Comparison of 320-Row Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography With Conventional Angiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease With Different Atherosclerotic Plaque Characteristics:

Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Function and Myocardial Mass: A Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography with Cardiac MRI and Echocardiography

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the left ventricular parameters obtained from multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) studies with two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is accepted as the gold standard in the evaluation of left ventricular functions. The study also aimed to evaluate whether or not there is a relationship between the MR-Argus and CMR tools software programs which are used in post-process calculations of data obtained by MRI.

Material/Methods

Forty patients with an average age of 51.4±14.9 years who had been scanned with cardiac MDCT were evaluated with cardiac MRI and 2DE. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output (CO), and myocardial mass values calculated by MDCT, MRI, and 2DE were compared with each other. Two different MR software programs were used to compare left ventricular functions. The CMR tools LV tutorials method is accepted as the gold standard because it can be used in three-dimensional functional evaluation. The Pearson Correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to compare the results from the two MR methods (MR-Argus and CMR tools) and the results from both the MDCT and the 2DE with the CMR tools results.

Results

Strong positive correlations for EF values were found between the MDCT and CMR tools (r=0.702 p<0.001), and between the MR-Argus and CMR tools (r=0.746 p<0.001). The correlation between the 2DE and CMR tools (r=0.449 p<0.004), however, was only moderate. Similar results were obtained for the other parameters. The strongest correlation for ESV, EDV, and EF was between the two MR software programs. The correlation coefficient between the MDCT and CMR tools is close to the correlation coefficient between the two software programs. While the correlation between 2DE and CMR tools was satisfactory for ESV, EDV, and CO values, it was at a moderate level for the other parameters.

Conclusions

Left ventricular functional analysis can be performed easily and reliably with cardiac MDCT used for coronary artery evaluation and it also gives more accurate results than 2DE.

Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to review the recent literatures on the diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography (CTA) for detection of coronary artery stenosis, with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference standard.

METHODS

A PubMed and EMBASE cross-search of the literatures on use of 320-slice CTA compared with ICA for detection of coronary artery stenosis, with publication date limited to January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012. Individual and pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated at the patient-, vessel- and segment-level. A positive result was defined as greater than or equal to 50%-diameter stenosis.

RESULTS

A total of ten studies were included in the present meta-analysis, examining 1088 patients, 1629 vessels and 12,406 segments. The meta-analysis at the patient-level indicated a pooled sensitivity of 93% (95%CI: 91%-95%), specificity of 86% (95%CI: 82%-89%), PPV of 90% (95%CI: 87%-92%) and NPV of 90% (95%CI: 87%-93%). At the vessel-level, the pooled sensitivity was 92% (95%CI: 89%-94%), specificity 95% (95%CI: 94%-96%), PPV 87% (95%CI: 83%-90%), and NPV 97% (95%CI: 96%-98%). At the segment-level, the pooled sensitivity was 78% (95%CI: 76%-80%), specificity 98% (95%CI: 97%-98%), PPV 82% (95%CI: 80%-84%), and NPV 97% (95%CI: 97%-97%).

CONCLUSIONS

320-CTA can effectively identify the majority of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The high NPV makes it as an effective noninvasive alternative to ICA for the exclusion of stenosis.