Coronary Sinus Compression

Cardiac tamponade

Cardiac tamponade is a medical emergency caused by the progressive accumulation of pericardial fluid (effusion), blood, pus or air in the pericardium, compressing the heart chambers and leading to haemodynamic compromise, circulatory shock, cardiac arrest and death. Pericardial diseases of any aetiology as well as complications of interventional and surgical procedures or chest trauma can cause cardiac tamponade. Tamponade can be precipitated in patients with pericardial effusion by dehydration or exposure to certain medications, particularly vasodilators or intravenous diuretics. Key clinical findings in patients with cardiac tamponade are hypotension, increased jugular venous pressure and distant heart sounds (Beck triad). Dyspnoea can progress to orthopnoea (with no rales on lung auscultation) accompanied by weakness, fatigue, tachycardia and oliguria. In tamponade caused by acute pericarditis, the patient can experience fever and typical chest pain increasing on inspiration and radiating to the trapezius ridge. Generally, cardiac tamponade is a clinical diagnosis that can be confirmed using various imaging modalities, principally echocardiography. Cardiac tamponade is preferably resolved by echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis. In patients who have recently undergone cardiac surgery and in those with neoplastic infiltration, effusive-constrictive pericarditis, or loculated effusions, fluoroscopic guidance can increase the feasibility and safety of the procedure. Surgical management is indicated in patients with aortic dissection, chest trauma, bleeding or purulent infection that cannot be controlled percutaneously. After pericardiocentesis or pericardiotomy, NSAIDs and colchicine can be considered to prevent recurrence and effusive-constrictive pericarditis.

Standardized Criteria for Identification of Cardiac Tamponade on Non-Electrocardiogram-gated Computed Tomography: Correlation With Echocardiographic Findings

PURPOSE

To identify imaging parameters that can help in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) of the chest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 64 patients who had undergone CT and echocardiography for evaluation of cardiac tamponade. Of 64 patients, 34 were diagnosed with tamponade and underwent pericardiocentesis for further diagnosis and treatment. CT measurements obtained were: pericardial effusion (PeEff) pocket size in 6 locations (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, right, and left lateral), pericardial thickening, diameters of the coronary sinus, upper superior vena cava, lower superior vena cava, and inferior vena cava. In addition, cardiac chamber sizes were measured. Subjective assessment of coronary sinus compression, pericardial enhancement, and pericardial thickening were also recorded.

RESULTS

Measurement of the sum of the right lateral and left lateral PeEff thickness resulted in 91.2% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity for cardiac tamponade with a threshold of 30 mm (receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve=0.94 [0.84 to 0.98], P <0.0001). Using the combination of inferior PeEff >16 mm, sum of right lateral and left lateral PeEff>30 mm, and presence of pericardial thickening resulted in 56% sensitivity and 100% specificity and positive predictive value for the determination of cardiac tamponade.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that CT measurements related to PeEff size and thickness aid in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade.

Coronary Sinus Diameter to Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Ratio in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Tamponade: A Novel Approach

BACKGROUND

In cardiac tamponade, coronary sinus (CS) as an intrapericardial structure can be easily compressed, whereas inferior vena cava (IVC) dilates. This inverse relationship may augment their roles in the evaluation of tamponade imaging.

AIM

We assessed the usefulness of computerized tomographic measures of CS diameter and also CS/IVC ratio to predict tamponade in clinically stable patients with large pericardial effusion.

METHODS

Sixty-six clinically stable patients who had large pericardial effusions were included. Coronary sinus diameter was measured from the point at 1 cm proximal to the CS ostium. Inferior vena cava diameter was measured from the segment between its right atrial orifice and hepatic vein.

RESULTS

Patients with tamponade had smaller CS diameter and CS/IVC ratio. After adjusting with other parameters, only either CS diameter or CS/IVC ratio predicted tamponade, respectively. (Nagelkerke r value for CS was 53.7% and 72.1% for CS/IVC ratio). In Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve analysis, a cutoff value of 6.85 mm for CS diameter had 82.6% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity and a cutoff value of 27% for CS/IVC ratio had 87.0% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity for predicting cardiac tamponade.

CONCLUSIONS

The tomographic measures of both the CS diameter and the CS/IVC ratio predicted tamponade in clinically stable patients with large pericardial effusion. Compared with CS diameter, CS/IVC ratio seemed to be a more powerful predictor of tamponade.

The evaluation of cardiac tamponade risk in patients with pericardial effusion detected by non-gated chest CT

BACKGROUND

Although pericardial effusion is often identified using non-gated chest computed tomography (CT), findings predictive of cardiac tamponade have not been adequately established.

PURPOSE

To determine the findings predictive of clinical cardiac tamponade in patients with moderate to large pericardial effusion using non-gated chest CT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 134 patients with moderate to large pericardial effusion who were identified from among 4581 patients who underwent non-gated chest CT. Cardiac structural changes, including right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), were qualitatively evaluated. The inferior vena cava ratio with hepatic (IVCupp) and renal portions (IVClow) and effusion size were measured. The diagnostic performance of each structural change was calculated, and multivariate analysis was used to determine the predictors of cardiac tamponade.

RESULTS

Of the 134 patients (mean age, 70.3 years; 64 men), 37 (28%) had cardiac tamponade. The sensitivity and specificity were 76% and 74% for RVOT compression; 87% and 84% for an IVClow ratio ≥0.77; and 60% and 77% for an effusion size ≥25.5 mm, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that RVOT compression, an IVClow ratio ≥0.77, and an effusion size ≥25.5 mm were independent predictors of cardiac tamponade. The combination of these three CT findings had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 81%, 95%, and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with moderate to large pericardial effusion, non-gated chest CT provides additional information for predicting cardiac tamponade.

Left atrial compression and the mechanism of exercise impairment in patients with a large hiatal hernia

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between cardiac compression and exercise impairment in patients with a large hiatal hernia (HH).

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea and exercise impairment are common symptoms of a large HH with unknown pathophysiology. Studies evaluating the contribution of cardiac compression to the pathogenesis of these symptoms have not been performed.

METHODS

We collected clinical data from a consecutive series of 30 patients prospectively evaluated with resting and stress echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and respiratory function testing before and after laparoscopic HH repair. Left atrial (LA), inferior pulmonary vein, and coronary sinus compression was analyzed in relation to exercise capacity (metabolic equivalents [METs] achieved on Bruce treadmill protocol).

RESULTS

Exertional dyspnea was present in 25 of 30 patients (83%) despite normal mean baseline respiratory function. Moderate to severe LA compression was qualitatively present in 23 of 30 patients (77%) on computed tomography. Right and left inferior pulmonary vein and coronary sinus compression was present in 11 of 30 (37%), 12 of 30 (40%), and 26 of 30 (87%) patients, respectively. Post-operatively, New York Heart Association functional class and exercise capacity improved significantly (number of patients in New York Heart Association functional classes I, II, III, and IV: 6, 11, 11, and 2 vs. 26, 4, 0, and 0, respectively, p < 0.001; METs [percentage predicted]: 75 ± 24% vs. 112 ± 23%, p < 0.001) and resolution of cardiac compression was observed. Absolute change in LA diameter on the echocardiogram was the only independent cardiorespiratory predictor of exercise capacity improvement post-operatively (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate, for the first time, marked exercise impairment and cardiac compression in patients with a large HH and normal respiratory function. After HH repair, exercise capacity improves significantly and correlates with resolution of LA compression.

A systematic approach to evaluation of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade

Pericardial disease leading to pericardial effusion (PEF) is a common condition encountered by the clinician in day-to-day practice. If the PEF becomes large enough, it can cause hemodynamic compromise, resulting in a cardiogenic shock state known as cardiac tamponade. There are many clinical and echocardiographic signs that a clinician can use to assess whether a large PEF is hemodynamically significant. However, these signs can be either conflicting or even absent. The purpose of this review is to first, describe the physiology of the pericardium in health and how it changes with disease; second, outline the pathophysiology of pericardial tamponade and discuss how it is responsible for the physical and echocardiographic findings of cardiac tamponade; and third, suggest an approach to applying these findings in a systematic order to ensure a correct diagnosis.

Pericardial disease: diagnosis and management

Pericardial diseases can present clinically as acute pericarditis, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, and constrictive pericarditis. Patients can subsequently develop chronic or recurrent pericarditis. Structural abnormalities including congenitally absent pericardium and pericardial cysts are usually asymptomatic and are uncommon. Clinicians are often faced with several diagnostic and management questions relating to the various pericardial syndromes: What are the diagnostic criteria for the vast array of pericardial diseases? Which diagnostic tools should be used? Who requires hospitalization and who can be treated as an outpatient? Which medical management strategies have the best evidence base? When should corticosteroids be used? When should surgical pericardiectomy be considered? To identify relevant literature, we searched PubMed and MEDLINE using the keywords diagnosis, treatment, management, acute pericarditis, relapsing or recurrent pericarditis, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, constrictive pericarditis, and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Studies were selected on the basis of clinical relevance and the impact on clinical practice. This review represents the currently available evidence and the experiences from the pericardial clinic at our institution to help guide the clinician in answering difficult diagnostic and management questions on pericardial diseases.

Contrast-fluid level in the inferior vena cava (IVC niveau sign) in patients with acute type A aortic dissection: computed tomography findings during acute cardiac tamponade

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report a new computed tomography (CT) finding in acute cardiac tamponade: a contrast-fluid level in the hepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) during an arterial dominant phase CT study (IVC niveau sign) in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed CT studies with the diagnosis of proximal aortic dissection (Stanford type A) with acute cardiac tamponade. There were 12 patients enrolled in the study (6 women, 6 men; mean age 66 years). A total of 62 patients were selected as a control chronic pericardial effusion group to compare with the acute cardiac tamponade group.

RESULTS

Among the 12 patients with acute cardiac tamponade, the IVC niveau sign was seen in 7 (58%). In the control chronic pericardial effusion group (n = 62), we identified the IVC niveau sign in only one patient (1.6%). There was a significant difference in the presence of the IVC niveau sign between the acute cardiac tamponade and chronic pericardial effusion groups (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of the IVC niveau sign suggests acute cardiac tamponade in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

"Acute pseudo-pericardial tamponade": the compression of the thoracal inferior vena cava--a case report

We describe a case of 68-year-old woman which was admitted to our hospital for mitral valve replacement (MVR), in whom acute compression of the vena cava inferior developed after repair of lacerated atrio-caval junction with hemostatic tissue sealant, biologic glue (BioGlue, Cryolife, inc, Kennesaw, Ga). Removal of the BioGlue relieved the unexpected problem.