Photon-Counting Detector CT Angiography for Endoleak Detection After Endovascular Aortic Repair: Triphasic CT With True Noncontrast Versus Biphasic CT With Virtual Noniodine Imaging

Synthetic hematocrit from virtual non-contrast images for myocardial extracellular volume evaluation with photon-counting detector CT

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy of a synthetic hematocrit derived from virtual non-contrast (VNC) and virtual non-iodine images (VNI) for myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) computation with photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing PCD-CT including a coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and a late enhancement (LE) scan and having a blood hematocrit were retrospectively included. In the first 75 patients (derivation cohort), CCTA and LE scans were reconstructed as VNI at 60, 70, and 80 keV and as VNC with quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) strengths 2, 3, and 4. Blood pool attenuation (BPmean) was correlated to blood hematocrit. In the next 50 patients (validation cohort), synthetic hematocrit was calculated using BPmean. Myocardial ECV was computed using the synthetic hematocrit and compared with the ECV using the blood hematocrit as a reference.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort (49 men, mean age 79 ± 8 years), a correlation between BPmean and blood hematocrit ranged from poor for VNI of CCTA at 80 keV, QIR2 (R2 = 0.12) to moderate for VNI of LE at 60 keV, QIR4; 70 keV, QIR3 and 4; and VNC of LE, QIR3 and 4 (all, R2 = 0.58). In the validation cohort (29 men, age 75 ± 14 years), synthetic hematocrit was calculated from VNC of the LE scan, QIR3. Median ECV was 26.9% (interquartile range (IQR), 25.5%, 28.8%) using the blood hematocrit and 26.8% (IQR, 25.4%, 29.7%) using synthetic hematocrit (VNC, QIR3; mean difference, -0.2%; limits of agreement, -2.4%, 2.0%; p = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

Synthetic hematocrit calculated from VNC images enables an accurate computation of myocardial ECV with PCD-CT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Virtual non-contrast images from cardiac late enhancement scans with photon-counting detector CT allow the calculation of a synthetic hematocrit, which enables accurate computation of myocardial extracellular volume.

KEY POINTS

Blood hematocrit is mandatory for conventional myocardial extracellular volume computation. Synthetic hematocrit can be calculated from virtual non-iodine and non-contrast photon-counting detector CT images. Synthetic hematocrit from virtual non-contrast images enables computation of the myocardial extracellular volume.

Photon-Counting Detector CT for Kidney Stone Detection in Excretory Phase CT-Comparison Between Virtual Non-contrast and Virtual Non-iodine Reconstructions in a 3D Printed Kidney Phantom

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of contrast media subtraction and kidney stone detection between a virtual non-iodine reconstruction algorithm (VNI; PureCalcium) and a virtual non-contrast (VNC) algorithm in excretory phase photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT), using a 3D printed kidney phantom under various tube voltages and radiation doses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3D-printed kidney phantom, holding Calcium Oxalate (CaOx) and uric acid stones within contrast-enhanced calyces, was created. The calyx density mirrored the average density observed in 200 excretory phase patients (916 HU at 110 kV). Imaging was conducted on a clinical dual-source PCD-CT at 120 kV and 140 kV, with radiation doses set at 5, 10, and 15 mGy. VNI and VNC algorithms were applied. Two blinded readers evaluated the image quality, along with the degree of contrast media and kidney stone subtraction, using visual scales. Krippendorff's alpha was calculated to determine inter-reader agreement, and the Chi-squared test was employed for comparing ordinal data.

RESULTS

Reader 2 rated overall image quality higher for VNI than VNC (4.90 vs. 4.00; P < .05), while Reader 1 found no significant difference (4.96 vs. 5.00; P > .05). Substantial agreement was observed between readers for contrast media subtraction in both VNC and VNI (Krippendorff's alpha range: 0.628-0.748). Incomplete contrast media subtraction occurred more frequently with VNI for both readers (Reader 1: 29% vs. 15%; P < .05; Reader 2: 24% vs. 20%; P > .05). Uric acid and smaller stones (<5 mm) were more likely to be subtracted than CaOx and larger stones in both VNC and VNI. Overall, a higher rate of stone subtraction was noted with VNI compared to VNC (Reader 1: 22% vs. 16%; Reader 2: 25% vs. 10%; P < .05). Neither radiation dose nor tube voltage significantly influenced stone subtraction (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

VNC demonstrated greater accuracy than VNI for contrast media subtraction and kidney stone visibility. Radiation dose and tube voltage had no significant impact. Nonetheless, both algorithms still exhibited frequent incomplete contrast media subtraction and partial kidney stone subtraction.

Universal 120-kV Dual-Source Ultra-High Pitch Protocol on the Photon-Counting CT System for Pediatric Abdomen of All Sizes: A Phantom Investigation Comparing With Energy-Integrating CT

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to determine if a universal 120-kV ultra-high pitch and virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) protocol on the photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system can provide sufficient image quality for pediatric abdominal imaging, regardless of size, compared with protocols using a size-dependent kV and dual-source flash mode on the energy-integrating CT (EICT) system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One solid water insert and 3 iodine (2, 5, 10 mg I/mL) inserts were attached or inserted into phantoms of variable sizes, simulating the abdomens of a newborn, 5-year-old, 10-year-old, and adult-sized pediatric patients. Each phantom setting was scanned on an EICT using clinical size-specific kV dual-source protocols with a pitch of 3.0. The scans were performed with fixed scanning parameters, and the CTDIvol values of full dose were 0.30, 0.71, 1.05, and 7.40 mGy for newborn to adult size, respectively. In addition, half dose scans were acquired on EICT. Each phantom was then scanned on a PCCT (Siemens Alpha) using a universal 120-kV protocol with the same full dose and half dose as determined above on the EICT scanner. All other parameters matched to EICT settings. Virtual monoenergetic images were generated from PCCT scans between 40 and 80 keV with a 5-keV interval. Image quality metrics were compared between PCCT VMIs and EICT, including image noise (measured as standard deviation of solid water), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) (measured at iodine inserts with solid water as background), and noise power spectrum (measured in uniform phantom regions).

RESULTS

Noise at a PCCT VMI of 70 keV (7.0 ± 0.6 HU for newborn, 14.7 ± 1.6 HU for adult) is comparable (P > 0.05, t test) or significantly lower (P < 0.05, t test) compared with EICT (7.8 ± 0.8 HU for newborn, 15.3 ± 1.5 HU for adult). Iodine CNR from PCCT VMI at 50 keV (50.8 ± 8.4 for newborn, 27.3 ± 2.8 for adult) is comparable (P > 0.05, t test) or significantly higher (P < 0.05, t test) to the corresponding EICT measurements (57.5 ± 6.7 for newborn, 13.8 ± 1.7 for adult). The noise power spectrum curve shape of PCCT VMI is similar to EICT, despite PCCT VMI exhibiting higher noise at low keV levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The universal PCCT 120 kV with ultra-high pitch and postprocessed VMIs demonstrated equivalent or improved performance in noise (70 keV) and iodine CNR (50 keV) for pediatric abdominal CT, compared with size-specific kV images on the EICT.

Advantages of Photon-Counting Detector CT in Aortic Imaging

Photon-counting Computed Tomography (PCCT) is a promising imaging technique. Using detectors that count the number and energy of photons in multiple bins, PCCT offers several advantages over conventional CT, including a higher image quality, reduced contrast agent volume, radiation doses, and artifacts. Although PCCT is well established for cardiac imaging in assessing coronary artery disease, its application in aortic imaging remains limited. This review summarizes the available literature and provides an overview of the current use of PCCT for the diagnosis of aortic imaging, focusing mainly on endoleaks detection and characterization after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), contrast dose volume, and radiation exposure reduction, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease and in those requiring follow-up CT.