Functional Volumetric MRI in Assessing Treatment Response to Intra-Arterial Therapy of Primary and Secondary Liver Tumors:

Assessment of Treatment Response Following Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization of Liver Malignancies

Transarterial radioembolization using yttrium-90 microspheres is an established and effective treatment for liver malignancies. Determining response to this treatment is difficult due to the radical changes that occur in tissue as a response to radiation. Though accurate assessment of treatment response is paramount for proper patient disposition, there is currently no standardized assessment protocol. Current methods of assessment often consider changes in size, necrosis, vascularity, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography FDG-PET metabolic activity, and diffusion using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). Current methods of assessment require a lag time of one to two months post-treatment to determine treatment effectiveness. This delay is a hindrance to obtaining better patient outcomes, giving rise to a need to identify markers for faster determination of treatment efficacy.

Quantitative volumetric functional MR imaging: an imaging biomarker of early treatment response in hypo-vascular liver metastasis patients after yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization

PURPOSE

To evaluate the value of quantitative volumetric functional MR imaging in early assessment of response to yttrium-90-labeled ((90)Y) transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with hypo-vascular liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy four metastatic lesions in 14 patients with hypo-vascular liver metastases after TARE were included in this retrospective study. Diffusion and contrast-enhanced MR imaging was performed before and early after treatment. All MR images were analyzed by two experienced radiologists. Response by anatomic metrics (RECIST, mRECIST, EASL) and functional metrics (ADC and arterial and venous enhancement) were reported in targeted and non-targeted lesions. A two-sample paired t test was used to compare the changes after TARE. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The anatomic metrics did not show any significant changes in both targeted and non-targeted groups. Targeted lesions demonstrated an increase in mean volumetric ADC (23.4%; p = 0.01), a decrease in arterial and venous enhancement (-22.9% and -6.7%, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) 1 month after treatment. Twenty one responding lesions (42%) by RECIST at 6 months demonstrated a significant increase in volumetric ADC (37.2%; p = 0.01), decrease in arterial and venous enhancement (-58.5% and -23.9%, respectively; p < 0.001) at 1 month post-treatment. Responding lesions did not change significantly by anatomic metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

RECIST, mRECIST, and EASL criteria failed to stratify lesions into responders and non-responders early after TARE in hypo-vascular liver metastasis. Quantitative volumetric functional MR imaging could be a promising tool as a biomarker for predicting early response and can potentially be utilized in clinical trials.

Hepatic imaging following intra-arterial embolotherapy

PURPOSE

To discuss guidelines and salient imaging findings of solid tumors treated with common intra-arterial procedures used in interventional oncology.

METHODS

A meticulous literature search of PubMed-indexed articles was conducted. Key words included "imaging + embolization," "imaging + TACE," "imaging + radioembolization," "imaging + Y90," "mRECIST," and "EASL." Representative post-treatment cross-sectional images were obtained from past cases in this institution.

RESULTS

Intra-arterial therapy (IAT) in interventional oncology includes bland embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization. Solid tumors of the liver are the primary focus of these procedures. Cross-sectional CT and/or MR are the main modalities used to image tumors after treatment. Traditional size-based response criteria (WHO and RECIST) alone are of limited utility in determining response to IAT; tumoral necrosis and enhancement must be considered. Specifically for HCC, the EASL and mRECIST guidelines are becoming widely adopted response criteria to assess these factors. DWI, FDG-PET, and CEUS are modalities that play an adjunctive but controversial role.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologists must be aware that the different forms of intra-arterial therapy yield characteristic findings on cross-sectional imaging. Knowledge of these findings is integral to accurate assessment of tumor response and progression.

Liver Malignancies Treated With Intra-Arterial Therapy: Assessment of Early Response as Quantified by Volumetric Enhancement Using Gadoxetate Disodium

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the value of volumetric contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using gadoxetate disodium in early assessment of treatment response after intra-arterial therapy (IAT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 21 patients (32 malignant lesions) who underwent MRI using gadoxetate disodium before and early after IAT. Two reviewers reported response by anatomic criteria including Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST), Modified RECIST (mRECIST), and European Association for the Study of Liver Disease and functional criteria including volumetric enhancement in hepatic arterial phase and portal venous phase. Treatment end point was RECIST at 6 months. A 2-sample paired t test was used to compare the mean changes after IAT. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Responders by RECIST at 6 months did not fulfill partial response by conventional criteria at 1 month, except for mRECIST by reader 2. The mRECIST and European Association for the Study of Liver Disease could not be assessed in a total of 4 and 3 lesions for readers 1 and 2, respectively. However, volumetric measurements were obtained in all lesions and the changes were statistically significant at 1 month for hepatic arterial phase (P = 0.02 and P = 0.008) and portal venous phase (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001), as assessed by both readers, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Volumetric contrast-enhanced MRI using gadoxetate disodium may be a helpful tool to evaluate early treatment response after IAT in malignant liver tumors.