Immunological success is predicted by enfuvirtide but not interleukin-2 therapy in immunodepressed patients

Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Lenacapavir Plus Optimized Background Regimen Versus Other Treatments for Multidrug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH) may not achieve virologic suppression (VS) with combination antiretroviral therapy due to multidrug resistance (MDR), intolerance, and safety concerns. These PWH often receive highly individualized treatment regimens, but these regimens may not enable PWH to achieve VS, thereby halting disease progression. Novel medications are required for treating individuals with MDR HIV. Lenacapavir (LEN), a first-in-class HIV capsid inhibitor, is under investigation for the treatment of HTE individuals with MDR HIV in the phase 2/3 CAPELLA study. This study aimed to compare LEN plus optimized background regimen (OBR) with fostemsavir (FTR) + OBR, ibalizumab (IBA) + OBR, and OBR alone in terms of VS, CD4 cell count change from baseline, immunologic recovery, and discontinuation due to adverse events, using indirect treatment comparisons.

METHODS

A systematic review identified clinical evidence on HIV-1 treatments in HTE PWH. A feasibility assessment evaluated the identified studies for indirect treatment comparison analyses based on population characteristics, interventions, comparators, and outcomes of interest. Unanchored simulated treatment comparisons of LEN + OBR versus comparators were conducted.

RESULTS

LEN + OBR had 6.57 times higher odds of VS at weeks 24 to 28 than FTR + OBR (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-32.28), 8.93 times higher odds of VS than IBA + OBR (95% CI 2.07-38.46), and 12.74 times higher odds of VS than OBR alone (95% CI 1.70-95.37). Change from baseline in CD4 cell count was similar across LEN + OBR, FTR + OBR, and IBA + OBR.

CONCLUSION

LEN + OBR has statistically significantly greater odds of VS at weeks 24 to 28 than its comparators and represents a novel treatment for people with MDR HIV.

Drug resistance and tropism as markers of the dynamics of HIV-1 DNA quasispecies in blood cells of heavily pretreated patients who achieved sustained virological suppression

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to address the dynamics of archived resistant quasispecies in cell-associated HIV-1 DNA over time in heavily ART-experienced patients with currently suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA.

METHODS

Longitudinal ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) analysis of reverse transcriptase, protease and V3 Env regions was performed on blood-cell-associated HIV-1 DNA samples. Drug-resistance-associated mutations (DRAMs) and tropism were interpreted using the ANRS and Geno2Pheno algorithms. We analysed frozen blood cells from patients enrolled in the INNOVE and ANRS 123 ETOILE studies who achieved sustained viral suppression after salvage optimized ART (SOT).

RESULTS

Samples were available at baseline and 6 and ≥12 months after SOT initiation in 10 patients. V3 loop sequences displayed wide intra-individual dynamics over time. Viral variants harbouring DRAMs exhibited three non-exclusive scenarios. First, when SOT exerted the same selective pressure as previous failing regimens, some viral quasispecies still harboured the same DRAMs at the same level as at the time of virological failure. Thus, as DRAMs were mostly associated with the same viral variant, variants with a complete resistance pattern remained archived. Second, some viral variants harbouring DRAMs were no longer detected over time when SOT consisted of new antiretroviral classes or had resistance profiles distinct from those of previous failing regimens. Third, variants with new DRAMs associated with SOT emerged in blood cells during follow-up despite sustained virological control.

CONCLUSIONS

Using longitudinal UDS analysis and focusing on DRAMs and tropism as markers, we demonstrated that, despite sustained virological control, archived HIV-1 DNA quasispecies continued to evolve.

Short-term additional enfuvirtide therapy is associated with a greater immunological recovery in HIV very late presenters: a controlled pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the addition of enfuvirtide to standard highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) could confer immunovirological benefits in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected very late presenters. The current study is an open comparative therapeutic trial of standard protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART ± additional enfuvirtide in treatment-naïve deeply immunologically impaired HIV-positive patients.

METHODS

Very late presenters (CD4 <50/mm(3)), without tuberculosis and neoplasms, were alternatively allocated to two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and lopinavir/ritonavir without (control arm, CO) or with (ENF arm) enfuvirtide 90 mg bid. Enfuvirtide was administered until the achievement of viral load <50 copies/ml and for at least 24 weeks. The primary objective was the magnitude of CD4+ cell recovery at 6 months. HIV RNA was intensively monitored in the first month, and, thereafter, monthly, as for CD4+ cell count and percentage, clinical data, and plasma drug concentrations.

RESULTS

Of 22 enrolled patients (11 per arm), 19 completed the study (10 in the ENF arm). Baseline CD4+ cell counts and % were comparable, with 20 CD4+/mm(3) (12-37) and a percentage of 3.3 (1.7-7.1) in the ENF arm, and 16 CD4+/mm(3) (9-29) and a percentage of 3.1 (2.3-3.8) in the CO arm, respectively. The baseline viral load was also comparable between the two arms, with 5.77 log10 (5.42-6) and 5.39 log10 (5.06-6) in the ENF and CO arms, respectively. Enfuvirtide recipients had higher CD4+ percentage at week 8 (7.6 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.02) and at week 24 (10.7 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.02), and a greater CD4+ increase at week 24 (207 vs. 134 cells/mm(3), p = 0.04), with 70% of enfuvirtide intakers versus 12.5% of controls who achieved a CD4+ cell count >200/mm(3) (p = 0.01). At 48 weeks, patients in the ENF arm had CD4+ cell counts higher than controls (251 vs. 153cells/mm(3), p = 0.04) and were also found to be faster in reaching a CD4 cell count over 200/mm(3): 18 (8-24) versus 48 (36-108) weeks (p = 0.01). Viral load decay at week 4 was greater in the ENF arm (-3 vs. -2.2 log, p = 0.04), while the proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/ml at week 24 was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, the addition of enfuvirtide to a lopinavir-based HAART was shown to be associated with a significantly faster and greater immunological recovery in newly discovered HIV-positive patients with very low CD4+ cell counts. Induction strategies using an enfuvirtide-based approach in such subjects warrant further investigation.

[Enhancing immune restoration in human immunodeficiency virus infection]

The primary objective of antiretroviral therapy has recently evolved from a virologic endpoint towards the achievement of normal CD4T cell count (greater than 500/mm(3)) to avoid progression to AIDS. This shift in the primary objective is supported by many clinical and epidemiological studies. Recent data have shown that HIV-infected adults with a CD4T cell count greater than 500cells/mm(3) on long-term combination antiretroviral therapy reach same mortality rates as the general population. However, less than 50% of patients receiving long-term suppressive antiretroviral combination reach such a CD4T cell level. New antiretroviral strategies to improve immune reconstitution, such as specific or non-specific immune-based therapy on one hand and the use of novel antiretroviral drugs from new classes on the other hand are currently under investigation. Here we review several current strategies that may improve immune reconstitution, keeping in mind that the best way to reach normal CD4T cell count is an early treatment initiation.

Enfuvirtide: from basic investigations to current clinical use

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Drug resistance is a major challenge in the treatment of HIV infection. Enfuvirtide is the first entry inhibitor to have been approved for clinical use.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Relevant information through searches of MEDLINE (1998 to June 2010) and meeting abstracts of major HIV/AIDS conferences (2003 - June 2010) using the search terms 'enfuvirtide', 'T-20' and 'fusion inhibitor'.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Enfuvirtide blocks HIV fusion to host cells. It works against the different HIV-1 variants but is not active against HIV-2. The recommended dosage of enfuvirtide is 90 mg b.i.d. subcutaneously. The two large Phase III pivotal clinical trials TORO 1 and 2 showed that enfuvirtide is an effective therapeutic option as rescue therapy in combination with other active antiretroviral drugs. Resistance to enfuvirtide is conferred by mutations in the HR1 region of gp41. Single and double mutations have been shown to result in high-level resistance to enfuvirtide. Postmarketing studies have been helpful to define more precisely the place of enfuvirtide in the sequence of antiretroviral therapy.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The emergence of new compounds and new classes of drugs, highly active against multiresistant virus but more convenient to administer than enfuvirtide, will probably prevent the extensive use of enfuvirtide. This drug remains attractive in some subgroups of patients because of its excellent systemic tolerance and the lack of interactions with the major cytochrome P450 isoenzymes.

Virologic and immunologic effectiveness of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)- versus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)-based regimens in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Although both tipranavir and darunavir are important options for the management of patients with multidrug resistant HIV, there are at present no studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of these 2 antiretroviral drugs in this population of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of ritonavir (TPV/r)- and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/ r)-based therapies in treatment-experienced patients (n = 38 and 47, respectively).

METHODS

Multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

RESULTS

The median baseline viral load and CD4 count were 4.7 copies/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 4.3, 5.2) and 168 cells/mm( 3) (IQR 80, 252) for TPV/r patients and 4.7 copies/mL (IQR 3.7, 5.1) and 171 cells/mm(3) (IQR 92, 290) for DRV/r patients. The median number of years on antiretroviral therapy (ART) prior to starting DRV/r or TPV/r were 12.7 (10.2-15.5) and 10.5 (8.4-12.6), respectively (P < .01). Current raltegravir (RAL) use (odds ratio [OR] 5.53, 95% CI 1.08-28.34) was significantly associated with virologic suppression at week 24 in multivariable logistic regression models, whereas the use of TPV/r was not significantly associated with virologic suppression compared to DRV/r (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.27-3.18, P = .91).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was observed between DRV/r and TPV/r in terms of virologic suppression.

Higher HIV-1 DNA associated with lower gains in CD4 cell count among patients with advanced therapeutic failure receiving optimized treatment (ANRS 123--ETOILE)

OBJECTIVE

To describe HIV-1 DNA levels from baseline (W0) to week 52 (W52) among patients receiving either interleukin-2 (IL-2) + optimized background therapy (OBT) or OBT as salvage treatment.

METHODS

This was evaluated in a substudy of the ETOILE Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales (ANRS) 123 trial (patients with CD4 ≤ 200/mm(3), HIV RNA>4 log(10) copies/mL and a genotypic score showing two or fewer active drugs). OBT included enfuvirtide whenever possible. HIV DNA was quantified with the ANRS assay.

RESULTS

Blood samples were available for 21 patients in the IL-2 + OBT arm and 23 in the OBT alone arm at baseline, and for 10 and 17 patients, respectively, at W52. Median baseline CD4 count was 47 cells/mm(3) and 68 cells/mm(3), respectively; median HIV RNA was 5.1 and 4.9 log(10) copies/mL. Baseline median HIV DNA load was 3.44 log(10) copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (interquartile range 3.31-4.08) and 3.51 (3.18-3.82) log(10) copies/10(6) PBMCs, respectively. At W52, it was 3.18 log(10) copies/10(6) PBMCs (2.75-3.52) and 3.48 log(10) copies/10(6) PBMCs (3.10-3.67), respectively. Cells were available at both W0 and W52 for 7 patients in the IL-2 + OBT arm and 14 in the OBT arm. Change in HIV DNA load was not associated with IL-2 use, but decreased among the seven patients receiving enfuvirtide (-0.22 log(10) copies/mL) as compared with the other 14 patients (+0.20 log(10); P=0.046). A steeper decrease in HIV DNA was observed among patients who had a larger increase in CD4 count (Pearson coefficient ρ=0.659, P=0.001). Adjusted for enfuvirtide use, there was a trend for an association between upper baseline HIV DNA level and a less frequent CD4 gain ≥ 50 cells/mm(3) at W52 (odds ratio=0.17, P=0.075).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV DNA levels were high in patients with advanced therapeutic failure. A larger viral reservoir may be associated with lower gains in CD4 count among patients receiving OBT. HIV DNA level could be a useful tool for the case management of patients in the late stages of disease.

T-cell dysfunction in HIV-1 infection: targeting the inhibitors

Since AIDS emerged almost three decades ago, there have been considerable advances in the field of antiretroviral chemotherapy for those chronically infected with HIV-1. However, this therapy is noncurative and as our understanding of HIV-1 immunopathogenesis increases, it is becoming apparent that further therapeutic interventions are required to reverse the devastating effects of HIV-1 infection worldwide. While viral clearance remains the principle goal of HIV-1 treatment, this article describes immunotherapeutic options that target the immunological effects of the virus, to reduce its presence in the body and counteract viral-induced T-cell dysfunction and inhibition. Such approaches may augment existing antiretroviral therapy to overturn virus-induced T-cell anergy in the infected host, improving levels of immune control that reduce viremia and decrease the rate of transmission.