Rituximab therapy produced rapid and sustained clinical improvement in a patient with systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis refractory to TNF alpha antagonists

B Cells on the Stage of Inflammation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Leading or Supporting Actors in Disease Pathogenesis?

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a term that collectively refers to a group of chronic childhood arthritides, which together constitute the most common rheumatic condition in children. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria define seven categories of JIA: oligoarticular, polyarticular rheumatoid factor (RF) negative (RF-), polyarticular RF positive (RF+), systemic, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis. The ILAR classification includes persistent and extended oligoarthritis as subcategories of oligoarticular JIA, but not as distinct categories. JIA is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process affecting the synovia that begins before the age of 16 and persists at least 6 weeks. If not treated, JIA can cause significant disability and loss of quality of life. Treatment of JIA is adjusted according to the severity of the disease as combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), synthetic and/ or biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although the disease etiology is unknown, disturbances in innate and adaptive immune responses have been implicated in JIA development. B cells may have important roles in JIA pathogenesis through autoantibody production, antigen presentation, cytokine release and/ or T cell activation. The study of B cells has not been extensively explored in JIA, but evidence from the literature suggests that B cells might have indeed a relevant role in JIA pathophysiology. The detection of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in JIA patients supports a breakdown in B cell tolerance. Furthermore, alterations in B cell subpopulations have been documented in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from JIA patients. In fact, altered B cell homeostasis, B cell differentiation and B cell hyperactivity have been described in JIA. Of note, B cell depletion therapy with rituximab has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in children with JIA, which further supports B cell intervention in disease development.

Use and effectiveness of rituximab in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a cohort study in the United Kingdom

Objectives

Rituximab (RTX) may be a treatment option for children and young people with JIA, although it is not licensed for this indication. The aim of this study was to describe RTX use and outcomes among children with JIA.

Methods

This analysis included all JIA patients within the UK Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases study starting RTX. Disease activity was assessed at RTX start and at follow-up. The total number of courses each patient received was assessed. Serious infections and infusion reactions occurring following RTX were reported.

Results

Forty-one JIA patients starting RTX were included, the majority with polyarthritis: polyarthritis RF negative [n = 14 (35%)], polyarthritis RF positive [n = 13 (33%)] and extended oligoarthritis [n = 9 (23%)]. Most were female (80%) with a median age of 15 years [interquartile range (IQR) 12–16] and a median disease duration of 9 years (IQR 5–11). The median improvement in the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (cJADAS; three-variable 71-joint JADAS) from RTX start was 9 units (n = 7; IQR −14–2). More than half reported more than one course of RTX. The median time between each course was 219 days (IQR 198–315). During follow-up, 17 (41%) patients reported switching to another biologic, including tocilizumab (n = 8), abatacept (n = 6) and TNF inhibitor (n = 3). Three patients (7%) reported a serious infection on RTX (rate of first serious infection 6.2/100 person-years). Four patients (10%) reported an infusion reaction.

Conclusions

This real-world cohort of children with JIA, the majority with polyarticular or extended oligoarticular JIA, showed RTX may be an effective treatment option for children who do not respond to TNF inhibitor, with a low rate of serious infections on treatment.

Difficult-To-Treat Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Current and Future Options

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood and is usually treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate or sulfasalazine. However, not all patients respond to these treatments, and toxicities may limit long-term use or diminish compliance. With advances in pharmacotherapy and the development of new therapeutic agents, there have been improvements in treatment of both systemic and non-systemic JIA, particularly with biologic agents such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-interleukin (IL)-1, and anti-IL6. Anti-cell therapies, such as co-stimulator blockers or anti-CD20, small molecules, and biosimilars represent new areas of interest, and, while many are not yet currently commercially available for use in children, preliminary studies appear to be promising. In the present article, the authors review therapeutic strategies for the different JIA subtypes, mainly according to guidelines and recommendations. Newer and possible future treatments for arthritis, already approved in adults but currently under study in children, are also discussed. Drugs currently in development plans for rheumatoid arthritis, which hopefully will also be useful for JIA patients in the future, are also mentioned in this paper.

Advances in the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent advances in the management strategies of polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and identify unanswered questions and avenues for further research.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is evidence for an early, aggressive, treat-to-target approach for polyarticular JIA. Clinical disease activity criteria have been recently defined and validated, including criteria for inactive disease and the juvenile arthritis disease activity score (JADAS). There is a need for evidence-based, defined disease targets and biomarkers for prediction of response, including targets for remission induction, and guidelines on drug withdrawal. Recent treatment consensus plans and guidelines are discussed and compared, including the 2015 NHS England clinical policy statement, the 2014 Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) treatment plans and the 2011 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines. Evidence for new agents such as tocilizumab, rituximab, golimumab, ustekinumab, certolizumab and tofacitinib is promising: the recent clinical trials are summarized here. Stratification of individual patient treatment remains a goal, and predictive biomarkers have been shown to predict success in the withdrawal of methotrexate therapy.

SUMMARY

There are promising advances in the treatment approaches, disease activity criteria, clinical guidelines, pharmaceutical choices and individually stratified therapy choices for polyarticular JIA.

Rituximab use in young adults diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis unresponsive to conventional treatment: report of 6 cases

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in childhood. Without an effective therapy, patients may progress quickly to functional disability. Recently, depletion of B cells emerged as a new approach for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, including JIA. We describe six cases of JIA patients followed at a referral center for Rheumatology and Pediatric Rheumatology, submitted to treatment with rituximab (RTX) after refractoriness to three anti-TNF agents. Patients received RTX cycles with two infusions every six months. Response to treatment was assessed by DAS28, HAQ/CHAQ, and an overall assessment by the doctor and the patient. Of our six patients, four were girls (mean age at onset of disease: 6.1 years; mean disease evolution time: 15.1 years; mean age upon receiving RTX: 21.6 years). Four patients belonged to polyarticular subtype (1 rheumatoid factor [RF]-negative, 3 FR-positive), a patient with systemic JIA subtype with a polyarticular course and arthritis related to enthesitis. Of our six patients, five responded to treatment; and during the course of 12 months, the clinical response was maintained, although not sustained. However, discontinuation by infusion reactions caused the withdrawal of RTX in two patients. The use of RTX in JIA is restricted to cases refractory to other biological agents and, even considering that this study was held in a small number of advanced patients, RTX proved to be an effective therapeutic option.

Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a revolution in care

A generation ago, children with arthritis faced a lifetime of pain and disability. Today, there are a multitude of treatment options, including a variety of biologics targeting key cytokines and other inflammatory mediators. While non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids were once the mainstay of therapy, they are now largely used as bridge or adjunctive therapies. Among the conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, methotrexate remains first-line therapy for most children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) due to its long track record of safety and effectiveness in the management of peripheral arthritis. Sulfasalazine and leflunomide may also have a secondary role. The tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have shown tremendous benefit in children with polyarticular JIA and likely in enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic JIA as well. There may be additional benefit in combining TNFi with methotrexate. Abatacept and tocilizumab also appear to benefit polyarticular JIA; the role of rituximab remains unclear. For the treatment of systemic JIA, while the TNFi are of less benefit, blockade of interleukin-1 or interleukin-6 is highly effective. Additionally, interleukin-1 blockade appears to be effective treatment of macrophage activation syndrome, one of the most dangerous complications of JIA; specifically, anakinra in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids may obviate the need for cytotoxic approaches. In contrast, methotrexate along with the TNFi and abatacept are effective agents for the management of uveitis, another complication of JIA. Overall, the biologics have demonstrated an impressive safety record in children with JIA, although children do need to be monitored for rare but potentially dangerous adverse events, such as tuberculosis and other infections; paradoxical development of additional autoimmune diseases; and possibly an increased risk of malignancy. Finally, there may be a window of opportunity during which children with JIA will demonstrate most optimal responses to aggressive therapy, underscoring the need for rapid diagnosis and initiation of treatment.

Cost of biologics in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a factor not to be overlooked

Biologics are a promising treatment option for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) but drug costs are very high compared to conventional treatment. From a socioeconomic view the additional costs of new interventions should be weighed against their incremental health benefits compared to standard care. Therefore we evaluated data on cost-effectiveness of biologics in JIA. We searched Medline, Embase, and The York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination database for relevant literature. Current data show that biologics are reducing direct and indirect healthcare costs if one excludes the costs of the drug itself. The costs of biologics are more than ten times as high as conventional drug treatment. As a result of limited data, no comparison on cost-effectiveness between biologics could be performed. Although data on long-term cost-effectiveness of biologics are lacking, the expectation is that they will be cost-effective in the long-term. The idea behind this is that biologic treatment should be administered to patients that without these drugs would incur high direct and indirect costs due to continuous severe disease resulting in irreversible disabilities. In our opinion the best cost benefit could be gained if these patients receive biologic treatment introduced early in the disease. This is in order to minimize irreversible damage to the joints and minimize need for long-term biologic therapy by early suppression of the disease. To support these hypotheses future research is needed on long-term cost-effectiveness of all biologics used in JIA.

Systemic arthritis in children: a review of clinical presentation and treatment

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) constitutes a small part of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), yet has a disproportionally higher rate of mortality. Despite being grouped under JIA, it is considered to be a multifactorial autoinflammatory disease. The objective of this paper is to review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical manifestations, complications, therapy, prognosis, and outcome of sJIA. The presentation and clinical manifestations of sJIA have not changed much in the past several decades, but the collective understanding of the pathogenesis and the development of new targeted therapies (particularly the biologic agents) have transformed and improved the disease outcome for children with sJIA.

Elevated BAFF (BLyS) and APRIL in Juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients: relation to clinical manifestations and disease activity

OBJECTIVE

To assess the level of B-cell activating factor belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF) also known as B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) and A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) in the serum of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients and to detect their relation to the clinical manifestations and disease activity in the different subtypes of the disease.

METHODS

Seventy-four consecutively recruited JIA patients were clinically examined, the Juvenile arthritis disease activity score in 27 joints (JADAS-27) calculated and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) used to measure the functional status. Thirty-four healthy matched children served as controls. Routine laboratory examinations were recorded and serum BAFF and April were determined.

RESULTS

The JIA patients were 20 systemic-onset, 31 oligoarticular and 23 polyarticular. Serum BAFF and APRIL were elevated in JIA patients being higher in systemic onset and both significantly correlated. APRIL significantly correlated with both JADAS-27 and CHAQ scores while BAFF correlated only with JADAS-27. The APRIL serum levels were significantly associated with the presence of RF and ANA. The BAFF serum levels were significantly higher in oligoarticular onset JIA patients with uveitis compared to those without.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest increased BAFF and APRIL serum levels in JIA patients denoting their possible role in the disease and calling for additional research to elucidate the intrinsic mechanisms explaining APRIL and BAFF over expression.

Updated consensus statement on the use of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Since initial approval for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), rituximab has been evaluated in clinical trials involving various populations with RA. Information has also been gathered from registries. This report therefore updates the 2007 consensus document on the use of rituximab in the treatment of RA.

METHODS

Preparation of this new document involved many international experts experienced in the treatment of RA. Following a meeting to agree upon the core agenda, a systematic literature review was undertaken to identify all relevant data. Data were then interrogated by a drafting committee, with subsequent review and discussion by a wider expert committee leading to the formulation of an updated consensus statement. These committees also included patients with RA.

RESULTS

The new statement covers wide-ranging issues including the use of rituximab in earlier RA and impact on structural progression, and aspects particularly pertinent to rituximab such as co-medication, optimal dosage regimens, repeat treatment cycles and how to manage non-response. Biological therapy following rituximab usage is also addressed, and safety concerns including appropriate screening for hepatitis, immunoglobulin levels and infection risk. This consensus statement will support clinicians and inform patients when using B-cell depletion in the management of RA, providing up-to-date information and highlighting areas for further research.

CONCLUSION

New therapeutic strategies and treatment options for RA, a chronic destructive and disabling disease, have expanded over recent years. These have been summarised in general strategic suggestions and specific management recommendations, emphasising the importance of expedient disease-modifying antirheumatic drug implementation and tight disease control. This consensus statement is in line with these fundamental principles of management.

[The importance of biologicals in the treatment of SoJIA]

Systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SoJIA) remains difficult to treat. In addition to conventional antirheumatic therapy with non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs (NSARDs), steroids or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologicals offer a new therapeutic approach for this disease in that they are able to target pathogenically relevant cytokines and effector cells. Some biologicals are already approved for use in children with rheumatic disease.In order to assess the currently available data on the use of biologicals in SoJIA, we performed a Medline search for the period 2005 to March 2010, including the MeSH terms "SoJIA", "systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis" and"biologicals", as well as an NIH study registry search. At Present there are scant and unconvincing data on the use of Etanercept or Adalimumab for the treatment of SoJIA. No results are published on the use of Infliximab or other new TNF-alpha inhibitors. The inhibition of IL-1 or IL-6 shows promising results. Data on the efficacy of Abatacept is limited due to very low numbers of SoJIA patients in the studies.Further studies on the use of biologicals in SoJIA while taking individual factors into consideration are required. The long-term safety of all biologicals should be investigated in prospective registers.