Is There a Drug–Drug Interaction Between Darunavir/Ritonavir and Raltegravir?

Validation of an UPLC-MS/MS method for quantitative analysis of raltegravir in human plasma samples

BACKGROUND

An ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed for the quantification of raltegravir (RTG) plasma concentrations in samples from HIV patients treated with the drug.

METHODS

Plasma samples were extracted by liquid-liquid extraction followed by evaporation to dryness and reconstitution in mobile phase. The chromatographic separation was carried out on an AQUITY UPLC C18 column with an isocratic mobile phase consisting of water containing 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (50:50 vol/vol). The detection was performed on a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer using multi-reaction monitoring via electrospray ionization source with positive ionization mode.

RESULTS

Under these conditions, a single chromatographic run could be completed within 1 minute. The method was validated by estimating the precision and the accuracy for inter- and intra-day analysis in the concentration range of 5-2560 ng/mL. The method was linear over the investigated range with all the correlation coefficients, r, greater than 0.995 on 5 replicates. The intra- and inter-day precision (percentage of coefficient of variation) ranged from 2.4% to 11.2%, and the inaccuracy (percent of relative standard deviation) ranged from 2.5% to 12.9%. No significant matrix effect was observed. The mean recovery value of RTG was 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

This rapid and sensitive method was validated and could be applied to pharmacokinetic studies for the determination of RTG concentrations in human plasma samples.

Variability of raltegravir plasma levels in the clinical setting

Therapeutic drug monitoring of raltegravir Ctrough levels was carried out in the setting of the Raltegravir Switch for Toxicity or Adverse events (RASTA) trial, a randomized pilot study exploring a 48-week safety and efficacy of treatment switch to raltegravir associated with tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine in patients with regimens with optimal virologic control. Blood sampling for measurement of raltegravir plasma levels was carried out at weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48. Plasma samples were analysed by a recently developed and validated UPLC-MS method. A total of 164 samples from 39 patients were assayed. Analysis for intra- and inter-subject variability was restricted to those patients with 4 or more determinations, including 30 patients and 142 determinations. The intra- and inter-subject variability measures were 85.9 and 124.6%, respectively, with an intra-/inter-subject variability ratio of 69%. We also analysed data from a subset of patients with well-documented adherence to protocol, defined as protocol compliant population, including 21 patients and 93 determinations. In this subpopulation, we estimated intra- and inter-subject variability of 79.87% and 110%, respectively, with an intra-/inter-subject variability ratio of 72.6%. This study confirms the notion that raltegravir is a highly variable drug according to the European Medicines Agency criteria. While this condition does not favour the adoption of therapeutic drug monitoring in the clinical practice, the latter is deemed useful in patients with drug plasma concentrations below or near the threshold level of efficacy (since intracellular raltegravir levels might be as low as 5% of the corresponding plasma levels), or to identify drug-drug interactions of potential clinical relevance.