Computed tomography evaluation of the normal appendix: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography

Low-Dose Abdominal CT for Evaluating Suspected Appendicitis in Adolescents and Young Adults: Review of Evidence

Due to its excellent diagnostic performance, CT is the mainstay of diagnostic test in adults with suspected acute appendicitis in many countries. Although debatable, extensive epidemiological studies have suggested that CT radiation is carcinogenic, at least in children and adolescents. Setting aside the debate over the carcinogenic risk of CT radiation, the value of judicious use of CT radiation cannot be overstated for the diagnosis of appendicitis, considering that appendicitis is a very common disease, and that the vast majority of patients with suspected acute appendicitis are adolescents and young adults with average life expectancies. Given the accumulated evidence justifying the use of low-dose CT (LDCT) of only 2 mSv, there is no reasonable basis to insist on using radiation dose of multi-purpose abdominal CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly in adolescents and young adults. Published data strongly suggest that LDCT is comparable to conventional dose CT in terms of clinical outcomes and diagnostic performance. In this narrative review, we will discuss such evidence for reducing CT radiation in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis.

Visibility of Normal Appendix on CT, MRI, and Sonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study is to assess the visibility of the normal appendix on CT, MRI, or ultrasound (US) images of a healthy population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to identify articles on the rates of detection of a normal appendix on CT, MRI, or US that appeared in the literature published up to January 20, 2017. Pooled detection rates were assessed using random-effects modeling, and rates associated with different imaging modalities were compared. Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess factors influencing detection rates and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies (21 CT studies with 5296 patients, 7 MRI studies with 600 patients, and 4 US studies with 1221 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. The overall normal appendix detection rate tended to be highest for CT (84%), followed by US (71%) and MR (69%), but no statistically significant differences were noted (for CT vs MRI, p = 0.16; for CT vs US, p = 0.23; and for MRI vs US, p = 0.91). Meta-regression analyses of the appendix detection rate with CT revealed that the year of publication of the study, the number of CT channels, and slice thickness affected study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Normal appendixes seemed to be more visible on CT than on MRI or US, although this finding did not have statistical significance. With respect to CT, detection of normal appendixes was significantly better when more channels and thinner slices were used.

Computed tomography localization of the appendix in the pediatric population relative to the lumbar spine

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to evaluate suspected acute appendicitis. Although very effective, CT uses ionizing radiation, exposing patients to an increased risk of cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the potential for decreasing the field of view of the CT (and therefore the dose to the patient) in the evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 212 consecutive patients who underwent CT for suspected acute appendicitis. The most superior aspect of the appendix with respect to vertebral bodies was recorded. Age, gender and diagnosis (negative, acute appendicitis or alternative diagnosis) were noted.

RESULTS

The appendix was visualized in 190 of 212 subjects (89.6%). Overall, all visualized appendixes were located at or below the level of L1. Sixty-three of the subjects (29.7%) were diagnosed with acute appendicitis via CT imaging. All appendixes in patients with acute appendicitis were located at or below the level of the L3 vertebral body, predominating at the level of L5. Six subjects (3.1%) received alternative diagnoses, including pneumonia, pyelonephritis, small bowel obstruction and infected urachal cyst. There were no differences in appendix location with regard to diagnosis, gender, or age (P=0.664, 0.748 and 0.705, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CT field of view may be decreased to the level of L1 or L3 superiorly, decreasing radiation dose without affecting the rate of appendix visualization.

A new technique for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: abdominal CT with compression to the right lower quadrant

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal CT with compression to the right lower quadrant (RLQ) in adults with acute appendicitis.

METHODS

168 patients (age range, 18-78 years) were included who underwent contrast-enhanced CT for suspected appendicitis performed either using compression to the RLQ (n = 71) or a standard protocol (n = 97). Outer diameter of the appendix, appendiceal wall thickening, luminal content and associated findings were evaluated in each patient. Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's and Pearson's chi-squared tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean outer diameter (MOD) between compression CT scans (10.6 ± 1.9 mm) and standard protocol (11.2 ± 2.3 mm) in patients with acute appendicitis (P = 1). MOD was significantly lower in the compression group (5.2 ± 0.8 mm) compared to the standard protocol (6.5 ± 1.1 mm) (P < 0.01) in patients without appendicitis. A cut-off value of 6.75 mm for the outer diameter of the appendix was found to be 100% sensitive in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis for both groups. The specificity was higher for compression CT technique (67.7 vs. 94.9%).

CONCLUSION

Normal appendix diameter was significantly smaller in the compression-CT group compared to standard-CT group, increasing diagnostic accuracy of abdominal compression CT.

KEY POINTS

• Normal appendix diameter is significantly smaller in compression CT. • Compression could force contrast material to flow through the appendiceal lumen. • Compression CT may be a CT counterpart of graded compression US.

Measurement error in CT assessment of appendix diameter

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal diameter continues to be cited as an important criterion for diagnosis of appendicitis by computed tomography (CT).

OBJECTIVE

To assess sources of error and variability in appendiceal diameter measurements by CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved review of imaging and medical records, we reviewed CTs performed in children <18 years of age between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2010. Appendiceal diameter was measured in the axial and coronal planes by two reviewers (R1, R2). One year later, 10% of cases were remeasured. For patients who had multiple CTs, serial measurements were made to assess within patient variability. Measurement differences between planes, within and between reviewers, within patients and between CT and pathological measurements were assessed using correlation coefficients and paired t-tests.

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty-one CTs performed in 519 patients (mean age: 10.9 ± 4.9 years, 50.8% female) were reviewed. Axial and coronal measurements were strongly correlated (r = 0.92-0.94, P < 0.0001) with coronal plane measurements significantly larger (P < 0.0001). Measurements were strongly correlated between reviewers (r = 0.89-0.9, P < 0.0001) but differed significantly in both planes (axial: +0.2 mm, P=0.003; coronal: +0.1 mm, P=0.007). Repeat measurements were significantly different for one reviewer only in the axial plane (0.3 mm difference, P<0.05). Within patients imaged multiple times, measured appendix diameters differed significantly in the axial plane for both reviewers (R1: 0.5 mm, P = 0.031; R2: 0.7 mm, P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Multiple potential sources of measurement error raise concern about the use of rigid diameter cutoffs for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis by CT.

Low vs. standard dose computed tomography in suspected acute appendicitis: Is it time for a change?

BACKGROUND

Clinical diagnosis is accurate in only 80% of patients with suspected appendicitis with negative appendectomy rates of up to 21%. In the UK the use of standard-dose CT (SDCT) is conservative due to concerns over radiation exposure and resource implications. The use of low dose computer tomography (LDCT) instead of standard dose computer tomography (SDCT) may partially address these concerns.

AIM

To compare LDCT and SDCT in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

METHODS

A literature search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases in July 2015 was conducted using the keywords 'low dose CT' and 'appendicitis'. Data were analysed and p values calculated using the Chi-square test. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.

RESULTS

LDCT (1.2-5.3 mSv) was not inferior to SDCT (5.2-10.2 mSv) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and proposing alternative diagnoses. SDCT was superior to LDCT in the negative predictive value of diagnosis of appendiceal perforation. There was no significant difference between LDCT and SDCT in negative appendectomy rate, appendiceal perforation rate and the need for additional imaging.

CONCLUSION

LDCT is not inferior to SDCT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and proposing alternative diagnoses. Further studies are recommended to further assess the potential role of LDCT & its cost effectiveness. Its use may improve the current management of patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

The utility of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in diagnosing acute appendicitis and staging its severity

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging to diagnose acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Abdominal ultrasonography (US) and ARFI imaging were performed in 53 patients that presented with right lower quadrant pain, and the results were compared with those obtained in 52 healthy subjects. Qualitative evaluation of the patients was conducted by Virtual Touch™ tissue imaging (VTI), while quantitative evaluation was performed by Virtual Touch™ tissue quantification (VTQ) measuring the shear wave velocity (SWV). The severity of appendix inflammation was observed and rated using ARFI imaging in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Alvarado scores were determined for all patients presenting with right lower quadrant pain. All patients diagnosed with appendicitis received appendectomies. The sensitivity and specificity of ARFI imaging relative to US was determined upon confirming the diagnosis of acute appendicitis via histopathological analysis.

RESULTS

The Alvarado score had a sensitivity and specificity of 70.8% and 20%, respectively, in detecting acute appendicitis. Abdominal US had 83.3% sensitivity and 80% specificity, while ARFI imaging had 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity, in diagnosing acute appendicitis. The median SWV value was 1.11 m/s (range, 0.6-1.56 m/s) for healthy appendix and 3.07 m/s (range, 1.37-4.78 m/s) for acute appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

ARFI imaging may be useful in guiding the clinical management of acute appendicitis, by helping its diagnosis and determining the severity of appendix inflammation.

Acute Appendicitis: Use of Clinical and CT Findings for Modeling Hospital Resource Utilization

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate associations between baseline CT findings in suspected acute appendicitis and subsequent hospital resource utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-eight patients (76 male and 62 female patients; mean [± SD] age, 40 ± 21 years) who were admitted for suspected acute appendicitis and underwent baseline CT were included. A single radiologist reviewed CT examinations for appendiceal-related findings. Linear and logistic regressions were performed to identify independent predictors of payer and hospital resource utilization. Combined performance of identified independent factors for predicting outcomes was determined.

RESULTS

Greater age, lower Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), lesser appendiceal wall thickness, absence of loculated fluid collection, and absence of periappendiceal fluid were significant independent predictors of inpatient surgery (joint sensitivity, 92.7%; specificity, 65.8%). Smaller appendiceal diameter, absence of periappendiceal fluid, and laparoscopic surgery were significant independent predictors of same-day discharge (joint sensitivity, 79.1%; specificity, 64.2%). Greater CCI, greater wall thickness, and presence of periappendiceal fluid were significant independent predictors of repeat abdominopelvic CT (joint sensitivity, 82.5%; specificity, 68.1%). Presence of an appendicolith was the only significant predictor of repeat emergency department visit within 30 days (sensitivity, 61.2%; specificity, 68.8%) and the only significant predictor of repeat inpatient admission within 30 days (sensitivity, 63.6%; specificity, 68.5%). Greater appendiceal diameter and presence of free air were significant predictors of inpatient costs, and predicted costs were as follows: $8047 + ($745 × appendiceal diameter) if free air was absent; and $-39,261 + ($4426 × appendiceal diameter) if free air was present. However, costs were poorly predicted when greater than $45,000. Sex, WBC count, and payer category were not independent predictors, relative to CT findings, of any outcome.

CONCLUSION

Admission CT findings serve as independent predictors of hospital resource utilization in suspected acute appendicitis.

Pediatric CT dose reduction for suspected appendicitis: a practice quality improvement project using artificial Gaussian noise--part 1, computer simulations

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop a departmental practice quality improvement project to systematically reduce CT doses for the evaluation of suspected pediatric appendicitis by introducing computer-generated gaussian noise.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred MDCT abdominopelvic examinations of patients younger than 20 years performed with girth-based scanning parameters for suspected appendicitis were reviewed. Two judges selected 45 examinations in which the diagnosis of appendicitis was excluded (14, appendix not visualized; 31, normal appendix visualized). Gaussian noise was introduced into axial image series, creating five additional series acquired at 25-76% of the original dose. Two readers reviewed 270 image series for appendix visualization (4-point Likert scale and arrow localization). Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were calculated by use of patient girth. Confidence ratings and localization accuracy were analyzed with mixed models and nonparametric bootstrap analysis at a 0.05 significance level.

RESULTS

The mean baseline SSDE for the 45 patients was 16 mGy (95% CI, 12-20 mGy), and the corresponding CTDIvol was 10 mGy (95% CI, 4-16 mGy). Changes in correct appendix localization frequencies were minor. There was no substantial trend with decreasing simulated dose level (p = 0.46). Confidence ratings decreased with increasing dose reduction (p = 0.007). The average decreases were -0.27 for the 25% simulated dose (p = 0.01), -0.17 for 33% (p = 0.03), and -0.03 for 43% (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric abdominal MDCT can be performed with 43% of the original dose (SSDE, 7 mGy; CTDIvol, 4.3 mGy) without substantially affecting visualization of a normal appendix.

Can outer-to-outer diameter be used alone in diagnosing appendicitis on 128-slice MDCT?

AIM: To assess the frequency of visualization, position and diameter of normal appendix on 128-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in adult population.

METHODS: Retrospective cross sectional study conducted at Radiology Department, Dallah Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from March 2013 to October 2013. Non-enhanced computed tomography scans of abdomen and pelvis of 98 patients presenting with hematuria (not associated with abdominal pain, fever or colonic disease) were reviewed by two radiologists, blinded to patient history. The study group included 55 females and 43 males with overall mean age of 54.7 years (range 21 to 94 years). The coronal reformatted images were reviewed in addition to the axial images. The frequency of visualization of appendix was recorded with assessment of position, diameter and luminal contents.

RESULTS: The appendix was recorded as definitely visualized in 99% of patients and mean outer-to-outer diameter of the appendix was 5.6 ± 1.3 mm (range 3.0-11.0 mm).

CONCLUSION: MDCT with its multiplanar reformation display is extremely useful for visualization of normal appendix. The normal appendix is very variable in its position and diameter. In the absence of other signs, the diagnosis of acute appendix should not be made solely on outer-to-outer appendiceal diameter.

How to evaluate appendices with borderline diameters on CT: proposal of a quick solution to overcome the limitations of the established CT criteria

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To propose a useful computed tomography (CT) criterion, the diameter with compression (DWC), especially in appendices with borderline diameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected 216 patients with visible appendices on CT after clinicopathologic confirmation of appendicitis. Each CT criterion of appendicitis was evaluated by an experienced abdominal radiologist: maximal outer diameter (MOD), DWC, mural thickness and enhancement, periappendiceal infiltration, and appendicolith. DWC is the expected diameter after deduction of the intraluminal compressible contents such as air and feces. All the CT criteria were compared in the appendicitis and nonappendicitis group.

RESULTS

The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the MOD and the DWC were 0.967 and 0.973, respectively. The optimal cutoff value was 8.2 mm for the MOD and 6.6 mm for the DWC. Twenty-five of the 80 appendicitis patients (31.2%) and 62 of the 136 nonappendicitis patients (45.6%) had MODs between 5.7 mm and 9.8 mm in the overlap between the two groups. In this overlap, the AUC of the MODs declined sharply to 0.767, whereas the AUC of the DWCs remained 0.923. Use of the criterion of DWC >6.6 mm yielded a sensitivity of 84.0%, a specificity of 88.7%, and an accuracy of 87.4%. There were no other criteria with both sensitivity and specificity >80% in the range of overlap.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed CT criterion of the DWC is not affected by normal distension or periappendiceal inflammation but only by true appendicitis. Therefore, DWC can improve the diagnostic performance of appendicitis regardless of the MOD.

The appendix may protect against Clostridium difficile recurrence

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Several risk factors have been identified for the development of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) that alter host immunity and disrupt colonic flora. Although the function of the appendix has been debated, its active, gut-associated lymphoid tissue and biofilm production indicate potential roles in recovery from initial CDI and protection against recurrent CDI. We investigated whether the presence or absence of an appendix is associated with CDI recurrence.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of adult inpatients with CDI who were admitted to a tertiary-care teaching hospital from 2005 to 2007 to identify those with and without an appendix. The primary dependent variable for statistical analysis was CDI recurrence.

RESULTS

In a multivariate analysis of 11 clinical variables, the presence of an appendix was associated inversely with CDI recurrence (P < .0001; adjusted relative risk, .398). Age older than 60 years also was associated with CDI recurrence (P = .0280; adjusted relative risk, 2.44).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an appendix has a significant and independent, inverse association with CDI recurrence, but this finding requires validation in a prospective study. Assessing the presence or absence of an appendix might be useful in predicting CDI recurrence.

A prospective comparison of standard-dose CT enterography and 50% reduced-dose CT enterography with and without noise reduction for evaluating Crohn disease

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare standard-dose CT enterography (CTE) and 50% reduced-dose CTE, obtained with and without an image noise reduction method, in the evaluation of Crohn disease.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients (69 men and 23 women; mean age [± SD], 31.2 ± 9.5 years) with Crohn disease underwent CTE. Using a dual-source scanner equipped with a proprietary noise reduction method (iterative reconstruction in image space [IRIS]), three sets of CTE images were obtained: standard-dose filtered back projection (FBP) (i.e., weighted FBP), low-dose (i.e., 50% reduction) FBP, and low-dose IRIS CTE. Image noise was measured. Two independent radiologists evaluated subjective image quality (1 [worst] to 4 [best]) and findings of active Crohn disease in the terminal small-bowel segment, including mural hyperenhancement, thickening and stratification, comb sign, and increased perienteric fat attenuation (1 [definitely absent] to 5 [definitely present]).

RESULTS

The mean (± SD) volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) was 7.0 ± 0.9 mGy and 3.5 ± 0.5 mGy for standard-dose and low-dose CTE examinations, respectively. The mean (± SD) image noise for standard-dose FBP, low-dose FBP, and low-dose IRIS CTE was 10.6 ± 1.7 HU, 13.9 ± 2.1 HU, and 9.7 ± 1.7 HU, respectively (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Both assessors found that image quality was poorer with low-dose (mean grade (± SD), 2.3 ± 0.4-2.7 ± 0.5) than in standard-dose (3 ± 0) CTE (p < 0.01), and one found that image quality was poorer with low-dose IRIS (2.3 ± 0.4) than with low-dose FBP (2.7 ± 0.5) CTE (p < 0.01). Low-dose (with or without IRIS) and standard-dose CTE showed ≥ 85% agreement (one-sided 95% CI ≥ 77%) in interpretation of bowel findings.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose CTE using 50% reduced-dose performed similarly to standard-dose CTE in identifying findings of enteric inflammation of Crohn disease. Although a noise reduction method markedly reduced image noise in half-dose examinations, its effect on image quality was not as great and was reader dependent.

Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how body habitus affects reader confidence in diagnosing acute appendicitis and appendiceal visualization using 64 MDCT technology with and without oral contrast. We conducted a HIPAA compliant, IRB approved study of adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department with nontraumatic abdominal pain. Subjects were randomized to two groups: 64 MDCT scans performed with oral and intravenous contrast or scans performed solely with intravenous contrast. Three radiologists established their confidence about the presence of appendicitis as well as recording whether the appendix was visualized. Reader confidence in diagnosing acute appendicitis was compared between the two groups for the three readers. The impact of patient BMI and estimated intra-abdominal fat on reader confidence in diagnosing appendicitis was determined. Finally, a comparison of the effect of BMI and intra-abdominal fat on appendiceal visualization between the two groups was carried out. Three hundred three patients were enrolled in this study. There was a statistically significant difference in confidence based on BMI for reader 2, group 1 in diagnosing appendicitis. No further statistically significant differences in reader confidence for diagnosing appendicitis based on BMI or intra-abdominal fat were identified. There was no influence of BMI or intra-abdominal fat on appendiceal visualization. Increasing BMI was seen to improve reader confidence for one of three readers in patients that received both oral and intravenous contrast. No further effects of BMI or intra-abdominal fat on confidence in diagnosing or excluding appendicitis were seen. Neither BMI nor intra-abdominal fat were seen to influence appendiceal visualization.

The appendix on CT

Appendicitis can be a difficult clinical diagnosis to make. A negative appendicectomy rate of 20% has traditionally been accepted as the consequences of appendiceal perforation can be grave. Cross-sectional imaging is increasingly being employed in the investigation of adults with suspected appendicitis. This review will demonstrate the appearance of the normal appendix on computed tomography (CT) and its appearance in a range of inflammatory and neoplastic processes including appendicitis, Crohn's disease, infections, and benign and malignant tumours.

Identification of the normal appendix in healthy adults by 64-slice MDCT: the value of adding coronal reformation images

The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the value of adding coronal reformation images to the identification of the normal appendix using 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT). 200 consecutive healthy adults with no history of abdominal surgery underwent abdominal CT using 64-slice MDCT without oral contrast administration and were enrolled in the study. Two gastrointestinal radiologists first interpreted the axial images only; after a 2-week interval, they then interpreted both the axial and the coronal images while blinded to the first interpretation. The identification of the normal appendix was interpreted using a four-point scale: 1, not identified; 2, identified with low confidence; 3, probably identified; 4, definitely identified. Agreement between the readers was determined with the use of weighted kappa statistics. Differences in confidence ratings for identification of the appendix were determined with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The agreement between the readers was higher when both axial and coronal images were reviewed (kappa = 0.85) than when only the axial scans images were reviewed (kappa = 0.43). The mean confidence scores for the identification of the normal appendix by the two readers were significantly higher when both the axial and coronal images were reviewed (mean, 3.81+/-0.498 and 3.83+/-0.485 for the two readers, respectively) than when only the axial images were reviewed (mean, 3.27+/-0.819 and 3.47+/-0.856, respectively) (all p<0.01). Therefore, adding coronal reformation images to 64-slice MDCT significantly improves inter-reader agreement and confidence in the identification of the normal appendix.