Stillbirth in Women Living With HIV Delivering in the United Kingdom and Ireland: 2007-2015

Guideline No. 450: Care of Pregnant Women Living with HIV and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal Transmission

OBJECTIVE

This guideline provides an update on the care of pregnant women living with HIV and the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission. This guideline is a revision of the previous guideline, No. 310 Guidelines for the Care of Pregnant Women Living With HIV and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal Transmission, and includes an updated review of the literature with contemporary recommendations.

TARGET POPULATION

Pregnant women newly diagnosed with HIV during antenatal screening and women living with HIV who become pregnant. This guideline does not include specific guidance for girls/women of reproductive age living with HIV who are not pregnant.

OUTCOMES

Prevention of perinatal HIV transmission is a key indicator of the success of a health care system and requires multidisciplinary care of pregnant women living with HIV. Intended outcomes include guidance on best practice in perinatal management for Canadian health care providers for pregnant women living with HIV; reduction of perinatal transmission of HIV toward a target of eradication of perinatal transmission; provision of optimal antenatal care for pregnant women to ensure the best maternal health outcomes and HIV suppression; and evidence-based support and recommendations for pregnant women living with HIV, maintaining awareness and consideration of the complex psychosocial impacts of living with HIV.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

The perinatal transmission of HIV has significant morbidity and mortality implications for the child, with associated lifelong health care costs. Pregnancy presents an emotionally and physically vulnerable time for pregnant women as well as an opportunity to engage them in health promotion. This guidance does not include recommendations with additional costs to health care facilities compared with the previous guideline. Application of the recommendations is aimed at health benefits to both mother and child by optimizing maternal health and preventing perinatal HIV transmission.

EVIDENCE

Published and unpublished literature was reviewed with a focus on publications post-2013. OVID-Medline, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant publications available in English or French for each section of this guideline. Results included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies published from 2012 to 2022. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline until May 2023. Unpublished literature, protocols, and international guidelines were identified by accessing the websites of health-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

The intended users of this guideline include obstetric care providers and infectious disease clinicians who provide care for pregnant women living with HIV.

SOCIAL MEDIA SUMMARY

Updated Canadian HIV in pregnancy guideline informed by global research and tailored to Canadian healthcare needs and goals for pregnant women living with HIV and their families.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Comparative risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with classes of antiretroviral therapy in pregnant women living with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended by World Health Organisation as preferred first-line regimen in pregnant women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (WLHIV). Non-nucleoside reverse transfer inhibitor (NNRTI)-based ART and protease inhibitor (PI)-based ART are designated as alternative regimens. The impact of different ART regimens on perinatal outcomes is uncertain. We aimed to assess the comparative risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in WLHIV receiving different classes of ART.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature review was conducted by searching PubMed, CINAHL, Global Health, and EMBASE for studies published between Jan 1, 1980, and July 14, 2023. We included studies reporting on the association of pregnant WLHIV receiving different classes of ART with 11 perinatal outcomes: preterm birth (PTB), very PTB, spontaneous PTB, low birthweight (LBW), very LBW, term LBW, preterm LBW, small for gestational age (SGA), very SGA (VSGA), stillbirth, and neonatal death. Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses compared the risk of each adverse perinatal outcome among WLHIV receiving INSTI-ART, NNRTI-ART, PI-ART, and nucleoside reverse transfer inhibitor (NRTI)-based ART, and compared specific "third drugs" from different ART classes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted based on country income status and study quality.

Results

Thirty cohort studies published in 2006-2022, including 222,312 pregnant women, met the eligibility criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses found no evidence that INSTI-ART is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes compared to NNRTI-ART and PI-ART. We found that PI-ART is associated with a significantly increased risk of SGA (RR 1.28, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [1.09, 1.51], p = 0.003) and VSGA (RR 1.41, 95% CI [1.08, 1.83], p = 0.011), compared to NNRTI-ART. Specifically, lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) was associated with an increased risk of SGA (RR 1.40, 95% CI [1.18, 1.65], p = 0.003) and VSGA (RR 1.84, 95% CI [1.37, 2.45], p = 0.002), compared to efavirenz, but not compared to nevirapine. We found no evidence that any class of ART or specific "third drug" was associated with an increased risk of PTB.

Conclusion

Our findings support the recommendation of INSTI-ART as first-line ART regimen for use in pregnant WLHIV. However, the increased risks of SGA and VGSA associated with PI-ART, compared to NNRTI-ART, may impact choice of second- and third-line ART regimens in pregnancy.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021248987.

Effects of community-based interventions for stillbirths in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) alone contributed to 42% of global stillbirths in 2019, and the rate of stillbirth reduction has remained slow. There has been an increased uptake of community-based interventions to combat stillbirth in the region, but the effects of these interventions have been poorly assessed. Our objectives were to examine the effect of community-based interventions on stillbirth in SSA.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched eight databases (MEDLINE [OvidSP], Embase [OvidSP], Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Global Health, Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation index [Web of Science Core Collection], CINAHL [EBSCOhost] and Global Index Medicus) and four grey literature sources from January 1, 2000 to July 7, 2023 for relevant studies from SSA. Community-based interventions targeting stillbirths solely or as part of complex interventions, with or without hospital interventions were included, while hospital-only interventions, microcredit schemes and maternity waiting home interventions were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's tools. The study outcome was odds of stillbirth in intervention versus control communities. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using random-effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed by intervention type and strategies. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot and Egger's test. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021296623.

Findings

Of the 4223 records identified, seventeen studies from fifteen SSA countries were eligible for inclusion. One study had four arms (community only, hospital only, community and hospital, and control arms), so information was extracted from each arm. Analysis of 13 of the 17 studies which had community-only intervention showed that the odds of stillbirth did not vary significantly between community-based intervention and control groups (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.78-1.17, I2 = 57%, p ≤ 0.01, n = 63,884). However, analysis of four (out of five) studies that included both community and health facility components found that in comparison with community only interventions, this combination strategy significantly reduced the odds of stillbirth by 17% (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.79-0.87, I2 = 11%, p = 0.37, n = 244,868), after excluding a study with high risk of bias. The quality of the 17 studies were graded as poor (n = 2), fair (n = 9) and good (n = 6).

Interpretation

Community-based interventions alone, without strengthening the quality and capacity of health facilities, are unlikely to have a substantial effect on reducing stillbirths in SSA.

Funding

Nuffield Department of Population Health, Balliol College, the Clarendon Fund, Medical Research Council.

Maternal and birth outcomes in pregnant people with and without HIV in the Western Cape, South Africa

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated associations of HIV and antiretroviral therapy (ART) with birth and maternal outcomes at a province-wide-level in the Western Cape, South Africa, in a recent cohort before dolutegravir-based first-line ART implementation.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included pregnant people delivering in 2018-2019 with data in the Western Cape Provincial Health Data Centre which integrates individual-level data on all public sector patients from multiple electronic platforms using unique identifiers. Adverse birth outcomes (stillbirth, low birth weight (LBW), very LBW (VLBW)) and maternal outcomes (early and late pregnancy-related deaths, early and late hospitalizations) were compared by HIV/ART status and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) calculated using log-binomial regression.

RESULTS

Overall 171,960 pregnant people and their singleton newborns were included, 19% (N = 32 015) identified with HIV. Amongst pregnant people with HIV (PPHIV), 60% (N = 19 157) were on ART preconception, 29% (N = 9276) initiated ART during pregnancy and 11% (N = 3582) had no ART. Adjusted for maternal age, multiparity, hypertensive disorders and residential district, stillbirths were higher only for PPHIV not on ART [aPR 1.31 (95%CI 1.04-1.66)] compared to those without HIV. However, LBW and VLBW were higher among all PPHIV, with aPRs of 1.11-1.22 for LBW and 1.14-1.54 for VLBW. Pregnancy-initiated ART was associated with early pregnancy-related death (aPR 3.21; 95%CI 1.55-6.65), and HIV with or without ART was associated with late pregnancy-related death (aPRs 7.89-9.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the universal ART era, PPHIV experienced higher rates of LBW and VLBW newborns, and higher late pregnancy-related death regardless of ART status than pregnant people without HIV.

Dolutegravir and pregnancy outcomes including neural tube defects in the USA during 2008-20: a national cohort study

BACKGROUND

A study from Botswana identified an increased risk of neural tube defects (NTDs) in infants of mothers with HIV who were treated with dolutegravir around the time of conception. We aimed to examine associations of dolutegravir use with NTDs and pregnancy loss using large health-care claims databases from the USA, a country with folic acid fortification of food.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we analysed health-care claims data, recorded in the Merative MarketScan commercial database (MarketScan data) and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicaid database (Medicaid data) from Jan 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2020. We identified pregnancies with enrolment during their entire duration among women aged 15-49 years and we estimated time of conception. For each pregnancy, we determined HIV status and periconceptional exposure to dolutegravir or other antiretroviral agents. We estimated and compared the incidence rate of NTDs, stillbirths, and pregnancy loss (ie, spontaneous or induced abortions) by type of periconceptional antiretroviral exposure. We calculated adjusted risk ratios of the adverse outcomes using Poisson models adjusting for demographic and clinical factors.

FINDINGS

Of 4 489 315 pregnancies in MarketScan data and 14 405 861 pregnancies in Medicaid data that had full enrolment, we identified 69 pregnancies in MarketScan data and 993 pregnancies in Medicaid data that were associated with HIV and periconceptional dolutegravir exposure. For women without HIV, the NTD rate was 4·1 per 10 000 live births (95% CI 3·9-4·3) in MarketScan and 5·7 per 10 000 live births (5·6-5·8) in Medicaid. No NTD cases were found among those with dolutegravir or non- dolutegravir antiretroviral drug exposure in the MarketScan data; only one NTD case was identified among women with dolutegravir, and three among women with non-dolutegravir antiretroviral exposure in Medicaid. After adjusting for covariates, there were no significant differences in risk ratios of NTD between groups with periconceptional dolutegravir or non-dolutegravir antiretroviral exposure and the group without HIV. However, compared with women without HIV, the risk of pregnancy loss was higher among women exposed to antiretroviral therapy: for dolutegravir exposure the adjusted risk ratio was 1·73 (95% CI 1·20-2·49) in MarketScan data and 1·41 (1·30-1·54) in Medicaid data; for non-dolutegravir antiretroviral exposure the adjusted risk ratio was 1·23 (1·10-1·37) in MarketScan data and 1·11 (1·07-1·15) in Medicaid data.

INTERPRETATION

We studied the largest US cohort of women with periconceptional or early-pregnancy dolutegravir exposure. Our results do not show an increased risk of NTDs in exposed infants in the USA. Administrative databases can be used, with rigorous methodology, to study correlates of rare outcomes, such as NTDs, and to monitor for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who receive antiretrovirals.

FUNDING

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Antiretroviral Options and Treatment Decisions During Pregnancy

The majority of pediatric human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections are the result of vertical transmissions that occur during pregnancy, childbirth, and breastfeeding. The treatment of all pregnant persons living with HIV remains a global health initiative. Early and consistent use of antiretroviral therapy throughout pregnancy and childbirth drastically reduces the risk of perinatal transmission of HIV, resulting in fewer children living with the disease worldwide. Given that the maternal HIV viral load is the strongest predictor of perinatal transmission, suppressive antiretroviral treatment during pregnancy is the principal means to eliminate transmission of HIV from mother to child. With the use of combined antiretroviral therapy, typically with dual-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus an integrase strand transfer inhibitor or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, HIV-infected mothers can now achieve virologic suppression to undetectable levels and yield a perinatal transmission rate of less than 2%. Important considerations of HIV treatment in pregnancy include the safety and efficacy of antiretroviral drugs, altered pregnancy-related pharmacokinetics, potential for birth defects or adverse neonatal outcomes, and individualized delivery planning based on maternal viral load. This practical review article summarizes the options, considerations, and recommendations for antiretroviral treatment in pregnancy to reduce perinatal HIV transmission and optimize health outcomes for mothers and infants worldwide.

Adverse perinatal outcomes associated with prenatal exposure to protease-inhibitor-based versus non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based antiretroviral combinations in pregnant women with HIV infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

About 1.3 million pregnant women lived with HIV and were eligible to receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) worldwide in 2021. The World Health Organization recommends protease inhibitors (PI)-based regimen as second or third-line during pregnancy. With remaining pregnant women exposed to PIs, there is still an interest to assess whether this treatment affects perinatal outcomes. Adverse perinatal outcomes after prenatal exposure to PI-based ART remain conflicting: some studies report an increased risk of preterm birth (PTB) and low-birth-weight (LBW), while others do not find these results. We assessed adverse perinatal outcomes associated with prenatal exposure to PI-based compared with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI)-based ART.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review searching PubMed, Reprotox, Clinical Trial Registry (clinicaltrials.gov) and abstracts of HIV conferences between 01/01/2002 and 29/10/2021. We used Oxford and Newcastle-Ottawa scales to assess the methodological quality. Studied perinatal outcomes were spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, congenital abnormalities, PTB (< 37 weeks of gestation), very preterm birth (VPTB, < 32 weeks of gestation), LBW (< 2500 grs), very low-birth-weight (VLBW, < 1500 g), small for gestational age (SGA) and very small for gestational age (VSGA). The association between prenatal exposure to PI-based compared to NNRTI-based ART was measured for each adverse perinatal outcome using random-effect meta-analysis to estimate pooled relative risks (RR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pre-specified analyses were stratified according to country income and study quality assessment, and summarized when homogeneous.

RESULTS

Out of the 49,171 citations identified, our systematic review included 32 published studies, assessing 45,427 pregnant women. There was no significant association between prenatal exposure to PIs compared to NNRTIs for VPTB, LBW, SGA, stillbirth, and congenital abnormalities. However, it was inconclusive for PTB, and PI-based ART is significantly associated with an increased risk of VSGA (sRR 1.41 [1.08-1.84]; I² = 0%) compared to NNRTIs.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not report any significant association between prenatal exposure to PIs vs NNRTIs-based regimens for most of the adverse perinatal outcomes, except for VSGA significantly increased (+ 41%). The evaluation of antiretroviral exposure on pregnancy outcomes remains crucial to fully assess the benefice-risk balance, when prescribing ART in women of reproductive potential with HIV.

PROSPERO NUMBER

CRD42022306896.

Adverse perinatal outcomes associated with protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy in pregnant women living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization recommends protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) as second-line and third-line regimens in pregnant women living with HIV (WLHIV). US, European, and UK guidelines include PI-based ART as first-line regimens, but advise against the use of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based ART, citing an increased risk of preterm birth (PTB). We aimed to assess the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in WLHIV receiving PI-ART and the comparative risks associated with different PI-ART regimens.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review by searching PubMed, CINAHL, Global Health, and EMBASE for studies published between Jan 1, 1980, and April 20, 2020. Two investigators independently selected studies and extracted data from studies reporting on the association of pregnant WLHIV receiving PI-ART with 11 perinatal outcomes: PTB, very PTB (VPTB), spontaneous PTB (sPTB), low birth weight (LBW), very LBW (VLBW), term LBW, preterm LBW, small for gestational age (SGA), very SGA (VSGA), stillbirth, and neonatal death. Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses examined the risk of each adverse perinatal outcome in WLHIV receiving PI-ART compared to non-PI-based ART (non-PI-ART), and comparisons of different PI-ART regimens. Quality assessments of studies were performed, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted based on country income status and study quality, heterogeneity assessed, and the effect of adjustment for confounding factors assessed. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021248987.

FINDINGS

Of 94,594 studies identified, 34 cohort studies including 57,546 women met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses showed that PI-ART was associated with a significantly increased risk of SGA (Relative Risk [RR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.43; I² =66.7%) and VSGA (RR 1.40, 1.09-1.81; I² =0.0%), but not PTB (RR 1.09, 0.95-1.24; I² =68.3%), VPTB (RR 1.30, 0.78-2.18; I² =43.0%), sPTB (RR 1.91, 0.61-5.99; I² =95.7%), LBW (RR 1.04, 0.85-1.27; I² =63.9%), VLBW (RR 0.72, 0.37-1.43; I² =37.9%), term LBW (RR 0.94, 0.30-3.02; I² =0.0%), stillbirth (RR 1.04, 0.60-1.79; I² =0.0%), and neonatal death (RR 1.82, 0.97-3.40; I² =0.0%), compared to non-PI-ART. We found no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between ART regimens containing LPV/r, atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), which are the most commonly used PIs.

INTERPRETATION

PI-ART is associated with an increased risk of SGA and VSGA, but not PTB or other perinatal outcomes. No significant differences in perinatal outcomes were found between LPV/r, ATV/r, and DRV/r. These findings should inform clinical guidelines, and further efforts should be made to improve perinatal outcomes among pregnant WLHIV.

FUNDING

None.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women living with HIV in Hubei province, China: prevalence and risk factors

Mother-to-child transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) has been greatly reduced with the advance of intervention technology. However, adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) are still common, and little is known about the driving forces of APOs among pregnant women living with HIV in China. Between January 2004 and December 2020, a total of 638 pregnancies among pregnant women living with HIV were enrolled in this study, 84 (13.2%) pregnancies with 87 APOs were reported. Preterm birth (3.8%), ectopic pregnancy (3.4%), spontaneous abortion (2.0%), and embryo arrest (1.7%) were the most common APOs in pregnant women living with HIV. Exposure to antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) during the first trimester (RR =  4.077, 95% CI: 0.521, 1.484, P<0.001) and the first CD4+ T lymphocyte count (CD4 count)≤ 350/μl (RR =  2.227, 95% CI: 0.063, 0.991, P = 0.026) were risk factors of APOs. The age≤ 30 years (RR =  -2.513, 95% CI: -1.067, -0.132, P = 0.012) was associated with the decreasing of APOs. Encouraging people to initiate combination antiretroviral therapy and reach a high CD4 count level before pregnancy would be helpful to prevent APOs. Pregnant women exposed to ARVs in the first trimester needed more attention for APOs.

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Among HIV-positive Women in the Era of Universal Antiretroviral Therapy Remain Elevated Compared With HIV-negative Women

BACKGROUND

Without treatment, HIV infection in pregnant women is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We compared adverse pregnancy outcomes among HIV-positive women on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and HIV-negative women who enrolled for antenatal care in selected health facilities in Maseru district, Lesotho.

METHODS

We enrolled a cohort of HIV-positive and HIV-negative women at their first antenatal visit and followed them through delivery. Study data on miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm birth, low birth weight and birth defects were collected through participant interviews and medical record abstraction. We used the Rao-Scott χ2 test and the t test to assess differences in characteristics and outcomes between HIV-positive and HIV-negative women and generalized estimating equations for multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 614 HIV-positive and 390 HIV-negative pregnant women were enrolled in the study with delivery information on 571 (93.1%) and 352 (90.3%) respectively. In the delivery cohort, the median age at enrolment was 28 years for HIV-positive women and 23 years for HIV-negative women with median gestational ages of 20 and 21 weeks, respectively. A total of 149 singleton pregnancies had documented adverse pregnancy outcomes; 33 (9.6%) HIV-negative pregnancies and 116 (20.6%) HIV-positive pregnancies. Compared with their HIV-negative counterparts, HIV-positive women were more likely to experience an adverse pregnancy outcome, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.71-3.97]; an intrauterine death (miscarriage or stillbirth), AOR 2.64 [95% CI: 1.25-5.49]; or a low birth weight delivery, AOR 1.89 [95% CI: 1.16-3.09].

CONCLUSION

Adverse pregnancy outcomes remained 2-3 times higher among HIV-positive women compared with HIV-negative women despite universal ART.