Preoperative T staging of gastric cancer: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38:544-550. [PMID: 24733002 DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000090]

Cross-sectional imaging of gastric cancer: pearls, pitfalls and lessons learned from multidisciplinary conference

Gastric cancer is rising in prevalence associated with high mortality, primarily due to late-stage detection, underscoring the imperative for early and precise diagnosis. Etiology involves an interplay of genetic susceptibilities and environmental factors with a prominent role of Helicobacter pylori infection. Due to its often-delayed symptom presentation, prompt and accurate diagnosis is necessary. A multimodal imaging approach, including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is critical for accurate staging. Each modality contributes unique advantages and limitations, highlighting the importance of integrating diagnostic strategy. Moreover, multidisciplinary conferences offer a vital collaborative platform, bringing together specialists from diverse fields for treatment planning. This synergistic approach not only enhances diagnostic precision but also improves patient outcome. This review highlights the critical role of imaging in diagnosis, staging, and management and advocates for interdisciplinary collaboration in early detection and comprehensive management of gastric cancer, aiming to reduce mortality.

Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer, with high morbidity and mortality rates, is one of the most heterogeneous tumors. Radical gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy are the standard treatments. However, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) need to be confirmed by many trials before implementation, creating a bottleneck in development. Although clinical benefits of NAT have been observed, a series of problems remain to be solved. Before therapy, more contributing factors should be offered for choice in the intended population and ideal regimens. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning is usually applied to evaluate effectiveness according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), yet CT scanning results sometimes differ from pathological responses. After NAT, the appropriate time for surgery is still empirically defined. Our review aims to discuss the abovementioned issues regarding NAT for GC, including indications, selection of regimens, lesion assessment and NAT-surgery interval time.

Preoperative T2-weighted MR imaging texture analysis of gastric cancer: prediction of TNM stages

PURPOSE

To explore the capability of algorithms to build multivariate models integrating morphological and texture features derived from preoperative T₂-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images of gastric cancer (GC) to evaluate tumor- (T), node- (N), and metastasis- (M) stages.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients at our hospital who underwent abdominal MR imaging and were diagnosed with GC from December 2011 to November 2016 were retrospectively included. Texture features were calculated using T₂-weighted images with a manual region of interest. Morphological characteristics were also evaluated. Classifiers and regression analyses were used to build multivariate models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess diagnostic efficacy.

RESULTS

There were 8, 10, and 3 texture parameters that showed significant differences in GCs at different overall (I-II vs. III-IV), T (1-2 vs. 3-4), and N (- vs. +) stages (all p < 0.05), respectively. Mild thickening was more common in stages I-II, T1-2, and N- GCs (all p < 0.05). An irregular outer contour was more commonly observed in stages III-IV (p = 0.001) and T3-4 (p = 0.001) GCs. T3-4 and N+ GCs tended to be thickening type lesions (p = 0.005 and 0.032, respectively). The multivariate models using the naive bayes algorithm showed the highest diagnostic efficacy in predicting T and N stages (area under the ROC curves [AUC] = 0.900 and 0.863, respectively), and the model based on regression analysis had the best predictive performance in overall staging (AUC = 0.839).

CONCLUSION

Multivariate models combining morphological characteristics with texture parameters based on machine learning algorithms were able to improve diagnostic efficacy in predicting the overall, T, and N stages of GCs.

Quantitative study of preoperative staging of gastric cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as a potential clinical index

PURPOSE

To determine the utility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging in quantitative analysis of preoperative tumor (T) and node (N) stages of gastric cancer, and to quantify the diagnostic threshold of IVIM parameters for serosal invasion and lymphatic metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 2016 to February 2020, 98 patients with gastric cancer who were receiving treatment in Zhongshan Hospital, China, were subject to an IVIM sequence imaging analysis. The IVIM sequence data were imported into software for post-processing of tumor regions of interest, and the IVIM parameters (the microvascular volume fraction (f), the molecular diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion-related incoherent microcirculation (D*) were calculated. The variation of these IVIM parameters with different tumor-node metastasis (TNM) stages were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. The IVIM parameters of serosal invasion and lymphatic metastasis were examined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and t-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 98 gastric cancer patients (65 males and 33 females) with an average age of 61.9 years were enrolled in this study. There were 14 patients in stage T1, 14 in stage T2, 10 in stage T3 and 60 in stage T4_a+b. There were 37 patients in stage N0, 19 in stage N1, 18 in stage N2 and 24 in stage N3. Statistically significant associations were found between the D values and T stages of gastric cancer. The D values of stage T4 cancers were significantly different from those of stage T2, T3 and T4 cancers. The D value decreased with increasing T stage. The mean D values of stages were 1.432 × 10^-3 mm²/s (T1), 1.225 × 10^-3 mm²/s (T2), 1.154 × 10^-3 mm²/s (T3) and 0.9468 × 10^-3 mm²/s (T4). The extent of the invasion of serosa was found to be significantly correlated with D value, with the diagnostic threshold for D being 1.107 × 10^-3 mm²/s. In addition, different pathological N stages of gastric cancer lesions showed statistically significantly variations in f values, but no correlation was found with different N stages. Finally, the extent of lymphatic metastasis was found to be correlated with D values, with the diagnostic threshold being 1.1739 × 10^-3 mm²/s. There was no statistically significant correlation between the IVIM MRI parameters and tumor size. The grade of tumor was found to be significantly correlated with D* value, with the diagnostic threshold for D* being 1.516 × 10^-2 mm²/s. There was no statistically significant correlation between the ADC value and tumor size. There was a significant difference in the ADC values among different T and N stage cancers. ADC value had statistically significant to distinguish gastric cancer with or without serosal invasion, its detection efficiency was not as high as that of D value, with an AUC of 0.628 and 0.830, respectively. The ADC value was not statistically significant in distinguishing gastric cancer with or without lymphatic metastasis (P ≥ 0.05). The ADC value had not statistically significant in distinguishing gastric cancer between low and medium-high grade (P ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We found that significant differences existed between whole-volume IVIM parameters of different T or N stages in gastric cancers, and were able to quantify different T or N stages of gastric cancer by the values of these parameters. The results of this quantitative study provide new tools for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer and will be valuable for the development of an new imaging method for determining the morphological stages of gastric cancer.

Use of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Gastric Cancer Staging

BACKGROUND

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), the quantitative parameter of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), is a measure for this restricted diffusion, and its role in gastric cancer (GC) including distinguishing malignant segments from healthy gastric wall, metastatic perigastric lymph nodes from benign nodes and evaluating response of GC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been investigated in previous studies. Evidence suggests that ADC may also be of help in assessment of aggressiveness and preoperative staging of gastric cancer, which needs to be explored in further studies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of DW-MRI and its quantitative parameter, ADC in staging of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Forty-six patients (28 male, 18 female, mean age 62 years) with non-metastatic biopsy- proven GC who underwent abdominal DW-MRI before surgery were included in this retrospective study. Tumor invasion depth (T-stage) and nodal involvement (N-stage) were evaluated using signal increase on DW-MRI, and tumor ADC was measured. Diagnostic performance of these results was assessed by comparing them with postsurgical histopathology based on 8th TNM classification.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DW-MRI in T-staging were 92.1%, 75%, 89.1% for ≤T2 vs. ≥T3; and 75%, 88.5%, 82.6% for ≤T3 vs. T4. However, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DW-MRI in N-staging were 89.3%, 88.9%, 89.1% for ≤N1 vs. ≥N2; and 73.7%, 96.3%, 86.9% for ≤N2 vs. N3, respectively. Relative preoperative ADC values correlated with pT staging (r=-0.397, p=0.006). There was also a statistically significant difference of relative ADC values between ≤T3 and T4 stages, and a cut-off of 0.64 s/mm2 could differentiate these stages with an odds ratio of 7.714 (95% confidence interval, 1.479-40.243). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differentiating ≤T3 and T4 stages was 0.725.

CONCLUSION

DW-MRI may contribute to the clinical staging of non-metastatic GC. In particular, relative ADC of DW-MRI can distinguish T4 gastric cancer from less advanced T-stages.

Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI

Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer and the assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment is of importance for treatment and prognosis. Current imaging techniques, mainly endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET), have their limitations. Historically, the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in gastric cancer has been limited, but with the continuous technical improvements, MRI has become a more potent imaging technique for gastrointestinal malignancies. The accuracy of MRI for T- and N-staging of gastric cancer is similar to EUS and CT, making MRI a suitable alternative to other imaging strategies. There is limited evidence on the performance of MRI for M-staging of gastric cancer specifically, but MRI is widely used for diagnosing liver metastases and shows potential for diagnosing peritoneal seeding. Recent pilot studies showed that treatment response assessment as well as detection of lymph node metastases and systemic disease might benefit from functional MRI (e.g. diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhancement). Regarding treatment guidance, additional value of MRI might be expected from its role in better defining clinical target volumes and setup verification with MR-guided radiation treatment.

Value of multi-slice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes and N-stage of gastric cancer

Objective

To establish new diagnostic criteria for improvement of the accuracy of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) in diagnosing the N-stage and lymph node (LN) metastasis of gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

MSCT was performed with plain and triphasic dynamic contrast enhancement. Different regions of LN metastasis and N-staging were determined according to the herein-proposed combined diagnostic criteria and were then correlated with the pathological analysis. The Kappa consistency test was used to study the accuracy of MSCT.

Results

The accuracy of MSCT in diagnosing the N-stage as a whole was 86.3%, and that in diagnosing LN metastasis was 79.1% to 98.9%. The Kappa values for stages N0, N1, and N3 ranged from 0.449 to 0.662, indicating good consistency in diagnosing these three stages between MSCT and the postsurgical pathological results. The K_total value was 0.567 between MSCT and the postsurgical pathological results in diagnosing LN metastasis. The risk of LN metastasis increased with the progression of lesion infiltrates.

Conclusions

Application of the combined diagnostic criteria increased the diagnostic performance of MSCT in not only judging the N-stage but also diagnosing LN metastasis. This study will provide valuable reference data for surgical planning for patients with GC in the clinical setting.

Gastric cancer and imaging biomarkers: Part 1 - a critical review of DW-MRI and CE-MDCT findings

Abstract

The current standard of care for gastric cancer imaging includes heterogeneity in image acquisition techniques and qualitative image interpretation. In addition to qualitative assessment, several imaging techniques, including diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CE-MDCT), dynamic-contrast enhanced MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, can allow quantitative analysis. However, so far there is no consensus regarding the application of functional imaging in the management of gastric cancer. The aim of this article is to specifically review two promising biomarkers for gastric cancer with reasonable spatial resolution: the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DW-MRI and textural features from CE-MDCT. We searched MEDLINE/ PubMed for manuscripts published from inception to 6 February 2018. Initially, we searched for (gastric cancer OR gastric tumour) AND diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Then, we searched for (gastric cancer OR gastric tumour) AND texture analysis AND computed tomography. We collated the results from the studies related to this query. There is evidence that: (1) the ADC is a promising biomarker for the evaluation of the aggressiveness (T and N stage), treatment response and prognosis of gastric cancer; (2) textural features are related to the degree of differentiation, Lauren classification, treatment response and prognosis of gastric cancer. We conclude that these imaging biomarkers hold promise as effective additional tools in the diagnostic pathway of gastric cancer and may facilitate the multidisciplinary work between the radiologist and clinician, and across different institutions, to provide a greater biological understanding of gastric cancer.

Key Points

• Quantitative imaging is the extraction of quantifiable features from medical images for the assessment of normal or pathological conditions and represents a promising area for gastric cancer.

• Quantitative analysis from CE-MDCT and DW-MRI allows the extrapolation of multiple imaging biomarkers.

• ADC from DW-MRI and CE- MDCT-based texture features are non-invasive, quantitative imaging biomarkers that hold promise in the evaluation of the aggressiveness, treatment response and prognosis of gastric cancer.

Role of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging in preoperative assessing HER2 status of gastric cancers

Purpose

To explore the role of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of gastric cancers preoperatively.

Results

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and pure diffusion coefficient (D) values correlated positively with HER2 scores of gastric cancers significantly (r = 0.276, P = 0.048; r = 0.481, P < 0.001, respectively). The ADC and D values of HER2 positive gastric cancers were significantly higher than those of HER2 negative tumors (P = 0.033, 0.007, respectively). With a cut-off value of 1.321 and 1.123 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec, the ADC and D values could distinguish HER2 positive gastric cancers from HER2 negative ones with an area under the curve of 0.733 and 0.762, respectively (P = 0.023, 0.011, respectively).

Materials and methods

Fifty-three patients with gastric cancers underwent IVIM MR imaging preoperatively. The values of ADC, D, pseudo diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion related fraction (f) of the lesions were obtained. Partial correlation test including tumor volume was performed to analyze correlations between IVIM values and HER2 scores excluding the impact of tumor size. IVIM parameters of gastric cancers with different HER2 status were compared using independent samples t test. Diagnostic performance of IVIM parameters in distinguishing HER2 positive gastric cancers from negative ones was tested with receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Conclusions

We confirmed the feasibility of IVIM MR imaging in preoperative assessment of HER2 status of gastric cancers, which might make up the shortfall of biopsy and facilitate personalized treatment for patients with gastric cancers.

Contribution of diffusion weighted MRI to diagnosis and staging in gastric tumors and comparison with multi-detector computed tomography

Background

Diagnostic performance of Diffusion-Weighted magnetic resonance Imaging (DWI) and Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) for TNM (Tumor, Lymph node, Metastasis) staging of gastric cancer was compared.

Patients and methods

We used axial T2-weighted images and DWI (b-0,400 and b-800 s/mm2) protocol on 51 pre-operative patients who had been diagnosed with gastric cancer. We also conducted MDCT examinations on them. We looked for a signal increase in the series of DWI images. The depth of tumor invasion in the stomach wall (tumor (T) staging), the involvement of lymph nodes (nodal (N) staging), and the presence or absence of metastases (metastatic staging) in DWI and CT images according to the TNM staging system were evaluated. In each diagnosis of the tumors, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative accuracy rates of DWI and MDCT examinations were found through a comparison with the results of the surgical pathology, which is the gold standard method. In addition to the compatibilities of each examination with surgical pathology, kappa statistics were used.

Results

Sensitivity and specificity of DWI and MDCT in lymph node staging were as follows: N1: DWI: 75.0%, 84.6%; MDCT: 66.7%, 82%;N2: DWI: 79.3%, 77.3%; MDCT: 69.0%, 68.2%; N3: DWI: 60.0%, 97.6%; MDCT: 50.0%, 90.2%. The diagnostic tool DWI seemed more compatible with the gold standard method (surgical pathology), especially in the staging of lymph node, when compared to MDCT. On the other hand, in T staging, the results of DWI and MDCT were better than the gold standard when the T stage increased. However, DWI did not demonstrate superiority to MDCT. The sensitivity and specificity of both imaging techniques for detecting distant metastasis were 100%.

Conclusions

The diagnostic accuracy of DWI for TNM staging in gastric cancer before surgery is at a comparable level with MDCT and adding DWI to routine protocol of evaluating lymph nodes metastasis might increase diagnostic accuracy.

Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2 image fusion and positron emission tomography/computed tomography of upper gastrointestinal cancers

PURPOSE

Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2 image fusion (DWIBS/T2) strongly contrasts cancerous tissue against background healthy tissues. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) applies the uptake of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in the diagnosis of cancer. Our aim was to compare DWIBS/T2 and PET/CT in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers.

METHODS

Patient records, including imaging results from July 2012 to March 2015, were analyzed retrospectively. Four men (age, 72.5 ± 5.3 years) and ten women (age, 71.6 ± 4.0 years) were enrolled in this study. The numbers of patients with esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and duodenal cancer were one, eight, three, and two, respectively.

RESULTS

Six out of eight patients with gastric cancer had positive results on both DWIBS/T2 and PET/CT. The diameter and depth of invasion of gastric cancer was larger in patients with positive DWIBS/T2 and PET/CT findings than those with negative findings. These results suggested that patients with gastric cancer with larger pixel numbers might tend to show positive results with DWIBS/T2.

CONCLUSIONS

DWIBS/T2 and PET/CT have similar sensitivity for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancer. The diameter and depth of invasion affected the detectability of gastric cancer.

Assessment of histological differentiation in gastric cancers using whole-volume histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of histogram analysis of the entire tumor volume in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for differentiating between histological grades in gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in a retrospective 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. ADC maps were obtained at two different b values (0 and 1000 sec/mm² ) for each patient. Tumors were delineated on each slice of the ADC maps, and a histogram for the entire tumor volume was subsequently generated. A series of histogram parameters (eg, skew and kurtosis) were calculated and correlated with the histological grade of the surgical specimen. The diagnostic performance of each parameter for distinguishing poorly from moderately well-differentiated gastric cancers was assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the 5^th , 10^th , 25^th , and 50^th percentiles, skew, and kurtosis between poorly and well-differentiated gastric cancers (P < 0.05). There were correlations between the degrees of differentiation and histogram parameters, including the 10^th percentile, skew, kurtosis, and max frequency; the correlation coefficients were 0.273, -0.361, -0.339, and -0.370, respectively. Among all the histogram parameters, the max frequency had the largest AUC value, which was 0.675.

CONCLUSION

Histogram analysis of the ADC maps on the basis of the entire tumor volume can be useful in differentiating between histological grades for gastric cancer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:440-449.

Advances in imaging of gastric cancer

Due to the advances in imaging technology, the diagnosis, staging, and efficacy evaluation of gastric cancer by imaging are continuously improving. This paper comprehensively analyzes different imaging methods in cancer research, focusing on new imaging techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, their advantages and limitations in clinical application, and the opportunities and challenges. Radiologists can take the initiative to collaborate with relevant clinical departments through a multidisciplinary platform with an open mind in the face of various problems presented clinically, understand the requirements for standardized diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, and fully communicate with imaging equipment providers and engineering and technical personnel to explore more methods and indicators to improve the diagnosis of this malignancy.

Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficients and HER2 status in gastric cancers: pilot study

Background

To evaluate whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of gastric cancer obtained from diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) correlates with the HER2 status.

Methods

Forty-five patients, who had been diagnosed with gastric cancer through biopsy, were enrolled in this IRB-approved study. Each patient underwent a DWI (b values: 0 and 1,000 sec/mm²) prior to surgery (curative gastrectomy or palliative resection). Postoperative microscopic findings, HER2 status by immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were obtained. HER2 status was compared among gastric cancers with various histopathological features using the chi square test. The ADC values of gastric cancers with positive and negative HER2 were compared using the student t test.

Results

A weak yet significant correlation was observed between the mean ADC values and HER2 status (r = 0.312, P = 0.037) and scores (r = 0.419, P = 0.004). The mean ADC value of HER2-positive gastric cancers was significantly higher than those of HER2-negative tumors (1.211 vs. 0.984 mm²/s, P = 0.020). The minimal ADC value of HER2-positive gastric cancers was significantly higher than those of HER2-negative tumors (1.105 vs. 0.905 × 10⁻³ mm²/s, P = 0.036).

Conclusions

In this pilot study, we have demonstrated that the ADC values of gastric cancer correlate with the HER2 status. Future research is warranted to see if DWI can predict HER2 status and help in tailoring therapy for gastric cancer.

Gastric Carcinoma: Ex Vivo MR Imaging at 7.0 T-Correlation with Histopathologic Findings

PURPOSE

To determine the imaging detail and diagnostic information that can be obtained at 7.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with a voxel volume of 9.5-14.0 nL as a means of evaluating the depth of mural invasion by gastric carcinomas ex vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Twenty gastric specimens containing 20 carcinomas were studied with a 7.0-T MR imaging system equipped with a four-channel surface coil. MR images were obtained with a 50-60 × 25-30 mm field of view, a 512 × 256 matrix, and a 1.0-mm section thickness, resulting in a voxel volume of 0.0095-0.0140 mm(3) (9.5-14.0 nL). The signal intensity of the gastric wall layers, tumor tissue, and fibrosis was described as low, intermediate, or high by comparing it with the signal intensity of the muscularis propria. Depth of invasion initially was assessed by two reviewers independently and then by the two reviewers in consensus. MR images were compared with histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

The 7.0-T T2-weighted MR images clearly depicted the normal gastric wall in all 20 specimens (100%) as consisting of seven layers, which clearly corresponded to the tissue layers of the gastric wall. These MR images enabled clear differentiation between tumor tissue and fibrosis. Reviewers disagreed on the depth of invasion at the initial reading in three (15%) of 20 specimens (between mucosa and submucosa in two specimens and between muscularis propria and subserosa and serosa in one specimen); however, in all 20 gastric carcinomas, the depth of invasion could be accurately determined on T2-weighted images after consensus interpretation.

CONCLUSION

Ex vivo 7.0-T MR imaging enables clear delineation of the gastric wall layers and clear differentiation of tumor tissue from fibrosis and allows one to assess the depth of mural invasion by gastric carcinomas.

Apparent diffusion coefficient value of gastric cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging: correlations with the histological differentiation and Lauren classification

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlations between histological differentiation and Lauren classification of gastric cancer and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with gastric cancer lesions underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (3.0T) and surgical resection. DWI was obtained with a single-shot, echo-planar imaging sequence in the axial plane (b values: 0 and 1000s/mm(2)). Mean and minimum ADC values were obtained for each gastric cancer and normal gastric walls by two radiologists, who were blinded to the histological findings. Histological type, degree of differentiation and Lauren classification of each resected specimen were determined by one pathologist. Mean and minimum ADC values of gastric cancers with different histological types, degrees of differentiation and Lauren classifications were compared. Correlations between ADC values and histological differentiation and Lauren classification were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean and minimum ADC values of gastric cancers, as a whole and separately, were significantly lower than those of normal gastric walls (all p values <0.001). There were significant differences in the mean and minimum ADC values among gastric cancers with different histological types, degrees of differentiation and Lauren classifications (p<0.05). Mean and minimum ADC values correlated significantly (all p<0.001) with histological differentiation (r=0.564, 0.578) and Lauren classification (r=-0.493, -0.481).

CONCLUSIONS

The ADC values may be helpful as a noninvasive tool for evaluating the histological features of gastric cancer, such as histological type, degree of differentiation and Lauren classification.