ASCA (Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae Antibody) in Patients With Scleroderma

Insights into origins and specificities of autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Autoantibodies are hallmark findings in systemic sclerosis (SSc), often present prior to disease onset. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis of SSc have long relied on the antitopoisomerase - anticentromere - anti-RNA polymerase antibody trichotomy. However, many more autoantibodies found in SSc are being actively investigated for insights into triggering events, mechanisms of tolerance break, and connections to tissue damage. This review examines recent studies on SSc autoantibodies and the early events that lead to their development.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent work has elucidated potential connections between human cytomegalovirus infection, silicone breast implants, and malignancy to SSc autoantibody development. At the level of the dendritic cell:T cell interaction, where tolerance is broken, new studies identified shared motifs in the peptide-binding domains of SSc-associated human leukocyte antigen alleles. Immunological analysis of SSc patient B cells has uncovered several anomalies in the regulatory capacities of SSc naïve and memory B cell populations. Expanding efforts to uncover new SSc autoantibodies revealed anti-CXCL4, anticollagen V, and other autoantibodies as potential players in disease pathogenesis.

SUMMARY

Further research into the role of autoantibodies in SSc development may uncover new mechanism-guided therapeutic targets. In addition, a better understanding of autoantibody associations with SSc disease outcomes will improve clinical care.

Meta-analysis of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies as diagnostic markers of Behçet's disease with gastrointestinal involvement

OBJECTIVE

Due to common exposure to yeast in the alcoholic and baking industry, positive rate of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) is reportedly high in patients with Behçet's disease (BD) who have gastrointestinal symptoms (gastrointestinal BD (GIBD)). We performed a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic value of ASCA in differentiating patients with BD from those with other chronic inflammatory bowel diseases.

METHODS

The meta-analysis is presented with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist. Relevant studies that investigated ASCA levels in patients with BD were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library on 12 July 2019; the search was rerun on 12 February 2020. Stata/SE V.12.0 and Meta-DiSc V.1.4 were used to perform the meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis, disaggregated by isotypes of ASCA.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed a strong association between ASCA and GIBD, especially ASCA-IgG (OR=5.50 (95% CI 2.58 to 11.55), p=0.000) and ASCA-IgG+IgA (OR=5.36 (95% CI 1.40 to 20.45), p=0.014). The positivity rate of ASCA in GIBD was significantly higher than that in ulcerative colitis (UC): IgA (OR=2.13 (95% CI 1.30 to 3.50), p=0.003); IgG+IgA (OR=2.19 (95% CI 1.03 to 4.66), p=0.042); IgG/IgA ((=2.03 (95% CI 1.30 to 3.17), p=0.002). However, the frequency of ASCA-IgG was significantly higher in patients with Crohn's disease than GIBD (OR=0.48 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.83), p=0.009). There was no significant difference in ASCA positivity between BD without gastrointestinal involvement and healthy controls and between GIBD and intestinal tuberculosis (iTB) (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

ASCA may play a role in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal involvement. Negative result of IgG favours the diagnosis of GIBD/BD when differentiated from Crohn's disease. ASCA-IgA showed moderate diagnostic performance in distinguishing GIBD and UC and the diagnostic performance was better in combination with IgG. However, ASCA may not be a useful serologic marker distinguishing GIBD and iTB.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020115245.