Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Multislice Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Extremity Fractures:

Cone-beam computed tomography produces images of numerically comparable diagnostic quality for bone and inferior quality for soft tissues compared with fan-beam computed tomography in cadaveric equine metacarpophalangeal joints

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an emerging modality for imaging of the equine patient. The objective of this prospective, descriptive, exploratory study was to assess visualization tasks using CBCT compared with conventional fan-beam CT (FBCT) for imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joint in equine cadavers. Satisfaction scores were numerically excellent with both CBCT and FBCT for bone evaluation, and FBCT was numerically superior for soft tissue evaluation. Preference tests indicated FBCT was numerically superior for soft tissue evaluation, while preference test scoring for bone was observer-dependent. Findings from this study can be used as background for future studies evaluating CBCT image quality in live horses.

Detecting Bone Marrow Edema of the Extremities on Spectral Computed Tomography Using a Three-Material Decomposition

BACKGROUND

Detecting bone marrow edema (BME) as a sign of acute fractures is challenging on conventional computed tomography (CT). This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a three-material decomposition (TMD) approach for detecting traumatic BME of the extremities on spectral computed tomography (SCT).

METHODS

This retrospective diagnostic study included 81 bone compartments with and 80 without BME. A TMD application to visualize BME was developed in collaboration with Philips Healthcare. The following bone compartments were included: distal radius, proximal femur, proximal tibia, distal tibia and fibula, and long bone diaphysis. Two blinded radiologists reviewed each case independently in random order for the presence or absence of BME.

RESULTS

The interrater reliability was 0.84 (p < 0.001). The different bone compartments showed sensitivities of 86.7% to 93.8%, specificities of 84.2% to 94.1%, positive predictive values of 82.4% to 94.7%, negative predictive values of 87.5% to 93.3%, and area under the curve (AUC) values of 85.7% to 93.1%. The distal radius showed the highest sensitivity and the proximal femur showed the lowest sensitivity, while the proximal femur presented the highest specificity and the distal tibia presented the lowest specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our TMD approach provides high diagnostic performance for detecting BME of the extremities. Therefore, this approach could be used routinely in the emergency setting.

Musculoskeletal CT Imaging: State-of-the-Art Advancements and Future Directions

CT is one of the most widely used modalities for musculoskeletal imaging. Recent advancements in the field include the introduction of four-dimensional CT, which captures a CT image during motion; cone-beam CT, which uses flat-panel detectors to capture the lower extremities in weight-bearing mode; and dual-energy CT, which operates at two different x-ray potentials to improve the contrast resolution to facilitate the assessment of tissue material compositions such as tophaceous gout deposits and bone marrow edema. Most recently, photon-counting CT (PCCT) has been introduced. PCCT is a technique that uses photon-counting detectors to produce an image with higher spatial and contrast resolution than conventional multidetector CT systems. In addition, postprocessing techniques such as three-dimensional printing and cinematic rendering have used CT data to improve the generation of both physical and digital anatomic models. Last, advancements in the application of artificial intelligence to CT imaging have enabled the automatic evaluation of musculoskeletal pathologies. In this review, the authors discuss the current state of the above CT technologies, their respective advantages and disadvantages, and their projected future directions for various musculoskeletal applications.

Human Bone Typing Using Quantitative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

INTRODUCTION

Bone typing is crucial to enable the choice of a suitable implant, the surgical technique, and the evaluation of the clinical outcome. Currently, bone typing is assessed subjectively by the surgeon.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to establish an automatic quantification method to determine local bone types by the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for an observer-independent approach.

METHODS

Six adult human cadaver skulls were used. The 4 generally used bone types in dental implantology and orthodontics were identified, and specific Hounsfield unit (HU) ranges (grey-scale values) were assigned to each bone type for identification by quantitative CBCT (qCBCT). The selected scanned planes were labelled by nonradiolucent markers for reidentification in the backup/cross-check evaluation methods. The selected planes were then physically removed as thick bone tissue sections for in vitro correlation measurements by qCBCT, quantitative micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and quantitative histomorphometry.

RESULTS

Correlation analyses between the different bone tissue quantification methods to identify bone types based on numerical ranges of HU values revealed that the Pearson correlation coefficient of qCBCT with micro-CT and quantitative histomorphometry was R = 0.9 (P = .001) for all 4 bone types .

CONCLUSIONS

We found that  qCBCT can reproducibly and objectively assess human bone types at implant sites.

Computed Tomography: State-of-the-Art Advancements in Musculoskeletal Imaging

ABSTRACT

Although musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a dominant role in characterizing abnormalities, novel computed tomography (CT) techniques have found an emerging niche in several scenarios such as trauma, gout, and the characterization of pathologic biomechanical states during motion and weight-bearing. Recent developments and advancements in the field of musculoskeletal CT include 4-dimensional, cone-beam (CB), and dual-energy (DE) CT. Four-dimensional CT has the potential to quantify biomechanical derangements of peripheral joints in different joint positions to diagnose and characterize patellofemoral instability, scapholunate ligamentous injuries, and syndesmotic injuries. Cone-beam CT provides an opportunity to image peripheral joints during weight-bearing, augmenting the diagnosis and characterization of disease processes. Emerging CBCT technologies improved spatial resolution for osseous microstructures in the quantitative analysis of osteoarthritis-related subchondral bone changes, trauma, and fracture healing. Dual-energy CT-based material decomposition visualizes and quantifies monosodium urate crystals in gout, bone marrow edema in traumatic and nontraumatic fractures, and neoplastic disease. Recently, DE techniques have been applied to CBCT, contributing to increased image quality in contrast-enhanced arthrography, bone densitometry, and bone marrow imaging. This review describes 4-dimensional CT, CBCT, and DECT advances, current logistical limitations, and prospects for each technique.

Weight-bearing cone-beam CT: the need for standardised acquisition protocols and measurements to fulfill high expectations-a review of the literature

Weight bearing CT (WBCT) of the lower extremity is gaining momentum in evaluation of the foot/ankle and knee. A growing number of international studies use WBCT, which is promising for improving our understanding of anatomy and biomechanics during natural loading of the lower extremity. However, we believe there is risk of excessive enthusiasm for WBCT leading to premature application of the technique, before sufficiently robust protocols are in place e.g. standardised limb positioning and imaging planes, choice of anatomical landmarks and image slices used for individual measurements. Lack of standardisation could limit benefits from introducing WBCT in research and clinical practice because useful imaging information could become obscured. Measurements of bones and joints on WBCT are influenced by joint positioning and magnitude of loading, factors that need to be considered within a 3-D coordinate system. A proportion of WBCT studies examine inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for different radiological measurements in the knee or foot with reproducibility generally reported to be high. However, investigations of test-retest reproducibility are still lacking. Thus, the current ability to evaluate, e.g. the effects of surgery or structural disease progression, is questionable. This paper presents an overview of the relevant literature on WBCT in the lower extremity with an emphasis on factors that may affect measurement reproducibility in the foot/ankle and knee. We discuss the caveats of performing WBCT without consensus on imaging procedures and measurements.

The Use of Computerized Tomography Scans in Elective Knee and Hip Arthroplasty—What Do They Tell Us and at What Risk?

The average background radiation exposure in the United States has nearly doubled over the previous quarter century, with almost all the increase derived from medical imaging. Nearly 2% of all cancers in the United States may be attributable to radiation from computerized tomography (CT) scans. Given the nondiagnostic nature of CT scans that are used in elective knee and hip arthroplasty today, special consideration should be given to the inherent risk of radiation exposure with routine use of this technology. Methods to decrease radiation exposure including modulating the settings of the CT machine and using alternative non-CT-based systems can decrease patient exposure to radiation from CT scans. The rapid evolution of CT technology in arthroplasty has allowed for expanded clinical applications, the benefits of which remain controversial.

Impact of introducing extremity cone-beam CT in an emergency radiology department: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal cone-beam CT (CBCT) recently appeared on the market, with image quality comparable to that of high-resolution CT. It was previously implemented mainly in craniofacial surgery and in orthopedic limb surgery for weight-bearing imaging, but without large-scale assessment in emergency settings. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in an emergency radiology department: 1) to assess whether introduction of CBCT dedicated to extremity traumatology reduced radiation dose delivered to the patient undergoing cross-sectional imaging, 2) to assess whether it increased turnover, and 3) to study the feasibility and practical consequences. Study hypothesis Introducing CBCT dedicated to traumatology in an emergency radiology department reduces radiation dose related to cross-sectional imaging in extremity trauma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two periods were distinguished: in May-November 2016, the only cross-sectional imaging available in our emergency radiology department was multi-detector CT (MDCT); in May-November 2017, both MDCT and CBCT were available. Thus, the population in period 1 (n=165) had undergone only MDCT extremity imaging, while patients in period 2 underwent either CBCT (n=139) or MDCT (n=85). Study parameters notably included dose-length product (DLP) and length of patient stay in the radiology department (turnover).

RESULTS

Mean DLP was significantly reduced with the introduction of CBCT: 210.3±133.6 mGy.cm (range, 20-595) in period 1, versus 138.4±92.7 mGy.cm (range, 32-623) in period 2 (p<0.0001). Taking both periods together, mean DLP was 50.7% lower with CBCT (n=139) than MDCT (n=249): respectively, 101.6±14.9 mGy.cm (range, 50.6-126.9) versus 206.5±131.8 mGy.cm (range, 20-623) (p<0.0001). Turnover accelerated with the introduction of CBCT, with mean stay of 84.9minutes in period 1 versus 72.1minutes in period 2 (p=0.011). In period 2, turnover was 23.6% faster with CBCT than MDCT: respectively, 64.9minutes versus 85.0minutes (p=0.0004).

DISCUSSION

Introducing CBCT dedicated to the extremities in an emergency radiology department was feasible. It reduced overall radiation dose and accelerated turnover.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative case-control study.

Diagnostic performance of cone-beam computed tomography for scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fractures. Diagnosing scaphoid fractures is challenging. Recently, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been shown to be a promising strategy for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. The diagnostic performance of CBCT remains inconclusive in the literature. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, our study aims to determine the diagnostic performance of CBCT for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. Five databases were searched up to March 25, 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies describing the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for scaphoid fractures in adult patients. QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Four studies (n = 350) were included in the meta-analysis. Three of the four studies had high bias risk. The result showed that CBCT had a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 and a pooled specificity of 0.99 for scaphoid fracture diagnosis. The heterogeneities of sensitivity and specificity were substantial. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98. No significant publication bias was observed. The result suggested that the diagnostic performance of CBCT for scaphoid fracture was excellent. The certainty of current evidence is low. Further well-designed studies with large sample sizes are warranted to confirm this finding.

Comparison of 3D X-ray tomography with computed tomography in patients with distal extremity fractures

OBJECTIVE

To compare fracture detection, image quality, and radiation dose in patients with distal extremity fractures using 3D tomography and computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IRB approval was obtained including informed consent for this prospective study from June to December 2016. Patients diagnosed with an acute fracture at CT were consecutively scanned on the same day using 3D tomography. Anatomical location (effected bone and location within the bone) and morphological characteristics of fractures (avulsion, articular involvement, mono- vs. multifragmented, displacement), visibility of bone/soft tissue structures, and image quality were assessed independently by two blinded readers on a 5-point Likert scale. Dose-length-product (DLP; mGy*cm) was compared between both modalities. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed rank test (P < 0.05), Student's t test (P < 0.05), and Cohen's kappa (κ) for interreader reliability were calculated.

RESULTS

In 46 patients (28 males; 18 females; mean age, 53 ± 20 years) with 28 hand/wrist and 18 foot/ankle examinations, 86 out of 92 fractures were diagnosed with 3D tomography compared with CT. No false-positive finding occurred at 3D tomography. The six missed fractures on 3D tomography were five avulsion fractures of the carpals/metacarpals or tarsals/metatarsals, respectively, and one nondisplaced fracture of the capitate. Interreader agreement of anatomical location and morphological characteristics was substantial to almost perfect for upper (κ = 0.80-0.96) and lower (κ = 0.70-0.97) extremity fractures. Visibility of bone and soft tissue structures and image quality were slightly inferior using 3D tomography compared with CT (upper extremity P < 0.001-0.038 and lower extremity P < 0.001-0.035). DLP of a comparable scan coverage was significantly lower for 3D tomography (P < 0.001) for both upper (3D mean, 19.4 ± 5.9 mGy*cm; estimated CT mean, 336.5 ± 52.2 mGy*cm) and lower extremities (3D mean, 24.1 ± 11.1 mGy*cm; estimated CT mean, 182.9 ± 6.5 mGy*cm). Even the highest DLP with 3D tomography was < 30% of the mean estimated CT dose of a comparable area of coverage.

CONCLUSION

Fracture assessment of peripheral extremities is reliable utilizing a low-dose 3D tomography X-ray system, with slightly reduced image quality.

Cost-effectiveness of introducing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the management of complex phalangeal fractures: economic simulation

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the management of the complex finger fractures with articular involvement.

Methods

We created a decision tree model simulating the diagnostic pathway of complex finger fractures, suggesting the use of CBCT as alternative to multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT), and we compared their clinical outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients. Measures of effectiveness are analysed by using quality-adjusted life years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and net monetary benefit.

Results

Diagnosis of a complex finger fracture performed with CBCT costed 67.33€ per patient, yielded 9.08 quality-adjusted life years, and gained an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 29.94€ and a net monetary benefit of 9.07 € at 30,000€ threshold. Using MSCT for diagnosis costed 106.23 €, yielded 8.18 quality-adjusted life years, and gained an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 371.15 € and a net monetary benefit of 8.09 €. CBCT strategy dominated the MSCT strategy. The acceptability curve shows that there is 98% probability of CBCT being the optimal strategy at 30,000€ threshold (1 EUR equal to 1.11 USD; updated on 02/02/2020).

Conclusion

CBCT in complex finger fractures management is cost saving compared with MSCT and may be considered a valuable imaging tool in preoperative assessment, allowing early detection and appropriate treatment. It shortens the time to completion of diagnostic work-up, reduces the number of additional diagnostic procedures, improves quality of life, and may reduce costs in a societal perspective.