Dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of image quality of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source computed tomography

Evaluation of low-dose pediatric chest CT examination using in-house developed various age-size pediatric chest phantoms

PURPOSE

This study aims to develop Various Age-size Pediatric Chest Phantoms (VAPC) to evaluate low-dose protocol that approximates clinical conditions achieved by low organ-specific doses and optimal image quality among the challenges of pediatric size variations.

METHODS

Three original pediatric data aged 1, 4, and 7 years were used as a reference for developing VAPC phantoms. Six protocols, namely standard dose (STD) and low dose (low mA and low kV) reconstructed using Filtered Back Projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms, were investigated. This study directly measured the lungs, heart, and spinal cord dose using LD-V1 film. Linearity, Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR), and Noise Power Spectrum (NPS) were evaluated to assess the CT image quality of the VAPC phantom.

RESULTS

This study found that the mean organ-specific dose was higher than CTDIvol. A Comparison of mean lung doses showed VAPC phantom 1 (y.o.) received 74.8% and 137.2% more doses than 4 (y.o.) and 7 (y.o.), respectively. Low kV produces a lower organ dose than low mA. The linearity of CT numbers is not biased at low doses. Differences in age measures significantly influenced organ-specific dose, MTF, CNR, and NPS.

CONCLUSION

Smaller pediatrics are still exposed to higher doses at low-dose examinations, whereas larger pediatrics have lower contrast resolution and increased image noise. CT number linearity is unbiased. The combination of low kV with FBP produces higher spatial resolution, while low mA with IR effectively reduces noise to detect low-contrast objects better.

Application of Deep Learning-Based Denoising Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction in Dynamic Abdominal CT: Comparison with Standard-Dose CT Using Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Method

The purpose is to evaluate whether deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithm provides sufficient image quality for abdominal computed tomography (CT) with a 30% reduction in radiation dose, compared to standard-dose CT reconstructed with conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). The subjects consisted of 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with standard dose and reconstructed with hybrid IR (ASiR-V50%) and another 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with approximately 30% less dose and reconstructed with ASiR-V50% and DLD at low-, medium- and high-strength (DLD-L, DLD-M and DLD-H, respectively). The standard deviation of attenuation in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for portal vein on portal venous phase was calculated. Lesion conspicuity in 23 abdominal solid mass on the reduced-dose CT was rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to -4 (markedly inferior). Compared with hybrid IR of standard-dose CT, DLD-H of reduced-dose CT provided significantly lower image noise (portal phase: 9.0 (interquartile range, 8.7-9.4) HU vs 12.0 (11.4-12.7) HU, P < 0.0001) and significantly higher CNR (median, 5.8 (4.4-7.4) vs 4.3 (3.3-5.3), P = 0.0019). As for DLD-M of reduced-dose CT, no significant difference was found in image noise and CNR compared to hybrid IR of standard-dose CT (P > 0.99). Lesion conspicuity scores for DLD-H and DLD-M were significantly better than hybrid IR (P < 0.05). Dynamic contrast-enhanced abdominal CT acquired with approximately 30% lower radiation dose and generated with the DLD algorithm exhibit lower image noise and higher CNR compared to standard-dose CT with hybrid IR.

Elimination of biological and physical artifacts in abdomen and brain computed tomography procedures using filtering techniques

•

Filters reduce the noise at the expense of visual image quality.

•

Digital interpretation of images prevents misinterpretation of the images due to blurring of the images.

•

Dose reduction without compromising the diagnostic.

Introduction

Medical images are usually affected by biological and physical artifacts or noise, which reduces image quality and hence poses difficulties in visual analysis, interpretation and thus requires higher doses and increased radiographs repetition rate.

Objectives

This study aims at assessing image quality during CT abdomen and brain examinations using filtering techniques as well as estimating the radiogenic risk associated with CT abdomen and brain examinations.

Materials and Methods

The data were collected from the Radiology Department at Royal Care International (RCI) Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan. The study included 100 abdominal CT images and 100 brain CT images selected from adult patients. Filters applied are namely: Mean filter, Gaussian filter, Median filter and Minimum filter. In this study, image quality after denoising is measured based on the Mean Squared Error (MSE), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), and the Structural Similarity Index Metric (SSIM).

Results

The results show that the images quality parameters become higher after applications of filters. Median filter showed improved image quality as interpreted by the measured parameters: PSNR and SSIM, and it is thus considered as a better filter for removing the noise from all other applied filters.

Discussion

The noise removed by the different filters applied to the CT images resulted in enhancing high quality images thereby effectively revealing the important details of the images without increasing the patients’ risks from higher doses.

Conclusions

Filtering and image reconstruction techniques not only reduce the dose and thus the radiation risks, but also enhances high quality imaging which allows better diagnosis.

A phantom study comparing low-dose CT physical image quality from five different CT scanners

BACKGROUND

To systematically evaluate the physical image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) on CT scanners from 5 different manufacturers using a phantom model.

METHODS

CT images derived from a Catphan 500 phantom were acquired using manufacturer-specific iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on CT scanners from 5 different manufacturers and compared using filtered back projection with 2 radiation doses of 0.25 and 0.75 mGy. Image high-contrast spatial resolution and image noise were objectively characterized by modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS). Image high-contrast spatial resolution and image low-contrast detectability were compared directly by visual evaluation. CT number linearity and image uniformity were compared with intergroup differences using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

The CT number linearity of 4 insert materials were as follows: acrylic (95% CI: 120.35 to 121.27; P=0.134), low-density polyethylene (95% CI: -98.43 to -97.43; P=0.070), air (95% CI: -996.16 to -994.51; P=0.018), and Teflon (95% CI: 984.40 to 986.87; P=0.883). The image uniformity values of GE Healthcare (95% CI: 3.24 to 3.83; P=0.138), Philips (95% CI: 2.62 to 3.70; P=0.299), Siemens (95% CI: 2.10 to 3.59; P=0.054), Minfound (95% CI: 2.35 to 3.65; P=0.589), and Neusoft (95% CI: 2.63 to 3.37; P=0.900) were evaluated and found to be within ±4 Hounsfield units (HU), with a range of 0.99-2.76 HU for standard deviations. There was no statistically significant difference in CT number linearity and image uniformity across the 5 CT scanners under different radiation doses with IR and DLIR algorithms (P>0.05). The resolution level at 10% MTF was 6.98 line-pairs-per-centimeter (lp/cm) on average, which was similar to the subjective evaluation results (mostly up to 7 lp/cm). DLIR at all 3 levels had the highest 50% MTF values among all reconstruction algorithms. For image low-contrast detectability, the minimum diameter of distinguishable contrast holes reached 4 mm at a 0.5% resolution. Increasing the radiation dose and IR strength reduced the image noise and NPS curve peak frequency while improving image low-contrast detectability.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the image quality of CT scanners from 5 different manufacturers in LDCT is comparable and that the CT number linearity is unbiased and can contribute to accurate bone mineral density quantification.

Tailored versus fixed scan delay in contrast-enhanced abdominal multi-detector CT: An intra-patient comparison of image quality

PURPOSE

To perform anintra-patient comparison betweena single-pass protocol (SP) and a portal venous phase (PVP) by means ofboth quantitative and qualitative analysis of image quality.

METHODS

Forty patients (31 M; 9F; aged 20-77 years; BMI 23 ± 4 Kg/m²) underwent both a SP and a PVP using a 64-rows multi-detector CT with a median interval time of 56 days (range5-903). All patients underwent i.v. bolus injection (2.0 cc/sec) of 1.7 cc/Kg of a non ionic iodinated contrast-media (370 mgI/ml) with scan delays of 67 ± 8 and 90 s for the SP and the PVP, respectively. Signal- (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for most visceral organs and for both abdominal aorta (AA) and main portal vein (MPV). For qualitative analysis, reproduction of abdominal viscera and vascular structures was blindly evaluated and inter-observer agreement calculated by the weighted Cohen k-analysis.

RESULTS

Attenuation values (H.U.) of AA (232 ± 53vs180 ± 36) and MPV (215 ± 39vs187 ± 42) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the SP than in PVP, respectively. At qualitative analysis, reproduction of mostabdominal viscerawas also significantly sharper (p < 0.001) with the SP than the PVPwith inter-observer agreement scores (k)ranging from 0.60 to 0.88 for all but one imaging criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

As the SP resulted in a significantly higher vascular enhancement and in a sharper reproduction of most abdominal viscera, it may be better suited than a PVP for the CT evaluation of non traumatic acute abdomen.

Influence of a novel deep-learning based reconstruction software on the objective and subjective image quality in low-dose abdominal computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

Modern reconstruction and post-processing software aims at reducing image noise in CT images, potentially allowing for a reduction of the employed radiation exposure. This study aimed at assessing the influence of a novel deep-learning based software on the subjective and objective image quality compared to two traditional methods [filtered back-projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (IR)].

METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, abdominal low-dose CT images of 27 patients (mean age 38 ± 12 years, volumetric CT dose index 2.9 ± 1.8 mGy) were reconstructed with IR, FBP and, furthermore, post-processed using a novel software. For the three reconstructions, qualitative and quantitative image quality was evaluated by means of CT numbers, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in six different ROIs. Additionally, the reconstructions were compared using SNR, peak SNR, root mean square error and mean absolute error to assess structural differences.

RESULTS

On average, CT numbers varied within 1 Hounsfield unit (HU) for the three assessed methods in the assessed ROIs. In soft tissue, image noise was up to 42% lower compared to FBP and up to 27% lower to IR when applying the novel software. Consequently, SNR and CNR were highest with the novel software. For both IR and the novel software, subjective image quality was equal but higher than the image quality of FBP-images.

CONCLUSION

The assessed software reduces image noise while maintaining image information, even in comparison to IR, allowing for a potential dose reduction of approximately 20% in abdominal CT imaging.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The assessed software reduces image noise by up to 27% compared to IR and 48% compared to FBP while maintaining the image information.The reduced image noise allows for a potential dose reduction of approximately 20% in abdominal imaging.

Diagnostic Performance of Different Simulated Low-Dose Levels in Patients with Suspected Cervical Abscess Using a Third-Generation Dual-Source CT Scanner

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of dose reduction on diagnostic accuracy and image quality of cervical computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected cervical abscess. Forty-eight patients (mean age 45.5 years) received a CT for suspected cervical abscess. Low-dose CT (LDCT) datasets with 25%, 50%, and 75% of the original dose were generated with a realistic simulation. The image data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) (strengths 3 and 5). A five-point Likert scale was used to assess subjective image quality and diagnostic confidence. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and submandibular gland and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and submandibular glandular fat were calculated to assess the objective image quality. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for LDCT using the original dose as the reference standard. The prevalence of cervical abscesses was high (72.9%) in the cohort; the mean effective dose for all 48 scans was 1.8 ± 0.8 mSv. Sternocleidomastoid and submandibular SNR and sternocleidomastoid muscle fat and submandibular gland fat CNR increased with higher doses and were significantly higher for ADMIRE compared to FBP, with the best results in ADMIRE 5 (all p < 0.001). Subjective image quality was highest for ADMIRE 5 at 75% and lowest for FBP at 25% of the original dose (p < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence was highest for ADMIRE 5 at 75% and lowest for FBP at 25% (p < 0.001). Patient-based diagnostic accuracy was high for all LDCT datasets, down to 25% for ADMIRE 3 and 5 (sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 100%) and lower for FBP at 25% dose reduction (sensitivity: 88.6-94.3%; specificity: 92.3-100%). The use of a modern dual-source CT of the third generation and iterative reconstruction allows a reduction in the radiation dose to 25% (0.5 mSv) of the original dose with the same diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of neck abscesses.

Evaluation of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V Reconstruction Algorithm vs Filtered Back Projection in the Detection of Hypodense Liver Lesions: Reader Performance and Preferences

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and readers' experience in the detection of focal liver lesions on computed tomography with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) reconstruction compared with filtered back projection (FBP) scans.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with liver lesions had FBP and ASIR-V scans. Two radiologists independently reviewed both sets of computed tomography scans, identifying and characterizing liver lesions.

RESULTS

Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V scans had a reduction in dose length product (P < 0.0001) with no difference in image contrast (P = 0.1805); image noise was less for the ASIR-V scans (P < 0.0001) and contrast-to-noise ratio was better for ASIR-V (P = 0.0002). Both readers found more hypodense liver lesions on the FBP (P = 0.01) scans. Multiple subjective imaging scores were significantly less for the ASIR-V scans for both readers.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ASIR-V scans were objectively better, our readers performed worse in lesion detection on them, suggesting a need for better education/experience with this technology during implementation.

Evaluation of an iterative model-based CT reconstruction algorithm by intra-patient comparison of standard and ultra-low-dose examinations

Background The explosive growth of computer tomography (CT) has led to a growing public health concern about patient and population radiation dose. A recently introduced technique for dose reduction, which can be combined with tube-current modulation, over-beam reduction, and organ-specific dose reduction, is iterative reconstruction (IR). Purpose To evaluate the quality, at different radiation dose levels, of three reconstruction algorithms for diagnostics of patients with proven liver metastases under tumor follow-up. Material and Methods A total of 40 thorax-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations acquired from 20 patients in a tumor follow-up were included. All patients were imaged using the standard-dose and a specific low-dose CT protocol. Reconstructed slices were generated by using three different reconstruction algorithms: a classical filtered back projection (FBP); a first-generation iterative noise-reduction algorithm (iDose4); and a next generation model-based IR algorithm (IMR). Results The overall detection of liver lesions tended to be higher with the IMR algorithm than with FBP or iDose4. The IMR dataset at standard dose yielded the highest overall detectability, while the low-dose FBP dataset showed the lowest detectability. For the low-dose protocols, a significantly improved detectability of the liver lesion can be reported compared to FBP or iDose⁴ ( P = 0.01). The radiation dose decreased by an approximate factor of 5 between the standard-dose and the low-dose protocol. Conclusion The latest generation of IR algorithms significantly improved the diagnostic image quality and provided virtually noise-free images for ultra-low-dose CT imaging.

90-kVp low-tube-voltage CT pulmonary angiography in combination with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm: effects on radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate low-tube-voltage 90-kVp CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm (Admire) compared to 120-kVp equivalent dual-energy (DE) acquisition with regards to radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic accuracy for pulmonary embolism (PE) assessment.

METHODS

CTPA studies of 40 patients with suspected PE (56.7 ± 16.3 years) performed on a third-generation 192-slice dual-source CT scanner were retrospectively included. 120-kVp equivalent linearly-blended (60% 90-kVp, 40% 150-kVp) and 90-kVp images were reconstructed. Attenuation and noise of the pulmonary trunk were measured to calculate contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). Three radiologists assessed the presence of central and segmental PE and diagnostic confidence. Interobserver agreement was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Radiation exposure was assessed as effective dose (ED).

RESULTS

Pulmonary trunk CNR values were significantly increased in 90-kVp compared to linearly-blended series (15.4 ± 6.3 vs 11.3 ± 4.6, p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy for PE assessment was similar in both series with excellent interobserver agreement (p = 0.48; ICC, 0.83; p = 0.48). Overall confidence for PE assessment was rated excellent for both series with a significant advantage for linearly-blended series (p < 0.001; 4.1 vs 3.8). ED was reduced by 37.2% with 90-kVp compared to 120-kVp equivalent image series (1.1 ± 0.6 vs 1.7 ± 0.7 mSv, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

90-kVp CTPA with Admire provided increased quantitative image quality with similar diagnostic accuracy and confidence for PE assessment compared to 120-kVp equivalent acquisition, while radiation dose was reduced by 37.2%. Advances in knowledge: 90-kVp CTPA with an advanced iterative reconstruction algorithm results in excellent image quality and reduction of radiation exposure without limiting diagnostic performance.

Low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urinary stone

Purpose

To prospectively determine the diagnostic performance of low-dose CT (LDCT) with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) technique for the detection of urinary stone disease.

Results

The average DLP and ED was 408.16 ± 119.04 mGy and 6.12 ± 1.79 mSv in CDCT, and 138.19 ± 76.87 mGy and 2.07 ± 1.15 mSv in LDCT, respectively. The dose reduction rate of LDCT was nearly 66.1% for both DLP and ED (P < 0.05). LDCT–80% ASIR images showed great image quality (mean score = 4.09), which was similar to CDCT-FBP images (mean score = 4.17) (P > 0.05), but higher than LDCT-FBP images (mean score = 2.77) (P < 0.05).

Materials and Methods

70 consetutive patients with clinically suspected urolithiasis underwent non-enhanced CT. Followed by both conventional-dose CT (CDCT) and low-dose CT (LDCT) scans. Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) scanning was used, with a noise index setting of 13 in CDCT and 25 in LDCT. Reconstructions were performed with filtered back projection (FBP) and different settings of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction [ASIR(40%, 60%, 80%)]. Urinary calculi (size, location, number), image quality (scale 1–5), image noise (scale 1–3) and diagnostic confidence levels (scale 1–3) were evaluated and measured by two radiologists independently. Radiation dose was recorded by calculating dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U test and Paired t tests.

Conclusions

LDCT with ASIR can reduce the radiation dose while maintain relatively high image quality in the diagnosis of urinary stone diseases.

Extent of simultaneous radiation dose and iodine reduction at stable image quality in computed tomography of the chest: A systematic approach using automated tube voltage adaption and iterative reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to systematically combine tube voltage adaptation and iterative reconstructions for reduction of iodine and radiation dose.

METHODS

Settings for the study protocol were evaluated in ex-ante trials to provide image quality that is comparable to a reference protocol at 120 kV with tube current modulation. Consecutive patients were randomized to undergo computed tomography (CT) of the chest using the study protocol (n = 62) or reference protocol (n = 50). Objective and subjective image quality was assessed and compared.

RESULTS

Tube voltage was decreased to 100 kV in 47 patients and to 80 kV in 15 patients in the study group. The iodine dosage (16.1 vs 10.5 g) and the effective radiation dose (3.6 vs 2.5 mSv) were significantly decreased in the study group (both P < .001). Contrast-to-noise ratio was comparable in the pulmonary trunk and increased in the aorta (P < .01). Subjective image quality was comparable without statistically significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous reductions in iodine dosage and radiation dose by one-third are feasible for CT of the chest.

Virtual single source CT using dual source acquisition: Clinical applicability in run-off CT-angiography for intra-individual comparison of different scan protocols

PURPOSE

Virtual single source computed tomography (VSS-CT) acquisition on a dual source CT (DSCT) has been demonstrated to allow for dose-neutral intra-individual comparison of three acquisition protocols at different radiation dose levels (RDL) within one acquisition in a phantom. The purpose of this study was twofold: first to evaluate the applicability of VSS-CT in patients and second to optimize the task-dependent trade-off between radiation dose and image quality of lower extremity CT angiography (run-off CTA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved prospective study 52 patients underwent run-off CTA between 06/2012 and 06/2013. VSS-CT acquisition was conducted using a first generation DSCT applying equal X-ray tube settings (120 kVp), collimation (2 × 32 × 0.6 mm), and slice thickness (1.0 mm) but different effective tube current-time products (tube A: 80 mAs, tube B: 40 mAs). Three different image datasets representing three different radiation dose levels (RDL40, RDL80, RDL120) were reconstructed using a soft kernel from the raw data of tube B, tube A or both tubes combined. Dose length products (DLP) of each raw data set were documented. Quantitative image quality (IQ) was assessed for five anatomical levels using image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). To investigate dose efficiency of each acquisition, the dose-weighted CNR (CNRD) was determined. Qualitative IQ was evaluated by two blinded readers in consensus using a 5-point Likert scale and compared with a Friedman- and posthoc Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

Mean DLP was 200 ± 40, 400 ± 90 and 600 ± 130 mGy·cm for the RDL40, RDL80 and RDL120, respectively. Image noise and CNR were best for RDL120 and decreased significantly for RDL80 and RDL40, independent of the anatomic level (p < 0.001). CNRD showed no significant differences at the abdominal and pelvic level between the investigated radiation dose levels. However, for thigh to foot level a significant increase of CNRD was noted between RDL120, RDL80 and RDL40. Significant differences of qualitative IQ were observed between RDL120 and RDL40 from the abdominal to the foot level, whereas no difference was seen for the other dose levels.

CONCLUSION

Radiation dose splitting with VSS-CT can be applied to run-off CTA facilitating intra-individual comparison of different acquisition protocols without additional radiation exposure. Furthermore, a radiation dose reduction potential for run-off CTA of approximately 1/3 as compared to the acquisition protocol recommended by the manufacturer could be identified in this study.

Diagnostic yield of 90-kVp low-tube-voltage carotid and intracerebral CT-angiography: effects on radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic performance for the detection of carotid stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of low-tube-voltage 90-kVp acquisition combined with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm (Admire) on radiation exposure, image quality, artifacts, and assessment of stenosis in carotid and intracranial CT angiography (CTA).

METHODS

Dual-energy CTA studies of 43 patients performed on a third-generation 192-slice dual-source CT were retrospectively evaluated. Intraindividual comparison of 90-kVp and linearly blended 120-kVp equivalent image series (M_0.6, 60% 90-kVp, 40% Sn-150-kVp) was performed. Contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios of common carotid artery, internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, and basilar artery were calculated. Qualitative image analysis included evaluation of artifacts and suitability for angiographical assessment at shoulder level, carotid bifurcation, siphon, and intracranial by three independent radiologists. Detection and quantification of carotid stenosis were performed. Radiation dose was expressed as dose-length product (DLP).

RESULTS

Contrast-to-noise values of all arteries were significantly increased in 90-kVp compared to M_0.6 (p < 0.001). Suitability for angiographical evaluation was rated excellent with low artifacts for all levels in both image series. Both 90-kVp and M_0.6 showed excellent accordance for detection and grading of carotid stenosis with almost perfect interobserver agreement (carotid stenoses in 32 of 129 segments; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.94). dose-length product was reduced by 40.3% in 90-kVp (110.6 ± 32.1 vs 185.4 ± 47.5 mGy·cm, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

90-kVp carotid and intracranial CTA with Admire provides increased quantitative and similarly good qualitative image quality, while reducing radiation exposure substantially compared to M_0.6. Diagnostic performance for arterial stenosis detection and quantification remained excellent. Advances in knowledge: 90-kVp carotid and intracranial CTA with an advanced iterative reconstruction algorithm results in excellent image quality and reduction of radiation exposure without limiting diagnostic performance.

Evaluation of reduced-dose CT for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in comparison to standard-dose CT

Background Patients with acute non-traumatic abdominal pain often undergo abdominal computed tomography (CT). However, abdominal CT is associated with high radiation exposure. Purpose To evaluate diagnostic performance of a reduced-dose 100 kVp CT protocol with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction as compared to a linearly blended 120 kVp protocol for assessment of acute, non-traumatic abdominal pain. Material and Methods Two radiologists assessed 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series of 112 consecutive patients with acute non-traumatic pain (onset < 48 h) regarding image quality, noise, and artifacts on a five-point Likert scale. Both radiologists assessed both series for abdominal pathologies and for diagnostic confidence. Both 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series were quantitatively evaluated regarding radiation dose and image noise. Comparative statistics and diagnostic accuracy was calculated using receiver operating curve (ROC) statistics, with final clinical diagnosis/clinical follow-up as reference standard. Results Image quality was high for both series without detectable significant differences ( P = 0.157). Image noise and artifacts were rated low for both series but significantly higher for 100 kVp ( P ≤ 0.021). Diagnostic accuracy was high for both series (120 kVp: area under the curve [AUC] = 0.950, sensitivity = 0.958, specificity = 0.941; 100 kVp: AUC ≥ 0.910, sensitivity ≥ 0.937, specificity = 0.882; P ≥ 0.516) with almost perfect inter-rater agreement (Kappa = 0.939). Diagnostic confidence was high for both dose levels without significant differences (100 kVp 5, range 4-5; 120 kVp 5, range 3-5; P = 0.134). The 100 kVp series yielded 26.1% lower radiation dose compared with the 120 kVp series (5.72 ± 2.23 mSv versus 7.75 ± 3.02 mSv, P < 0.001). Image noise was significantly higher in reduced-dose CT (13.3 ± 2.4 HU versus 10.6 ± 2.1 HU; P < 0.001). Conclusion Reduced-dose abdominal CT using 100 kVp yields excellent image quality and high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Low-dose computed tomography with 4th-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in assessment of oncologic patients

AIM

To compare radiation dose and image quality of low-dose computed tomography (CT) protocol combined with hybrid-iterative reconstruction algorithm with standard-dose CT examinations for follow-up of oncologic patients.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with known malignant diseases which underwent, during clinical follow-up, both standard-dose and low-dose whole-body CT scans were enrolled. Low-dose CT was performed on 256-row scanner, with 120 kV and automated mA modulation, and iterative reconstruction algorithm. Standard-dose CT was performed on 16-rows scanner, with 120 kV, 200-400 mAs (depending on patient weight). We evaluated density values and signal-to-noise ratio, along with image noise (SD), sharpness and diagnostic quality with 4-point scale.

RESULTS

Density values in liver, spleen and aorta were higher in low-dose images (liver 112.55 HU vs 103.90 HU, P < 0.001), as SD values in liver and spleen (liver 16.81 vs 14.41). Volumetric-Computed-Tomographic-Dose-Index (CTDIvol) and Dose-Length-Product (DLP) were significantly lower in low-dose CT as compared to standard-dose (DLP 1025.6 mGy*cm vs 1429.2 mGy*cm, P < 0.001) with overall dose reduction of 28.9%. Qualitative analysis did not reveal significant differences in image noise and diagnostic quality.

CONCLUSION

Automatic tube-current modulation combined with hybrid-iterative algorithm allows radiation dose reduction of 28.9% without loss of diagnostic quality, being useful in reducing dose exposure in oncologic patients.

Iterative Reconstructions in Reduced-Dose CT: Which Type Ensures Diagnostic Image Quality in Young Oncology Patients?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms for reduced-dose computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-four young oncology patients (mean age 30 ± 9 years) were included. After routine thoraco-abdominal CT (dose 100%, average CTDI_vol 9.1 ± 2.4 mGy, range 4.4-16.9 mGy), follow-up CT was acquired at 50% (average CTDI_vol 4.5 ± 1.2 mGy, range 2.2-8.4 mGy) in 29 patients additionally at 20% dose (average CTDI_vol 1.9 ± 0.5 mGy, range 0.9-3.4 mGy). Each reduced-dose CT was reconstructed using both ASIR and MBIR. Four radiologists (two juniors and two seniors) blinded to dose and technique read each set of CT images regarding objective and subjective image qualities (high- or low-contrast structures), subjective noise or pixilated appearance, diagnostic confidence, and lesion detection.

RESULTS

At all dose levels, objective image noise was significantly lower with MBIR than with ASIR (P < 0.001). The subjective image quality for low-contrast structures was significantly higher with MBIR than with ASIR (P < 0.001). Reduced-dose abdominal CT images of patients with higher body mass index (BMI) were read with significantly higher diagnostic confidence than images of slimmer patients (P < 0.001) and had higher subjective image quality, regardless of technique. Although MBIR images appeared significantly more pixilated than ASIR images, they were read with higher diagnostic confidence, especially by juniors (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced-dose CT during the follow-up of young oncology patients should be reconstructed with MBIR to ensure diagnostic quality. Elevated body mass index does not hamper the quality of reduced-dose CT.

Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction in thoracoabdominal CT, using Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) technique in a longitudinal study

Objective

To step-wise evaluate image quality of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) in reduced-dose (RD) thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) compared to full-dose (FD) and RD filtered back projection (FBP) in a longitudinal study.

Materials and methods

122 patients were included in this prospective study. 49 patients (14 men: mean age ± SD, 56±0.4 years; 35 women: 58±1.3 years) completed FD, RD1 (80%-dose) and RD2 (60%-dose) thoracoabdominal CT. Each CT dataset was reconstructed with FBP and SAFIRE. For quantitative image analysis image noise was measured in defined tissue regions. Qualitative image evaluation was performed according to the European Guidelines on Quality criteria for CT. Additionally artifacts, lesion conspicuity, and edge sharpness were assessed.

Results

Compared to FD-FBP noise in soft tissue increased by 12% in RD1-FBP and 27% in RD2-FBP reconstructions, whereas SAFIRE lead to a decrease of 28% (RD1) and 17% (RD2), respectively (all p <0.001). Visually sharp reproduction, lesion conspicuity, edge sharpness of pathologic findings, and overall image quality did not differ statistically significant between FD-FBP and RD-SAFIRE datasets. Image quality decreased in RD1- and RD2-FBP compared to FD-FBP, reaching statistically significance in RD2 datasets (p <0.001). In RD1- and RD2-FBP (p <0.001) streak artifacts were noted.

Conclusion

Using SAFIRE the reference mAs in thoracoabdominal CT can be reduced by at least 30% in clinical routine without loss of image quality or diagnostic information.

The Detection of Focal Liver Lesions Using Abdominal CT: A Comparison of Image Quality Between Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction V and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate image quality characteristics of abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) vs currently using applied adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This institutional review board-approved study included 35 consecutive patients who underwent CT of the abdomen. Among these 35 patients, 27 with focal liver lesions underwent abdomen CT with a 128-slice multidetector unit using the following parameters: fixed noise index of 30, 1.25 mm slice thickness, 120 kVp, and a gantry rotation time of 0.5 seconds. CT images were analyzed depending on the method of reconstruction: ASIR (30%, 50%, and 70%) vs ASIR-V (30%, 50%, and 70%). Three radiologists independently assessed randomized images in a blinded manner. Imaging sets were compared to focal lesion detection numbers, overall image quality, and objective noise with a paired sample t test. Interobserver agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The detection of small focal liver lesions (<10 mm) was significantly higher when ASIR-V was used when compared to ASIR (P <0.001). Subjective image noise, artifact, and objective image noise in liver were generally significantly better for ASIR-V compared to ASIR, especially in 50% ASIR-V. Image sharpness and diagnostic acceptability were significantly worse in 70% ASIR-V compared to various levels of ASIR.

CONCLUSION

Images analyzed using 50% ASIR-V were significantly better than three different series of ASIR or other ASIR-V conditions at providing diagnostically acceptable CT scans without compromising image quality and in the detection of focal liver lesions.

Pure Iterative Reconstruction Improves Image Quality in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen and Pelvis Acquired at Substantially Reduced Radiation Doses in Patients With Active Crohn Disease

We assessed diagnostic accuracy and image quality of modified protocol (MP) computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis reconstructed using pure iterative reconstruction (IR) in patients with Crohn disease (CD).

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients with CD were referred with suspected extramural complications. Two contemporaneous CT datasets were acquired in all patients: standard protocol (SP) and MP. The MP and SP protocols were designed to impart radiation exposures of 10% to 20% and 80% to 90% of routine abdominopelvic CT, respectively. The MP images were reconstructed with model-based IR (MBIR) and adaptive statistical IR (ASIR).

RESULTS

The MP-CT and SP-CT dose length product were 88 (58) mGy.cm (1.27 [0.87] mSv) and 303 [204] mGy.cm (4.8 [2.99] mSv), respectively (P < 0.001). Median diagnostic acceptability, spatial resolution, and contrast resolution were significantly higher and subjective noise scores were significantly lower on SP-ASIR 40 compared with all MP datasets. There was perfect clinical agreement between MP-MBIR and SP-ASIR 40 images for detection of extramural complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified protocol CT using pure IR is feasible for assessment of active CD.

Effect of reconstruction methods and x-ray tube current-time product on nodule detection in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom: A crossed-modality JAFROC observer study

Purpose:

To evaluate nodule detection in an anthropomorphic chest phantom in computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR^3D) and filtered back projection (FBP) over a range of tube current–time product (mAs).

Methods:

Two phantoms were used in this study: (i) an anthropomorphic chest phantom was loaded with spherical simulated nodules of 5, 8, 10, and 12 mm in diameter and +100, −630, and −800 Hounsfield units electron density; this would generate CT images for the observer study; (ii) a whole-body dosimetry verification phantom was used to ultimately estimate effective dose and risk according to the model of the BEIR VII committee. Both phantoms were scanned over a mAs range (10, 20, 30, and 40), while all other acquisition parameters remained constant. Images were reconstructed with both AIDR^3D and FBP. For the observer study, 34 normal cases (no nodules) and 34 abnormal cases (containing 1–3 nodules, mean 1.35 ± 0.54) were chosen. Eleven observers evaluated images from all mAs and reconstruction methods under the free-response paradigm. A crossed-modality jackknife alternative free-response operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis method was developed for data analysis, averaging data over the two factors influencing nodule detection in this study: mAs and image reconstruction (AIDR^3D or FBP). A Bonferroni correction was applied and the threshold for declaring significance was set at 0.025 to maintain the overall probability of Type I error at α = 0.05. Contrast-to-noise (CNR) was also measured for all nodules and evaluated by a linear least squares analysis.

Results:

For random-reader fixed-case crossed-modality JAFROC analysis, there was no significant difference in nodule detection between AIDR^3D and FBP when data were averaged over mAs [F(1, 10) = 0.08, p = 0.789]. However, when data were averaged over reconstruction methods, a significant difference was seen between multiple pairs of mAs settings [F(3, 30) = 15.96, p < 0.001]. Measurements of effective dose and effective risk showed the expected linear dependence on mAs. Nodule CNR was statistically higher for simulated nodules on images reconstructed with AIDR^3D (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

No significant difference in nodule detection performance was demonstrated between images reconstructed with FBP and AIDR^3D. mAs was found to influence nodule detection, though further work is required for dose optimization.

Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Tube-Voltage Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT: Evaluation of Objective and Subjective Image Quality

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dose-saving techniques in neck CT cause increased image noise that can be counteracted by iterative reconstruction. Our aim was to evaluate the image quality of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) in contrast-enhanced low-tube-voltage neck CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-one patients underwent 90-kV(peak) neck CT by using third-generation 192-section dual-source CT. Image series were reconstructed with standard filtered back-projection and ADMIRE strength levels 1, 3, and 5. Attenuation and noise of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, internal jugular vein, submandibular gland, tongue, subscapularis muscle, and cervical fat were measured. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated. Two radiologists assessed image noise, image contrast, delineation of smaller structures, and overall diagnostic acceptability. Interobserver agreement was calculated.

RESULTS

Image noise was significantly reduced by using ADMIRE compared with filtered back-projection with the lowest noise observed in ADMIRE 5 (filtered back-projection, 9.4 ± 2.4 Hounsfield units [HU]; ADMIRE 1, 8.3 ± 2.8 HU; ADMIRE 3, 6.7 ± 2.0 HU; ADMIRE 5, 5.4 ± 1.7 HU; all, P < .001). Sternocleidomastoid SNR and internal jugular vein-sternocleidomastoid contrast-to-noise ratios were significantly higher for ADMIRE with the best results in ADMIRE 5 (all, P < .001). Subjective image quality and image contrast of ADMIRE 3 and 5 were consistently rated better than those for filtered back-projection and ADMIRE 1 (all, P < .001). Image noise was rated highest for ADMIRE 5 (all, P < .005). Delineation of smaller structures was voted higher in all ADMIRE strength levels compared with filtered back-projection (P < .001). Global interobserver agreement was good (0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced 90-kVp neck CT is feasible, and ADMIRE 5 shows superior objective image quality compared with filtered back-projection. ADMIRE 3 and 5 show the best subjective image quality.

Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the radiation dose and image quality performance of thoracoabdominal examinations with an automated tube voltage selection (tube voltage adaptation), tube current modulation, and high pitch using a third-generation dual-source computed tomography (CT) compared intraindividually with 120-kV examinations with tube current modulation with special attention on clinically relevant lesions in the liver, the lungs, and extrahepatic soft tissues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board. Computed tomography of the body was performed using a third-generation dual-source system in 95 patients (mean body mass index, 25 kg/m²; range, 18-35 kg/m²). For 49 of these patients, all calculated tube settings and resulting dose values were recorded for each of the 12 gradual contrast weightings of the tube voltage adaptation algorithm. Spiral CT was performed for all patients with an intermediate weighting (grade 7) in a portal venous phase at 120 reference kV, 180 reference mAs, and pitch of 1.55. Objective image quality was assessed on the basis of contrast-to-noise ratio. Subjective image quality was assessed on the basis of clarity and sharpness of anatomical and pathological structures as well as interfering beam hardening and spiral and motion artifacts (heart, lungs, diaphragm). Previous examinations on a 64-slice scanner served as reference.

RESULTS

All examinations were rated good or excellent for clinical diagnosis. Automated tube voltage selection resulted in significantly lower effective radiation dose (9.5 mSv) compared with the reference (12.0 mSv; P < 0.01). Contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality of soft tissue lesions were significantly increased (P < 0.01). Motion artifacts were significantly reduced (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Automated tube voltage adaptation combined with high-pitch protocols allows for a substantial radiation dose reduction while substantially increasing the image quality, even at large-volume exposure.

A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to survey the radiation dose used in CT urography (CTU) in routine clinical practice, both before and after implementation of a scanning protocol that uses iterative reconstruction (Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D [AIDR 3D]).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively surveyed dose reports from consecutive CTU examinations performed in 2011 with the use of 64- and 320-MDCT scanners that were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and from CTU examinations performed from May 2012 through November 2013 that were reconstructed with the use of AIDR 3D. Findings from these dose reports were then correlated with such patient characteristics as weight and body mass index (BMI; weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters). Only dose reports from single-bolus three-phase CTU examinations were included in the study. The volume CT dose index, dose-length product (DLP), and effective dose were surveyed both per examination and per phase by use of published effective dose DLP conversion factors. Image quality was evaluated subjectively for a subset of patients.

RESULTS

The two study cohorts included 82 patients (median patient weight, 75.0 kg; median BMI, 25.3) who underwent CTU with FBP and 85 patients (median patient weight, 78.0 kg; median BMI, 24.5) who underwent CTU with AIDR 3D. The median total DLP and median effective dose were 924 mGy · cm and 13.0 mSv, respectively, in the CTU with the FBP cohort and 433 mGy · cm and 6.1 mSv, respectively, in the CTU with the AIDR 3D cohort. The median DLP in the unenhanced, nephrogenic, and excretory phases was 218, 300, and 441 mGy · cm, respectively, in patients undergoing CTU with FBP and 114, 121, and 190 mGy · cm, respectively, in patients undergoing CTU with AIDR 3D. Image quality was diagnostic in both groups, with relatively fewer artifacts noted on scans obtained using CTU with AIDR 3D.

CONCLUSION

Our study presents detailed dose data from three-phase CTU examinations performed both before and after implementation of iterative reconstruction. Implementation of a CTU protocol using iterative reconstruction resulted in a mean effective dose of 6.1 mSv with preservation of clinical diagnostic image quality.

Ultralow-Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography: Comparison of 2 Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in a Prospective Clinical Study

PURPOSE

To assess lesion detection and image quality of ultralow-dose (ULD) abdominal computed tomography (CT) reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and 2 iterative reconstruction techniques: hybrid-based iDose, and image-based SafeCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved ongoing prospective clinical study, 41 adult patients provided written informed consent for an additional ULD abdominal CT examination immediately after standard dose (SD) CT exam on a 256-slice multidetector computed tomography (iCT, Philips-Healthcare). The SD examination (size-specific dose estimate, 10 ± 3 mGy) was performed at 120 kV with automatic exposure control, and reconstructed with FBP. The ULD examination (1.5 ± 0.4 mGy) was performed at 120 kV and fixed tube current of 17 to 20 mAs/slice to achieve ULD radiation dose, with the rest of the scan parameters same as SD examination. The ULD data were reconstructed with (a) FBP, (b) iDose, and (c) SafeCT. Lesions were detected on ULD FBP series and compared to SD FBP "reference-standard" series. True lesions, pseudolesions, and missed lesions were recorded. Four abdominal radiologists independently blindly performed subjective image quality. Objective image quality included image noise calculation and noise spectral density plots.

RESULTS

All true lesions (n, 52: liver metastases, renal cysts, diverticulosis) in SD FBP images were detected in ULD images. Although there were no missed or pseudolesions on ULD iDose and ULD SafeCT images, appearance of small low-contrast hepatic lesions was suboptimal. The ULD FBP images were unacceptable across all patients for both lesion detection and image quality. In patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m or less, ULD iDose and ULD SafeCT images were acceptable for image quality that was close to SD FBP for both normal and abnormal abdominal and pelvic structures. With increasing BMI, the image quality of ULD images was deemed unacceptable due to photo starvation. Evaluation of kidney stones with ULD iDose/SafeCT images was found acceptable regardless of patient size. Image noise levels were significantly lower in ULD iDose and ULD SafeCT images compared to ULD FBP (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results show that ULD abdominal CT reconstructed with iterative reconstruction techniques is achievable in smaller patients (BMI ≤ 25 kg/m) but remains a challenge for overweight to obese patients. Lesion detection is similar in full-dose SD FBP and ULD iDose/SafeCT images, with suboptimal visibility of low-contrast lesions in ULD images.

Automated tube voltage adaptation in combination with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in thoracoabdominal third-generation 192-slice dual-source computed tomography: effects on image quality and radiation dose

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate image quality and radiation exposure of portal venous-phase thoracoabdominal third-generation 192-slice dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) with automated tube voltage adaptation (TVA) in combination with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients underwent oncologic portal venous-phase thoracoabdominal follow-up CT twice within 7 months. The initial examination was performed on second-generation 128-slice DSCT with fixed tube voltage of 120 kV in combination with filtered back projection reconstruction. The second examination was performed on a third-generation 192-slice DSCT using automated TVA in combination with ADMIRE. Attenuation and image noise of liver, spleen, renal cortex, aorta, vena cava inferior, portal vein, psoas muscle, and perinephric fat were measured. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Radiation dose was assessed as size-specific dose estimates (SSDE). Subjective image quality was assessed by two observers using five-point Likert scales. Interobserver agreement was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

Automated TVA set tube voltage to 90 kV (n = 8), 100 kV (n = 31), 110 kV (n = 11), or 120 kV (n = 1). Average SSDE was decreased by 34.9% using 192-slice DSCT compared to 128-slice 120-kV DSCT (7.8 ± 2.4 vs. 12.1 ± 3.2 mGy; P < .001). Image noise was substantially lower; SNR and CNR were significantly increased in 192-slice DSCT compared to 128-slice DSCT (all P < .005). Image quality was voted excellent for both acquisition techniques (5.00 vs. 4.93; P = .083).

CONCLUSIONS

Automated TVA in combination with ADMIRE on third-generation 192-slice DSCT in portal venous-phase thoracoabdominal CT provides excellent image quality with reduced image noise and increased SNR and CNR, whereas average radiation dose is reduced by 34.9% compared to 128-slice DSCT.

The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether reduced radiation dose abdominal CT images reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) compromise the depiction of clinically competent features when compared with the currently used routine radiation dose CT images reconstructed with ASIR.

METHODS

27 consecutive patients (mean body mass index: 23.55 kg m(-2) underwent CT of the abdomen at two time points. At the first time point, abdominal CT was scanned at 21.45 noise index levels of automatic current modulation at 120 kV. Images were reconstructed with 40% ASIR, the routine protocol of Dong-A University Hospital. At the second time point, follow-up scans were performed at 30 noise index levels. Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), 40% ASIR, 30% ASIR-V, 50% ASIR-V and 70% ASIR-V for the reduced radiation dose. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses of image quality were conducted. The CT dose index was also recorded.

RESULTS

At the follow-up study, the mean dose reduction relative to the currently used common radiation dose was 35.37% (range: 19-49%). The overall subjective image quality and diagnostic acceptability of the 50% ASIR-V scores at the reduced radiation dose were nearly identical to those recorded when using the initial routine-dose CT with 40% ASIR. Subjective ratings of the qualitative analysis revealed that of all reduced radiation dose CT series reconstructed, 30% ASIR-V and 50% ASIR-V were associated with higher image quality with lower noise and artefacts as well as good sharpness when compared with 40% ASIR and FBP. However, the sharpness score at 70% ASIR-V was considered to be worse than that at 40% ASIR. Objective image noise for 50% ASIR-V was 34.24% and 46.34% which was lower than 40% ASIR and FBP.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal CT images reconstructed with ASIR-V facilitate radiation dose reductions of to 35% when compared with the ASIR.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study represents the first clinical research experiment to use ASIR-V, the newest version of iterative reconstruction. Use of the ASIR-V algorithm decreased image noise and increased image quality when compared with the ASIR and FBP methods. These results suggest that high-quality low-dose CT may represent a new clinical option.

Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality of a novel advanced iterative reconstruction (IR) method called as "adaptive statistical IR V" (ASIR-V) by comparing the image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and spatial resolution from those of filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical IR (ASIR) on computed tomography (CT) phantom image.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed CT scans at 5 different tube currents (50, 70, 100, 150, and 200 mA) using 3 types of CT phantoms. Scanned images were subsequently reconstructed in 7 different scan settings, such as FBP, and 3 levels of ASIR and ASIR-V (30%, 50%, and 70%). The image noise was measured in the first study using body phantom. The CNR was measured in the second study using contrast phantom and the spatial resolutions were measured in the third study using a high-resolution phantom. We compared the image noise, CNR, and spatial resolution among the 7 reconstructed image scan settings to determine whether noise reduction, high CNR, and high spatial resolution could be achieved at ASIR-V.

RESULTS

At quantitative analysis of the first and second studies, it showed that the images reconstructed using ASIR-V had reduced image noise and improved CNR compared with those of FBP and ASIR (P < 0.001). At qualitative analysis of the third study, it also showed that the images reconstructed using ASIR-V had significantly improved spatial resolution than those of FBP and ASIR (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our phantom studies showed that ASIR-V provides a significant reduction in image noise and a significant improvement in CNR as well as spatial resolution. Therefore, this technique has the potential to reduce the radiation dose further without compromising image quality.

Virtual single-source computed tomography using dual-source acquisition: a new technique for the dose-neutral intraindividual comparison of different scan protocols

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the image quality of a standard single-source (SSS) computed tomography (CT) with that of a virtual single-source CT (VSS-CT) data set reconstructed from 2 raw data sets obtained by dual-source CT acquisition in abdominal CT to establish a radiation dose-neutral approach for the intraindividual comparison of 3 acquisition protocols at different radiation dose levels (RDLs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An abdominal phantom representing an 80-kg male was imaged using dual-source CT (SOMATOM Definition; Siemens Healthcare) at 3 RDLs with 120 kV(p) and different tube currents (low, standard, and high milliampere-second protocol). For each RDL, raw data were obtained once in single-source mode using x-ray tube A only and 5 times in dual-source mode using different ratios for tube current of x-ray tubes A and B (same total radiation dose; A/B: 90%/10%, 80%/20%, 70%/30%, 60%/40%, 50%/50%). For each RDL, SSS-CT and 5 virtual single-source image data sets (VSS-CT50 - 90) were reconstructed. To compare SSS-CT and VSS-CT data sets, image quality was assessed in terms of high- and low-contrast performance by calculating the modulation transfer function, image noise, noise power spectrum, and, for low contrast lesion detectability, the modified multiscale structural similarity index (MS-SSIM*). A maximum decrease of Δ = 5% of image quality compared with SSS-CT was defined as acceptable, and a noninferiority analysis with Δ was performed.

RESULTS

For modulation transfer function, noninferiority was observed for all VSS-CT data sets and RDL (P < 0.05). Image noise demonstrated an acceptable increase (<3.2%, P < 0.05) for each RDL and noise power spectrum showed only minor differences in the midfrequency range. The MS-SSIM* index demonstrated for the high RDL protocol a minor decrease for VSS-CT data sets (<2%, P < 0.05). For the standard and low RDL, the relative differences of the MS-SSIM* index increased and were only in 1 case above Δ (standard RDL, mean VSS-CT80 5.1%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The image quality obtained by virtual and SSS reconstruction using equivalent total radiation exposure to the patient showed only negligible differences in image quality. Therefore, this technique might allow an intraindividual comparison of full and reduced radiation dose protocols within 1 image acquisition step by simply splitting the radiation dose between the 2 x-ray tubes of a dual-source CT.

Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk

The theory of task-based assessment of image quality is reviewed in the context of imaging with ionizing radiation, and objective figures of merit (FOMs) for image quality are summarized. The variation of the FOMs with the task, the observer and especially with the mean number of photons recorded in the image is discussed. Then various standard methods for specifying radiation dose are reviewed and related to the mean number of photons in the image and hence to image quality. Current knowledge of the relation between local radiation dose and the risk of various adverse effects is summarized, and some graphical depictions of the tradeoffs between image quality and risk are introduced. Then various dose-reduction strategies are discussed in terms of their effect on task-based measures of image quality.

Quantitative analysis of the effect of iterative reconstruction using a phantom: determining the appropriate blending percentage

PURPOSE

To investigate the optimal blending percentage of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) in a reduced radiation dose while preserving a degree of image quality and texture that is similar to that of standard-dose computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The CT performance phantom was scanned with standard and dose reduction protocols including reduced mAs or kVp. Image quality parameters including noise, spatial, and low-contrast resolution, as well as image texture, were quantitatively evaluated after applying various blending percentages of ASIR. The optimal blending percentage of ASIR that preserved image quality and texture compared to standard dose CT was investigated in each radiation dose reduction protocol.

RESULTS

As the percentage of ASIR increased, noise and spatial-resolution decreased, whereas low-contrast resolution increased. In the texture analysis, an increasing percentage of ASIR resulted in an increase of angular second moment, inverse difference moment, and correlation and in a decrease of contrast and entropy. The 20% and 40% dose reduction protocols with 20% and 40% ASIR blending, respectively, resulted in an optimal quality of images with preservation of the image texture.

CONCLUSION

Blending the 40% ASIR to the 40% reduced tube-current product can maximize radiation dose reduction and preserve adequate image quality and texture.

Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare image quality (objective and subjective parameters) and confidence in lesion detection between 3 image reconstruction algorithms in computed tomographic (CT) examinations of the abdomen/pelvis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective institutional review board-approved study included 65 patients (mean [SD] age, 71.3 ± 9 years; mean [SD] body mass index, 24.4 [4.8] kg) who underwent routine CT examinations of the abdomen/pelvis followed immediately by 2 low-dose scans. Raw data sets were reconstructed by using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), and a model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Measurements of objective noise and CT numbers were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Six subjective image quality parameters were scored. Diagnostic confidence and accuracy in detection of various elementary lesions were performed.

RESULTS

Objectively, mean image noise for MBIR was significantly superior at all dose levels (P < 0.001). Subjectively, standard-dose ASIR and low-dose MBIR scans were better than standard-dose FBP scan in all parameters assessed (P < 0.05). Low-dose MBIR scans were comparable with standard-dose ASIR scans in all parameters except at noise index of 70 (approximately 85% dose reduction), where, in this case, the detection of liver lesions less than 5 mm were rated inferior (P < 0.05) with diagnostic accuracy reducing to 77.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose MBIR scan shows superior objective noise reduction compared with standard-dose FBP and ASIR. Subjectively, low-dose MBIR scans at 76% dose reduction were also superior compared with standard-dose FBP and ASIR. However, at dose reductions of 85%, small liver lesions may be missed.

Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT: using a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dose reduction in a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE

To assess lesion detection and image quality parameters of a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) in reduced dose (RD) abdominal CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This IRB-approved prospective study included 82 abdominal CT examinations performed for 41 consecutive patients (mean age, 62 ± 12 years; F:M 28:13) who underwent a RD CT (SSDE, 1.5 mGy ± 0.4 [∼ 0.9 mSv] at 120 kV with 17-20 mAs/slice) immediately after their standard dose (SD) CT exam (10 mGy ± 3 [∼ 6 mSv] at 120 kV with automatic exposure control) on 256 MDCT (iCT, Philips Healthcare). SD data were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP). RD data were reconstructed with FBP and IMR. Four radiologists used a five-point scale (1=image quality better than SD CT to 5=image quality unacceptable) to assess both subjective image quality and artifacts. Lesions were first detected on RD FBP images. RD IMR and RD FBP images were then compared side-by-side to SD-FBP images in an independent, randomized and blinded fashion. Friedman's test and intraclass correlation coefficient were used for data analysis. Objective measurements included image noise and attenuation as well as noise spectral density (NSD) curves to assess the noise in frequency domain were obtained. In addition, a low-contrast phantom study was performed.

RESULTS

All true lesions (ranging from 32 to 55) on SD FBP images were detected on RD IMR images across all patients. RD FBP images were unacceptable for subjective image quality. Subjective ratings showed acceptable image quality for IMR for organ margins, soft-tissue structures, and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, compared to RD FBP in patients with a BMI ≤ 25 kg/m(2) (median-range, 2-3). Irrespective of patient BMI, subjective ratings for hepatic/renal cysts, stones and colonic diverticula were significantly better with RD IMR images (P<0.01). Objective image noise for RD FBP was 57-66% higher, and for RD IMR was 8-56% lower than that for SD-FBP (P<0.01). NSD showed significantly lower noise in the frequency domain with IMR in all patients compared to FBP.

CONCLUSION

IMR considerably improved both objective and subjective image quality parameters of RD abdominal CT images compared to FBP in patients with BMI less than or equal to 25 kg/m(2).

Advanced modelled iterative reconstruction for abdominal CT: qualitative and quantitative evaluation

AIM

To determine qualitative and quantitative image-quality parameters in abdominal imaging using advanced modelled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) with third-generation dual-source 192 section CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients undergoing abdominal portal-venous CT at different tube voltage levels (90, 100, 110, and 120 kVp, n = 10 each) and 10 consecutive patients undergoing abdominal non-enhanced low-dose CT (100 kVp, 60 mAs) using a third-generation dual-source 192 section CT machine in the single-source mode were included. Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and ADMIRE (strength levels 1-5). Two blinded, independent readers subjectively determined image noise, artefacts, visibility of small structures, and image contrast, and measured attenuation in the liver, spleen, kidney, muscle, fat, and urinary bladder, and objective image noise.

RESULTS

Subjective noise was significantly lower and image contrast significantly higher for each increasing ADMIRE strength level and also for ADMIRE 1 compared to FBP (all, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found for artefact and visibility ratings among image sets (all, p > 0.05). Attenuation was similar across tube voltage-image datasets in all anatomical regions (all, p > 0.05). Objective noise was significantly lower for each increasing ADMIRE strength level, and for ADMIRE 1 compared to FBP (all, p < 0.001, maximal reduction 53%). Independent predictors of noise were tube voltage (p < 0.05) and current (p < 0.001), diameter (p < 0.05), and reconstruction algorithm (p<0.001); the amount of noise reduction was related only to the reconstruction algorithm (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Abdominal CT using ADMIRE results in an improved image quality with lower image noise as compared with FBP, while the attenuation of various anatomical regions remains constant among reconstruction algorithms.

Pilot study of low-dose nonenhanced computed tomography with iterative reconstruction for diagnosis of urinary stones

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for detecting urinary stones with the use of an iterative reconstruction technique for reducing radiation dose and image noise.

Materials and Methods

A total of 101 stones from 69 patients who underwent both conventional nonenhanced computed tomography (CCT) and LDCT were analyzed. Interpretations were made of the two scans according to stone characteristics (size, volume, location, Hounsfield unit [HU], and skin-to-stone distance [SSD]) and radiation dose by dose-length product (DLP), effective dose (ED), and image noise. Diagnostic performance for detecting urinary stones was assessed by statistical evaluation.

Results

No statistical differences were found in stone characteristics between the two scans. The average DLP and ED were 384.60±132.15 mGy and 5.77±1.98 mSv in CCT and 90.08±31.80 mGy and 1.34±0.48 mSv in LDCT, respectively. The dose reduction rate of LDCT was nearly 77% for both DLP and ED (p<0.01). The mean objective noise (standard deviation) from three different areas was 23.0±2.5 in CCT and 29.2±3.1 in LDCT with a significant difference (p<0.05); the slight increase was 21.2%. For stones located throughout the kidney and ureter, the sensitivity and specificity of LDCT remained 96.0% and 100%, with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 96.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

LDCT showed significant radiation reduction while maintaining high image quality. It is an attractive option in the diagnosis of urinary stones.

Low-dose high-pitch CT angiography of the supraaortic arteries using sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction

Objective

To prospectively evaluate image quality and radiation dose using a low-dose computed tomography angiography protocol and iterative image reconstruction for high-pitch dual-source CT-angiography (DSCTA) of the supraaortic arteries.

Material and Methods

DSCTA was performed in 42 patients, using either 120 kVp tube voltage, 120 mAS tube current, 2.4 pitch and filtered back projection, or 100 kVp tube voltage, 100 mAs tube current, 3.2 pitch, and sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction. Measurements of vessel attenuation, of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were performed to objectively evaluate image quality. Two readers evaluated subjective image quality and image noise, using a four-point scale. Effective dose was used to compare the differences in radiation dose.

Results

Low-dose protocol application showed significantly higher vessel opacification (p = 0.013), and non-significantly higher CNR and SNR values. There was no difference in the subjective image quality and image noise reading between the protocols. Effective dose was significantly lower using the low-dose protocol (1.29±0.21 mSv vs. 2.92±0.72 mSv; p<0.001).

Conclusion

The combined use of reduced tube voltage, reduced tube current, and iterative reconstruction reduces radiation dose by 55.4% in high-pitch DSCTA of the supraaortic arteries without impairment of image quality.