1
|
Lin E, Yuh EL. Computational Approaches for Acute Traumatic Brain Injury Image Recognition. Front Neurol 2022; 13:791816. [PMID: 35370919 PMCID: PMC8964403 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.791816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, there have been major advances in deep learning algorithms for image recognition in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Interest in this area has increased due to the potential for greater objectivity, reduced interpretation times and, ultimately, higher accuracy. Triage algorithms that can re-order radiological reading queues have been developed, using classification to prioritize exams with suspected critical findings. Localization models move a step further to capture more granular information such as the location and, in some cases, size and subtype, of intracranial hematomas that could aid in neurosurgical management decisions. In addition to the potential to improve the clinical management of TBI patients, the use of algorithms for the interpretation of medical images may play a transformative role in enabling the integration of medical images into precision medicine. Acute TBI is one practical example that can illustrate the application of deep learning to medical imaging. This review provides an overview of computational approaches that have been proposed for the detection and characterization of acute TBI imaging abnormalities, including intracranial hemorrhage, skull fractures, intracranial mass effect, and stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esther L. Yuh
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Finck T, Moosbauer J, Probst M, Schlaeger S, Schuberth M, Schinz D, Yiğitsoy M, Byas S, Zimmer C, Pfister F, Wiestler B. Faster and Better: How Anomaly Detection Can Accelerate and Improve Reporting of Head Computed Tomography. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020452. [PMID: 35204543 PMCID: PMC8871235 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Most artificial intelligence (AI) systems are restricted to solving a pre-defined task, thus limiting their generalizability to unselected datasets. Anomaly detection relieves this shortfall by flagging all pathologies as deviations from a learned norm. Here, we investigate whether diagnostic accuracy and reporting times can be improved by an anomaly detection tool for head computed tomography (CT), tailored to provide patient-level triage and voxel-based highlighting of pathologies. Methods: Four neuroradiologists with 1–10 years of experience each investigated a set of 80 routinely acquired head CTs containing 40 normal scans and 40 scans with common pathologies. In a random order, scans were investigated with and without AI-predictions. A 4-week wash-out period between runs was included to prevent a reminiscence effect. Performance metrics for identifying pathologies, reporting times, and subjectively assessed diagnostic confidence were determined for both runs. Results: AI-support significantly increased the share of correctly classified scans (normal/pathological) from 309/320 scans to 317/320 scans (p = 0.0045), with a corresponding sensitivity, specificity, negative- and positive- predictive value of 100%, 98.1%, 98.2% and 100%, respectively. Further, reporting was significantly accelerated with AI-support, as evidenced by the 15.7% reduction in reporting times (65.1 ± 8.9 s vs. 54.9 ± 7.1 s; p < 0.0001). Diagnostic confidence was similar in both runs. Conclusion: Our study shows that AI-based triage of CTs can improve the diagnostic accuracy and accelerate reporting for experienced and inexperienced radiologists alike. Through ad hoc identification of normal CTs, anomaly detection promises to guide clinicians towards scans requiring urgent attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Finck
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.P.); (S.S.); (M.S.); (D.S.); (C.Z.); (B.W.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Julia Moosbauer
- DeepC GmbH, Atelierstraße 29, 81671 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (M.Y.); (S.B.); (F.P.)
| | - Monika Probst
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.P.); (S.S.); (M.S.); (D.S.); (C.Z.); (B.W.)
| | - Sarah Schlaeger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.P.); (S.S.); (M.S.); (D.S.); (C.Z.); (B.W.)
| | - Madeleine Schuberth
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.P.); (S.S.); (M.S.); (D.S.); (C.Z.); (B.W.)
| | - David Schinz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.P.); (S.S.); (M.S.); (D.S.); (C.Z.); (B.W.)
| | - Mehmet Yiğitsoy
- DeepC GmbH, Atelierstraße 29, 81671 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (M.Y.); (S.B.); (F.P.)
| | - Sebastian Byas
- DeepC GmbH, Atelierstraße 29, 81671 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (M.Y.); (S.B.); (F.P.)
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.P.); (S.S.); (M.S.); (D.S.); (C.Z.); (B.W.)
| | - Franz Pfister
- DeepC GmbH, Atelierstraße 29, 81671 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (M.Y.); (S.B.); (F.P.)
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.P.); (S.S.); (M.S.); (D.S.); (C.Z.); (B.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wagner MW, Namdar K, Biswas A, Monah S, Khalvati F, Ertl-Wagner BB. Radiomics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence-what the neuroradiologist needs to know. Neuroradiology 2021; 63:1957-1967. [PMID: 34537858 PMCID: PMC8449698 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02813-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an ever-increasing role in Neuroradiology. METHODS When designing AI-based research in neuroradiology and appreciating the literature, it is important to understand the fundamental principles of AI. Training, validation, and test datasets must be defined and set apart as priorities. External validation and testing datasets are preferable, when feasible. The specific type of learning process (supervised vs. unsupervised) and the machine learning model also require definition. Deep learning (DL) is an AI-based approach that is modelled on the structure of neurons of the brain; convolutional neural networks (CNN) are a commonly used example in neuroradiology. RESULTS Radiomics is a frequently used approach in which a multitude of imaging features are extracted from a region of interest and subsequently reduced and selected to convey diagnostic or prognostic information. Deep radiomics uses CNNs to directly extract features and obviate the need for predefined features. CONCLUSION Common limitations and pitfalls in AI-based research in neuroradiology are limited sample sizes ("small-n-large-p problem"), selection bias, as well as overfitting and underfitting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias W Wagner
- Division of Neuroradiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Khashayar Namdar
- Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Asthik Biswas
- Division of Neuroradiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Suranna Monah
- Division of Neuroradiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Farzad Khalvati
- Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Birgit B Ertl-Wagner
- Division of Neuroradiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|