Multiarterial Phase Acquisition in Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MRI for the Detection of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Patients: Comparison of Compressed Sensing Versus View Sharing Techniques

Local Ablation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Significance of Tumor Size, Location, and Biology

ABSTRACT

Local ablation therapy, encompassing radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, and cryoablation, has emerged as a crucial strategy for managing small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), complementing liver resection and transplantation. This review delves into the clinical significance of tumor size, location, and biology in guiding treatment decisions for HCCs undergoing local ablation therapy, with a focus on tumors smaller than 3 cm. Tumor size significantly influences treatment outcomes, with larger tumors associated with poorer local tumor control due to challenges in creating sufficient ablative margins and the likelihood of microvascular invasion and peritumoral satellite nodules. Advanced ablation techniques such as centripetal or no-touch RFA using multiple electrodes, cryoablation using multiple cryoprobes, and microwave ablation offer diverse options for HCC treatment. Notably, no-touch RFA demonstrates superior local tumor control compared with conventional RFA by achieving sufficient ablative margins, making it particularly promising for hepatic dome lesions or tumors with aggressive biology. Laparoscopic RFA proves beneficial for treating anterior subphrenic HCCs, whereas artificial pleural effusion-assisted RFA is effective for controlling posterior subphrenic HCCs. However, surgical resection generally offers better survival outcomes for periportal HCCs compared with RFA. Cryoablation exhibits a lower incidence of vascular or biliary complications than RFA for HCCs adjacent to perivascular or periductal regions. Additionally, aggressive tumor biology, such as microvascular invasion, can be predicted using magnetic resonance imaging findings and serum tumor markers. Aggressive HCC subtypes frequently exhibit Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System M features on magnetic resonance imaging, aiding in prognosis. A comprehensive understanding of tumor size, location, and biology is imperative for optimizing the benefits of local ablation therapy in managing HCCs.

The timing phase affected the inconsistency of APHE subtypes of liver observations in patients at risk for HCC on the multi-hepatic arterial phase imaging

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether liver observations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) display inconsistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) subtypes on the multi-hepatic arterial phase imaging (mHAP) and to further investigate factors affecting inconsistent APHE subtype of observations on mHAP imaging.

METHODS

From April 2018 to June 2021, a total of 141 patients at high risk of HCC with 238 liver observations who underwent mHAP MRI acquisitions were consecutively included in this retrospective study. Two experienced radiologists reviewed individual arterial phase imaging independently and assessed the enhancement pattern of each liver observation according to LI-RADS. Another two experienced radiologists identified and recorded the genuine timing phase of each phase independently. When a disagreement appeared between the two radiologists, another expert participated in the discussion to get a final decision. A separate descriptive analysis was used for all observations scored APHE by the radiologists. The Kappa coefficient was used to determine the agreement between the two radiologists. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate the factors affecting inconsistent APHE subtype of liver observations on mHAP imaging.

RESULTS

The interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect agreement on the assessment of timing phase (κ = 0.712-0.887) and evaluation of APHE subtype (κ = 0.795-0.901). A total of 87.8% (209/238) of the observations showed consistent nonrim APHE and 10.2% (24/238) of the observations showed consistent rim APHE on mHAP imaging. A total of 2.1% (5/238) of the liver observations were considered inconsistent APHE subtypes, and all progressed nonrim to rim on mHAP imaging. 87.9% (124/141) of the mHAP acquisitions were all arterial phases and 12.1% (17/141) of the mHAP acquisitions obtained both the arterial phase and portal venous phase. Univariate analysis was performed and found that the timing phase of mHAP imaging affected the consistency of APHE subtype of liver observations. When considering the timing phase and excluding the portal venous phase acquired by mHAP imaging, none of the liver observations showed inconsistent APHE subtypes on mHAP imaging.

CONCLUSION

The timing phase which mHAP acquisition contained portal venous phase affected the inconsistency of APHE subtype of liver observations on mHAP imaging. When evaluating the APHE subtype of liver observations, it's necessary to assess the timing of each phase acquired by the mHAP technique at first.

Enhancing gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI: a synergistic approach with deep learning CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and optimized fat suppression techniques

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a deep learning (DL) controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA)-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) technique can improve image quality, lesion conspicuity, and lesion detection compared to a standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE technique in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 168 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI at 3 T using both standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE techniques on pre-contrast and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. Additionally, high-resolution (HR) DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE was obtained with 1-mm slice thickness on the HBP. Three abdominal radiologists independently assessed the image quality and lesion conspicuity of pre-contrast and HBP images. Statistical analyses involved the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for image quality assessment and the generalized estimation equation for lesion conspicuity and detection evaluation.

RESULTS

DL and HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE demonstrated significantly improved overall image quality and reduced artifacts on pre-contrast and HBP images compared to standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE (p < 0.001), with a shorter acquisition time (DL vs standard, 11 s vs 17 s). However, the former presented a more synthetic appearance (both p < 0.05). HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE showed superior lesion conspicuity to standard and DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE on HBP images (p < 0.001). Moreover, HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE exhibited a significantly higher detection rate of small (< 2 cm) solid focal liver lesions (FLLs) on HBP images compared to standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE (92.5% vs 87.4%; odds ratio = 1.83; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

DL and HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE achieved superior image quality compared to standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE. Additionally, HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE improved the lesion conspicuity and detection of small solid FLLs. DL and HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE hold the potential clinical utility for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

DL and HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE hold promise as potential alternatives to standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE in routine clinical liver MRI, improving the image quality and lesion conspicuity, enhancing the detection of small (< 2 cm) solid focal liver lesions, and reducing the acquisition time.

KEY POINTS

• DL and HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE demonstrated improved overall image quality and reduced artifacts on pre-contrast and HBP images compared to standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, in addition to a shorter acquisition time. • DL and HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE yielded a more synthetic appearance than standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE. • HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE showed improved lesion conspicuity than standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE on HBP images, with a higher detection of small (< 2 cm) solid focal liver lesions.

Application of a deep learning algorithm for three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in patients at a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of a vendor-specific deep learning reconstruction algorithm (DLRA) in enhancing image quality and focal lesion detection using three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo images in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients at a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 83 high-risk patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI using a 3-T scanner. Triple arterial phase, high-resolution portal venous phase, and high-resolution hepatobiliary phase images were reconstructed using conventional reconstruction techniques and DLRA (AIRTM Recon DL; GE Healthcare) for subsequent comparison. Image quality and solid focal lesion detection were assessed by three abdominal radiologists and compared between conventional and DL methods. Focal liver lesion detection was evaluated using figures of merit (FOMs) from a jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis on a per-lesion basis.

RESULTS

DLRA-reconstructed images exhibited significantly improved overall image quality, image contrast, lesion conspicuity, vessel conspicuity, and liver edge sharpness and reduced subjective image noise, ringing artifacts, and motion artifacts compared to conventionally reconstructed images (all P < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the FOMs of non-cystic focal liver lesions between the conventional and DL methods, DLRA-reconstructed images showed notably higher pooled sensitivity than conventionally reconstructed images (P < 0.05) in all phases and higher detection rates for viable post-treatment HCCs in the arterial and hepatobiliary phases (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing DLRA can enhance the image quality in 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI examinations, leading to improved detection of viable post-treatment HCCs.

Advanced Abdominal MRI Techniques and Problem-Solving Strategies

MRI plays an important role in abdominal imaging because of its ability to detect and characterize focal lesions. However, MRI examinations have several challenges, such as comparatively long scan times and motion management through breath-holding maneuvers. Techniques for reducing scan time with acceptable image quality, such as parallel imaging, compressed sensing, and cutting-edge deep learning techniques, have been developed to enable problem-solving strategies. Additionally, free-breathing techniques for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, such as extra-dimensional-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, golden-angle radial sparse parallel, and liver acceleration volume acquisition Star, can help patients with severe dyspnea or those under sedation to undergo abdominal MRI. We aimed to present various advanced abdominal MRI techniques for reducing the scan time while maintaining image quality and free-breathing techniques for dynamic imaging and illustrate cases using the techniques mentioned above. A review of these advanced techniques can assist in the appropriate interpretation of sequences.

Multiple arterial-phase MRI with gadoxetic acid improves diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3.0 cm

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multiple arterial-phase magnetic resonance imaging (MA-MRI) was introduced to overcome the limitations of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, but its clinical impacts on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis have not been well assessed. We investigated whether MA-MRI with gadoxetic acid could improve the diagnosis of HCC ≤3.0 cm in comparison with single arterial-phase MRI (SA-MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 397 patients from two tertiary institutions who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (243 patients with 271 lesions in cohort-1 underwent SA-MRI, and 154 patients with 166 lesions in cohort-2 underwent MA-MRI). The patients had 437 hepatic lesions ≤3.0 cm with pathologic confirmation. The arterial-phase image quality and diagnostic performance of SA-MRI and MA-MRI were analysed and compared. To minimize the effects of selection bias because of potential confounding between the two groups, propensity score-matching was additionally performed.

RESULTS

MA-MRI showed a significantly higher percentage of optimal arterial-phase timing (94.2% vs. 74.5%, p < .001) and lower incidence of inadequate examinations (1.3% vs. 5.8%, p = .034) than SA-MRI. MA-MRI had a significantly higher non-rim arterial-phase hyperenhancement (APHE) detection rate (94.9% vs. 85.5%, p = .005) and sensitivity for diagnosing HCC (87.4% vs. 70.0%, p < .001) than SA-MRI, but no significant difference in specificity (92.9% vs. 93.1%, p = .966). In 123 pairs of propensity score-matched patients, MA-MRI had significantly higher sensitivity (89.1% vs. 74.5%, p = .006) than SA-MRI with equal specificity (92.3% vs. 92.3%, p > .999).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with SA-MRI, MA-MRI with gadoxetic acid can detect more non-rim APHE and significantly improve sensitivity for diagnosing HCC ≤3.0 cm, without a significant decrease in specificity.