Improved Image Quality and Decreased Radiation Dose of Lower Extremity Computed Tomography Angiography Using Low-Tube-Voltage and Adaptive Iterative Reconstruction:

Comparison of CT image quality between the AIDR 3D and FIRST iterative reconstruction algorithms: an assessment based on phantom measurements and clinical images

Modern CT iterative reconstruction algorithms are transitioning from a statistical-based to model-based approach. However, increasing complexity does not ensure improved image quality for all indications, and thorough characterization of new algorithms is important to understand their potential clinical impacts. This study performs both quantitative and qualitative analyses of image quality to compare Canon's statistical-based Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) algorithm to its model-based algorithm, Forward-projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion(FIRST). A phantom was used to measure the task-specific modulation transfer function (MTF_Task), the noise power spectrum (NPS), and the low-contrast object-specific CNR (CNR_LO) for each algorithm using three dose levels and the convolution algorithm (kernel) appropriate for abdomen, lung, and brain imaging. Additionally, MTF_Taskwas measured at four contrast levels, and CNR_LOwas measured for two object sizes. Lastly, three radiologists participated in a preference study to compare clinical image quality for three study types: non-contrast abdomen, pulmonary embolism (PE), and lung screening. Nine questions related to the appearance of anatomical features or image quality characteristics were scored for twenty exams of each type. The behavior of both algorithms depended strongly on the kernel selected. Phantom measurements suggest that FIRST should be beneficial over AIDR 3D for abdomen imaging, but do not suggest a clear overall benefit to FIRST for lung or brain imaging; metrics suggest performance may be equivalent to or slightly favor AIDR 3D, depending on the size of the object being imaged and whether spatial resolution or low-contrast resolution is more important for the task at hand. Overall, radiologists strongly preferred AIDR 3D for lung screening, slightly preferred AIDR 3D for non-contrast abdomen, and had no preference for PE. FIRST was superior for the reduction of metal artifacts. Radiologist preference may be influenced by changes to noise texture.

Application value of iterative reconstruction with CTA to intractable headache patients

Application value of iterative reconstruction with computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in the patients with intractable headache was investigated. One hundred and eighty patients with headache, who were admitted and treated in Cangzhou Central Hospital, were selected to undergo CTA scan. The patients were divided into group A, B and C according to different scanning conditions and data reconstruction techniques. In group A, the scanning parameters were 120 kV and 300 mA, and filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm was used for data reconstruction. In group B, the scan parameters were 100 kV and automatic milliamperes. Further, adaptive iterative dose reduction via three-dimensional processing (AIDR-3D) was used for data reconstruction. In group C, the scan parameters were 80 kV with automatic milliamperes, and AIDR-3D technique was utilized for data reconstruction. The CT value, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), subjective assessment score of image quality and radiation dose of the three groups of images were compared. There were significant differences in CT values, standard deviation (SD) values, SNRs and CNRs of different vessel segments and muscles among the three groups (P<0.05). The image assessment scores at the levels of the atlas and C7 vertebra as well as those of the brain parenchyma in the three groups had notable differences (P<0.05). However, they showed no differences at the level of the C4 vertebra (P>0.05). Further, significant differences were observed in volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI_vol), dose-length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) (P<0.05). In conclusion, for patients with intractable headache, the image quality of the CTA scan using AIDR-3D reconstruction method showed better results over FBP reconstruction method. Further, best results were observed when the scan parameters were 100 kV, automatic milliamperes and the data reconstruction was performed by AIDR-3D.

Establishment of a three-dimensional finite element model of severe kyphotic deformity secondary to ankylosing spondylitis

Objective To establish a three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) model of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) kyphosis that is a digital platform for further studies. Methods A 30-year-old man with AS kyphosis underwent computed tomography transverse scanning from T1 to the sacrococcyx. The images were imported into Mimics® 17.0 software to establish a 3D model of the posterior spine, which was then imported into Studio Geomagic 2013 software. Posterior spine convex geometry was established on the 3D geometric model for subsequent optimization of image processing. Unigraphics NX 8.5 produced the spinal kyphosis surface model. Modeled calcification of ligaments and partial resection of useless sacral bone were added. The model was imported into ANSYS 15.0 FE analysis software. Ligaments were added. Parameters were set to generate a 3D FE model of AS. Results and Conclusion A 3D FE model of AS was successfully established, providing a reliable digital platform for subsequent biomechanical analysis.

May-Thurner syndrome: MDCT findings and clinical correlates

May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is a venous compression syndrome in which the left common iliac vein is compressed between the lower lumbar spine and the right common iliac artery. While asymptomatic compression is very common, the process can lead to morbidity in selected individuals, most commonly deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and the sequelae thereof. Radiologists must recognize the diagnosis because of the unique management, which differs from DVT without iliac vein compression. The current pictorial essay will review the pathophysiology, imaging, and treatment of MTS.