FDG PET/CT findings in a rare case of giant fibrovascular polyp of the esophagus harboring atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma

Giant Fibrovascular Polyp Mimicking Esophageal Malignancy on 18 F-FDG PET/CT

ABSTRACT

A 52-year-old man presented with continuous dull pain from the throat to the epigastric region with dysphagia. Initial endoscopy misdiagnosed a subepithelial tumor causing external compression of the esophagus. A CT scan visualized a 14.0 × 4.0-cm pedunculated mass inside the esophagus. Subsequent 18 F-FDG PET/CT identified an intense FDG-avid area in the mass, which strongly suggested esophageal cancer. Total mass excision was performed, and fibrovascular polyp with chronic ulcerative inflammation was finally confirmed on histologic examination.

Fibrovascular Polyp of the Cervical Esophagus: A Rare Neoplasm

Fibrovascular polyps are rare benign epithelial neoplasia of the cervical esophagus. Usually they are large and frequently require a thoracotomy/thoracoscopy. This is a case report of an elderly lady with a large Fibrovascular polyp who had anemia and weight loss due to dysphagia, managed by rendezvous technique.

Giant fibrovascular polyps of the esophagus. Trans oral versus surgical approach. Case report and systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Giant fibrovascular esophageal polyp is a rare benign intraluminal tumour. The aim of this study is to perform a review of the most recent literature in order to describe and analyse the current range of possible diagnostics and treatment strategies.

CASE REPORT

We present two cases of giant fibrovascular esophageal polyp treated with a combined minimally invasive transluminal approach at Sanchinarro University Hospital. Further, we perform a literature review.

CONCLUSION

We present two cases of grant fibrovascular polyp submitted to minimally invasive transluminal approach. Furthermore, 54 original articles reporting 59 cases have been analysed. In the surgical group, an esophagotomy and polyp resection were performed in 31 (91 %) patients and a total esophagectomy in two patients (5,8 %). Severe morbidity occurred in two patients (5,8 %.) The median hospital stay was 9.25 days. A total of two (5,8 %) cases of recurrence have been registered. In the minimally invasive transluminal approach group, 27 patients had a polyp resection performed completely by endoscopy/transoral. There were no complications but there was one case of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The transluminal approach is safe and should be considered also in the treatment of large esophageal polyps.

Polypoid fibroadipose tumors of the esophagus: 'giant fibrovascular polyp' or liposarcoma? A clinicopathological and molecular cytogenetic study of 13 cases

Giant fibrovascular polyp of the esophagus is a descriptive diagnostic term intended to encompass rare, large, polypoid esophageal masses composed of fibroadipose tissue. Despite sometimes dramatic clinical presentations, they have historically been considered to represent reactive, non-neoplastic proliferations. Recently, however, a small number of reports have described well-differentiated liposarcomas of the esophagus, mimicking giant fibrovascular polyps. In order to clarify the relationship between esophageal liposarcoma and giant fibrovascular polyp, we retrieved esophageal cases coded as 'giant fibrovascular polyp,' 'lipoma' and 'liposarcoma' from our archives and re-examined their clinicopathologic features and MDM2 amplification status. Thirteen cases were identified (lipoma (n=1), giant fibrovascular polyp (n=5), well-differentiated liposarcoma (n=3), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n=3)). The tumors ranged from 5.2 to 19.5 cm and arose predominantly in the cervical esophagus. All consisted chiefly of mature adipose tissue, with a variable component of fibrous septa. In all cases, close inspection of these fibrous septa showed them to contain an increased number of slightly enlarged spindled cells with irregular, hyperchromatic nuclei, similar to those seen in some well-differentiated liposarcomas. Three cases, all previously classified as dedifferentiated liposarcoma, showed in addition solid zones of non-lipogenic spindle cell sarcoma. By fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), all cases showed MDM2 amplification, confirming diagnoses as well-differentiated (N=10) and dedifferentiated (N=3) liposarcoma. Clinical follow-up (8 cases, range 22-156 months, median 33 months) showed 3 patients with local recurrences (1 well-differentiated and 2 dedifferentiated liposarcomas), 1 patient with liver metastases (dedifferentiated liposarcoma) and 2 deaths from disease (both dedifferentiated liposarcomas). These results suggest that the great majority of large, polypoid, fat-containing masses of the esophagus represent well and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, rather than 'giant fibrovascular polyps.' We suggest that the diagnosis of 'giant fibrovascular polyp' should be made with great caution in the esophagus, and only after careful morphological study and MDM2 FISH has excluded the possibility of liposarcoma.

Liposarcoma of Hypopharynx and Esophagus: a Unique Entity?

PURPOSE

Liposarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in adults. It represents approximately 20 % of all mesenchymal malignancies. It most frequently involves retroperitoneum, trunk, and extremities. Hypopharyngeal and esophageal localization of liposarcoma is extremely rare.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of literature and reported 26 and 33 cases of hypopharyngeal and esophageal liposarcoma. We analyzed natural history, imaging features, histology, treatment, and prognosis, with a specific focus to similarities and differences between tumors of hypopharynx and esophagus.

RESULTS

Hypopharyngeal and esophageal liposarcomas have more similarities than differences. Incidence has a peak at 6th and 7th decades. The diagnostic procedures are barium swallow, endoscopic examination, and CT/MR imaging. Well-differentiated liposarcoma represents the most frequent histological subtype. Surgical excision is the main treatment. Endoscopic resection can be useful for pedunculated tumors of hypopharynx and cervical esophagus. Differences between hypopharyngeal and esophageal liposarcoma are represented by local recurrence rate (greater for hypopharyngeal tumors), number of giant tumors, and time to recurrence (greater for esophageal tumors). Finally, liposarcomas of distal esophagus need more extended approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Liposarcomas of hypopharynx and cervical esophagus could be considered a unique pathological entity, with similar features and treatment options. Survival rate is dependent on histological type and location. Local recurrence is common, especially for hypopharyngeal liposarcoma, while the risk of lymph node or distant metastasis is very low. Patients should undergo regular examinations to rule out local recurrence, also for a long time, especially for esophageal tumors.