99mTc-sestamibi using a direct conversion molecular breast imaging system to assess tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer: 2022 Update

Imaging plays a vital role in managing patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as treatment decisions rely heavily on accurate assessment of response to therapy. This document provides evidence-based guidelines for imaging breast cancer before, during, and after initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

The Clinical Value of Breast Specific Gamma Imaging and Positron Imaging: An Update

In the management of patients with breast cancer (BC), a mammography contributed to screen an early-stage patient, to plan a therapy strategy, to evaluate a therapy outcome, to detect a recurrence, and to reduce a mortality. Currently, various imaging modalities, such as CT, MR, Ultrasound (US), SPECT/CT, PET/CT, PET/MR have been utilized for the management of BC patients. In order to overcome a limited spatial resolution and sensitivity of whole-body systems in nuclear medicine imaging, dedicated breast imaging modalities were developed. One is a gamma imaging system with single/dual head scintillation detectors or semiconductor detectors associated with light compression device for breast parenchyma. Radiopharmaceutical for the gamma imaging is ^99mTc-sestamibi. Another is a positron imaging system with opposite-type panel detectors and ring-shaped type detectors. Radiopharmaceutical for positron imaging is ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose. The breast-specific gamma and positron imaging systems were utilized mainly to detect small lesions less than 1 cm in diameter especially in patients with dense breast, to evaluate an effect of preoperative neo-adjuvant therapy, to plan surgical procedures (conservative-surgery vs mastectomy), and to detect a recurrence. By combining higher sensitivity and spatial resolution scanners with new radiopharmaceuticals, an information on molecular-level pathology of BC is increasingly available in an individual patient. This article reviewed clinical impact and future perspective of this field.

Molecular Breast Imaging: A Scientific Review

Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a nuclear medicine technique that has evolved considerably over the past two decades. Technical advances have allowed reductions in administered doses to the point that they are now acceptable for screening. The most common radiotracer used in MBI, 99mTc-sestamibi, has a long history of safe use. Biopsy capability has become available in recent years, with early clinical experience demonstrating technically successful biopsies of MBI-detected lesions. MBI has been shown to be an effective supplemental screening tool in women with dense breasts and is also utilized for breast cancer staging, assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, problem solving, and as an alternative to breast MRI in women who have a contraindication to MRI. The degree of background parenchymal uptake on MBI shows promise as a tool for breast cancer risk stratification. Radiologist interpretation is guided by a validated MBI lexicon that mirrors the BI-RADS lexicon. With short interpretation times, a fast learning curve for radiologists, and a substantially lower cost than breast MRI, MBI provides many benefits in the practices in which it is utilized. This review will discuss the current state of MBI technology, clinical applications of MBI, MBI interpretation, radiation dose associated with MBI, and the future of MBI.

Molecular Breast Imaging in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review clinical uses and image interpretation of molecular breast imaging (MBI) and clarify radiation risks. CONCLUSION. MBI detects additional cancers compared with conventional imaging in women with dense breasts and those with elevated risk of breast cancer. Its role as an imaging biomarker of cancer risk and in assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy response is growing. Radiation risk is minimal; benefit-to-risk ratio is similar to that of mammography. MBI is low cost, well tolerated, and easily adapted into clinical practice.

Comparison of 99mTc-Sestamibi Molecular Breast Imaging and Breast MRI in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the size of invasive breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) at breast MRI and molecular breast imaging (MBI) and to assess the accuracy of post-NAC MBI and MRI relative to pathologic analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Women with invasive breast cancer greater than or equal to 1.5 cm were enrolled to compare the longest dimension before and after NAC at MRI and MBI. MBI was performed on a dual-detector cadmium zinc telluride system after administration of 6.5 mCi (240 MBq) ^99mTc-sestamibi. The accuracy of MRI and MBI in assessing residual disease (invasive disease or ductal carcinoma in situ) was determined relative to pathologic examination. RESULTS. The longest dimension at MRI was within 1.0 cm of that at MBI in 72.3% of cases before NAC and 70.1% of cases after NAC. The difference between the longest dimension at imaging after NAC and pathologic tumor size was within 1 cm for 58.7% of breast MRI cases and 59.6% of MBI cases. Ninety patients underwent both MRI and MBI after NAC. In the 56 patients with invasive residual disease, 10 (17.9%) cases were negative at MRI and 23 (41.1%) cases were negative at MBI. In the 34 patients with breast pathologic complete response, there was enhancement in 10 cases (29.4%) at MRI and uptake in six cases (17.6%) at MBI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value after NAC were 82.8%, 69.4%, 81.4%, and 71.4%, respectively, for MRI and 58.9%, 82.4%, 84.6%, and 54.9%, respectively, for MBI. CONCLUSION. Breast MRI and MBI showed similar disease extent before NAC. MBI may be an alternative to breast MRI in patients with a contraindication to breast MRI. Neither modality showed sufficient accuracy after NAC in predicting breast pathologic complete response to obviate tissue diagnosis to assess for residual invasive disease. Defining the extent of residual disease compared with pathologic evaluation was also limited after NAC for both breast MRI and MBI.

Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions

Recent advances in nuclear medicine instrumentation have led to the emergence of improved molecular imaging techniques to image breast cancer: dedicated gamma cameras using γ-emitting ^99mTc-sestamibi and breast-specific PET cameras using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose. This article focuses on the current role of such approaches in the clinical setting including diagnosis, assessing local extent of disease, monitoring response to therapy, and, for gamma camera imaging, possible supplemental screening in women with dense breasts. Barriers to clinical adoption and technologies and radiotracers under development are also discussed.

Comparison of Breast MR Imaging with Molecular Breast Imaging in Breast Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment Response Evaluation

Breast MR imaging and molecular breast imaging (MBI) are functional imaging modalities that can be used to noninvasively evaluate the pathophysiology and biology of breast cancer. In the era of personalized medicine, these imaging techniques give clinicians insight into cancer pathobiology and allows them to individualize treatment regimens. Breast MR imaging has gained acceptance for breast cancer evaluation; work is ongoing on validation of MBI for breast cancer evaluation. This article discusses clinical applications of breast MR imaging and MBI, and compares the performance of these techniques in breast cancer screening, diagnosis, staging, and treatment response evaluation.

Comparison of fan beam, slit-slat and multi-pinhole collimators for molecular breast tomosynthesis

Recently, we proposed and optimized dedicated multi-pinhole molecular breast tomosynthesis (MBT) that images a lightly compressed breast. As MBT may also be performed with other types of collimators, the aim of this paper is to optimize MBT with fan beam and slit-slat collimators and to compare its performance to that of multi-pinhole MBT to arrive at a truly optimized design. Using analytical expressions, we first optimized fan beam and slit-slat collimator parameters to reach maximum sensitivity at a series of given system resolutions. Additionally, we performed full system simulations of a breast phantom containing several tumours for the optimized designs. We found that at equal system resolution the maximum achievable sensitivity increases from pinhole to slit-slat to fan beam collimation with fan beam and slit-slat MBT having on average a 48% and 20% higher sensitivity than multi-pinhole MBT. Furthermore, by inspecting simulated images and applying a tumour-to-background contrast-to-noise (TB-CNR) analysis, we found that slit-slat collimators underperform with respect to the other collimator types. The fan beam collimators obtained a similar TB-CNR as the pinhole collimators, but the optimum was reached at different system resolutions. For fan beam collimators, a 6-8 mm system resolution was optimal in terms of TB-CNR, while with pinhole collimation highest TB-CNR was reached in the 7-10 mm range.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer

Patients with locally advanced invasive breast cancers are often treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to definitive surgical intervention. The primary aims of this approach are to: 1) reduce tumor burden thereby permitting breast conservation rather than mastectomy; 2) promptly treat possible metastatic disease, whether or not it is detectable on preoperative staging; and 3) potentially tailor future chemotherapeutic decisions by monitoring in-vivo tumor response. Accurate radiological assessment permits optimal management and planning in this population. However, assessment of tumor size and response to treatment can vary depending on the modality used, the measurement technique (such as single longest diameter, 3-D measurements, or calculated tumor volume), and varied response of different tumor subtypes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (such as concentric shrinkage or tumor fragmentation). As discussed in further detail, digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, US and MRI represent the key modalities with potential to help guide patient management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

The role of molecular breast imaging in predicting complete tumor response to treatment and residual tumor extent following neoadjuvant therapy

The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of molecular breast imaging (MBI) in predicting complete tumor response to treatment and residual tumor extent following neoadjuvant therapy. A consecutive series of 43 female patients with large or locally advanced primary breast cancer, scheduled for surgery following neoadjuvant therapy, was retrospectively reviewed. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent MBI using a high-resolution semiconductor-based device for image acquisition. MBI data were correlated with surgical histopathological findings. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess differences in residual tumor size with MBI and histopathological examination. From the images obtained using MBI, 7 patients were negative for residual tumors with pathological complete response (specificity, 100%) and positive in 34/36 patients with residual disease (sensitivity, 94.4%), including 26/27 patients with unifocal and 8/9 patients with multicentric/multifocal tumors, 5 of which exhibited multiple microscopic foci scattered in a fibrotic area. Overall accuracy was 95.3% and the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 100 and 77.8%, respectively. MBI was false-negative in one patient with a 2.5-cm invasive ductal carcinoma located close to the chest wall and in one patient with microscopic foci of epithelial carcinoma. In the patients with unifocal residual tumors, correlation of tumor size between MBI and histopathology was r=0.981 (P<0.0001); however, MBI overestimated the number of lesions in one of these cases. In the patients with multifocal/multicentric tumors, MBI adequately assessed residual tumor extent in 5/8 positive cases, overestimating the number of lesions in one case and underestimating tumor extent in 2 further cases with microscopic foci scattered in a fibrotic area. MBI proved to be a highly accurate diagnostic tool in predicting complete tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy and residual tumor extent, correlating with surgical histopathological findings in 86% of overall cases. A positive result was always associated with the presence of residual disease and MBI tumor size was strongly correlated with histopathological analysis mainly in unifocal residual tumors.

Comparison of Tc-99m maraciclatide and Tc-99m sestamibi molecular breast imaging in patients with suspected breast cancer

Background

Molecular breast imaging (MBI) performed with ^99mTc sestamibi has been shown to be a valuable technique for the detection of breast cancer. Alternative radiotracers such as ^99mTc maraciclatide may offer improved uptake in breast lesions. The purpose of this study was to compare relative performance of ^99mTc sestamibi and ^99mTc maraciclatide in patients with suspected breast cancer, using a high-resolution dedicated gamma camera for MBI. Women with breast lesions suspicious for malignancy were recruited to undergo two MBI examinations—one with ^99mTc sestamibi and one with ^99mTc maraciclatide. A radiologist interpreted MBI studies in a randomized, blinded fashion to assign an assessment score (1–5) and measured lesion size. Lesion-to-background (L/B) ratio was measured with region-of-interest analysis.

Results

Among 39 analyzable patients, 21 malignant tumors were identified in 21 patients. Eighteen of 21 tumors (86%) were seen on ^99mTc sestamibi MBI and 19 of 21 (90%) were seen on ^99mTc maraciclatide MBI (p = 1). Tumor extent measured with both radiopharmaceuticals correlated strongly with pathologic size (^99mTc sestamibi, r = 0.84; ^99mTc maraciclatide, r = 0.81). The L/B ratio in detected breast cancers was similar for the two radiopharmaceuticals: 1.55 ± 0.36 (mean ± S.D.) for ^99mTc sestamibi and 1.62 ± 0.37 (mean ± S.D.) for ^99mTc maraciclatide (p = 0.53). No correlation was found between the L/B ratio and molecular subtype for ^99mTc sestamibi (r_s = 0.12, p = 0.63) or ^99mTc maraciclatide (r_s = −0.12, p = 0.64). Of 20 benign lesions, 10 (50%) were seen on ^99mTc sestamibi and 9 of 20 (45%) were seen on ^99mTc maraciclatide images (p = 0.1). The average L/B ratio for benign lesions was 1.34 ±0.40 (mean ±S.D.) for ^99mTc sestamibi and 1.41 ±0.52 (mean ±S.D.) for ^99mTc maraciclatide (p = 0.75). Overall diagnostic performance was similar for both radiopharmaceuticals. AUC from ROC analysis was 0.83 for ^99mTc sestamibi and 0.87 for ^99mTc maraciclatide (p = 0.64).

Conclusions

^99mTc maraciclatide offered comparable lesion uptake to ^99mTc sestamibi, in both malignant and benign lesions. There was good correlation between lesion extent and uptake measured from both radiopharmaceuticals. ^99mTc maraciclatide offered a marginal (but not significant) improvement in sensitivity over ^99mTc sestamibi. Our findings did not support an association between the uptake of either radiopharmaceutical and tumor molecular subtype.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00888589

Breast Imaging Utilizing Dedicated Gamma Camera and (99m)Tc-MIBI: Experience at the Tel Aviv Medical Center and Review of the Literature Breast Imaging

The scope of the current article is the clinical role of gamma cameras dedicated for breast imaging and (99m)Tc-MIBI tumor-seeking tracer, as both a screening modality among a healthy population and as a diagnostic modality in patients with breast cancer. Such cameras are now commercially available. The technology utilizing a camera composed of a NaI (Tl) detector is termed breast-specific gamma imaging. The technology of dual-headed camera composed of semiconductor cadmium zinc telluride detectors that directly converts gamma-ray energy into electronic signals is termed molecular breast imaging. Molecular breast imaging system has been installed at the Department of Nuclear medicine at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv in 2009. The article reviews the literature well as our own experience.

Direct-Conversion Molecular Breast Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer: Imaging Features, Extent of Invasive Disease, and Comparison Between Invasive Ductal and Lobular Histology

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study were to compare the tumor appearance of invasive breast cancer on direct-conversion molecular breast imaging using a standardized lexicon and to determine how often direct-conversion molecular breast imaging identifies all known invasive tumor foci in the breast, and whether this differs for invasive ductal versus lobular histologic profiles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with prior invasive breast cancer and concurrent direct-conversion molecular breast imaging examinations were retrospectively reviewed. Blinded review of direct-conversion molecular breast imaging examinations was performed by one of two radiologists, according to a validated lexicon. Direct-conversion molecular breast imaging findings were matched with lesions described on the pathology report to exclude benign reasons for direct-conversion molecular breast imaging findings and to document direct-conversion molecular breast imaging-occult tumor foci. Associations between direct-conversion molecular breast imaging findings and tumor histologic profiles were examined using chi-square tests.

RESULTS

In 286 patients, 390 invasive tumor foci were present in 294 breasts. A corresponding direct-conversion molecular breast imaging finding was present for 341 of 390 (87%) tumor foci described on the pathology report. Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) tumor foci were more likely to be a mass (40% IDC vs 15% invasive lobular carcinoma [ILC]; p < 0.001) and to have marked intensity than were ILC foci (63% IDC vs 32% ILC; p < 0.001). Direct-conversion molecular breast imaging correctly revealed all pathology-proven foci of invasive disease in 79.8% of cases and was more likely to do so for IDC than for ILC (86.1% vs 56.7%; p < 0.0001). Overall, direct-conversion molecular breast imaging showed all known invasive foci in 249 of 286 (87%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Direct-conversion molecular breast imaging features of invasive cancer, including lesion type and intensity, differ by histologic subtype. Direct-conversion molecular breast imaging is less likely to show all foci of ILC compared with IDC.

Role of imaging in neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) involves administration of chemotherapeutic agents to patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer prior to definitive surgical treatment. Assessment of disease response to chemotherapeutic agents in vivo prior to any surgical intervention is necessary as medical oncologists are commonly tailoring or changing therapy during NAC based on response. It can also maximize the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, resulting in more women undergoing breast conservation rather than mastectomy. Although some studies show a pCR to NAC in only 13-26 % of women, recent studies have shown higher pCR rates, especially for HER2-positive disease treated with targeted anti-HER2 therapy. Thus, accurate imaging tools for quantifying disease response are critical in the evaluation and management of patients undergoing NAC. There is currently no standard imaging method for monitoring response to therapy. Response to therapy tends to vary by tumor subtype and can be accurately assessed on imaging. We review the role of imaging before and after neoadjuvant therapy and discuss the advantages and limitations of currently available modalities, including mammography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear imaging.

99mTc-3P4-RGD2 scintimammography in the assessment of breast lesions: comparative study with 99mTc-MIBI

Purpose

To compare the potential application of ^99mTc-3P-Arg-Gly-Asp (^99mTc-3P₄-RGD₂) scintimammography (SMM) and ^99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (^99mTc-MIBI) SMM for the differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions.

Method

Thirty-six patients with breast masses on physical examination and/or suspicious mammography results that required fine needle aspiration cytology biopsy (FNAB) were included in the study. ^99mTc-3P₄-RGD₂ and ^99mTc-MIBI SMM were performed with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) at 60 min and 20 min respectively after intravenous injection of 738±86 MBq radiotracers on a separate day. Images were evaluated by the tumor to non-tumor localization ratios (T/NT). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed on each radiotracer to calculate the cut-off values of quantitative indices and to compare the diagnostic performance for the ability to differentiate malignant from benign diseases.

Results

The mean T/NT ratio of ^99mTc-3P₄-RGD₂ in malignant lesions was significantly higher than that in benign lesions (3.54±1.51 vs. 1.83±0.98, p<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ^99mTc-3P₄-RGD₂ SMM were 89.3%, 90.9% and 89.7%, respectively, with a T/NT cut-off value of 2.40. The mean T/NT ratio of ^99mTc-MIBI in malignant lesions was also significantly higher than that in benign lesions (2.86±0.99 vs. 1.51±0.61, p<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ^99mTc-MIBI SMM were 87.5%, 72.7% and 82.1%, respectively, with a T/NT cut-off value of 1.45. According to the ROC analysis, the area under the curve for ^99mTc-3P₄-RGD₂ SMM (area = 0.851) was higher than that for ^99mTc-MIBI SMM (area = 0.781), but the statistical difference was not significant.

Conclusion

^99mTc-3P₄-RGD₂ SMM does not provide any significant advantage over the established ^99mTc-MIBI SMM for the detection of primary breast cancer. The T/NT ratio of ^99mTc-3P₄-RGD₂ SMM was significantly higher than that of ^99mTc-MIBI SMM. Both tracers could offer an alternative method for elucidating non-diagnostic mammograms.