Residual Anatomical Disease in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients With FDG-PET-Based Complete Response After First-Line R-CHOP Therapy: Does It Have Any Prognostic Value?

Cell-free DNA and the monitoring of lymphoma treatment

The technique of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis, also called liquid biopsy, has been developed over the past several years to serve as a minimal residual disease tool, as has already been done with reliability and robustness in acute leukemias. This technique has important theoretical advantages, including the simplicity of acquiring blood samples, which can easily be repeated over time, its noninvasive and quantitative nature, which provides results consistent with the results obtained from tumor genomic DNA, and its speed and low cost. cfDNA analysis, as the leading tool to quantify somatic mutations, is a major technological leap in the noninvasive management of lymphomas. This technology may empower monitoring and treatment adjustment in real time and enable the quick detection of refractory lymphomas and resistance to routine therapies. Here, we summarize the results that have established the clinical relevance of cfDNA in diagnostic and prognostic stratification and the monitoring of lymphoma treatments.

End-of-Treatment PET/Computed Tomography Response in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

"PET imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), integrated with PET/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), is an effective management tool of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The results of end-of-treatment (EOT) FDG-PET/CT are more accurate for detection of active disease with residual masses on CT. Complete response defined by EOT FDG-PET/CT (PET-CR) correlates with long-term outcome of patients. Treatment efficacy is determined using EOT PET/CT rather than progression-free survival (PFS) for clinical trials assessing novel drugs. If the correlation of EOT PET/CT with PFS is further proven in large studies and meta-analyses, EOT PET-CR could serve as an expedited novel endpoint replacing PFS."

Analysis of prognostic value of complete response by PET-CT and further stratification by clinical and biological markers in DLBCL patients

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is performed as the standard method for response assessment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, a substantial proportion of patients experience relapse even if they have achieved complete response (CR) defined by PET-CT. We validated the prognostic value of CR by PET-CT and applied the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) and cell of origin (COO) to patients with CR by PET-CT to evaluate their additional predictive ability for survival outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed DLBCL patients who were treated with R-CHOP or an R-CHOP-like regimen and who achieved CR by PET-CT or CT only. A total of 185 patients were analyzed: 114 patients achieved CR by PET-CT and 71 patients by CT only. Patients with CR by PET-CT had significantly better overall survival (OS) than those with CR by CT (5-year OS, 87.5 vs. 62.4%, P = 0.003). Patients with high risk according to the NCCN-IPI had a dismal outcome despite achieving CR by PET-CT (5-year OS, 61.8%). In contrast, low-, low-intermediate-, and high-intermediate-risk patients had excellent outcomes (5-year OS, 100, 89.7, and 93.5%, respectively). Among patients with CR by PET-CT, patients with germinal center B cell (GCB) DLBCL (n = 40) had significantly better survival than those with non-GCB DLBCL (n = 57) (5-year OS, 96.9 vs. 75.5%, P = 0.039). We demonstrated that CR by PET-CT was a better predictor of survival outcomes than CR by CT only. The NCCN-IPI and COO subtypes could identify a subpopulation of poor-risk patients among those who achieved CR by PET-CT.