Role of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Necrotizing Autoimmune Myopathy

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy: A comprehensive review of the pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatments

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a rare and newly recognized autoimmune disease within the spectrum of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. It is characterized by myositis-specific autoantibodies, elevated serum creatine kinase levels, inflammatory infiltrate, and weakness. IMNM can be classified into three subtypes based on the presence or absence of specific autoantibodies: anti-signal recognition particle myositis, anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase myositis, and seronegative IMNM. In recent years, IMNM has gained increasing attention and emerged as a research hotspot. Recent studies have suggested that the pathogenesis of IMNM is linked to aberrant activation of immune system, including immune responses mediated by antibodies, complement, and immune cells, particularly macrophages, as well as abnormal release of inflammatory factors. Non-immune mechanisms such as autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum stress also participate in this process. Additionally, genetic variations associated with IMNM have been identified, providing new insights into the genetic mechanisms of the disease. Progress has also been made in IMNM treatment research, including the use of immunosuppressants and the development of biologics. Despite the challenges in understanding the etiology and treatment of IMNM, the latest research findings offer important guidance and insights for delving deeper into the disease's pathogenic mechanisms and identifying new therapeutic strategies.

Updated consensus statement: Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of neuromuscular disorders report of the AANEM ad hoc committee

Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is an immune-modulating biologic therapy that is increasingly being used in neuromuscular disorders despite the paucity of high-quality evidence for various specific diseases. To address this, the AANEM created the 2009 consensus statement to provide guidance on the use of IVIG in neuromuscular disorders. Since then, there have been several randomized controlled trials for IVIG, a new FDA-approved indication for dermatomyositis and a revised classification system for myositis, prompting the AANEM to convene an ad hoc panel to update the existing guidelines.New recommendations based on an updated systemic review of the literature were categorized as Class I-IV. Based on Class I evidence, IVIG is recommended in the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) in adults, multifocal motor neuropathy, dermatomyositis, stiff-person syndrome and myasthenia gravis exacerbations but not stable disease. Based on Class II evidence, IVIG is also recommended for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and pediatric GBS. In contrast, based on Class I evidence, IVIG is not recommended for inclusion body myositis, post-polio syndrome, IgM paraproteinemic neuropathy and small fiber neuropathy that is idiopathic or associated with tri-sulfated heparin disaccharide or fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 autoantibodies. Although only Class IV evidence exists for IVIG use in necrotizing autoimmune myopathy, it should be considered for anti-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase myositis given the risk of long-term disability. Insufficient evidence exists for the use of IVIG in Miller-Fisher syndrome, IgG and IgA paraproteinemic neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, chronic autoimmune neuropathy, polymyositis, idiopathic brachial plexopathy and diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexopathy.

What Is in the Myopathy Literature?

ABSTRACT

This update begins with the results of a positive trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in dermatomyositis and a study of molecular and morphologic patterns in inclusion body myositis that may explain treatment refractoriness. Single center reports of muscular sarcoidosis and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy follow. There is also a report of caveolae-associated protein 4 antibodies as a potential biomarker and cause of immune rippling muscle disease. The remainder covers updates on muscular dystrophies as well as congenital and inherited metabolic myopathies with an emphasis on genetic testing. Rare dystrophies, including one involving ANXA11 mutations and a series on oculopharyngodistal myopathy, are discussed.

Zilucoplan in immune-mediated necrotising myopathy: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial

Background

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is an autoimmune myopathy characterised by proximal muscle weakness, high creatine kinase (CK) values, and autoantibodies recognizing 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) or the signal recognition particle (SRP). There are currently no approved therapies for IMNM and many patients experience active disease despite off-label treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressants. Detection of complement-activating anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP autoantibodies and the presence of complement deposition on the sarcolemma of non-necrotic myofibers led to the hypothesis that complement activation may be pathogenic in IMNM, therefore zilucoplan, a complement component 5 (C5) inhibitor, could be a potential therapy.

Methods

IMNM01, a phase 2, multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04025632) at 15 sites (four countries) evaluated efficacy, safety, and tolerability of zilucoplan in adult participants with anti-HMGCR or anti-SRP autoantibody-positive IMNM. Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive daily subcutaneous zilucoplan (0·3mg/kg) or placebo for eight weeks; with optional enrolment in the study open-label extension. Primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline to Week 8 in CK levels. Secondary endpoints included safety.

Findings

Between 07 November 2019 and 07 January 2021, 27 participants (13 female and 14 male) received zilucoplan (n=12) or placebo (n=15) and completed the 8-week main study. At Week 8 there were no clinically relevant or statistically significant differences, despite target engagement based on mode of action, between treatment arms in mean percent change (standard deviation) of CK levels versus baseline (-9·86% [26·06] versus -20·72% [31·22] in zilucoplan [n=10] and placebo arms [n=14], p=0·46, respectively) and no clinically relevant improvement over time within the treatment arm. There were no unexpected adverse safety or tolerability findings. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were reported in n=9 (75·0%) vs n=13 (86·7%) and n=0 (0%) and n=3 (20·0%) participants, respectively. The most frequent TEAEs were headache (n=4 in both groups [33·3% and 26·7%, respectively]) and nausea (n=3 in both groups [25·0% and 20·0%, respectively]).

Interpretation

C5 inhibition does not appear to be an effective treatment modality for IMNM. Rather than driving myofiber necrosis, complement activation may be secondary to muscle injury.

Funding

Study funded by Ra Pharmaceuticals (now part of UCB Pharma).

Anti-SRP immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy: A critical review of current concepts

Purpose of review

This review aims to describe clinical and histological features, treatment, and prognosis in patients with anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) autoantibodies positive immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (SRP-IMNM) based on previous findings.

Previous findings

Anti-SRP autoantibodies are specific in IMNM. Humoral autoimmune and inflammatory responses are the main autoimmune characteristics of SRP-IMNM. SRP-IMNM is clinically characterized by acute or subacute, moderately severe, symmetrical proximal weakness. Younger patients with SRP-IMNM tend to have more severe clinical symptoms. Patients with SRP-IMNM may be vulnerable to cardiac involvement, which ought to be regularly monitored and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the recommended detection method. The pathological features of SRP-IMNM are patchy or diffuse myonecrosis and myoregeneration accompanied by a paucity of inflammatory infiltrates. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced autophagy pathway and necroptosis are activated in skeletal muscle of SRP-IMNM. Treatment of refractory SRP-IMNM encounters resistance and warrants further investigation.

Summary

Anti-SRP autoantibodies define a unique population of IMNM patients. The immune and non-immune pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in SRP-IMNM.

What Is in the Myopathy Literature?

ABSTRACT

We cover intensive care unit-acquired neuromuscular disorders associated with coronavirus disease 2019. Outcomes may be worse than expected in these patients, and there is some evidence that coronavirus disease 2019 causes myopathy directly. Corticosteroid regimens in Duchenne muscular dystrophy are addressed including outcomes in pulmonary and cardiac function. A recent article notes a continued diagnostic delay in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. An interesting report of a Canary Islands cohort of patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy is discussed. Features and clinical pearls related to a series of patients with limb-girdle muscle dystrophy R12 (anoctaminopathy) and a misdiagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy are provided. The last section on autoimmune myopathy includes articles on clinical and pathologic features associated with myositis-specific antibodies and dermatomyositis, the epidemiology of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNMs) in Olmsted County, Minnesota, and features of a German cohort of hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase-associated IMNM. A recent article proposes the benefit of early intravenous immunoglobulin use for adults with IMNM. We also highlight a report of 2 unusual cases of antisignal recognition particle myopathy presenting with asymmetric distal weakness.