Impact of Contrast Media Concentration on Low-Kilovolt Computed Tomography Angiography: A Systematic Preclinical Approach

Influence of Contrast Media Temperature and Concentration on Patient Comfort and Safety in Computed Tomography: CATCHY II Trial

BACKGROUND

Previous research on the necessity to reduce the viscosity of contrast media (CM) by either prewarming CM before injection during computed tomography (CT) or by using less concentrated CM has yielded conflicting results. In addition, there is limited evidence on patient comfort.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to examine if prewarming CM, with varying CM concentrations, is superior to CM at room temperature, with respect to patient comfort and safety in CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All elective patients scheduled for contrast-enhanced CT scans at Maastricht University Medical Center+ between October 27, 2021 and October 31, 2022 were eligible for inclusion when a questionnaire evaluating patient comfort was completed. This 1-year period was divided into 4 intervals (4 groups): group 1 (370 mg I/mL, 37°C), group 2 (370 mg I/mL, room temperature), group 3 (300 mg I/mL, 37°C), and group 4 (300 mg I/mL, room temperature). All CT scans were performed using state of the art equipment (Siemens Healthineers; SOMATOM Force and SOMATOM Definition AS, Forchheim, Germany). Contrast media injections were performed using a dual-head power injector (Stellant; Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany) and individualized to body weight and/or tube voltage, depending on the CM protocols. After the CT scan, patients completed a questionnaire covering the primary outcomes comfort, pain, and adverse events such as feelings of heat, nausea, vomiting, itchiness, urticaria, difficulty breathing, dizziness, goosebumps, or an odd taste. Technicians were asked to report any adverse events, including extravasation and allergic-like reactions. The secondary outcome involved attenuation (in Hounsfield unit, HU), which was evaluated by assessing the HU of the coronary arteries for vascular CT, and liver enhancement in portal venous CT. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for continuous scale outcomes and χ 2 tests for examining adverse events.

RESULTS

Results showed no significant differences examining comfort score ( P = 0.054), pain sensation ( P = 0.469), extravasation ( P = 0.542), or allergic-like reaction ( P = 0.253). Significant differences among the 4 groups were found with respect to heat sensation and dizziness ( P = 0.005 and P = 0.047, respectively), showing small effect sizes. All other adverse effects showed no significant results. No significant differences were observed in coronary attenuation among the 4 groups in coronary CT angiography ( P = 0.113). When analyzing attenuation in portal venous CT scans, significant differences were found among the 4 groups ( P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Administrating prewarmed CM is nonsuperior compared with CM at room temperature in relation to patient comfort and safety, regardless of CM concentration. These findings suggest that prewarming CM before usage is unnecessary, which will improve the efficiency of daily clinical workflow and brings environmentally friendly benefits.

Intravenous Contrast Material for Cardiac Computed Tomography: Results From the Open-label Multicenter, Multivendor Italian Registry of Contrast Material Use in Cardiac Computed Tomography

PURPOSE

The Italian Registry of Contrast Material use in Cardiac Computed Tomography (iRCM-CCT) is a multicenter, multivendor, observational study on the use of contrast media (CM) in patients undergoing cardiac computed tomography (CCT). The aim of iRCM-CCT is to assess image quality and safety profile of intravenous CM compounds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

iRCM-CCT enrolled 1842 consecutive patients undergoing CCT (≥50 per site) at 20 cluster sites with the indication of suspected coronary artery disease. Demographic characteristics, CCT, and CM protocols, clinical indications, safety markers, radiation dose reports, qualitative (ie, poor vascular enhancement) and quantitative (ie, HU attenuation values) image parameters were recorded. A centralized coordinating center collected and assessed all image parameters.

RESULTS

The cohort included 891 men and 951 women (age: 63±14 y, body mass index: 26±4 kg/m2) studied with ≥64 detector rows computed tomography scanners and different iodinated intravenous CM protocols and compounds (iodixanol, iopamidol, iohexol, iobitridol, iopromide, and iomeprol). The following vascular attenuation was reported: 504±147 HU in the aorta, 451±146 HU in the right coronary artery, 474±146 HU in the left main, 451±146 HU in the left anterior descending artery, and 441±149 HU in the circumflex artery. In 4% of cases the image quality was not satisfactory due to poor enhancement. The following adverse reactions to CM were recorded: 6 (0.3%) extravasations and 17 (0.9%) reactions (11 mild, 4 moderate, 2 severe).

CONCLUSIONS

In a multicenter registry on CM use during CCT the prevalence of CM-related adverse reactions was very low. The appropriate use of CM is a major determinant of image quality.

Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Image Quality With High-concentration and Low-concentration Contrast Agents: The Randomized CONCENTRATE Trial

PURPOSE

To confirm that the image quality of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography with a low tube voltage (80 to 100 kVp), iterative reconstruction, and low-concentration contrast agents (iodixanol 270 to 320 mgI/mL) was not inferior to that with conventional high tube voltage (120 kVp) and high-concentration contrast agent (iopamidol 370 mgI/mL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial enrolled a total of 318 patients from 8 clinical sites. All patients were randomly assigned 1: 1: 1 for each contrast medium of 270, 320, and 370 mgI/mL. CT scans were taken with a standard protocol in the high-concentration group (370 mgI/mL) and with 20 kVp lower protocol in the low-concentration group (270 or 320 mgI/mL). Image quality and radiation dose were compared between the groups. Image quality was evaluated with a score of 1 to 4 as subject image quality.

RESULTS

The mean HU, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio of the 3 groups were significantly different (all P<0.0001). The signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of the low-concentration groups were significantly lower than those of the high-concentration group (P<0.05). However, the image quality scores were not significantly different among the 3 groups (P=0.745). The dose length product and effective dose of the high-concentration group were significantly higher than those of the low-concentration group (P<0.0001 and 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The CT protocol with iterative reconstruction and lower tube voltage for low-concentration contrast agents significantly reduced the effective radiation dose (mean: 3.7±2.7 to 4.1±3.1 mSv) while keeping the subjective image quality as good as the standard protocol (mean: 5.7±3.4 mSv).

Contrast medium protocols in routine chest CT: a survey study

BACKGROUND

Administration of contrast medium (CM) is an important image quality factor in computed tomography (CT) of the chest. There is no clear evidence or guidelines on CM strategies for chest CT, thus a consensus approach is needed.

PURPOSE

To survey the potential impact on differences in chest CT protocols, with emphasis on strategies for the administration of CM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 170 respondents were included in this survey, which used two different approaches: (i) an online survey was sent to the members of the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI); and (ii) an email requesting a copy of their CT protocol was sent to all hospitals in Norway, and university hospitals in Sweden and Denmark. The survey focused on factors affecting CM protocols and enhancement in chest CT.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 24% (n = 170): 76% of the respondents used a CM concentration of ≥350 mgI/mL; 52% of the respondents used a fixed CM volume strategy. Fixed strategies for injection rate and delay were also the most common approach, practiced by 73% and 57% of the respondents, respectively. The fixed delay was in the range of 20-90 s. Of the respondents, 56% used flexible tube potential strategies (kV).

CONCLUSION

The chest CT protocols and CM administration strategies employed by the respondents vary widely, affecting the image quality. The results of this study underline the need for further research and consensus guidelines related to chest CT.

Optimization of the Parameters for the Test Bolus Technique in Computed Tomography Angiography of Head and Neck

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to optimize low-dose scanning protocols for the test bolus technique in 64-detector computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) of the head and neck.

METHODS

A total of 250 patients were randomly divided into 5 groups of 50 patients each: conventional group (group A: 120 kV, 100 mA) and low-dose groups (group B: 100 kV, 100 mA; group C: 100 kV, 50 mA; group D: 80 kV, 100 mA; and group E: 80 kV, 50 mA). Subjective scores and objective measurements (CT values of the aortic arch, image noise, and signal-to-noise ratio) were used to evaluate the image quality and compare the radiation doses of the 5 groups.

RESULTS

The image quality of the 5 groups met the diagnostic requirements, with no significant difference in the subjective evaluation findings (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in the CT values between the conventional group and low-dose groups (P < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference between groups B and C and between groups D and E (P > 0.05). Moreover, the volume CT dose index and dose length product of groups B, C, D, and E decreased by 37.62%, 70.45%, 65.28%, and 83.39%, respectively, compared with those of group A. Although the image noise of the low-dose groups increased, an appropriate reduction in the tube voltage enhanced the contrast medium-induced x-ray attenuation and increased the CT value, which resulted in a nonsignificant difference in the signal-to-noise ratio. Therefore, the image quality of the low-dose groups was not affected compared with that of the conventional group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the test bolus technique in 64-detector CTA, the low-dose protocol of using 80 kV and 50 mA reduces the radiation dose by 83.39% compared with the conventional scan, without affecting the image quality.

Influence of Contrast Material Temperature on Patient Comfort and Image Quality in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

International guideline recommendations on safe use of contrast media (CM) are conflicting regarding the necessity to prewarm iodinated CM.

PURPOSE

Aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of room temperature CM compared with prewarmed CM on image quality, safety, and patient comfort in abdominal computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

CATCHY (Contrast Media Temperature and Patient Comfort in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen) is a double-blinded, randomized noninferiority trial. Between February and August 2020, 218 participants referred for portal venous abdominal CT were prospectively and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. All patients received iopromide at 300 mg I/mL: group 1 at room temperature (~23°C [~73°F]) and group 2 prewarmed to body temperature (37°C [99°F]). A state-of-the-art individualized CM injection protocol was used, based on body weight and adapted to tube voltage. Primary outcome was absolute difference in mean liver attenuation between groups, calculated with a 2-sided 95% confidence interval. The noninferiority margin was set at -10 HU. Secondary outcomes were objective (signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio) and subjective image quality; CM extravasations and other adverse events; and participant comfort (5-point scale questionnaire) and pain (numeric rating scale). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04249479).

RESULTS

The absolute difference in mean attenuation between groups was + 4.23 HU (95% confidence interval, +0.35 to +8.11; mean attenuation, 122.2 ± 13.1 HU in group 1, 118.0 ± 15.9 HU in group 2; P = 0.03). Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and subjective image quality were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.53, 0.23, and 0.99 respectively). Contrast extravasation occurred in 1 patient (group 2), and no other adverse events occurred. Comfort scores were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (P = 0.03); pain did not significantly differ (perceived P > 0.99; intensity P = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Not prewarming iodinated CM was found noninferior in abdominal CT imaging. Prewarming conferred no beneficial effect on image quality, safety, and comfort, and might therefore no longer be considered a prerequisite in state-of-the art injection protocols for parenchymal imaging.

Effect of decreased contrast injection flow rate on aortic enhancement in 80-KV peak CT with contrast dose reduction

BACKGROUND

Effect of decreased injection flow rate of contrast agent at the same iodine dose and delivery rate on aortic enhancement has not been clearly elucidated.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of decreased injection flow rate of contrast agent on aortic peak enhancement in a dynamic flow phantom and on aortic enhancement in clinical dynamic 80-kVp computed tomography (CT) with contrast dose reduction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the dynamic flow phantom experiment, the effect of a decreased injection flow rate at the same total iodine dose and delivery rate on simulated aortic peak enhancement was evaluated. In the clinical retrospective study, we searched 312 patients with renal dysfunction who underwent an 80-kVp abdominal dynamic CT with 40% reduction of contrast agent from a standard 120-kVp protocol and measured the aortic enhancement at the level of the hepatic hilum. Independent predictors for aortic enhancement were determined by multiple linear regression analysis, and after adjustment of significant predictors, independent variables for acquiring optimal aortic enhancement, ≥300 HU, were determined by multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the phantom experiment, decreased flow rate showed a significant but small descent effect (6%-9%) on simulated aortic peak enhancement. In the multiple linear regression analysis, only age was an independent predictor of aortic enhancement; there was no independent predictor for optimal age-adjusted aortic enhancement of ≥300 HU.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased injection flow rate had a small influence on aortic enhancement in vitro but had no significant effect on the aortic enhancement in clinical dynamic 80-kVp CT.

Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta-Optimization of Automatic Tube Voltage Selection Settings to Reduce Radiation Dose or Contrast Medium in a Prospective Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of low-kV protocols with optimized automatic tube voltage selection (ATVS) settings to reduce either radiation dose or contrast medium (CM) with that of a reference protocol for computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the thoracoabdominal aorta.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved, single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial, 126 patients receiving CTA of the aorta were allocated to one of three computed tomography protocols: (A) reference protocol at 120 kVp and standard weight-adapted CM dose; (B) protocol at 90 kVp, reduced radiation and standard CM dose; and (C) protocol at 90 kVp, standard radiation and reduced CM dose. All three protocols were performed on a third-generation dual-source computed tomography scanner using the semimode of the ATVS system. The image-task-dependent optimization settings of the ATVS (slider level) were adjusted to level 11 (high-contrast task) for protocols A and B and level 3 (low-contrast task) for protocol C. Radiation dose parameters were assessed. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of protocols B and C were tested for noninferiority compared with A. Subjective image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Size-specific dose estimate was 34.3% lower for protocol B compared with A (P < 0.0001). Contrast medium was 20.2% lower for protocol C compared with A (P < 0.0001). Mean CNR in B and C was noninferior to protocol A (CNR of 30.2 ± 7, 33.4 ± 6.7, and 30.5 ± 8.9 for protocols A, B, and C, respectively). There was no significant difference in overall subjective image quality among protocols (4.09 ± 0.21, 4.03 ± 0.19, and 4.08 ± 0.17 for protocols A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The slider settings of an ATVS system can be adjusted to optimize either radiation dose or CM at noninferior image quality in low-kV CTA of the aorta. This optimization could be used to extend future ATVS algorithms to take clinical risk factors like kidney function of individual patients into account.

Computed tomography with a full FOV photon-counting detector in a clinical setting, the first experience

OBJECTIVES

to assess the feasibility of CT with an integrated photon-counting-detector system (PC-CT) in the body imaging of clinical patients.

METHODS

120 examinations using photon counting detector CT were evaluated in six groups: 1/ a standard-dose lung, 2/ low-dose lung, 3/ ultra-high resolution (UHR) lung, 4/ standard-dose abdominal, 5/ lower-dose abdominal, 6/ UHR abdominal CTA. All CT examinations were performed on a single-source prototype device equipped with a photon counting detector covering a 50 cm scan field of view. Standard dose examinations were performed with the use of detector element size of 0.4 mm, ultra-high-resolution examinations with the detector element size of 0.2 mm, respectively. The stability of the system during imaging was tested. The diagnostic quality of the acquired images was assessed based on the imaging of key structures and the noise level in five-point scale, the effective dose equivalent, dose length product and noise level, and also relation to body mass index and body surface area were compared with three similar groups of CT images made with energy integrating high end scanner. The parameters were evaluated using Wilcoxon test for independent samples, the independence was tested using Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

When PC-CT images radiation dose is compared with the similar imaging using energy integrating CT, the PC-CT shows lower dose in ultra-high resolution mode, the dose is significantly lower (p < 0.0001), the standard dose examinations were performed with the comparable radiation doses. PC-CT exhibited the significantly higher ratio between parenchyma signal and background noise both in lung and in abdominal imaging (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PC-CT showed imaging stability and excellent diagnostic quality at dose values that are comparable or better to the quality of energy integrating CT, the better signal and improved resolution is most important advantage of photon counting detector CT over energy integrating detector CT.

Safety Analysis of Iobitridol as a Nonionic Contrast Medium: A Postmarketing Multicenter Surveillance Study With 94,960 Patients Almost 20 Years After Introduction

OBJECTIVES

Our study sought to reevaluate the safety and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol as a nonionic contrast medium after almost 20 years of use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This noninterventional postmarketing surveillance noncontrolled, multicenter (168 centers in Germany) study enrolled 94,960 patients receiving intravenous or intra-arterial iobitridol. The majority of the adjusted population (n = 92,550, 98.2%) underwent either computed tomography examination (n = 46,502, 49.3%) or intravenous urography (n = 46,048, 48.8%). A standardized questionnaire was used to ascertain patient's information, known risk factors, renal function status, premedication, type of examination, injection of contrast agent, imaging quality, diagnostic value, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 469 patients (0.49%) experienced an adverse event (AE), and 24 patients (0.025%) reported a serious AE (SAE). All patients recovered and no fatal event occurred. The prevalence of AE was significantly higher in patients with at least one risk factor, with premedication, with a history of AE, in female and patients younger than 60 years old (P < 0.05). Presence of at least one risk factor is the only predictive factor for the prevalence of SAE (P = 0.042). In patients with a history of AE, premedication did not significantly lower the AE rate (P = 0.737). No statistically significant difference in the prevalence of AE between the different combination of cortisone and/or antihistamines as pretreatment was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Iobitridol is a safe contrast medium with a high tolerability and efficacy. Presence of risk factors such as cardiovascular diseases, allergies, or asthma was the only significant predictive factor for an AE and an SAE. Premedication did not significantly lower the occurrence of an AE and an SAE.

Contrast Saline Mixture DualFlow Injection Protocols for Low-Kilovolt Computed Tomography Angiography: A Systematic Phantom and Animal Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate a contrast media (CM)-saline mixture administration with DualFlow (DF) to adapt injection protocols to low-kilovolt (kV) computed tomography angiography (CTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In both a circulation phantom and animal model (5 Goettingen minipigs), 3 injection protocols were compared in dynamic thoracic CTA: (a) DF injection protocol at 80 kV with a iodine delivery rate (IDR) of 0.9 gI/s, a flowrate of 5 mL/s injected with a 60%/40% ratio of iopromide (300 mgI/mL) and saline (dose contrast medium 180 mgI/kg body weight [BW]); (b) reference CTA was performed at 120 kV and a 40% higher iodine dose applied at higher IDR (1.5 gI/s, 5 mL/s iopromide [300 mgI/mL]; no simultaneously administered saline; 300 mgI/kg BW); and (c) conventional single-flow (SF) protocol with identical IDR as the DF protocol at 80 kV (0.9 gI/s, 3 mL/s iopromide [300 mgI/mL]; no simultaneously administered saline; 180 mgI/kg BW). All 3 injection protocols are followed by a saline chaser applied at the same flow rate as the corresponding CM injection. Time attenuation curves representing the vascular bolus shape were generated for pulmonary trunk and descending aorta.

RESULTS

In the circulation phantom, pulmonary and aortic time attenuation curves for the 80 kV DF injection protocols do not significantly differ from the 80 kV SF and the 120 kV SF reference. In the animal model, the 80 kV DF protocol shows similar pulmonal and aortic peak enhancement when compared with the 120 kV SF and 80 kV SF protocols. Also, the bolus length above an attenuation level of 300 HU reveals no significant differences between injection protocols. However, the time to peak was significantly shorter for the 80 kV DF when compared with the 80 kV SF protocol (15.78 ± 1.9 seconds vs 18.24 ± 2.0 seconds; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

DualFlow injection protocols can be tailored for low-kV CTA by reducing the IDR while overall flow rate remains unchanged. Although no differences in attenuation were found, DF injections offer a shorter time to peak closer to the reference 120 kV protocol.This allows the use of DF injection protocols to calibrate bolus density in low-kV CTA and yields the potential for a more individualized CM administration.

Impact of iodine concentration and scan parameters on image quality, contrast enhancement and radiation dose in thoracic CT

Background

We investigated the impact of varying contrast medium (CM) densities and x-ray tube potentials on contrast enhancement (CE), image quality and radiation dose in thoracic computed tomography (CT) using two different scanning techniques.

Methods

Seven plastic tubes containing seven different CM densities ranging from of 0 to 600 HU were positioned inside a commercial chest phantom with padding, representing three different patient sizes. Helical scans of the phantom in single-source mode were obtained with varying tube potentials from 70 to 140 kVp. A constant volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) depending on phantom size and automatic dose modulation was tested. CE (HU) and image quality (contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR) were measured for all combinations of CM density and tube potential. A reference threshold of CE and kVp was defined as ≥ 200 HU and 120 kVp.

Results

For the medium-sized phantom, with a specific CE of 100–600 HU, the diagnostic CE (200 HU) at 70 kVp was ~ 90% higher than at 120 kVp, for both scan techniques (p < 0.001). Changes in CM density/specific HU together with lower kVp resulted in significantly higher CE and CNR (p < 0.001). When changing only the kVp, no statistically significant differences were observed in CE or CNR (p ≥ 0.094), using both dose modulation and constant CTDIvol.

Conclusions

For thoracic CT, diagnostic CE (≥ 200 HU) and maintained CNR were achieved by using lower CM density in combination with lower tube potential (< 120 kVp), independently of phantom size.

A Solution for Homogeneous Liver Enhancement in Computed Tomography: Results From the COMpLEx Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to reach homogeneous enhancement of the liver, irrespective of total body weight (TBW) or tube voltage. An easy-to-use rule of thumb, the 10-to-10 rule, which pairs a 10 kV reduction in tube voltage with a 10% decrease in contrast media (CM) dose, was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 256 patients scheduled for an abdominal CT in portal venous phase were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups. In group 1 (n = 64), a tube voltage of 120 kV and a TBW-adapted CM injection protocol was used: 0.521 g I/kg. In group 2 (n = 63), tube voltage was 90 kV and the TBW-adapted CM dosing factor remained 0.521 g I/kg. In group 3 (n = 63), tube voltage was reduced by 20 kV and CM dosing factor by 20% compared with group 1, in line with the 10-to-10 rule (100 kV; 0.417 g I/kg). In group 4 (n = 66), tube voltage was decreased by 30 kV paired with a 30% decrease in CM dosing factor compared with group 1, in line with the 10-to-10 rule (90 kV; 0.365 g I/kg). Objective image quality was evaluated by measuring attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU), signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio in the liver. Overall subjective image quality was assessed by 2 experienced readers by using a 5-point Likert scale. Two-sided P values below 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Mean attenuation values in groups 1, 3, and 4 were comparable (118.2 ± 10.0, 117.6 ± 13.9, 117.3 ± 21.6 HU, respectively), whereas attenuation in group 2 (141.0 ± 18.2 HU) was significantly higher than all other groups (P < 0.01). No significant difference in attenuation was found between weight categories 80 kg or less and greater than 80 kg within the 4 groups (P ≥ 0.371). No significant differences in subjective image quality were found (P = 0.180).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed 10-to-10 rule is an easily reproducible method resulting in similar enhancement in portal venous CT of the liver throughout the patient population, irrespective of TBW or tube voltage.

Individually Body Weight-Adapted Contrast Media Application in Computed Tomography Imaging of the Liver at 90 kVp

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the attenuation and image quality (IQ) of a body weight-adapted contrast media (CM) protocol compared with a fixed injection protocol in computed tomography (CT) of the liver at 90 kV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-nine consecutive patients referred for abdominal CT imaging in portal venous phase were included. Group 1 (n = 100) received a fixed CM dose with a total iodine load (TIL) of 33 g I at a flow rate of 3.5 mL/s, resulting in an iodine delivery rate (IDR) of 1.05 g I/s. Group 2 (n = 99) received a body weight-adapted CM protocol with a dosing factor of 0.4 g I/kg with a subsequent TIL adapted to the patients' weight. Injection time of 30 seconds was kept identical for all patients. Therefore, flow rate and IDR changed with different body weight. Patients were divided into 3 weight categories; 70 kg or less, 71 to 85 kg, and 86 kg or greater. Attenuation (HU) in 3 segments of the liver, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were used to evaluate objective IQ. Subjective IQ was assessed by a 5-point Likert scale. Differences between groups were statistically analyzed (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).

RESULTS

No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between groups. The CM volume and TIL differed significantly between groups (P < 0.01), with mean values in group 1 of 110 mL and 33 g I, and in group 2 of 104.1 ± 21.2 mL and 31.2 ± 6.3 g I, respectively. Flow rate and IDR were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05). Body weight-adapted protocoling led to more homogeneous enhancement of the liver parenchyma compared with a fixed protocol with a mean enhancement per weight category in group 2 of 126.5 ± 15.8, 128.2 ± 15.3, and 122.7 ± 21.2 HU compared with that in group 1 of 139.9 ± 21.4, 124.6 ± 24.8, and 116.2 ± 17.8 HU, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Body weight-adapted CM injection protocols result in more homogeneous enhancement of the liver parenchyma at 90 kV in comparison to a fixed CM volume with comparable objective and subjective IQ, whereas overall CM volume can be safely reduced in more than half of patients.