Grimm NL, Pace JL, Levy BJ, Arthur D, Portman M, Solomito MJ, Weiss JM. Demographics and Epidemiology of Discoid Menisci of the Knee: Analysis of a Large Regional Insurance Database.
Orthop J Sports Med 2020;
8:2325967120950669. [PMID:
32999890 PMCID:
PMC7506788 DOI:
10.1177/2325967120950669]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background:
A discoid meniscus is a morphological variant of normal knee joint meniscus
shape and ultrastructure that can lead to traumatic tearing of this tissue
and early joint osteoarthritis.
Purpose/Hypothesis:
The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of discoid menisci
in a large, ethnically diverse regional cohort and to evaluate possible risk
factors. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the
epidemiological distribution of discoid menisci based on ethnicity or
sex.
Study Design:
Descriptive epidemiology study.
Methods:
The study population was from a regional, integrated health care system
cohort from Kaiser Permanente of Southern California that, as of 2016,
included more than 4.5 million patients. Patient demographics included age,
sex, and ethnicity within this cohort. Potential risk factors analyzed
included age, sex, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). Unique
characteristics of a discoid meniscus were analyzed, including a symptomatic
versus asymptomatic meniscus, location of meniscal tear and type of
meniscus, and frequency of meniscal surgical treatment.
Results:
A total of 223 patients with a confirmed discoid meniscus were identified,
yielding an overall prevalence rate of 4.88 per 100,000 patients. Those
identifying as Black had the lowest prevalence (2.68/100,000), while
Hispanic ethnicity had the highest (6.01/100,000). However, there was no
significant difference with regard to ethnicity (P = .283),
nor any significant difference between sexes. BMI did not significantly
influence the rate of discoid menisci (P = .504). A
majority (77.5%) of patients were symptomatic, while 22.5% of patients with
discoid menisci were asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. Symptomatic
discoid menisci were more likely to be operated on compared with
asymptomatic discoid menisci (71% vs 14%, respectively; P =
.001; odds ratio, 14.8 [95% CI, 5.8-37.2]). Horizontal and bucket-handle
tears were the more common tear types. Of the discoid menisci in this
cohort, 55.6% underwent surgery, with 95.2% undergoing reported
saucerization.
Conclusion:
In this very diverse population-based cohort of patients, there did not seem
to be a significant predilection of discoid menisci with regard to
ethnicity. Neither sex nor BMI significantly influenced the rate of discoid
menisci. More than three-quarters of those with a diagnosed discoid meniscus
were symptomatic. Of the tears that occurred with discoid menisci,
horizontal and bucket-handle tears made up the largest proportion.
Collapse