond 5–10 nM. With elvitegravir, large cluster variants more rapidly acquired first mutations (T66I, A92G, N155H or S147G) by week 8 followed by sequential accumulation of multiple mutations leading to viral escape (>10 μM) by week 24.

Conclusions: Further studies are needed to understand virological features of large cluster viruses that may favour their transmissibility, replicative competence and potential to escape selective antiretroviral drug pressure.

Antiviral Activity of Bictegravir and Cabotegravir against Integrase Inhibitor-Resistant SIVmac239 and HIV-1

Animal models are essential to study novel antiretroviral drugs, resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), and treatment strategies. Bictegravir (BIC) is a novel potent integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) that has shown promising results against HIV-1 infection in vitro and in vivo and against clinical isolates with resistance against INSTIs. BIC has a higher genetic barrier to the development of resistance than two clinically approved INSTIs, termed raltegravir and elvitegravir. Another clinically approved INSTI, dolutegravir (DTG) also possesses a high genetic barrier to resistance, while a fourth compound, termed cabotegravir (CAB), is currently in late phases of clinical development. Here we report the susceptibilities of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and HIV-1 integrase (IN) mutants containing various RAMs to BIC, CAB, and DTG. BIC potently inhibited SIV and HIV-1 in single cycle infection with 50% effective concentrations (EC₅₀s) in the low nM range. In single cycle SIV infections, none of the E92Q, T97A, Y143R, or N155H substitutions had a significant effect on susceptibility to BIC (≤4-fold increase in EC₅₀), whereas G118R and R263K conferred ∼14-fold and ∼6-fold increases in EC₅₀, respectively. In both single and multiple rounds of HIV-1 infections, BIC remained active against the Y143R, N155H, R263K, R263K/M50I, and R263K/E138K mutants (≤4-fold increase in EC₅₀). In multiple rounds of infection, the G140S/Q148H combination of substitutions decreased HIV-1 susceptibility to BIC 4.8-fold compared to 16.8- and 7.4-fold for CAB and DTG, respectively. BIC possesses an excellent resistance profile in regard to HIV and SIV and could be useful in nonhuman primate models of HIV infection.

An effective HIV-1 integrase inhibitor screening platform: Rationality validation of drug screening, conformational mobility and molecular recognition analysis for PFV integrase complex with viral DNA

As an important target for the development of novel anti-AIDS drugs, HIV-1 integrase (IN) has been widely concerned. However, the lack of a complete accurate crystal structure of HIV-1 IN greatly blocks the discovery of novel inhibitors. In this work, an effective HIV-1 IN inhibitor screening platform, namely PFV IN, was filtered from all species of INs. Next, the 40.8% similarity with HIV-1 IN, as well as the high efficiency of virtual screening and the good agreement between calculated binding free energies and experimental ones all proved PFV IN is a promising screening platform for HIV-1 IN inhibitors. Then, the molecular recognition mechanism of PFV IN by its substrate viral DNA and six naphthyridine derivatives (NRDs) inhibitors was investigated through molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and water-mediated interactions analyses. The functional partition of NRDs IN inhibitors could be divided into hydrophobic and hydrophilic ones, and the Mg²⁺ ions, water molecules and conserved DDE motif residues all interacted with the hydrophilic partition, while the bases in viral DNA and residues like Tyr212, Pro214 interacted with the hydrophobic one. Finally, the free energy landscape (FEL) and cluster analyses were performed to explore the molecular motion of PFV IN-DNA system. It is found that the association with NRDs inhibitors would obviously decrease the motion amplitude of PFV IN-DNA, which may be one of the most potential mechanisms of IN inhibitors. This work will provide a theoretical basis for the inhibitor design based on the structure of HIV-1 IN.

HIV drug resistance against strand transfer integrase inhibitors

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are the newest class of antiretroviral drugs to be approved for treatment and act by inhibiting the essential HIV protein integrase from inserting the viral DNA genome into the host cell’s chromatin. Three drugs of this class are currently approved for use in HIV-positive individuals: raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), and dolutegravir (DTG), while cabotegravir (CAB) and bictegravir (BIC) are currently in clinical trials. RAL and EVG have been successful in clinical settings but have relatively low genetic barriers to resistance. Furthermore, they share a high degree of cross-resistance, which necessitated the development of so-called second-generation drugs of this class (DTG, CAB, and BIC) that could retain activity against these resistant variants. In vitro selection experiments have been instrumental to the clinical development of INSTIs, however they cannot completely recapitulate the situation in an HIV-positive individual. This review summarizes and compares all the currently available information as it pertains to both in vitro and in vivo selections with all five INSTIs, and the measured fold-changes in resistance of resistant variants in in vitro assays. While the selection of resistance substitutions in response to RAL and EVG bears high similarity in patients as compared to laboratory studies, there is less concurrence regarding the “second-generation” drugs of this class. This highlights the unpredictability of HIV resistance to these inhibitors, which is of concern as CAB and BIC proceed in their clinical development.

The M184I/V and K65R nucleoside resistance mutations in HIV-1 prevent the emergence of resistance mutations against dolutegravir

OBJECTIVE

Recommended treatments for newly diagnosed HIV-positive individuals now focus on the integrase strand transfer inhibitors, raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG) and dolutegravir (DTG). In treatment-naive individuals, cases of RAL-based and EVG-based virological failure, although rare, are associated with the occurrence of resistance mutations in integrase and/or reverse transcriptase coding sequences. In such cases, common resistance substitutions in reverse transcriptase that were associated with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors included M184I/V and K65R and these occurred together with various mutations in integrase. In some instances, these mutations in reverse transcriptase preceded the emergence of mutations in integrase. In contrast, no resistance substitutions in either integrase or reverse transcriptase have been observed to date in viruses isolated from treatment-naive individuals who experienced treatment failure with DTG-based regimens.

DESIGN

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of the M184I/V and K65R substitutions in reverse transcriptase on the ability of HIV-1 to become resistant against RAL, EVG or DTG.

METHODS

We performed tissue culture selection experiments using reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant viruses containing resistance substitutions at positions K65R, M184I or M184V in the presence of increasing concentrations of RAL, EVG or DTG and monitored changes in integrase sequences by genotyping.

RESULTS

Selections using EVG and RAL led to the emergence of resistance mutations in integrase. In contrast, only the wild-type virus was able to acquire resistance mutations for DTG.

CONCLUSION

Resistance mutations against nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors antagonized the development of HIV-1 resistance against DTG but not RAL or EVG.

Clinical benefit of dolutegravir in HIV-1 management related to the high genetic barrier to drug resistance

This manuscript reviews the reasons why Integrase inhibitors should now routinely constitute a part of first line antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV disease. The use of these drugs that are generally well tolerated has resulted in far less drug resistance than was the case with most other categories of antiviral compounds. In addition, the integrase inhibitor family of drugs has been less prone to the problem of transmitted drug resistance which is due to a wide variety of substitutions in the HIV genome that can be sexually transmitted from one person to another. However, the use of integrase inhibitors in first line therapy may unfortunately not soon happen in developing country settings where non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors continue to be a mainstay of initial therapy, primarily for reasons of cost. As long as this situation continues, problems of drug resistance and transmitted drug resistance will be common in such settings. Current evidence also suggests that the use of dolutegravir as a first line integrase inhibitor may limit development of drug resistance to an extent that exceeds the use of other members of this family of drugs. This may be due to particular patterns of resistance involving dolutegravir, whereby the mutations that are associated with resistance against this compound may actually diminish both HIV replication capacity as well as integrase enzymatic activity in a far-reaching and unique manner. This gives potential hope that the use of dolutegravir in first line therapy could actually form part of the long-sought goal of attainment of a functional cure for HIV disease.

Development of a G118R mutation in HIV-1 integrase following a switch to dolutegravir monotherapy leading to cross-resistance to integrase inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

Dolutegravir shows a high barrier to resistance with no previously reported cases of acquired integrase mutations during first-line therapy. In this study, rapid development of the G118R mutation arose following a switch from first-line elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine to dolutegravir monotherapy. The G118R mutation also arose in a treatment-experienced patient switched to dolutegravir monotherapy. The genetic basis for G118R selection and potential phenotypic outcome was ascertained.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Genotypic analysis was performed on patients with virological failure (<1000 copies/mL) on dolutegravir-containing regimens. The Los Alamos database was queried for glycine codon 118 polymorphisms. Cell culture selections and phenotypic drug susceptibility assays assessed resistance via the G118R pathway.

RESULTS

We report on two patients who developed viral failure while on dolutegravir monotherapy. Both patients had been on a current or previous regimen containing integrase inhibitors. Virological failure (<1000 copies/mL) emerged early within 2 months following the dolutegravir switch. The appearance of G118R in these two cases and subtype C and CRF02_AG in vitro selections were related to a rare GGA natural polymorphism at codon 118 (1.5% prevalence), facilitating a GGA to AGA transition. Cell culture selections were used to assess the in vitro progression of the G118R pathway leading to cross-resistance to all integrase inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although resistance to dolutegravir is typically rare, genetic polymorphisms and monotherapy can facilitate the acquisition of G118R.