Comparison of the Timing of Hepatic Arterial Phase and Image Quality Using Test-Bolus and Bolus-Tracking Techniques in Gadolinium-Ethoxybenzyl-Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid-Enhanced Hepatic Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Dynamic Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Free Breathing: A Feasibility Study With a Motion Compensated Variable Density Radial Acquisition and a Viewsharing High-Pass Filtering Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Robust dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images are crucial for accurate detection and categorization of focal liver lesions in liver/abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As optimal dynamic imaging usually requires multiple breath-holds, its inherent susceptibility to motion artifacts frequently results in degraded image quality in incompliant patients. Because free-breathing imaging may overcome this drawback, the intention of this study was to evaluate a dynamic MRI sequence acquired during free breathing using the variable density, elliptical centric golden angle radial stack-of-stars radial sampling scheme, which so far has not been implemented in 4-dimensional applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective pilot study, 27 patients received a routine abdominal MRI protocol including the prototype free-breathing sequence (4DFreeBreathing) for dynamic imaging. This enables more convenient and faster reconstruction through variable density, elliptical centric golden angle radial stack-of-stars without the use of additional reconstruction hardware, and even higher motion robustness through soft-gating. A standard breath-hold sequence performed subsequently served as reference standard. Of the continuous dynamic data sets, each dynamic phase was analyzed regarding image quality, motion artifacts and vessel conspicuity using 5-point Likert scales. Furthermore, correct timing of the late arterial phase was compared with the preexaminations.

RESULTS

4DFreeBreathing delivered motion-free dynamic images with high temporal resolution in each subject. Overall image quality scores were rated good or excellent for 4DFreeBreathing and the gold standard without significant differences (P = 0.34). There were significantly less motion artifacts in the 4DFreeBreathing sequence (P < 0.0001), whereas vessel conspicuity in each dynamic phase was comparable for both groups (P = 0.45, P > 0.99, P = 0.22, respectively). Correct timing of the late arterial phase could be achieved in 27 of 27 (100%) examinations using 4DFreeBreathing versus 35 of 53 (66%) preexaminations using gold standard (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The benefit of convenient and fast image reconstruction combined with the superiority in motion robustness and timing compared with standard breath hold sequences renders 4DFreeBreathing an attractive alternative to existing free-breathing techniques in dynamic liver MRI.

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Assessment of arterial phase artifacts and hepatobiliary uptake in a large series

PURPOSE

To report the quality of gadoxetate disodium MRI in a large series by assessing the prevalence of: 1) arterial phase (AP) artifacts and its predictive factors, 2) decreased hepatic contrast uptake during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP).

METHODS

This retrospective single center study included 851 patients (M/F:537/314, mean age: 63y) with gadoxetate disodium MRI. The MRI protocol included unenhanced, dual arterial [early and late arterial phases (AP)], portal venous, transitional and hepatobiliary phases. Three radiologists graded dynamic images using a 5-scale score (1: no motion, 5: severe, nondiagnostic) for assessment of transient severe motion (TSM, defined as a score ≥4 during at least one AP with a score ≤3 during other phases). HBP uptake was assessed using a 3-scale score (based on portal vein/hepatic signal). The association between demographic, clinical and acquisition parameters with TSM was tested in uni- and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

TSM was observed in 103/851 patients (12.1 %): 83 (9.8 %) in one AP and 20 (2.3 %) in both APs. A score of 5 (nondiagnostic) was assigned in 7 patients in one AP (0.8 %) and none in both. Presence of TSM was significantly associated with age (p = 0.002) and liver disease (p = 0.033) in univariate but not in multivariate analysis (p > 0.05). No association was found between acquisition parameters and TSM occurrence. Limited or severely limited HBP contrast uptake was observed in 87 patients (10.2 %), and TSM was never associated with severely limited HBP contrast uptake.

CONCLUSION

TSM was present in approximately 12 % of gadoxetate disodium MRIs, rarely on both APs (2.3 %), and was poorly predicted. TSM was never associated with severely limited HBP contrast uptake.