The Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Gadobutrol and Gadoteridol Show Similar Elimination Kinetics From the Brain After Repeated Intravenous Injections in Rabbits

Waiting times between examinations with intravascularly administered contrast media: a review of contrast media pharmacokinetics and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines

The pharmacokinetics of contrast media (CM) will determine how long safe waiting intervals between successive CT or MRI examinations should be. The Contrast Media Safety Committee has reviewed the data on pharmacokinetics of contrast media to suggest safe waiting intervals between successive contrast-enhanced imaging studies in relation to the renal function of the patient. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Consider a waiting time between elective contrast-enhanced CT and (coronary) angiography with successive iodine-based contrast media administrations in patients with normal renal function (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) of optimally 12 h (near complete clearance of the previously administered iodine-based contrast media) and minimally 4 h (if clinical indication requires rapid follow-up). KEY POINTS: • Pharmacokinetics of contrast media will guide safe waiting times between successive administrations. • Safe waiting times increase with increasing renal insufficiency. • Iodine-based contrast media influence MRI signal intensities and gadolinium-based contrast agents influence CT attenuation.

Different Impact of Gadopentetate and Gadobutrol on Inflammation-Promoted Retention and Toxicity of Gadolinium Within the Mouse Brain

OBJECTIVES

Using a murine model of multiple sclerosis, we previously showed that repeated administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine led to retention of gadolinium (Gd) within cerebellar structures and that this process was enhanced with inflammation. This study aimed to compare the kinetics and retention profiles of Gd in inflamed and healthy brains after application of the macrocyclic Gd-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadobutrol or the linear GBCA gadopentetate. Moreover, potential Gd-induced neurotoxicity was investigated in living hippocampal slices ex vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice at peak of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE; n = 29) and healthy control mice (HC; n = 24) were exposed to a cumulative dose of 20 mmol/kg bodyweight of either gadopentetate dimeglumine or gadobutrol (8 injections of 2.5 mmol/kg over 10 days). Magnetic resonance imaging (7 T) was performed at baseline as well as at day 1, 10, and 40 post final injection (pfi) of GBCAs. Mice were sacrificed after magnetic resonance imaging and brain and blood Gd content was assessed by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-mass spectrometry (MS) and ICP-MS, respectively. In addition, using chronic organotypic hippocampal slice cultures, Gd-induced neurotoxicity was addressed in living brain tissue ex vivo, both under control or inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor α [TNF-α] at 50 ng/μL) conditions.

RESULTS

Neuroinflammation promoted a significant decrease in T1 relaxation times after multiple injections of both GBCAs as shown by quantitative T1 mapping of EAE brains compared with HC. This corresponded to higher Gd retention within the EAE brains at 1, 10, and 40 days pfi as determined by laser ablation-ICP-MS. In inflamed cerebellum, in particular in the deep cerebellar nuclei (CN), elevated Gd retention was observed until day 40 after last gadopentetate application (CN: EAE vs HC, 55.06 ± 0.16 μM vs 30.44 ± 4.43 μM). In contrast, gadobutrol application led to a rather diffuse Gd content in the inflamed brains, which strongly diminished until day 40 (CN: EAE vs HC, 0.38 ± 0.08 μM vs 0.17 ± 0.03 μM). The analysis of cytotoxic effects of both GBCAs using living brain tissue revealed an elevated cell death rate after incubation with gadopentetate but not gadobutrol at 50 mM. The cytotoxic effect due to gadopentetate increased in the presence of the inflammatory mediator TNF-α (with vs without TNF-α, 3.15% ± 1.18% vs 2.17% ± 1.14%; P = 0.0345).

CONCLUSIONS

In the EAE model, neuroinflammation promoted increased Gd retention in the brain for both GBCAs. Whereas in the inflamed brains, efficient clearance of macrocyclic gadobutrol during the investigated time period was observed, the Gd retention after application of linear gadopentetate persisted over the entire observational period. Gadopentetate but not gadubutrol appeared to be neurotoxic in an ex vivo paradigm of neuronal inflammation.

Small Brain Lesion Enhancement and Gadolinium Deposition in the Rat Brain: Comparison Between Gadopiclenol and Gadobenate Dimeglumine

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the set of studies was to compare gadopiclenol, a new high relaxivity gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agent (GBCA) to gadobenate dimeglumine in terms of small brain lesion enhancement and Gd retention, including T1 enhancement in the cerebellum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a first study, T1 enhancement at 0.1 mmol/kg body weight (bw) of gadopiclenol or gadobenate dimeglumine was evaluated in a small brain lesions rat model at 2.35 T. The 2 GBCAs were injected in an alternated and cross-over manner separated by an interval of 4.4 ± 1.0 hours (minimum, 3.5 hours; maximum, 6.1 hours; n = 6). In a second study, the passage of the GBCAs into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was evaluated by measuring the fourth ventricle T1 enhancement in healthy rats at 4.7 T over 23 minutes after a single intravenous (IV) injection of 1.2 mmol/kg bw of gadopiclenol or gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 6/group). In a third study, Gd retention at 1 month was evaluated in healthy rats who had received 20 IV injections of 1 of the 2 GBCAs (0.6 mmol/kg bw) or a similar volume of saline (n = 10/group) over 5 weeks. T1 enhancement of the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) was assessed by T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 2.35 T, performed before the injection and thereafter once a week up to 1 month after the last injection. Elemental Gd levels in central nervous system structures, in muscle and in plasma were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) 1 month after the last injection.

RESULTS

The first study in a small brain lesion rat model showed a ≈2-fold higher number of enhanced voxels in lesions with gadopiclenol compared with gadobenate dimeglumine. T1 enhancement of the fourth ventricle was observed in the first minutes after a single IV injection of gadopiclenol or gadobenate dimeglumine (study 2), resulting, in the case of gadopiclenol, in transient enhancement during the injection period of the repeated administrations study (study 3). In terms of Gd retention, T1 enhancement of the DCN was noted in the gadobenate dimeglumine group during the month after the injection period. No such enhancement of the DCN was observed in the gadopiclenol group. Gadolinium concentrations 1 month after the injection period in the gadopiclenol group were slightly increased in plasma and lower by a factor of 2 to 3 in the CNS structures and muscles, compared with gadobenate dimeglumine.

CONCLUSIONS

In the small brain lesion rat model, gadopiclenol provides significantly higher enhancement of brain lesions compared with gadobentate dimeglumine at the same dose. After repeated IV injections, as expected for a macrocyclic GBCA, Gd retention is minimalized in the case of gadopiclenol compared with gadobenate dimeglumine, resulting in no T1 hypersignal in the DCN.

Gadolinium Clearance in the First 5 Weeks After Repeated Intravenous Administration of Gadoteridol, Gadoterate Meglumine, and Gadobutrol to rats

Background

Studies of gadolinium (Gd) clearance from animals in the first weeks after administration of gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCAs) have previously looked at solitary timepoints only. However, this does not give information on differences between GBCAs and between organs in terms of Gd elimination kinetics.

Purpose

To compare Gd levels in rat cerebellum, cerebrum, skin, and blood at 1, 2, 3, and 5 weeks after repeated administration of macrocyclic GBCAs.

Study Type

Prospective.

Animal Model

One hundred eighty male Sprague–Dawley rats randomized to three groups (n = 60/group), received intravenous administrations of gadoteridol, gadoterate meglumine, or gadobutrol (0.6 mmol/kg for each) four times/week for 5 consecutive weeks. Rats were sacrificed after washout periods of 1, 2, 3, or 5 weeks.

Field Strength/Sequence

Not applicable.

Assessment

Cerebellum, cerebrum, skin, and blood were harvested for Gd determination by inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (15 animals/group/all timepoints).

Statistical Tests

Anova and Dunnett's test (data with homogeneous variances and normal distribution). Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon's rank sum tests (data showing nonhomogeneous variances or a non‐normal distribution, significance levels: P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001).

Results

Gd levels in cerebellum, cerebrum, and skin were significantly lower after gadoteridol than after gadoterate and gadobutrol at all timepoints. Mean cerebellum Gd concentrations after gadoteridol, gadoterate, and gadobutrol decreased from 0.693, 0.878, and 1.011 nmol Gd/g at 1 week to 0.144, 0.282, and 0.297 nmol Gd/g at 5 weeks after injection. Similar findings were noted for cerebrum and skin. Conversely, significantly higher Gd levels were noted in blood after gadoteridol compared to gadobutrol at 1, 2, and 3 weeks and compared to gadoterate at all timepoints.

Data Conclusion

Gadoteridol is eliminated more rapidly from rat cerebellum, cerebrum, and skin compared to gadoterate and gadobutrol in the first 5 weeks after administration, resulting in lower levels of retained Gd in these tissues.

Evidence Level

1

Technical Efficacy

Stage 5