Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (& lt; or =2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions: special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:96-103. [PMID: 20057319 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e3181c5faf7]

Intracellular enhancement technique for gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of hepatic function

PURPOSE

To investigate the utility of intracellular enhancement (ICE) technique which suppresses signals from the extracellular space for the evaluation of hepatic function on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) images.

METHODS

We subjected 67 patients with suspected neoplastic hepatic lesions to gadoxetic acid-enhanced HBP imaging with and without ICE [i-HBP, conventional-HBP (c-HBP)]. A radiologist calculated the liver/spleen contrast (LSC) [LSC = signal intensity (SI) of liver/SI of spleen]. Receiver-operating analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the LSC on i-HBP- (i-LSC) and c-HBP images (c-LSC) to differentiate between Child-Pugh classes A and B.

RESULTS

Of the 67 patients, 57 were in Child-Pugh class A and 10 were in class B. For their differentiation, the area under the curve value of i-LSC was higher than of c-LSC (0.81 vs. 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

ICE technique can improve the accuracy of estimating hepatic function on HBP images.

Application value of different imaging methods in the early diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

Objective

To determine the diagnostic value of ultrasound, multi-phase enhanced computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging of small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

Experimental studies on diagnosing small hepatocellular carcinoma in four databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, were comprehensively searched from October 2007 to October 2024. Relevant diagnostic accuracy data were extracted and a Bayesian model that combined direct and indirect evidence was used for analysis.

Results

16 original studies were included and data from 2,447 patients were collated to assess the diagnostic value of 10 different methods. The methodological quality of the included studies was good and there was no obvious publication bias. The pooled DOR of all diagnostic methods was 19.61, which was statistically significant (I2 = 76.0%, P < 0.01, 95% CI:13.30 - 28.92). Normal US + CEUS + ultrasonic elastic imaging had the highest specificity (92.9), accuracy (93.6), and positive predictive value (94.4). Unenhanced MRI + Contrast-enhanced MRI had the highest sensitivity (96.6) and negative predictive value (96.6), but specificity (12.5) and positive predictive value (34.4) were extremely poor. Contrast-enhanced MRI had the highest diagnostic value in individual imaging methods (sensitivity: 66, specificity: 55.5, accuracy: 67.9, positive predictive value: 64.4, negative predictive value: 66.5). There was significant inconsistency and high heterogeneity in this study.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024507883.

Reducing transient severe motion artifacts of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI by oxygen inhalation: effective for pleural effusion but not ascites

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of low-flow oxygen inhalation in mitigating transient severe motion (TSM) artifacts associated with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced hepatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Patients undergoing gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI were included. During the examination, the experimental group received oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula, while the control group did not. Images and TSM scores were evaluated and compared across precontrast, arterial, venous, and hepatobiliary phases. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the presence of pleural effusion or ascites.

RESULTS

A total of 325 patients were included. The motion scores were highest in the arterial phase and lowest in the hepatobiliary phase in both groups, but were significantly lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05). The incidence of TSM was significantly lower in the experimental group (3.29%) compared to the control group (13.29%, p = 0.01). While pleural effusion was associated with reduced image quality in both groups (p < 0.05), the image quality in the pleural effusion category was higher in the experimental group than in the control group. Oxygen inhalation showed limited efficacy in mitigating TSM related to ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-flow oxygen inhalation can effectively reduce the occurrence of gadoxetate disodium-related TSM. Pleural effusion may impair respiratory function and contribute to TSM, which can be alleviated by oxygen supplementation. However, Oxygen inhalation is less effective under the condition of ascites.

High-resolution free-breathing hepatobiliary phase MRI of the liver using XD-GRASP

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of high-resolution free-breathing (FB) hepatobiliary phase imaging of the liver using the eXtra-Dimension Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel (XD-GRASP) MRI technique.

METHODS

Fifty-eight clinical patients (41 males, mean age = 52.9 ± 12.9) with liver lesions who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent were prospectively recruited for this study. Both breath-hold volumetric interpolated examination (BH-VIBE) imaging and FB imaging were performed during the hepatobiliary phase. FB images were acquired using a stack-of-stars golden-angle radial sequence and were reconstructed using the XD-GRASP method. Two experienced radiologists blinded to acquisition schemes independently scored the overall image quality, liver edge sharpness, hepatic vessel clarity, conspicuity of lesion, and overall artifact level of each image. The non-parametric paired two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to BH-VIBE images, XD-GRASP images received significantly higher scores (P < 0.05) for the liver edge sharpness (4.83 ± 0.45 vs 4.29 ± 0.46), the hepatic vessel clarity (4.64 ± 0.67 vs 4.15 ± 0.56) and the conspicuity of lesion (4.75 ± 0.53 vs 4.31 ± 0.50). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between BH-VIBE and XD-GRASP images for the overall image quality (4.61 ± 0.50 vs 4.74 ± 0.47) and the overall artifact level (4.13 ± 0.44 vs 4.05 ± 0.61).

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional BH-VIBE MRI, FB radial acquisition combined with XD-GRASP reconstruction facilitates higher spatial resolution imaging of the liver during the hepatobiliary phase. This enhancement can significantly improve the visualization and evaluation of the liver.

Intra-patient and inter-observer image quality analysis in liver MRI study with gadoxetic acid using two different multi-arterial phase techniques

PURPOSE

To evaluate intra-patient and interobserver agreement in patients who underwent liver MRI with gadoxetic acid using two different multi-arterial phase (AP) techniques.

METHODS

A total of 154 prospectively enrolled patients underwent clinical gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI twice within 12 months, using two different multi-arterial algorithms: CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and TWIST-VIBE. For every patient, breath-holding time, body mass index, sex, age were recorded. The phase without contrast media and the APs were independently evaluated by two radiologists who quantified Gibbs artefacts, noise, respiratory motion artefacts, and general image quality. Presence or absence of Gibbs artefacts and noise was compared by the McNemar's test. Respiratory motion artefacts and image quality scores were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Interobserver agreement was assessed by Cohen kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Compared with TWIST-VIBE, CAIPIRINHA-VIBE images had better scores for every parameter except higher noise score. Triple APs were always acquired with TWIST-VIBE but failed in 37% using CAIPIRINHA-VIBE: 11% have only one AP, 26% have two. Breath-holding time was the only parameter that influenced the success of multi-arterial techniques. TWIST-VIBE images had worst score for Gibbs and respiratory motion artefacts but lower noise score.

CONCLUSION

CAIPIRINHA-VIBE images were always diagnostic, but with a failure of triple-AP in 37%. TWIST-VIBE was successful in obtaining three APs in all patients. Breath-holding time is the only parameter which can influence the preliminary choice between CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and TWIST-VIBE algorithm.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

If the patient is expected to perform good breath-holds, TWIST-VIBE is preferable; otherwise, CAIPIRINHA-VIBE is more appropriate.

A low albumin level as a risk factor for transient severe motion artifact induced by gadoxetate disodium administration: A retrospective observational study with free-breathing dynamic MRI and an experimental study in rats

Objectives

In the arterial phase of gadoxetate disodium administration for dynamic MRI, transient severe motion (TSM) sometimes occurs, making image evaluation difficult. This study was to identify risk factors for TSM in a clinical study, and confirm them and investigate the cause in an animal study.

Methods

A retrospective, single-center, observational study included patients who underwent dynamic MRI using gadoxetate disodium for the first time from April 2016 to September 2019 and free-breathing MRI was performed. Differences in clinical characteristics and laboratory tests between the presence and absence of TSM were examined. Animal experiments were conducted in 50 rats; gadoxetate disodium was injected into three sites (distal inferior vena cava (IVC), ascending aorta, and descending aorta) to identify the organ which triggers respiratory irregularities. Phosphate-buffered saline and gadopentetate dimeglumine were also injected into the distal IVC. In addition, to evaluate the effect of albumin, gadoxetate disodium was diluted with phosphate-buffered saline or 5% human serum albumin and injected into the ascending aorta. The time course of the respiratory rate was monitored and evaluated.

Results

20 of 51 (39.2%) patients showed TSM. On multivariable analysis, a low albumin level was an independent risk factor (P = .035). Gadoxetate disodium administration caused significant tachypnea compared to gadopentetate dimeglumine or PBS (an elevation of 16.6 vs 3.0 or 4.3 breaths/min; both P < .001) in rats. The starting time of tachypnea was earlier with injection into the ascending aorta than into the descending aorta (10.3 vs 17.9 sec; P < .001) and the distal IVC (vs 15.6 sec; P < .001). With dilution with albumin instead of phosphate-buffered saline, tachypnea was delayed and suppressed (9.9 vs 13.0 sec; P < .001, 24.1 vs 17.0 breaths/min; P = .031).

Conclusions

A low albumin level is a risk factor for TSM, which could be caused by the effect of gadoxetate disodium on the head and neck region.

Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The definition of washout in gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) is controversial. The current Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) defines washout only in the portal venous phase on Gd-EOB-MRI, leading to low diagnostic sensitivity for HCC. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-MRI using conventional (cWO) and modified (mWO) definitions of washout.

METHODS

The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies published between January 1, 2010, and August 1, 2021, that compared the diagnostic performance of cWO and mWO for HCC. The mWOs added transition phase (TP) hypointensity (mWO-1), hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity (mWO-2), or both (mWO-3). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Ten comparative studies with 2391 patients were included. Compared to cWO, the overall mWO yielded significantly higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%, p = 0.00) and lower specificity (97% vs. 93%, p = 0.01) for diagnosing HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.90 and 0.94 for the cWO and mWO, respectively. Regarding the three types of mWOs, mWO-2 showed the highest sensitivity (85%) and specificity (96%) for diagnosing HCC. mWO-2 achieved the highest AUC (0.97), followed by mWO-1 (0.90), and mWO-3 (0.89). Average reviewer experience and scanner field strength were significantly associated with study heterogeneity (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusion of TP and HBP hypointensity in the definition of washout improved the sensitivity with slightly lower specificity for diagnosing HCC in LI-RADS.

KEY POINTS

• Compared to the conventional definition of washout, studies using a modified definition had higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%) but lower specificity (97% vs. 93%) in LI-RADS for the diagnosis of HCC. • Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity may be a preferred alternative washout for HCC diagnosis with the highest area under the curve. • Studies with experienced reviewer or 3.0T MRI showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity for diagnosing HCC when using modified washout (p < 0.05).

[Clinical relevance of the new S3 guideline on hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract cancer for practitioners]

The update of the S3 German guideline for the management of the hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract cancer contains a comprehensive revision of the guideline for hepatocellular carcinoma and establishes a new guideline for biliary tract cancer. In recent years several studies have been conducted to improve diagnostic and therapeutic options for liver cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsy are important for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma. This guideline shows the progress in the treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma, including advances in liver transplantation, bridging and downstaging. For cholangiocarcinoma there is a focus on interventional treatment and resection. This guideline also emphasizes the need of molecular diagnostics and the resulting treatment options in targeted therapy.

[Small hepatocellular carcinoma : Diagnostics according to guidelines and established in the clinical setting]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-especially the characterization of small lesions <2 cm-continues to be a radiological challenge.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

In the current S3 guideline on diagnosis and therapy of HCC, contrast-enhanced imaging examinations, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are still the diagnostic standard.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

HCC in the cirrhotic liver should be diagnosed by its typical contrast-enhanced pattern in the MRI. In addition, the use of quality assurance instruments such as LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) contributes to the desired consistency of findings, even with small ambiguous findings.

PERFORMANCE

Many studies have shown that the LI-RADS classification reflects the likelihood of HCC and other malignant liver lesions.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Guidelines and quality assurance instruments contribute to a more precise diagnosis in patients with suspected HCC.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

A guideline-compliant diagnostic algorithm and the LI-RADS should be used across the board for accurate HCC diagnostics.

Morphological, dynamic and functional characteristics of liver pseudolesions and benign lesions

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and one of the most common causes of death among patients with cirrhosis, developing in 1-8% of them every year, regardless of their cirrhotic stage. The radiological features of HCC are almost always sufficient for reaching the diagnosis; thus, histological confirmation is rarely needed. However, the study of cirrhotic livers remains a challenge for radiologists due to the developing of fibrous and regenerative tissue that cause the distortion of normal liver parenchyma, changing the typical appearances of benign lesions and pseudolesions, which therefore may be misinterpreted as malignancies. In addition, a correct distinction between pseudolesions and malignancy is crucial to allow appropriate targeted therapy and avoid treatment delays.The present review encompasses technical pitfalls and describes focal benign lesions and pseudolesions that may be misinterpreted as HCC in cirrhotic livers, providing the imaging features of regenerative nodules, large regenerative nodules, siderotic nodules, hepatic hemangiomas (including rapidly filling and sclerosed hemangiomas), segmental hyperplasia, arterioportal shunts, focal confluent fibrosis and focal fatty changes. Lastly, the present review explores the most promising new imaging techniques that are emerging and that could help radiologists differentiate benign lesions and pseudolesions from overt HCC.

The utility of laparoscopic ultrasound during minimally invasive liver procedures in patients with malignant liver tumors who have undergone preoperative magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) during minimally invasive liver procedures in patients with malignant liver tumors who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Medical records of patients with malignant liver lesions who underwent laparoscopic liver surgery between October 2005 and January 2018 and who underwent an MRI examination at our institution within a month before surgery were collected from a prospectively maintained database. The size and location of tumors detected on LUS, as well as whether they were seen on preoperative imaging, were recorded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors that were associated with the detection of liver lesions on LUS that were not seen on preoperative MRI.

RESULTS

A total of 467 lesions were identified in 147 patients. Tumor types included colorectal cancer metastasis (n = 53), hepatocellular cancer (n = 38), neuroendocrine metastasis (n = 23), and others (n = 33). Procedures included ablation (67%), resection (23%), combined resection and ablation (6%), and diagnostic laparoscopy with biopsy (4%). LUS identified 39 additional lesions (8.4%) that were not seen on preoperative MRI in 14 patients (10%). These were colorectal cancer (n = 20, 51%), neuroendocrine (n = 11, 28%) and other metastases (n = 8, 21%). These additional findings on LUS changed the treatment plan in 13 patients (8.8%). Factors predicting tumor detection on LUS but not on MRI included obesity (p = 0.02), previous exposure to chemotherapy (p < 0.001), and lesion size < 1 cm (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that, despite advances in MRI, LUS performed during minimally invasive liver procedures may detect additional tumors in 10% of patients with liver malignancies, with the highest yield seen in obese patients with previous exposure to chemotherapy. These results support the routine use of LUS by hepatic surgeons.

MR Imaging Contrast Agents: Role in Imaging of Chronic Liver Diseases

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients with chronic liver disease, particularly for detection and characterization of liver lesions. The two most commonly used contrast agents for liver MR imaging are extracellular agents (ECAs) and hepatobiliary agents (HBAs). In patients with liver disease, the main advantage of ECA-enhanced MR imaging is its high specificity for the diagnosis of progressed HCCs. Conversely, HBAs have an additional contrast mechanism, which results in high liver-to-lesion contrast and highest sensitivity for lesion detection in the hepatobiliary phase. Emerging data suggest that features depicted on contrast-enhanced MR imaging scans are related to tumor biology and are predictive of patients' prognosis, likely to further expand the role of contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the clinical care of patients with chronic liver disease.

Utility of Radial Scanning for the Identification of Arterial Hypervascularity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of assessing the arterial hypervascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on dynamic computed tomography (CT) scans and gadoxetic acid (EOB)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans performed with radial sampling.

METHODS

We studied the images of 40 patients with hypervascular HCC. A radiologist recorded the standard deviation of the attenuation (or the signal intensity [SI]) in subcutaneous fat tissue as the image noise (N) and calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as follows: (CNR) = (n-ROIT - n-ROIL)/N, where n-ROIT is the mean attenuation (or SI) of the tumor divided by the mean attenuation (or SI) of the aorta and n-ROIL is the mean attenuation (or SI) of the liver parenchyma divided by the mean attenuation (or SI) of the aorta.

RESULTS

The CNR was significantly higher on EOB-enhanced MRI than on dynamic CT scans.

CONCLUSIONS

For the assessment of HCC vascularity, EOB-enhanced MRI scans acquired with radial sampling were more accurate than dynamic CT images.

Value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and DWI in classification, characterization and confidence in diagnosis of solid focal liver lesions

OBJECTIVE

To assess gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) value in classification (benign vs. malignant) and characterization of solid focal liver lesions (SFLLs) and impact on confidence in diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 195 lesions (46 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs], 45 metastases, 32 adenomas, 37 focal nodular hyperplasias [FNHs] and 35 hemangiomas) were retrospectively evaluated in 93 patients. Three imaging datasets were compared: DWI/ apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (set A), Gd-EOB-DTPA (set B) and combination of both (set C). Two radiologists (R) independently classified (on a five-point ordinal scale) and characterized each lesion. The accuracy in classification and characterization was compared, and the diagnostic confidence was assessed.

RESULTS

The classification accuracy on set A, B and C was 86.2%, 91.3% and 91.8% (R1), and 84.6%, 91.8% and 93.3% (R2); and characterization accuracy was 67.2%, 88.2% and 87.7% (R1), and 60.5%, 88.2% and 85.6% (R2). Classification by reader 1 showed no significant difference between set A and B (p=.09). For both readers, there was a significant difference between set A and C in both classification and characterization (all p < .05), but no significant difference between set B and C in neither classification nor characterization. No significant difference between the three datasets in classification and characterization of hemangiomas (all p > .05). The diagnostic confidence of the readers has increased progressively from set A to Set C (all p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

DWI may suggest benignity or malignancy of solid liver lesions, while Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced imaging remains superior in lesions characterization and the combination of both increases the diagnostic confidence. DWI is very helpful in the diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas.

Imaging-based diagnosis of benign lesions and pseudolesions in the cirrhotic liver

Liver cirrhosis is a leading cause of death worldwide, with 1-year mortality rates of up to 57% in decompensated patients. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary tumor in cirrhotic livers and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Annually, up to 8% of patients with cirrhosis develop HCC. The diagnosis of HCC rarely requires histological confirmation: in fact, according to the most recent guidelines, the imaging features of HCC are almost always sufficient for a certain diagnosis. Thus, the role of the radiologist is pivotal because the accurate detection and characterization of focal liver lesions in patients with cirrhosis are essential in improving clinical outcomes. Despite recent technical innovations in liver imaging, several issues remain for radiologists regarding the differentiation of HCC from other hepatic lesions, particularly benign lesions and pseudolesions. It is important to avoid misdiagnosis of benign liver lesions as HCC (false-positive cases) because this diagnostic misinterpretation may lead to ineligibility of a patient for potentially curative treatments or inappropriate assignment of high priority scores to patients on waiting lists for liver transplantation. This review presents a pocket guide that could be useful for the radiologist in the diagnosis of benign lesions and pseudolesions in cirrhotic livers, highlighting the imaging features that help in making the correct diagnosis of macroregenerative nodules; siderotic nodules; arterioportal shunts; hemangiomas, including fast-filling hemangiomas, hemangiomas with pseudowashout, and sclerosed hemangiomas; confluent fibrosis; pseudomasses in chronic portal vein thrombosis; and focal fatty changes.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Extracellular Contrast Detects Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Greater Accuracy Than With Gadoxetic Acid or Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI), and MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI) in the detection of HCC using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS).

METHODS

We studied 125 participants (102 men; mean age, 55.3 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent CT, ECA-MRI, or HBA-MRI (with gadoxetic acid) before surgery for a nodule initially detected by ultrasound at a tertiary center in Korea, from November 2016 through February 2019. We collected data on major features and assigned LI-RADS categories (v2018) from CT and MRI examinations. We then compared the diagnostic performance for LR-5 for each modality alone, and in combination.

RESULTS

In total, 163 observations (124 HCCs, 13 non-HCC malignancies, and 26 benign lesions; mean size, 20.7 mm) were identified. ECA-MRI detected HCC with 83.1% sensitivity and 86.6% accuracy, compared to 64.4% sensitivity and 71.8% accuracy for CT (P < .001) and 71.2% sensitivity (P = .005) and 76.5% accuracy for HBA-MRI (P = .005); all technologies detected HCC with 97.4% specificity. Adding CT to either ECA-MRI (89.2% sensitivity, 91.4% accuracy; both P < .05) or HBA-MRI (82.8% sensitivity, 86.5% accuracy; both P < .05) significantly increased its diagnostic performance in detection of HCC compared with the MRI technologies alone. ECA-MRI identified arterial phase hyperenhancement in a significantly higher proportion of patients (97.6%) than CT (81.5%; P < .001) or HBA-MRI (89.5%; P = .002). ECA-MRI identified non-peripheral washout in 79.8% of patients, vs 74.2% of patients for CT and 73.4% of patients for HBA-MRI (differences not significant). ECA-MRI identified enhancing capsules in 85.5% of patients, vs 33.9% for CT (P < .001) and 41.4% for HBA-MRI (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In a prospective study of patients with chronic liver disease and a nodule detected by ultrasound, ECA-MRI detected HCC with higher levels of sensitivity and accuracy than CT or HBA-MRI, based on LI-RADS. Diagnostic performance was best when CT was used in combination with MRI compared with MRI alone.

Impact of the introduction of direct-acting anti-viral drugs on hepatocarcinogenesis: a prospective serial follow-up MRI study

BACKGROUND

We conducted a prospective study using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) to determine whether sustained virological response (SVR) by direct-acting anti-viral (DAA) drugs suppresses hepatocarcinogenesis in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

AIM

To use serial Gd-EOB-MRI to assess the impact of DAAs on hepatocarcinogenesis.

METHODS

Between February 2008 and December 2018, 1083 consecutive patients with HCV infection underwent Gd-EOB-MRI. Of these, 719 patients were enrolled, including 210 patients in the 'Non-DAA group', who did not receive DAAs before the introduction of DAAs, and 509 patients in the 'DAA group', who achieved SVR after the introduction of DDAs. Factors associated with hepatocarcinogenesis were analysed by a Cox proportional hazard model. In addition, hepatocarcinogenesis was classified into two types, 'multistep' and 'de novo', on the basis of Gd-EOB-MRI findings. Factors associated with each type were analysed by Fine and Gray proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Hepatocarcinogenesis was observed in 67 of 719 (9.3%) patients. Factors associated with hepatocarcinogenesis were male gender, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2 or 3, Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP-L3) ≥5%, the presence of nonhypervascular hypointense nodules (NHHNs) and Non-DAA group. Of 67 patients, multistep hepatocarcinogenesis occurred in 58 patients (86.6%) and de novo hepatocarcinogenesis occurred in nine patients (13.4%). Factors associated with multistep hepatocarcinogenesis were male gender and Non-DAA group.

CONCLUSION

The eradication of HCV by DAA therapy reduces multistep hepatocarcinogenesis.

Atypical Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Solve Challenging Cases Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed noninvasively with contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasonography on the basis of its hallmark imaging features of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images. However, approximately 40% of HCCs show atypical imaging features, posing a significant diagnostic challenge for radiologists. Another challenge for radiologists in clinical practice is the presentation of many HCC mimickers such as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, arterioportal shunt, and hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver. The differentiation of HCCs from these mimickers on preoperative imaging studies is of critical importance. Hence, we will review the typical and atypical imaging features of HCCs and the imaging features of its common mimickers. In addition, we will discuss how to solve these challenges in practice.

New Arterial Phase Enhancing Nodules on MRI of Cirrhotic Liver: Risk of Progression to Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Implications for LI-RADS Classification

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the outcome of new arterial phase enhancing nodules at MRI of cirrhotic livers, including clinical and imaging factors that affect progression to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to assess the diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 (LI-RADSv2018) versus version 2017 (LI-RADSv2017) in categorizing these nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A database search identified 129 new arterial phase enhancing, round, solid, space-occupying nodules in 79 patients with cirrhosis who underwent surveillance MRI. Three readers assessed the nodules for LI-RADS findings and made assessments based on the 2017 and 2018 criteria. Clinical information and laboratory values were collected. Outcome data were assessed on the basis of follow-up imaging and pathology results. Interreader agreement was assessed. Logistic regression and ROC curve analyses were used to assess the utility of the features for prediction of progression to HCC. RESULTS. Of the 129 nodules, 71 (55%) progressed to HCC. LI-RADSv2017 score, LIRADSv2018 score, and mild-to-moderate T2 hyperintensity were significant independent predictors of progression to HCC in univariate analyses. Serum α-fetoprotein level, hepatitis B or C virus infection as the cause of liver disease, and presence of other HCCs were significant predictors of progression to HCC in multivariate analyses. The rates of progression of LI-RADS category 3 and 4 observations were 38.1% and 57.6%, respectively, for LI-RADSv2017 and 44.4% and 69.9%, respectively, for LI-RADSv2018. CONCLUSION. New arterial phase enhancing nodules in patients with cirrhosis frequently progress to HCC. Factors such as serum α-fetoprotein level and presence of other HCCs are strong predictors of progression to HCC.

Assessment of Hepatic Perfusion Using GRASP MRI: Bringing Liver MRI on a New Level

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of hepatic perfusion imaging using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for characterizing liver parenchyma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before and after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a potential alternative to volume perfusion computed tomography (VPCT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 2017 and September 2018, 10 patients (male = 8; mean age, 66.5 ± 8.6 years) with HCC were included in this prospective, institutional review board-approved study. All patients underwent DCE GRASP MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution after injection of liver-specific MR contrast agent before and after TACE. In addition, VPCT was acquired before TACE serving as standard of reference. From the dynamic imaging data of DCE MRI and VPCT, perfusion maps (arterial liver perfusion [mL/100 mL/min], portal liver perfusion [mL/100 mL/min], hepatic perfusion index [%]) were calculated using a dual-input maximum slope model and compared with assess perfusion measures, lesion characteristics, and treatment response using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. To evaluate interreader agreement for measurement repeatability, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated.

RESULTS

Perfusion maps could be successfully generated from all DCE MRI and VPCT data. The ICC was excellent for all perfusion maps (ICC ≥ 0.88; P ≤ 0.001). Image analyses revealed perfusion parameters for DCE MRI and VPCT within the same absolute range for tumor and liver tissue. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI further enabled quantitative assessment of treatment response showing a significant decrease (P ≤ 0.01) of arterial liver perfusion and hepatic perfusion index in the target lesion after TACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic contrast-enhanced GRASP MRI allows for a reliable and robust assessment of hepatic perfusion parameters providing quantitative results comparable to VPCT and enables characterization of HCC before and after TACE, thus posing the potential to serve as an alternative to VPCT.

Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI: performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of the LI-RADS v.2018 scale by comparing it with the Likert scale, in the characterization of liver lesions.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with chronic liver disease underwent MR examination for characterization of 44 liver lesions. Images were independently analyzed by two radiologists using the LI-RADS scale and by another two radiologists using the Likert scale. The reference standard used was either histopathological evaluation or a 4-year MRI follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The LI-RADS scale obtained an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 70%, while the Likert scale achieved an accuracy of 79%, a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 87%, a PPV of 89% and a NPV of 70%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 85% for the LI-RADS scale and 83% for the Likert scale. The inter-observer agreement was strong (k = 0.89) between the LI-RADS evaluators and moderate (k = 0.69) between the Likert evaluators.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistically significant difference between the performances of the two scales; nevertheless, we suggest that the LI-RADS scale be used, as it appeared more objective and consistent.

Diagnosis of recurrent HCC: intraindividual comparison of gadoxetic acid MRI and extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI) and MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI) for detection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after multiple treatments.

METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed patient consent. A total of 135 patients with suspected HCC recurrence after 2-5 treatments (surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, and/or radiofrequency ablation) underwent both HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI within a 1 month interval. HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI were analyzed for HCC detection by two observers using a five-point scale. The diagnostic performances according to MRI modality were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 136 liver lesions (121 HCCs and 15 benign lesions; median size, 1.9 cm) were identified. ECA-MRI showed greater sensitivity (90.9% vs. 76.9% for observer 1; 91.7% vs. 78.5% for observer 2) and accuracy (91.2% vs. 78.7% for observer 1; 91.9% vs. 80.2% for observer 2) than HBA-MRI for both observers (P = 0.002, 0.003). Fifteen (12.4%) HCCs were correctly diagnosed with ECA-MRI but not with HBA-MRI by both observers. Interobserver agreement was excellent (0.885) for ECA-MRI and substantial (0.749) for HBA-MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

For detection of recurrent HCC, ECA-MRI was superior to HBA-MRI in terms of sensitivity and accuracy. Therefore, ECA-MRI could be the preferred imaging modality over HBA-MRI for assessing HCC recurrence following multiple treatments.

Use of gadoxetate disodium in patients with chronic liver disease and its implications for liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS)

Use of gadoxetate disodium, a hepatobiliary gadolinium-based agent, in patients with chronic parenchymal liver disease offers the advantage of improved sensitivity for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Imaging features of liver observations on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI may also serve as biomarkers of recurrence-free and overall survival following definitive treatment of HCC. A number of technical and interpretative pitfalls specific to gadoxetate exist, however, and needs to be recognized when protocoling and interpreting MRI exams with this agent. This article reviews the advantages and pitfalls of gadoxetate use in patients at risk for HCC, and the potential impact on Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) imaging feature assessment and categorization. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1236-1252.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Hepatocellular carcinoma and mimickers

Gadoxetic acid, a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent, has emerged as an important tool for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is useful for the evaluation of early-stage HCC, diagnosis of HCC precursor lesions, and highly sensitive diagnosis of HCC. Furthermore, functional information provided by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can aid in the characterization of focal liver lesions. For example, whereas lesions lack functioning hepatocytes appear hypointense in the hepatobiliary phase, preserved or enhanced expression of organic anion transporting polypeptides in some HCCs as well as focal nodular hyperplasia lead to hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase; and a targetoid appearance on transitional phase or hepatobiliary phase imaging can be helpful for identifying the histopathological composition of tumors. While gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may improve the sensitivity of HCC diagnosis and provide new insights into the characterization of focal liver lesions, there are many challenges associated with its use. This article reviews the pros and cons of HCC diagnosis with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and discuss some clues in the radiological differentiation of HCC from HCC mimickers.

Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses

BACKGROUND

To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses.

METHODS

Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T MR before treatment. Mean enhancement time (MET), positive enhancement integral (PEI), a maximum slope of increase (MSI), and a maximum slope of decrease (MSD) were measured.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between benign and malignant hepatic masses with respect to MET, PEI, and MSI values. The PEI and MSI values between hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), cholangiocarcinomas, and metastatic tumors had significant differences. The MSD value between metastatic tumors, HCCs, and hemangiomas were significantly different. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operator characteristic curves for MET, PEI, and MSI were 0.70, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The specificity of MET, PEI, and MSI were all 77%, and the sensitivities of MSI was the highest, of which was 82.40%. Logistic regression analysis showed the regression equation to be P = 1/[1 + e^{0.008 × 1 + 0.007 × 2-6.707}], and taking the Youden index maximum points as a diagnostic point was 0.2946.

CONCLUSION

Some parameters of MDCE-MRI have significant roles in differentiating hepatic masses.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI of transient hepatic enhancement differences: Another cause of hypointense observation on hepatobiliary phase

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine the frequency, natural history and factors associated with the presence of transient hepatic enhancement difference showing hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI of 125 patients (91 men; 34 women) with transient hepatic enhancement difference were retrospectively reviewed. Three readers qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated MR imaging features and evolution at follow up. The Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Kruskall-Wallis rank test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Transient hepatic enhancement difference were hypointense on hepatobiliary phase images in 20 of 125 cases (16%). At univariate analysis there was association with wedge-shape morphology (p < 0.001), size ≥21 mm (p < 0.001), hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (p < 0.001), restricted diffusion (p < 0.001) and previous treatment (p < 0.005). At multivariate analysis, the following factors were associated: previous treatment (p < 0.05), hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (p < 0.001) and size ≥21 mm (p < 0.001). Of 12 patients with hypointense transient hepatic enhancement difference on hepatobiliary phase images who had follow-up MRI, nine showed reduction in size.

CONCLUSION

Transient hepatic enhancement difference observations showing hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI are not infrequent and may shrink at follow-up. They are more likely associated with size ≥21 mm, hyperintensity on T2-weighted images and previous treatment of adjacent tumor.

Imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Multiphasic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are both used for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. To determine if there is a relative diagnostic benefit of one over the other, we synthesized evidence regarding the relative performance of CT, extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI, and gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. We also assessed whether liver biopsy versus follow-up with the same versus alternative imaging is best for CT-indeterminate or MRI-indeterminate liver nodules in patients with cirrhosis. We searched multiple databases from inception to April 27, 2016, for studies comparing CT with extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI or gadoxetate-enhanced MRI in adults with cirrhosis and suspected HCC. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Of 33 included studies, 19 were comprehensive, while 14 reported sensitivity only. For all tumor sizes, the 19 comprehensive comparisons showed significantly higher sensitivity (0.82 versus 0.66) and lower negative likelihood ratio (0.20 versus 0.37) for MRI over CT. The specificities of MRI versus CT (0.91 versus 0.92) and the positive likelihood ratios (8.8 versus 8.1) were not different. All three modalities performed better for HCCs ≥2 cm. Performance was poor for HCCs <1 cm. No studies examined whether adults with cirrhosis and an indeterminate nodule are best evaluated using biopsy, repeated imaging, or alternative imaging. Concerns about publication bias, inconsistent study results, increased risk of bias, and clinical factors precluded support for exclusive use of either gadoxetate-enhanced or extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI over CT.

CONCLUSION

CT, extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI, or gadoxetate-enhanced MRI could not be definitively preferred for HCC diagnosis in patients with cirrhosis; in patients with cirrhosis and an indeterminate mass, there were insufficient data comparing biopsy to repeat cross-sectional imaging or alternative imaging. (Hepatology 2018;67:401-421).

Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging outperformed multidetector computed tomography in diagnosing small hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Early detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions can improve longterm patient survival. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was performed in diagnosing small HCCs measuring up to 2 cm (≤2 cm). Two investigators searched multiple databases for studies in which the performances of either Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI or MDCT were reported with sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables for diagnosing HCCs up to 2 cm on a per-lesion or per-patient level. Diagnostic performances were quantitatively pooled by a bivariate random-effect model with further meta-regression and subgroup analyses. A total of 27 studies (14 on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, 9 on MDCT, and 4 on both) were included, enrolling a total of 1735 patients on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and 1781 patients on MDCT. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI demonstrated significantly higher overall sensitivity than did MDCT (0.96 versus 0.65; P < 0.01), without substantial loss of specificity (0.94 versus 0.98; P > 0.05). Area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and 0.85 with MDCT. Regarding Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, sensitivity was significantly higher for studies from non-Asian countries than Asian countries (0.96 versus 0.93; P < 0.01), for retrospective studies than prospective studies (0.95 versus 0.91; P < 0.01), and for those with Gd-EOB-DTPA injection rate ≥ 1.5 mL/s than that of <1.5 mL/s (0.97 versus 0.90; P < 0.01). In conclusion, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI demonstrated higher sensitivity and overall diagnostic accuracy than MDCT, and thus should be the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing small HCCs measuring up to 2 cm. Liver Transplantation 23 1505-1518 2017 AASLD.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver: diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and evaluation of response to treatment - Part 2

In the second part of this review, we will describe the ancillary imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that can be seen on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol, and on novel and emerging protocols such as diffusion weighted imaging and utilization of hepatocyte-specific/hepatobiliary contrast agent. We will also describe the morphologic sub-types of HCC, and give a simplified non-invasive diagnostic algorithm for HCC, followed by a brief description of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS), and MRI assessment of tumor response following locoregional therapy.

The value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging in characterizing cirrhotic nodules with atypical enhancement on Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images

Purpose

To evaluate the utility of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing atypically enhanced cirrhotic nodules detected on conventional Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images.

Materials and methods

We enrolled 61 consecutive patients with 88 atypical nodules seen on conventional Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI within a 3-month period. Using a reference standard, we determined that 58 of the nodules were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 30 were dysplastic nodules (DNs). Tumor size, signal intensity on precontrast T1-weighted images (T1WI), T2-weighted images (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI), and the enhancement patterns seen on dynamic phase and hepatocyte phase images were determined.

Results

There were significant differences between DNs and HCC in hyperintensity on T2WI, hypointensity on T1WI, hypervascularity on arterial phase images, typical HCC enhancement patterns on dynamic MR images, hypointensity on hepatocyte phase images, and hyperintensity on DWI. The sensitivity and specificity were 79.3% and 83.3% for T2WI, 50.0% and 80.0% for T1WI, 82.8% and 76.7% for DWI, 17.2% and 100% for dynamic MR imaging, 93.1% and 83.3% for hepatocyte phase imaging, and 46.8% and 100% when arterial hypervascularity was combined with hypointensity on hepatocyte-phase imaging.

Conclusion

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatocyte phase imaging is recommended for patients at high risk for HCC who present with atypical lesions on conventional Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images.

Hepatocellular carcinoma detection: diagnostic performance of a simulated abbreviated MRI protocol combining diffusion-weighted and T1-weighted imaging at the delayed phase post gadoxetic acid

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a "simulated" abbreviated MRI (AMRI) protocol using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T1-weighted (T1w) imaging obtained at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) post gadoxetic acid injection alone and in combination, compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced (CE)-T1w imaging for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This was an IRB approved HIPAA compliant retrospective single institution study including patients with liver disease who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for HCC diagnosis. Three independent observers assessed 2 sets of images (full CE-set and AMRI including DWI+T1w-HBP). Diagnostic performance of T1w-HBP and DWI alone and in combination was compared to that of CE-set. All imaging sets included unenhanced T1w and T2w sequences. A preliminary analysis was performed to assess cost savings of AMRI protocol compared to a full MRI study.

RESULTS

174 patients including 62 with 80 HCCs were assessed. Equivalent per-patient sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were observed for DWI (85.5% and 92.2%, pooled data) and T1w-HBP (89.8% and 94.2%) (P = 0.1-0.7), while these were significantly lower for the full AMRI protocol (DWI+T1w-HBP, 80.6% and 80%, P = 0.02) when compared to CE-set (90.3% and 94.9%). Higher specificity and positive predictive value were observed for CE-set vs. AMRI (P = 0.02). The estimated cost reduction of AMRI versus full MRI ranged between 30.7 and 49.0%.

CONCLUSION

AMRI using DWI and T1w-HBP has a clinically acceptable sensitivity and NPV for HCC detection. This could serve as the basis for a future study assessing AMRI for HCC screening and surveillance.

Reducing Artifacts during Arterial Phase of Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging: Dilution Method versus Reduced Injection Rate

Purpose To compare two contrast material-administration protocols (dilution vs slow injection) in terms of their effectiveness in arterial phase artifact reduction at gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant retrospective case-controlled cohort study was approved by the institutional review board, with a waiver of informed patient consent. A total of 318 consecutive patients undergoing gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging were placed into one of two subcohorts of 159 consecutive patients each: the dilution subcohort (gadoxetic acid was diluted 1:1 with saline and injected at a rate of 2.0 mL/sec) and the slow injection subcohort (gadoxetic acid was not diluted and was injected at a rate of 1.0 mL/sec). Eighty-nine patients in the dilution subcohort also underwent follow-up MR imaging with the slow injection method, and 34 patients in the slow injection subcohort underwent follow-up MR imaging with the dilution method. Both patient- and image-based analyses, as well as intraindividual analysis, were used to compare two parameters-mean artifact score rated by two observers using a five-point scale and frequency of severe artifact-between the dilution and slow injection subcohorts with the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test, χ² test, and generalized estimating equation. Results In both patient- and image-based analyses, the mean artifact score and frequency of severe artifact were lower in the dilution subcohort (mean, 1.46% and 3.8% [six of 159]) than in the slow injection subcohort (mean, 1.95% and 15.1% [24 of 159]) (P ≤ .001 and P < .001, respectively). In intraindividual analysis, both variables were also decreased in the dilution subcohort (P = .007 and P = .001, respectively). We found the two variables to be significantly increased in the slow injection subcohort when compared with that in the dilution subcohort for three different MR platforms (P < .05). Conclusion In comparison with slow injection of undiluted contrast material at a rate of 1.0 mL/sec, gadoxetic acid diluted to 50% and injected at a rate of 2 mL/sec had a significantly less severe ghosting artifact in the arterial phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. ^© RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to directly (head-to-head) compare the per-lesion diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (also referred to as CT hereafter) and gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (also referred to as MRI hereafter) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies reporting direct per-lesion comparison data of contrast-enhanced multidetector CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging that were published between January 2000 and January 2015 were analyzed. The data of each study were extracted. Systematic review, paired meta-analysis, and subgroup analysis were performed. Twelve studies including 627 patients and 793 HCC lesions were analyzed. The sensitivity estimates of MRI and CT were, respectively, 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.93) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.58–0.80), with significant difference (P < 0.05). The sensitivity estimates were both 0.94 (95% CI 0.92–0.96) (Chi-square 4.84, degrees of freedom = 1, P > 0.05). In all subgroups, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging was more sensitive than multidetector CT for the detection of HCC, and specificity estimates of both tests maintained at a similarly high level in all conditions: sensitivity estimates of both tests were reduced in studies where patients were diagnosed with HCC solely by liver explant or in those where HCC lesions were small (≤2 cm, especially when ≤1 cm). But in all situations, sensitivities of MRI were higher than those of CT with or without significance. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging showed better per-lesion diagnostic performance than multidetector CT for the diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis and in small hepatic lesions.

Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MR imaging versus CT during hepatic arteriography and portography for small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma

To compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with that of computed tomography (CT) during hepatic arteriography and arterial portography (CT HA/AP) for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from small hypervascular nodules.This retrospective study included 38 patients with 131 hypervascular nodules (≤2 cm) who had underwent MRI and CT HA/AP within a 2-week interval. Two observers analyzed MRI while other 2 observers analyzed CT HA/AP. Thereafter, MRI observers reviewed the CT HA/AP and magnetic resonance (MR) images again using both modalities. HCC was diagnosed by pathologic or imaging studies according to American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria. Alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve [Az]), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.The pooled Az was significantly higher for the combined modalities (0.946) than for MRI alone (0.9, P = 0.004), and for MRI than for CT HA/AP alone (0.827, P = 0.0154). Subgroup analysis for HCC ≤1 cm showed the sensitivity of the combined modalities (79.4%) was significantly higher than for MRI (52.9%) and CT HA/AP alone (50%) (both, P < 0.005). The specificity of the combined modalities was not different from MRI alone (98.8% vs. 97.3%, P = 0.5), but was significantly higher than for CT HA/AP alone (98.8% vs. 92.5%, P = 0.022).Hypervascular HCCs >1 to 2 cm can be diagnosed sufficiently by MRI. The combined modalities increased the diagnostic accuracy of HCCs ≤1 cm, compared with MRI or CT HA/AP alone.