Choosing Daily Labs Wisely in the Hospital: A Novel Tool for Assessing Laboratory Testing Appropriateness

Reducing Iatrogenic Blood Losses in Premature Infants

OBJECTIVE

Iatrogenic blood losses from repetitive laboratory testing are a leading cause of anemia of prematurity and blood transfusions. We used an implementation science approach to decrease iatrogenic blood losses during the first 3 postnatal weeks among very low birth weight infants.

METHODS

We performed qualitative interviews of key stakeholders to assess implementation determinants (ie, barriers and facilitators to reducing iatrogenic blood losses), guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Next, we selected implementation strategies matched to these implementation determinants to de-implement excess laboratory tests. The number of laboratory tests, amount of blood taken (ml/kg), and laboratory charges were compared before and after implementation using quasi-Poisson and multi-variable regression models.

RESULTS

Qualitative interviews with 14 clinicians revealed implementation-related themes, including provider-specific factors, recurring orders, awareness of blood loss and cost, and balance between over- and under-testing. Implementation strategies deployed included resident education, revised order sets, blood loss and cost awareness, audit and feedback, and the documentation of blood out. There were 184 and 170 infants in the pre- and postimplementation cohorts, respectively. There was an 18.5% reduction in laboratory tests (median 54 [36 - 80] versus 44 [29 - 74], P = .01) in the first 3 postnatal weeks, a 17% decrease in blood taken (mean 18.1 [16.4 - 20.1] versus 15 [13.4 - 16.8], P = .01), and an overall reduction of $290 328 in laboratory charges. No difference was noted in the number of blood transfusions. Postimplementation interviews showed no adverse events attributable to implementation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

An implementation science approach combining qualitative and quantitative methods reduced laboratory tests, blood loss, and charges.

Evaluation of Routine Postoperative Labs Following Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients With Normal Preoperative Renal Function

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate predictors of abnormal routine postoperative day 1 (POD1) labs in patients with normal pre-operative renal function following robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and the associated clinical outcomes of these lab results.

METHODS

We analyzed 500 consecutive RAPN from a single surgeon series. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) III or greater were excluded from the study. Three hundred ninty-three RAPN were included in the analysis. Routine POD1 lab tests including hemoglobin (Hgb), creatinine, potassium, and sodium were evaluated to determine rates of abnormal values and rates of clinical intervention. Abnormal Hgb at POD1 was defined as <8 g/dL or ≥3 g/dL decrease from the preoperative (baseline) value. Abnormal sodium (Na) preoperatively and postoperatively was defined as <135 mEq/L or >145 mEq/L. Abnormal potassium (K) was defined preoperatively and POD1 as <3.5 mEq/L or >5 mEq/L.

RESULTS

Of 37.4% (147/393) had one or more abnormal labs at POD1. Of the 101 patients with abnormal Hgb, 15 patients required blood transfusion. Twenty-six patients had abnormal sodium for which two were treated with IV fluids. Twenty-seven patients had potassium abnormalities (12/25 were hypokalemia). Acute kidney injury stage I was seen in 27 patients (6.9%) and stage II in 3 (0.8%). Patients with abnormal labs were more likely to have larger renal mass, higher R.E.N.A.L. scores, intraoperative complications, longer operative times, and higher EBL on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

POD1 serum laboratory tests appear to be necessary following RAPN in patients with normal pre-operative renal function.