Colchicine-Induced Rhabdomyolysis in a Heart/Lung Transplant Patient With Concurrent Use of Cyclosporin, Pravastatin, and Azithromycin

Muscular toxicity of colchicine combined with statins: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database from 2004-2023

Background

Through an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), we explored the signal strength of adverse reactions (ADRs) related to myopathy caused by the combination of colchicine and statins and gained insight into the characteristics of these myopathy related ADRs.

Methods

We extracted data from the FAERS database about ADRs in individuals with myopathy resulting from the combination of colchicine and statins. The analysis was conducted for the period spanning from January 2004 to December 2023 using the reported odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) methods to assess muscle-related ADR signals.

Results

A total of 18,386 reports of statin myopathy-associated adverse reactions, 348 colchicine myopathy-associated adverse reactions, and 461 muscle-associated adverse reactions due to the combination of the two were collected; the strongest signals of statin myotoxicity events were for necrotizing myositis (ROR 50.47, 95% CL 41.74-61.01; IC 3.70 95% CL 3.25-4.08); the strongest signal for colchicine myotoxicity events was toxic myopathy (ROR 32.50, 95% CL 19.74-53.51; IC 4.97 95% CL 1.89-5.10), and the strongest signal for statins combined with colchicine was toxic myopathy (ROR 159.85, 95% CL 111.60-228.98; IC 7.22 95% CL 3.59-5.9); muscle-related adverse reactions signals were meaningful when the two drugs were combined in the order of colchicine combined with fluvastatin (ROR 187.38, 95% CL 96.68-363.17; IC 6.99 95% CL 1.65-5.68); colchicine combined with simvastatin in 135 cases (ROR 30.08. 95% CL 25.25-35.85; IC 4.80 95% CL 3.96-5.12); and colchicine combined with rosuvastatin (ROR 25.73, 95% CL 20.16-32.83; IC 4.59 95% CL 3.38-4.98) versus colchicine combined with atorvastatin (ROR 25.73, 95% CL 22.33-29.66; IC 4.59 95% CL 3.97-4.91) with almost identical signal intensity, followed by colchicine combined with pravastatin (ROR 13.67, 95% CL 9.17-20.37; IC 3.73 95% CL 1.87-4.47), whereas no signals were generated for lovastatin or pitavastatin.

Conclusion

Similar ADRs can occur when colchicine and statins are used individually or in combination; however, the strength of these reactions may differ. To minimize the risk of drug interactions, statins with less potential interactions, such as lovastatin, pitavastatin, and pravastatin, should be chosen, and myopathy-related indices and symptoms should be closely monitored during use.

Recent advances in the therapeutic management of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease

Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease is a form of crystal-induced arthropathy that arises from the accumulation of calcium pyrophosphate crystals within joints and soft tissues. This process leads to inflammation and damage to the affected joints. It can present asymptomatically or as acute or chronic inflammatory arthritis. Risk factors and comorbidities, including prior joint injury, osteoarthritis, hereditary or familial predisposition, and metabolic diseases, should be evaluated in CPPD cases. The management of CPPD remains a challenge in the sparsity of randomized controlled trials. The lack of such trials makes it difficult to establish evidence-based treatment protocols for CPPD. This review provides an overview of the current pharmacological management of CPPD, focusing on reducing inflammation, alleviating symptoms, and preventing acute flares. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and colchicine are effective in managing acute CPP arthritis. Colchicine may also be used prophylactically to prevent recurrent flares. In cases where other treatments have failed, anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, can be administered to alleviate acute flares. The management of chronic CPP inflammatory arthritis includes NSAIDs and/or colchicine, followed by hydroxychloroquine, low-dose glucocorticoids, and methotrexate, with limited data on efficacy. Tocilizumab can be used in refractory cases. In small studies, synovial destruction using intra-articular injection of yttrium 90 can decrease pain. To date, no disease-modifying therapies exist that reduce articular calcification in CPPD.

Colchicine Drug Interaction Errors and Misunderstandings: Recommendations for Improved Evidence-Based Management

Colchicine is useful for the prevention and treatment of gout and a variety of other disorders. It is a substrate for CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and concomitant administration with CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitors can cause life-threatening drug-drug interactions (DDIs) such as pancytopenia, multiorgan failure, and cardiac arrhythmias. Colchicine can also cause myotoxicity, and coadministration with other myotoxic drugs may increase the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Many sources of DDI information including journal publications, product labels, and online sources have errors or misleading statements regarding which drugs interact with colchicine, as well as suboptimal recommendations for managing the DDIs to minimize patient harm. Furthermore, assessment of the clinical importance of specific colchicine DDIs can vary dramatically from one source to another. In this paper we provide an evidence-based evaluation of which drugs can be expected to interact with colchicine, and which drugs have been stated to interact with colchicine but are unlikely to do so. Based on these evaluations we suggest management options for reducing the risk of potentially severe adverse outcomes from colchicine DDIs. The common recommendation to reduce the dose of colchicine when given with CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitors is likely to result in colchicine toxicity in some patients and therapeutic failure in others. A comprehensive evaluation of the almost 100 reported cases of colchicine DDIs is included in table form in the electronic supplementary material. Colchicine is a valuable drug, but improvements in the information about colchicine DDIs are needed in order to minimize the risk of serious adverse outcomes.

A systematic review of the drug-drug interaction between statins and colchicine: Patient characteristics, etiologies, and clinical management strategies

Colchicine and statins are frequently co-prescribed for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, auto-inflammatory diseases, and gout. Both are substrates and inhibitors of the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 isozyme and P-glycoprotein so that taken together, they represent a clinically significant interaction. Data suggest the interaction may be associated with potentially life-threatening myopathies and rhabdomyolysis. The purposes of this systematic review (SR) were to gather and appraise evidence surrounding the statin-colchicine drug interaction and discuss related risk-mitigation strategies. An electronic literature search was performed. Twenty-one articles met the protocol to be included in the qualitative analysis: 18 case reports/series, 2 retrospective observational cohort studies, and 1 retrospective case-control study. Thirty-eight patients developed an adverse drug event (ADE) receiving statin-colchicine combination therapy; 25 (66%) patients developed myopathy; 10 (26%) patients developed rhabdomyolysis, and three (8%) patients developed neuromyopathy. Over 70% of patients developed ADEs on simvastatin or atorvastatin, and 80% of studies reported moderate-to-high intensity statins. Colchicine dosing varied but ranged between 0.5 to 1.5 mg daily. Sixty-two percent of patients in the case reports/series had comorbid renal disease. Seven studies (33% of all included studies) reported patients taking concomitant interacting medications at the CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein efflux pump. Seventeen studies (81% of all included studies) reported ADEs leading to hospitalization. A multivariate analysis from one case-control study identified risk factors prognosticating myopathy ADEs in patients taking statin-colchicine therapy: comorbid renal disease and/or cirrhosis, colchicine doses 1.2 mg daily or greater, and concomitant interacting medications. Clinicians must be cognizant that the statin-colchicine drug interaction may lead to patient harm and thus should employ risk-mitigation strategies for statin-associated muscle symptoms. Future studies are warranted to validate clinically relevant risk factors that are strongly associated with the complications owing to the statin-colchicine drug interaction.

Colchicine-induced rhabdomyolysis: a review of 83 cases

A 74-year-old man with medical history significant for atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidaemia and coronary artery disease on atorvastatin presented to the emergency department with profound weakness. The patient reports he first noticed his weakness 4 weeks after starting colchicine, prescribed for recurrent pericarditis with pericardial effusion, a complication following recent coronary artery bypass grafting. The patient was also on prednisone therapy for presumed post-pericardiotomy syndrome. The weakness involved all four limbs but was more notable in the lower extremities, with preserved sensation and tenderness to palpation. Labs showed an elevated creatinine phosphokinase and serum creatinine consistent with rhabdomyolysis. Discontinuation of the offending medications, including colchicine and atorvastatin, as well as intravenous fluid resuscitation with physical rehabilitation, led to improvement in the patient's symptoms. He was eventually discharged to a rehabilitation facility to continue physical therapy.

Rosuvastatin and Colchicine combined myotoxicity: lessons to be learnt

Statins and colchicine co-administration consists of a potentially catastrophic drug-drug interaction since it provokes myotoxicity, myopathy and various degrees of rhabdomyolysis. Lipophilic statins and colchicine are biotransformed in the liver, primarily via CYP3A4 enzyme system leading to elevated blood levels of both agents and resulting in increased potential for combined myotoxicity. Hence, it would be of great clinical importance not only the awareness of this devastating complication but also the more advantageous type of statin that we should choose to achieve the recommended therapeutic goals regarding LDL levels with minimal myopathy risk. Therefore, once colchicine's use is commenced, a hydrophilic statin selection, such as rosuvastatin, seems favorable regarding the risk of myotoxicity. Herein, we aim to describe a patient with chronic kidney disease stage III and nephrotic syndrome that developed acute rhabdomyolysis soon after the administration of rosuvastatin while receiving colchicine. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the combined effect of rosuvastatin and colchicine in the setting of chronic kidney disease leading to myotoxicity.

Efficacy and safety of gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use in people with chronic kidney disease: a Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN)-initiated literature review

Gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use in people with underlying chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging, given limited treatment options and risk of worsening renal function with inappropriate treatment dosing. This literature review aimed to describe the current literature on the efficacy and safety of gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use in people with CKD stages 3-5. A literature search via PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was performed from 1 January 1959 to 31 January 2018. Inclusion criteria were studies with people with gout and renal impairment (i.e. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²), and with exposure to colchicine, interleukin-1 inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and glucocorticoids. All study designs were included. A total of 33 studies with efficacy and/or safety analysis stratified by renal function were reviewed-colchicine (n = 20), anakinra (n = 7), canakinumab (n = 1), NSAIDs (n = 3), and glucocorticoids (n = 2). A total of 58 studies reported these primary outcomes without renal function stratification-colchicine (n = 29), anakinra (n = 10), canakinumab (n = 6), rilonacept (n = 2), NSAIDs (n = 1), and glucocorticoids (n = 10). Most clinical trials excluded study participants with severe CKD (i.e. eGFR or CrCl of < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²). Information on the efficacy and safety outcomes of gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use stratified by renal function is lacking. Clinical trial results cannot be extrapolated for those with advanced CKD. Where possible, current and future gout flare studies should include patients with CKD and with study outcomes reported based on renal function and using standardised gout flare definition.

Potential therapeutic applications of phytoconstituents as immunomodulators: Pre-clinical and clinical evidences

Autoimmune and infectious diseases are the major public health issues and have gained great attention in the last few years for the search of new agents with therapeutic benefits on the host immune functions. In recent years, natural products (NPs) have been studied broadly for their multi-targeted activities under pathological conditions. Interestingly, several attempts have been made to outline the immunomodulatory properties of NPs. Research on in-vitro and in-vivo models have shown the immunomodulatory activity of NPs, is due to their antiinflammatory property, induction of phagocytosis and immune cells stimulation activity. Moreover, studies on humans have suggested that phytomedicines reduce inflammation and could provide appropriate benefits either in single form or complex combinations with other agents preventing disease progression, subsequently enhancing the efficacy of treatment to combat multiple malignancies. However, the exact mechanism of immunomodulation is far from clear, warranting more detailed investigations on their effectiveness. Nevertheless, the reduction of inflammatory cascades is considered as a prime protective mechanism in a number of inflammation regulated autoimmune diseases. Altogether, this review will discuss the biological activities of plant-derived secondary metabolites, such as polyphenols, alkaloids, saponins, polysaccharides and so forth, against various diseases and their potential use as an immunomodulatory agent under pathological conditions.

Transporter-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions and Their Significance

Drug transporters are considered to be determinants of drug disposition and effects/toxicities by affecting the absorption, distribution, and excretion of drugs. Drug transporters are generally divided into solute carrier (SLC) family and ATP binding cassette (ABC) family. Widely studied ABC family transporters include P-glycoprotein (P-GP), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs). SLC family transporters related to drug transport mainly include organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs), organic anion transporters (OATs), organic cation transporters (OCTs), organic cation/carnitine transporters (OCTNs), peptide transporters (PEPTs), and multidrug/toxin extrusions (MATEs). These transporters are often expressed in tissues related to drug disposition, such as the small intestine, liver, and kidney, implicating intestinal absorption of drugs, uptake of drugs into hepatocytes, and renal/bile excretion of drugs. Most of therapeutic drugs are their substrates or inhibitors. When they are comedicated, serious drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may occur due to alterations in intestinal absorption, hepatic uptake, or renal/bile secretion of drugs, leading to enhancement of their activities or toxicities or therapeutic failure. This chapter will illustrate transporter-mediated DDIs (including food drug interaction) in human and their clinical significances.

ABC Family Transporters

The transport of specific molecules across lipid membranes is an essential function of all living organisms. The processes are usually mediated by specific transporters. One of the largest transporter families is the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family. More than 40 ABC transporters have been identified in human, which are divided into 7 subfamilies (ABCA to ABCG) based on their gene structure, amino acid sequence, domain organization, and phylogenetic analysis. Of them, at least 11 ABC transporters including P-glycoprotein (P-GP/ABCB1), multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs/ABCCs), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) are involved in multidrug resistance (MDR) development. These ABC transporters are expressed in various tissues such as the liver, intestine, kidney, and brain, playing important roles in absorption, distribution, and excretion of drugs. Some ABC transporters are also involved in diverse cellular processes such as maintenance of osmotic homeostasis, antigen processing, cell division, immunity, cholesterol, and lipid trafficking. Several human diseases such as cystic fibrosis, sitosterolemia, Tangier disease, intrahepatic cholestasis, and retinal degeneration are associated with mutations in corresponding transporters. This chapter will describe function and expression of several ABC transporters (such as P-GP, BCRP, and MRPs), their substrates and inhibitors, as well as their clinical significance.

Clinical Implications of P-Glycoprotein Modulation in Drug-Drug Interactions

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) occur commonly and may lead to severe adverse drug reactions if not handled appropriately. Considerable information to support clinical decision making regarding potential DDIs is available in the literature and through various systems providing electronic decision support for healthcare providers. The challenge for the prescribing physician lies in sorting out the evidence and identifying those drugs for which potential interactions are likely to become clinically manifest. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a drug transporting protein that is found in the plasma membranes in cells of barrier and elimination organs, and plays a role in drug absorption and excretion. Increasingly, P-gp has been acknowledged as an important player in potential DDIs and a growing body of information on the role of this transporter in DDIs has become available from research and from the drug approval process. This has led to a clear need for a comprehensive review of P-gp-mediated DDIs with a focus on highlighting the drugs that are likely to lead to clinically relevant DDIs. The objective of this review is to provide information for identifying and interpreting evidence of P-gp-mediated DDIs and to suggest a classification for individual drugs based on both in vitro and in vivo evidence (substrates, inhibitors and inducers). Further, various ways of handling potential DDIs in clinical practice are described and exemplified in relation to drugs interfering with P-gp.

Characterization of Statin-Associated Myopathy Case Reports in Thailand Using the Health Product Vigilance Center Database

BACKGROUND

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors [statins], a widely prescribed cholesterol-lowering therapy, are associated with muscle-related adverse events. While characteristics of such events are well documented in Western countries, little data exists for the Thai population.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of patients, type and dosing of statin, and to identify patterns of drug use that may be associated with such adverse events using the national pharmacovigilance database known as Thai Vigibase.

METHOD

Muscle-related adverse events involving statins in the Thai Vigibase from 1996 to December 2009 were identified. For each report, the following information was extracted: patient demographics, co-morbidities, detailed information of adverse event, detailed information of suspected drug, treatment and outcome, as well as causality assessment and quality of reports. Descriptive statistics were performed for all study variables.

RESULTS

A total of 198 cases of statin-associated muscle-related adverse events were identified. Mean age was 61.4 ± 12.4 years of age and 59.6% were female. Simvastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and cerivastatin were implicated as the suspected drug in 163 (82.3%), 24 (12.1%), 10 (5.1%) and 1 (0.5%) cases, respectively. Rhabdomyolysis accounted for 55.6% of all muscle-related adverse events. Drug interactions known to enhance such toxicity of statins were identified in 40.9% of the total set of reports. Similar to studies from Western countries, fibrates, HIV protease inhibitors, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, azole antifungals and macrolides were commonly found in such cases. Interestingly, colchicine has been identified as the second most common drug interaction in our database. Case fatality rates were 0.9, 1.6 and 16.7%, when there were 0, 1 and ≥2 interacting drugs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of muscle-related adverse events with statins in the Thai population showed some similarities and differences compared with Western countries. Such similarities included advanced age, female sex, certain co-morbidities and drug interactions. While the majority of interacting drugs are well known, a big proportion of cases of statin-colchicine interaction attributed to long-term use of colchicine in Thailand was noted and should be further investigated. Based on these results, an attempt to avoid dangerous and well-known drug interactions among statin users should be implemented nationwide.

Drug Class Combination–Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Objective: To evaluate the quality of available evidence of drug class combinations and their association with the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE and Embase databases was completed using the following terms: “risk factor AND (acute kidney injury or acute kidney failure) AND (drug or medication).” Study Selection and Data Extraction: Inclusion criteria were the following: English language, full-text availability, and at least 1 drug-combination. Each citation was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. The literature was evaluated using the quality of evidence component of GRADE. No standardized definition of AKI was applied throughout.. Data Synthesis: Out of 2139 total citations, 151 were assessed for full-text review, with 121 citations (6%) meeting inclusion criteria, producing76 unique drug class combinations. Overall, 56 combinations (73.7%) were considered very low quality; 12 (15.8%) were considered low quality. There were 8 (10.5%) of moderate quality, and no combination was considered high quality. 58 (76%) combinations that had a single citation,with a mean of 1.6 citations per drug class combination. The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and diuretics was reported in 10 citations, the largest number of citations. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a lack of well-designed studies addressing drug class combination–associated AKI. The combination of NSAIDs and diuretics with or without additional renin-angiotensin aldosterone agents had the strongest level of evidence. Despite limitations, the information included in this review may result in additional scrutiny about combining certain individual nephrotoxic drugs.

Colchicine-Induced Acute Neuromyopathy in a Patient Using Concomitant Fluconazole: Case Report and Literature Review

A 54-year-old woman presented at the emergency department after experiencing lower limb weakness and bilateral ankle pain for 2 days. She had a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus nephropathy with chronic kidney disease, and chronic gouty arthritis. She had received 0.6 mg colchicine orally once or twice daily for 8 months. Four days prior to her emergency department visit, she was discharged from our nephrology ward, where she had been admitted because of a urinary tract infection. During hospitalization, she was treated with intravenous cefazolin for 7 days. Because of persistent symptoms, we performed repeated urinalysis, which revealed the presence of yeast. She was diagnosed with fungal cystitis, and was administered a 7-day course of once-daily oral fluconazole (100 mg). On day 5 of the course, she was discharged and asked to continue taking oral colchicine (0.6 mg, twice daily), as well as fluconazole for the full 7-day course. Neurological examination revealed marked symmetrical weakness (Medical Research Council grade 4/5). Her sensation and coordination were intact. Initial laboratory investigation revealed hyperkalemia (6.2 mmol/L), and blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and creatine kinase levels of 181, 11.16 mg/dL, and 803 U/L respectively. Her liver function tests showed elevated alanine aminotransferase levels (112 U/L). Electromyographic results were consistent with colchicine neuromyopathy. Ten days after treatment cessation, muscle enzyme levels normalized and weakness gradually disappeared. We used the Drug Interaction Probability Scale to evaluate our patient’s case. A score of 5 was calculated, indicating that the drug–drug interaction was the probable cause of neuromuscular toxicity.

Colchicine as an anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective agent

INTRODUCTION

Colchicine has been successfully used for the treatment of neutrophilic disorders such as familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), Behçet disease (BD) and gout. There is a growing interest in its cardiovascular effects.

AREAS COVERED

A MEDLINE/PubMed search for English articles published from January 1972 to June 2015 was completed using the following terms: therapy, pharmacokinetics, efficiency, side effects, toxicity, heart, colchicine, inflammation, FMF, amyloidosis, BD, gout, cardiovascular disorders, pericarditis, arrhythmias, inflammation, neutrophils, platelets.

EXPERT OPINION

By targeting neutrophils, endothelial cells and platelets, inhibiting mitosis, vascular hyperplasia and fibrosis, colchicine improves outcomes of pericarditis, myocardial ischemia and coronary interventions. Studies in neutrophilic rheumatic diseases and cardiovascular disorders demonstrated that oral colchicine at doses of 0.5 - 2.5 mg/daily is useful for treating pericarditis, myocardial ischemia and coronary occlusion. In rheumatic and cardiovascular disorders, therapeutic doses of the drug reduce C-reactive protein to levels below 2 mg/L, prevent myocardial damage and preserve normal values of atrial and ventricular impulse generation. One of the drug's frequent side effects is diarrhea, which is treated by diet modification or temporary discontinuation of the therapy. Certain drugs (macrolides, statins), comorbidities and certain genetic factors increase risk of colchicine toxicity.

Effect of steady-state atorvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of colchicine in healthy adults under fasted conditions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Colchicine is commonly prescribed for gout. While minimally metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 isoenzyme, colchicine is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Atorvastatin is metabolized primarily by CYP3A4 and is a P-gp inhibitor. Patients with gout often have dyslipidemia; therefore, the potential for co-administration of atorvastatin and colchicine exists. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of oral atorvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of a single, oral dose of colchicine.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy adult subjects were enrolled in this single-center, open-label, non-randomized, one-sequence, two-period drug-drug interaction study. On day 1, subjects received a single oral dose of colchicine 0.6 mg. After a 14-day washout, subjects received atorvastatin 40 mg once daily for 14 days followed by a single dose of colchicine 0.6 mg co-administered with atorvastatin 40 mg on day 28. Main outcome measures were colchicine maximum plasma concentration (C max), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC last), and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC∞), which were compared with and without concurrent atorvastatin.

RESULTS

Colchicine AUC last, AUC∞, and C max increased by 27, 24, and 31 %, respectively, when co-administered with atorvastatin. Corresponding 90 % confidence intervals around the ratios were outside the established no-effect 80-125 % interval.

CONCLUSION

Increased colchicine exposure was observed after a single dose of colchicine was administered with steady-state atorvastatin. Additional studies with multiple dosing of both drugs are needed to further determine the clinical implications of these results.

Post-transplant recurrent pericarditis with pericardial tamponade is successfully treated with colchicine: A case report

Recurrent pericarditis is a rare complication following renal transplantation. Colchicine, an inhibitor of microtubule polymerization, has been recommended for the treatment of recurrent acute pericarditis in non-transplant patients and is commonly used for the treatment of gout in transplant patients. However, the use of colchicine for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis in renal transplant patients has rarely been reported. In the present study, a rare case of recurrent pericarditis, manifested as large pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade within the first year following renal transplantation, was successfully treated with colchicine. Therefore, low-dose colchicine may be a safe and effective option for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis in renal transplant patients.

Colchicine-induced myoneuropathy in a cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipient

Colchicine is a relatively safe medication that is widely used for both prevention and treatment of gout attack. However, serious adverse events, including myoneuropathy and multiorgan failure, have been reported. We report a case of colchicine-induced myoneuropathy in a female kidney transplant recipient who had been taking cyclosporine. She developed gastrointestinal discomfort and paresthesia 5 days after the initiation of colchicine. She showed signs of myoneuropathy, and hepatic and renal injury. Colchicine toxicity was suspected, and colchicine was discontinued. Her symptoms and laboratory findings improved gradually. Literature was reviewed for previous reports of colchicine-induced myoneuropathy in solid organ transplant recipients.

The epidemiology and treatment of gout

The development and expression of gout depends on three key steps: (1) chronic hyperuricemia, (2) the growth of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals, and (3) interaction between MSU crystals and the inflammatory system. Epidemiological studies have continued to improve our understanding of the environmental and genetic factors which influence chronic hyperuricemia and gout. The influence of obesity, alcohol, race, sex, age, and specific dietary components will be discussed below. The primary mechanism of hyperuricemia is insufficient renal clearance of uric acid which in turn is dependent on transport of uric acid in the proximal renal tubule. Knowledge of the transport mechanisms has improved understanding of the genetic influences on gout and is relevant to understanding of the effects of drugs which can increase or decrease renal uric acid clearance. The application of established principles of management including diagnosis through crystal identification, the gradual introduction of hypouricemic therapy with the use of prophylaxis to reduce the risk of flares, identification of a suitably low target of plasma urate, a progressive increase in therapy to achieve the target and taking steps to encourage good compliance, has the potential to improve outcomes for patients with this very common affliction. The potential role for new therapies will also be discussed.