A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of 18F-Fluciclovine With 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer in PET/CT

Biochemical Relapse-Free Survival in Postprostatectomy Patients Receiving 18F-Fluciclovine-Guided Prostate Bed-Only Radiation: Post Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

Whole-pelvis (WP) radiation therapy (radiation) improved biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) compared with prostate bed (PB)-only radiation in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0534, but was performed in an era prior to positron emission tomography (PET) staging. Separately, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT-guided postprostatectomy radiation improved 3-year bRFS versus radiation guided by conventional imaging alone. We hypothesized that patients who were changed from WP to PB-only radiation after PET would have bRFS that was: (a) no higher than patients initially planned for PB-only radiation; and (b) lower than patients planned for WP radiation without PET guidance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a post hoc analysis of a prospective, randomized trial comparing conventional (arm 1) versus PET-guided (arm 2) postprostatectomy radiation. In arm 2, pre-PET treatment field decisions were recorded and post-PET fields were defined per protocol; pathologic node negative (pN0) without pelvic or extrapelvic PET uptake received PB-only radiation. Three-year bRFS was compared in patients planned for WP with change to PB-only radiation (arm 2 [WP:PB]) vs arm 2 patients planned for PB-only with final radiation to PB-only (arm 2 [PB:PB]) and arm 1 pN0 patients treated with WP radiation (arm 1 [WP]) using the Z test and log-rank test. Demographics were compared using the chi-square test, Fisher exact test, or analysis of variance, as appropriate.

RESULTS

We identified 10 arm 2 (WP:PB), 31 arm 2 (PB:PB) and 11 arm 1 (WP) patients. Androgen deprivation was used in 50.0% of arm 2 (WP:PB) and 3.2% of arm 2 (PB:PB) patients, P < .01. Median preradiation prostate-specific antigen was higher in arm 2 (WP:PB) vs arm 2 (PB:PB) patients (0.4 vs 0.2 ng/mL, P = .03); however, there were no significant differences in T stage, Gleason score, or margin positivity. Three-year bRFS was 80% in arm 2 (WP:PB) vs 87.4% in arm 2 (PB:PB), P = .47, respectively. Arm 1(WP) patients had significantly worse 3-year (23%) bRFS vs arm 2 (WP:PB), P < .01.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients initially planned for WP radiation with field decision change to PB-only radiation after PET showed (1) no significant difference in 3-year bRFS compared with patients initially planned for PB-only radiation; and (2) improved bRFS compared with patients receiving WP radiation without PET guidance. PET-guided volume de-escalation in selected patients may be 1 approach to mitigating toxicity without compromising outcomes.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Molecular Imaging Techniques for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Molecular imaging modalities show valuable non-invasive techniques capable of precisely and selectively addressing molecular markers associated with prostate cancer (PCa). This systematic review provides an overview of imaging markers utilized in positron emission tomography (PET) methods, specifically focusing on the pathways and mediators involved in PCa. This systematic review aims to evaluate and analyse existing literature on the diagnostic accuracy of molecular imaging techniques for detecting PCa. The PubMed, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were searched, identifying 32 studies that reported molecular imaging modalities for detecting PCa. Numerous imaging modalities and radiotracers were used to detect PCa, including 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT), 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI, 18F-choline PET/MRI, and 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/MRI. Across 11 studies, radiolabelled 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging had a pooled sensitivity of 80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-93), specificity of 90 (95% CI: 71-98), and accuracy of 86 (95% CI: 64-96). The PSMA-ligand 68Ga-PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance and appears promising for detecting and staging PCa.

Evaluating appropriateness of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT relative to standard of care imaging guidelines and the impact of ADT on positivity: a prospective study in 62 Veterans Administration patients at a single institution

BACKGROUND

According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT is considered appropriate after negative standard of care (SOC) imaging.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare 18F-fluciclovine to SOC imaging, investigate whether it should be done when SOC imaging is (+), and evaluate its detection rate in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy.

METHODS

We recruited 57 prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence with 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT and SOC imaging within 30 days. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (GS), history of radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation therapy (RT) or hormone therapy (HT) were reviewed.

RESULTS

The 57 patients had a median PSA of 2.6 and average GS of 7.4; 27 (47.4%) had RP, 28 (49.1%) had RT, 1 (1.75%) had HT and 1 (1.75%) observation only. 18F-fluciclovine identified disease recurrence in 45/57 patients (78.9%), including oligometastasis in 18/45 (40%). SOC imaging identified recurrent disease in 12/57 patients (21.1%) while 18F-fluciclvoine identified additional sites of disease in 11/12 (91.7%). The (+) 18F-fluciclovine studies had a median PSA 2.6 ng/ml compared to 6.0 ng/ml in the (+) SOC studies.

CONCLUSION

18F-fluciclovine was superior to SOC imaging for lesion detection, identification of oligometastasis and identification of additional sites of disease.

Application of next-generation imaging in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following primary interventional treatment occurs in approximately one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Next-generation imaging (NGI) can identify local and metastatic recurrence with greater sensitivity than conventional imaging, potentially allowing for more effective interventions. This narrative review examines the current clinical evidence on the utility of NGI for patients with BCR.

METHODS

A search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications on NGI applied to BCR. Given other relevant recent reviews on the topic, this review focused on papers published between January 2018 to May 2023.

RESULTS

NGI technologies, including positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, have demonstrated increased sensitivity and selectivity for diagnosing BCR at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations <2.0 ng/ml. Detection rates range between 46% and 50%, with decreasing PSA levels for choline (1-3 ng/ml), fluciclovine (0.5-1 ng/ml), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (0.2-0.49 ng/ml) PET radiotracers. Expert working groups and European and US medical societies recommend NGI for patients with BCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data support the improved detection performance and selectivity of NGI modalities versus conventional imaging techniques; however, limited clinical evidence exists demonstrating the application of NGI to treatment decision-making and its impact on patient outcomes. The emergence of NGI and displacement of conventional imaging may require a reexamination of the current definitions of BCR, altering our understanding of early recurrence. Redefining the BCR disease state by formalizing the role of NGI in patient management decisions will facilitate greater alignment across research efforts and better reflect the published literature.

Detection Rate of PSMA PET Using Different Ligands in Men with Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies

BACKGROUND

Despite the acknowledged diagnostic detection rate of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer, little is known about the quality of evidence, particularly focusing on prospective studies. Most systematic reviews are based on retrospective reports.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies reporting the diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET (computed tomography (CT) and MR) for the detection of biochemically recurrent metastatic prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, from database until March 1, 2023 for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies using PSMA PET imaging in prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was to assess diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET imaging in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. We calculated the pooled overall diagnostic detection rate with 95% CI using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between the studies including risk of biases estimation.

RESULTS

A total of 6800 patients from 32 articles were included in this study. The overall detection rate of PSMA PET for prostate cancer was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63, 0.71). For histologically confirmed lymph nodes, the PPV from 13 prospective studies containing 1496 patients was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93, 0.99). We performed a subgroup analysis of PSMA PET detection rates according to categorically grouped Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) values of 0-0.5, 0.5-1.0, 1.0-2.0, and >2.0 ng/ml and obtained detection rates of 0.44, 0.63, 0.82, and 0.94, respectively. The detection rate of 18F PSMA was better in men with a PSA between 1 ng/ml and 2 ng/ml in comparison to 68Ga PSMA (0.91 with 95% CI 0.81-0.99 vs. 0.79 with 95% CI 0.73, 0.85).

CONCLUSION

PSMA PET imaging provides a good detection rate for the metastatic recurrence of prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. The detection rate improves significantly above a serum PSA value of 1 ng/ml. The diagnostic detection rate of 18F-PSMA is best at PSA values between 1 and 2 ng/ml, in comparison to 68Ga PSMA. This conclusion is heavily biased, further research needs to focus on better methodology to minimize the risk of biases.

Application of Advanced Imaging to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management: A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Unanswered Questions

Major advances in prostate cancer diagnosis, staging, and management have occurred over the past decade, largely due to our improved understanding of the technical aspects and clinical applications of advanced imaging, specifically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate-cancer-specific positron emission tomography (PET). Herein, we review the established utility of these important and exciting technologies, as well as areas of controversy and uncertainty that remain important areas for future study. There is strong evidence supporting the utility of MRI in guiding initial biopsy and assessing local disease. There is debate, however, regarding how to best use the imaging modality in risk stratification, treatment planning, and assessment of biochemical failure. Prostate-cancer-specific PET is a relatively new technology that provides great value to the evaluation of newly diagnosed, treated, and recurrent prostate cancer. However, its ideal use in treatment decision making, staging, recurrence detection, and surveillance necessitates further research. Continued study of both imaging modalities will allow for an improved understanding of their best utilization in improving cancer care.

A Clinical Role of PET-MRI in Prostate Cancer?

PET/MRI is a relevant application field for prostate cancer management, offering advantages in early diagnosis, staging, and therapy planning. Despite drawbacks such as higher costs, longer acquisition time, and the need for skilled personnel, the technical integration of PET and MRI provides valuable information for detecting primary tumors, identifying metastases, and characterizing the disease, leading to more accurate staging and personalized treatment strategies. However, PET/MRI adoption has been slow, but ongoing technological advancements and AI integration might overcome challenges and improve clinical utility. As precision medicine gains importance in oncology, PET/MRI's multiparametric data can tailor treatment plans to individual patients, providing a comprehensive assessment of tumor biology and aggressiveness for more effective therapeutic strategies.

Diagnostic Performance of PSMA-Based 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients After Definitive Treatment With PSA Level ≤0.2 ng/mL

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer (PC) patients after definitive treatment and with low-level prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≤0.2 ng/mL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in PC patients who received definitive treatments with PSA level of ≤0.2 ng/mL and underwent 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT within a 1-week interval of PSA examination, and without interval treatment change or history of other cancer. Patient and tumor characteristics at initial diagnosis, treatment regimens, and findings on 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT were collected. Patients with minimal 6-month (median, 11 months; range, 6-21 months) follow-up or definitive biopsy results of the suspected PET/CT findings were included. Imagine findings were reached with consensus among experienced board-certified nuclear medicine physicians. Comprehensive follow-up and/or biopsy results were used as definitive determination of presence or absence of disease. Comparisons between groups of positive and negative 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT were done by using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 96 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CTs from 93 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median Gleason score (GS) of positive group is 8 (range, 6-10), whereas negative group is 7 (range, 6-10). The median age of positive group is 71 (range, 50-90), whereas negative group is 69 (range, 45-88). There were 49 positive (51%) and 47 negative 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CTs (49%). Detection rates at PSA level of ≤0.1 and 0.2 ng/mL were 58.7% (27/46) and 44% (22/50), respectively. The scan-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value are 100%, 95%, 96%, and 100% in group with PSA level of ≤0.1 ng/mL, and 100%, 97%, 95%, and 100% in group with PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL, respectively. Sites of involvement on positive 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CTs were prostate bed, pelvic lymph nodes, bone, chest and supraclavicular lymph nodes, lung, and adrenal glands. The SUV max value on positive lesions ranged from 1.9 to 141.4; the smallest positive lymph node was 0.4 cm. High GS of 8-10, known metastatic status (M1), presence of extraprostatic extension, presence of seminal vesicle invasion, and very high-risk PC are significantly associated with positive 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT results ( P < 0.05). Of all analyzed treatment regimes, upfront surgery (radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection) had strong correlation with negative PET/CT results ( P < 0.001). If patients received ADT only, or ADT plus chemotherapy, the PET/CT results were most likely positive ( P = 0.026). For other treatment regimes, there were no statistical differences between the groups ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of low PSA level in PC patients after definitive treatment, 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT is most beneficial in detection of disease in patients with GS of 8 or higher at the time of diagnosis, and the ones who have history of ADT only, or ADT plus chemotherapy. There is excellent negative prediction value of 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT. However, there is no cutoff PSA level for 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT indication and no correlation between PSA level and SUV max of positive lesions on 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT.

PSMA PET imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men in the United States. Imaging techniques such as CT, MRI, and bone scans have traditionally been used for diagnosis and staging. Molecular imaging modalities targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have recently gained attention due to their high affinity and accuracy. PSMA PET has been combined with other modalities such as multiparametric MRI for better diagnostic and prognostic performance. PSMA imaging has been studied at different clinical settings with a wide range of disease aggressiveness. In this review we will explore the role of PSMA PET in high-risk prostate cancer staging, biochemical recurrence, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. The primary focus of this review article is to examine the latest developments in the use of PSMA imaging and emphasize the clinical situations where its effectiveness has been demonstrated to significantly impact the treatment of prostate cancer. In addition, we will touch upon the potential future advancements of PSMA PET imaging and its evolving significance in the management of prostate cancer.

Multi-institutional Development and Validation of Contouring Guidelines for Para-aortic Elective Nodal Irradiation in Prostate Cancer Based on Patterns of Involvement on Targeted Molecular Imaging Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

PURPOSE

Molecular imaging better identifies anatomic regions of metastatic spread of prostate cancer compared with conventional imaging, resulting in para-aortic (PA) nodal metastases being increasingly identified. Consequently, some radiation oncologists electively treat the PA lymph node region in patients with gross or high risk of PA nodal involvement. The anatomic locations of at-risk PA lymph nodes for prostate cancer are unknown. Our objective was to use molecular imaging to develop guidelines for the optimal delineation of the PA clinical target volume (CTV) in patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of patients with prostate cancer undergoing 18F-fluciclovine or 18F-DCFPyL prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Images of patients with PET-positive PA nodes were imported into the treatment planning system, avid nodes were contoured, and measurements were taken in relation to anatomic landmarks. A contouring guideline that encompassed the location of ≥95% of PET-positive PA nodes was created using descriptive statistics and then validated in an independent data set.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-nine patients had molecular PET/CT imaging in the development data set (78% 18F-fluciclovine, 22% prostate-specific membrane antigen). Seventy-six patients (14%) had evidence of PA nodal metastasis. We determined that expanding the CTV to 1.8 cm left of the aorta, 1.4 cm right of the inferior vena cava (IVC), 7 mm posterior to the aorta/IVC or to the vertebral body, and superiorly to the T11/T12 vertebral interface, with the anterior border 4 mm anterior to the aorta/IVC and inferior border at the bifurcation of the aorta/IVC, resulted in coverage of ≥95% of PET-positive PA nodes. When the guideline was used in the independent validation data set (246 patients with molecular PET/CT imaging, of whom 31 had PA nodal metastasis), 97% of nodes were encompassed, thereby validating our guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

We used molecular PET/CT imaging to determine the anatomic locations of PA metastases to develop contouring guidelines for creating a prostate cancer PA CTV. Although the optimal patient selection and clinical benefits of PA radiation therapy remain uncertain, our results will aid in delineating the optimal target when PA radiation therapy is pursued.

International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology

PREAMBLE

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide between individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. The merged International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) is an international, nonprofit, scientific association whose purpose is to promote communication, research, development, and applications in the field of magnetic resonance in medicine and biology and other related topics and to develop and provide channels and facilities for continuing education in the field.The ISMRM was founded in 1994 through the merger of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine and/or magnetic resonance imaging. The SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM will periodically define new guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and/or magnetic resonance imaging and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the world. Existing practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each practice guideline, representing a policy statement by the SNMMI/EANM/ISMRM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review. The SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging and magnetic resonance imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guideline by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. These guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the SNMMI, the ISMRM, and the EANM caution against the use of these guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. The practice of medicine includes both the art and the science of the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources, and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

Emerging Role of Nuclear Medicine in Prostate Cancer: Current State and Future Perspectives

Prostate cancer is the most frequent epithelial neoplasia after skin cancer in men starting from 50 years and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dosage can be used as an early screening tool. Prostate cancer imaging includes several radiological modalities, ranging from ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance to nuclear medicine hybrid techniques such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Innovation in radiopharmaceutical compounds has introduced specific tracers with diagnostic and therapeutic indications, opening the horizons to targeted and very effective clinical care for patients with prostate cancer. The aim of the present review is to illustrate the current knowledge and future perspectives of nuclear medicine, including stand-alone diagnostic techniques and theragnostic approaches, in the clinical management of patients with prostate cancer from initial staging to advanced disease.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up of Prostate Cancer: 2022 Update

Prostate cancer has a wide spectrum ranging between low-grade localized disease and castrate-resistant metastatic disease. Although whole gland and systematic therapies result in cure in the majority of patients, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer can still occur. Imaging approaches including anatomic, functional, and molecular modalities are continuously expanding. Currently, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer is grouped in three major categories: 1) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy, 2) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after nonsurgical local and pelvic treatments, and 3) Metastatic prostate cancer treated by systemic therapy (androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy). This document is a review of the current literature regarding imaging in these settings and the resulting recommendations for imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Prostate Cancer-PET Imaging Update

Prostate cancer is the most common non-dermatologic cancer in men, and one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. The incidence of prostate cancer increases precipitously after the age of 65 and demonstrates variable aggressiveness, depending on its grade and stage at diagnosis. Despite recent advancements in prostate cancer treatment, recurrence is seen in 25% of patients. Advancements in prostate cancer Positron Emission Tomography (PET) molecular imaging and recent United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals have led to several new options for evaluating prostate cancer. This manuscript will review the commonly used molecular imaging agents, with an emphasis on Fluorine-18 fluciclovine (Axumin) and PSMA-ligand agents, including their protocols, imaging interpretation, and pitfalls.

18 F-Fluciclovine PET Detected Early Tumor Recurrence in Prostatectomy Bed With Low PSA of 0.3 ng/mL But Negative on 18 F-PSMA PET Scan

ABSTRACT

A 58-year-old man with metastatic prostate cancer was treated with prostatectomy, radiation therapy to bone metastasis, and androgen deprivation therapy plus abiraterone. He had posttreatment nadir PSA of 0.1 ng/mL. A follow-up 18 F-fluciclovine PET performed with PSA of 0.3 ng/mL showed a focal tracer-avid lesion in the left prostatectomy bed. This lesion was negative on 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT, but with typical MRI features for disease recurrence. Minimal urinary activity of fluciclovine helped detection of local disease recurrence in the prostatectomy bed.

Comparison of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT With 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Initial Staging in Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for initial staging in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

Forty treatment-naive, biopsy-proven, intermediate- or high-risk PCa patients were prospectively recruited. Each patient underwent PET/CT with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-PSMA-1007 (within 2 weeks). Assessment of both set of images included delineating number and characteristics of lesions, measurement of tracer uptake (SUV max ), miPSMA scoring, and PET-based stage categorization.

RESULTS

Intraprostatic lesions were detected in all patients by both tracers with concordant PET-based T stage. Median SUV max of the dominant PSMA-positive prostatic lesions was not significantly different with 18 F-PSMA-1007 and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 (19.9 vs 19.4, P = 0.127, n = 40). Prostatic miPSMA scores were similar in 31/40 (77.5%) patients with both tracers (weighted κ = 0.71). In 23/40 (57.5%) patients, regional lymph nodes (n = 171) were detected by both tracers. Few additional PET-positive regional lymph nodes (n = 3) were exclusively detected by 18 F-PSMA in 2 patients without altering PET-based N stage. Extraregional lymph nodes (n = 123 in 17/40 patients) and visceral metastatic lesions (n = 18 in 3/40 patients) were detected concordantly by both tracers. PET-positive marrow based and skeletal metastases (n = 71) were detected in 14/40 (35%) patients by both tracers. Few additional marrow and skeletal lesions (n = 7) were exclusively detected on 18 F-PSMA-1007 in 5/14 patients, potentially upstaging PET-based M stage in 2/5 patients. Both radiotracers showed excellent interreader agreement for region-wise detection of lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT is comparable to 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in detecting primary and metastatic lesions of PCa.

The Performance of FDA-Approved PET Imaging Agents in the Detection of Prostate Cancer

Positron emission tomography (PET) incorporated with X-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is increasingly being used as a diagnostic tool for prostate cancer (PCa). In this review, we describe and evaluate the clinical performance of some Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents used for visualizing PCa: [¹⁸F]FDG, [¹¹C]choline, [¹⁸F]FACBC, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [¹⁸F]DCFPyL, and [¹⁸F]-NaF. We carried out a comprehensive literature search based on articles published from 1 January 2010 to 1 March 2022. We selected English language articles associated with the discovery, preclinical study, clinical study, and diagnostic performance of the imaging agents for the evaluation. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging agents demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in both primary and recurrent PCa, compared with [¹¹C]choline and [¹⁸F]FACBC, both of which target dividing cells and are used especially in patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. When compared to [¹⁸F]-NaF (which is suitable for the detection of bone metastases), PSMA-targeted agents were also capable of detecting lesions in the lymph nodes, soft tissues, and bone. However, a limitation of PSMA-targeted imaging was the heterogeneity of PSMA expression in PCa, and consequently, a combination of two PET tracers was proposed to overcome this obstacle. The preliminary studies indicated that the use of PSMA-targeted scanning is more cost efficient than conventional imaging modalities for high-risk PCa patients. Furthering the development of imaging agents that target PCa-associated receptors and molecules could improve PET-based diagnosis of PCa.

Digital PET/CT with 18F-FACBC in early castration-resistant prostate cancer: our preliminary results

BACKGROUND

We assessed the role of digital PET/CT (dPET/CT) with ¹⁸F-FACBC in patients affected by castration-resistant prostate cancer with PSA levels ≤ 3 ng/mL (early CRPC), no lesions detectable at cross-sectional imaging (CIM) and bone scan (BS).

METHODS

Clinical data of patients submitted to ¹⁸F-FACBC dPET/CT were retrospectively reviewed. PET/CT results were analyzed: lesions' number, location, and, in case of positive lymph nodes, largest node's short axis (i.e. SA) were annotated. According to PET/CT's results, patients with ¹⁸F-FACBC-avid lesions were further stratified into 1) unifocal; 2) oligometastatic (≤ 5 lesions); 3) disseminated (> 6 lesions).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled. ¹⁸F-FACBC dPET/CT was positive in 21 out of 24 patients (87.5%). Thirteen patients (54.1%) showed recurrence in pelvic region, seven of whom with pelvic nodes' involvement, while eight cases (33.3%) presented ¹⁸F-FACBC-avid metastases to extra-pelvic nodes or bone. Average SA of PET-positive nodes resulted in 8.9 ± 3 mm. Patients were categorized as unifocal in four cases (26.6%), oligometastatic in 10 subjects (66.6%) and disseminated in 1 case (0.6%). PET/CT impacted on clinical management in 14 cases (58.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁸F-FACBC dPET/CT detected M1 status in 33.3% of early CRPC patients, significantly impacting on clinical management.

MRI-guided focal or integrated boost high dose rate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer

Background and purpose

Locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy merits an effective salvage strategy that mitigates the risk of adverse events. We report outcomes of a cohort enrolled across two institutions investigating MRI-guided tumor-targeted salvage high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT).

Materials and methods

Analysis of a prospective cohort of 88 patients treated across two institutions with MRI-guided salvage HDR-BT to visible local recurrence after radiotherapy (RT). Tumor target dose ranged from 22-26 Gy, using either an integrated boost (ibBT) or focal technique (fBT), delivered in two implants over a median of 7 days. Outcome metrics included cancer control and toxicity (CTCAE). Quality of life (QoL-EPIC) was analyzed in a subset.

Results

At a median follow-up of 35 months (6 -134), 3 and 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) outcomes were 67% and 49%, respectively. At 5 years, fBT was associated with a 17% cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) outside the GTV (vs. 7.8% ibBT, p=0.14), while LF within the GTV occurred in 13% (vs. 16% ibBT, p=0.81). Predictors of LF outside fBT volumes included pre-salvage PSA>7 ng/mL (p=0.03) and interval since RT less than 5 years (p=0.04). No attributable grade 3 events occurred, and ibBT was associated with a higher rate of grade 2 toxicity (p<0.001), and trend towards a larger reduction in QoL sexual domain score (p=0.07), compared to fBT.

Conclusion

A tumor-targeted HDR-BT salvage approach achieved favorable cancer control outcomes. While a fBT was associated with less toxicity, it may be best suited to a subgroup with lower PSA at later recurrence. Tumor targeted dose escalation may be warranted.

The future of PSMA PET and WB MRI as next-generation imaging tools in prostate cancer

Radiolabelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET-CT has been shown in numerous studies to be superior to conventional imaging in the detection of nodal or distant metastatic lesions. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET-CT is now recommended by many guidelines for the detection of biochemically relapsed disease after radical local therapy. PSMA radioligands can also function as radiotheranostics, and Lu-PSMA has been shown to be a potential new line of treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Whole-body (WB) MRI has been shown to have a high diagnostic performance in the detection and monitoring of metastatic bone disease. Prospective, randomized, multicentre studies comparing ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET-CT and WB MRI for pelvic nodal and metastatic disease detection are yet to be performed. Challenges for interpretation of PSMA include tracer trapping in non-target tissues and also urinary excretion of tracers, which confounds image interpretation at the vesicoureteral junction. Additionally, studies have shown how long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) affects PSMA expression and could, therefore, reduce tracer uptake and visibility of PSMA⁺ lesions. Furthermore, ADT of short duration might increase PSMA expression, leading to the PSMA flare phenomenon, which makes the accurate monitoring of treatment response to ADT with PSMA PET challenging. Scan duration, detection of incidentalomas and presence of metallic implants are some of the major challenges with WB MRI. Emerging data support the wider adoption of PSMA PET and WB MRI for diagnosis, staging, disease burden evaluation and response monitoring, although their relative roles in the standard-of-care management of patients are yet to be fully defined.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-IV. Gynecologic and Genitourinary Malignancies

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT), has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With concurrently acquired positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT), a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan provides information to allow better visualization of radioactivity from deep or dense structures and to provide detailed anatomic information. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging interpretive strategies for PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The fourth report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in gynecologic and genitourinary malignancies.

Abstract

Concurrently acquired positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) is an advanced imaging modality with diverse oncologic applications, including staging, therapeutic assessment, restaging and longitudinal surveillance. This series of six review articles focuses on providing practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use and interpretative strategies of PET-CT for oncologic indications in adult patients. In this fourth article of the series, the more common gynecological and adult genitourinary malignancies encountered in clinical practice are addressed, with an emphasis on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals. The advent of new FDA-approved radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer imaging has revolutionized PET-CT imaging in this important disease, and these are addressed in this report. However, [¹⁸F]F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) remains the mainstay for PET-CT imaging of gynecologic and many other genitourinary malignancies. This information will serve as a guide for the appropriate role of PET-CT in the clinical management of gynecologic and genitourinary cancer patients for health care professionals caring for adult cancer patients. It also addresses the nuances and provides guidance in the accurate interpretation of FDG PET-CT in gynecological and genitourinary malignancies for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees.

18F-PSMA-11 Versus 68Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Staging and Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Double-blind Randomised Cross-over Trial

BACKGROUND

Fluorine-18 (¹⁸F)-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) offers several advantages over gallium-68 (⁶⁸Ga) in terms of costs, yield, transport/distribution, and image resolution.

OBJECTIVE

This trial investigates the new radiotracer ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 via a prospective, intraindividual crossover design. The trial was powered for noninferiority of ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 over ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in terms of the number of positive PET scans. Secondary endpoints were as follows: (1) superiority of ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 over ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 with respect to the number of positive PET scans, the total number of suspicious prostate cancer lesions, and the miPSMA expression score of corresponding lesions; (2) correlation of the PET/CT images with available follow-up data for ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11; and (3) assessment of the interobserver variability.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Prostate cancer patients (primary or biochemical recurrence) were randomised in a double-blind crossover design whereby each patient received both ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

All scans were reviewed and scored by three independent experienced nuclear physicians following the proposed guideline for the interpretation of PSMA-ligand PET/CT, as described by Eiber et al. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 82 patients were included for scan analyses. The primary endpoint was met: per patient, the proportions of positive scans rated by the three readers were 67%/67%, 65%/65%, and 73%/70% for ¹⁸F-PSMA-11/⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The miPSMA expression score was higher for ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 than for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 for the reference reader. Follow-up data showed identical estimated sensitivity for both the ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 and the ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 scan (0.92, 0.83, and 0.92 for the three readers). A fair to good agreement among readers (at patient level) was obtained, which was demonstrated by a Light's kappa value of 0.59 for both tracers.

CONCLUSIONS

The tracer ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 is noninferior to⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11. Superiority of ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 was limited to the miPSMA expression score, given by the reference reader. Inter-rater agreement was fair to good, and equal for both radiotracers.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we compared two radiotracers: ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11. We proved that ¹⁸F-PSMA-11 is not inferior to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 for detecting prostate cancer and thus can be used as an alternative. Possible superiority of this tracer should be further investigated in specific subpopulations.

Role of 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the prospective literature on the role of 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI as a tool for functional imaging in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR), particularly with respect to detection efficacy and impact on management.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed in July 2021, focusing on original prospective studies looking at PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in BCR.

RESULTS

We included 20 prospective studies reporting on 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI. Pooled PSMA PET positivity was 66.6% out of 2110 patients. The only factor consistently reported as associated with PSMA PET positivity was PSA level at the time of the study. Analysis of PSMA PET positivity rates in differing PSA ranges confirmed increasing positivity with increasing PSA levels. No significant adverse reactions were reported in the 20 studies, but only 6 studies mentioned safety or adverse reactions. A major change of management occurred in 42.7% of all patients scanned with PSMA PET/CT and more specifically 63.2% of those patients positive on PSMA PET/CT. There are no long-term studies that prove a survival benefit from these changes in management.

CONCLUSION

There is prospective evidence for efficacy of PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in localizing disease recurrence in BCR, which increases with increasing PSA level at the time of scanning. There are no reported significant adverse effects related to the PSMA PET ligands. There is evidence of major change in management but no evidence for whether this achieves any improvement in outcome.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Identified Tumor Recurrence in Prostatectomy Bed With Rising PSA of 0.9 ng/mL but Negative on MRI and 18F-Fluciclovine PET Scan

ABSTRACT

A 63-year-old man with prostate cancer was treated with prostatectomy who had postoperative PSA of 0.6 ng/mL. A pelvic MRI, whole body bone scan, CT chest and abdomen exams did not show any residual or metastatic prostate disease. His PSA increased to 0.9 ng/mL in two months. A fluciclovine PET did not show any tracer avid metastatic or recurrent disease. A 0.7 cm non-fluciclovine-avid nodule at the left prostatectomy bed was considered benign. A 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET one month later showed avid radiotracer uptake within this nodule. The patient received androgen deprivation treatment after PSMA PET/CT and responded well.

[18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT Improves the Clinical Management of Early Recurrence Prostate Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

In the challenge between increasingly sensitive PET radiopharmaceuticals for the evaluation of prostate cancer patient in biochemical relapse, the choice of the most accurate PET tracer must be guided by literature data, but above all tailored to the patient’s profile. In describing our single-center experience, we aimed to identify biochemical and clinical–histological factors to be considered in patient selection and the semiquantitative parameters that can help the interpretation of malignant from benign lesions, in order to optimize the performance of this imaging method. These data in combination with a significant impact on therapeutic decision making can be useful to further validate the [¹⁸F]Fluciclovine PET/CT clinical application.

Abstract

We investigated the [¹⁸F]Fluciclovine PET/CT reliability in the early detection of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) and its impact on therapeutic decision making. We retrospectively analyzed 58 [¹⁸F]Fluciclovine PET/CT scans performed to identify early PCa recurrence. Detection rate (DR) and semiquantitative analysis were evaluated in relation to biochemical and clinical–histological features. Clinical follow-up data were collected and considered as gold standard to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV). The impact of [¹⁸F]Fluciclovine PET/CT on clinical management was also assessed. Overall DR resulted as 66%, while DR was 53%, 28%, and 7% in prostate/bed, lymph nodes, and bone, respectively. DR significantly increased with higher PSA values (p = 0.009) and 0.45 ng/mL was identified as the optimal cut-off value. Moreover, SUVmax and SUVmean resulted significant parameters in interpreting malignant from benign findings. [¹⁸F]Fluciclovine PET/CT reached a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 87.10%, 80.00%, 87.10%, 80.00%, and 84.31%, respectively. Therapeutic strategy was changed in 51% of patients. Our results support [¹⁸F]Fluciclovine PET/CT as a reliable tool for early restaging of PCa patients, especially for local recurrence detection, leading to a significant impact on clinical management. Semiquantitative analysis could improve specificity in interpreting malignant from benign lesions.

Is there a diagnostic benefit of late-phase abdomino-pelvic PET/CT after urination as part of whole-body 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for restaging patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy?

Background

To assess the diagnostic value of an additional late-phase PET/CT scan after urination as part of ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for the restaging of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR).

Methods

This retrospective trial included patients with BCR following radical prostatectomy, who underwent standard whole-body early-phase PET/CT performed 105 ± 45 min and an additional late-phase PET/CT performed 159 ± 13 min after injection of ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA-11. Late-phase PET/CT covered a body volume from below the liver to the upper thighs and was conducted after patients had used the bathroom to empty their urinary bladder. Early- and late-phase images were evaluated regarding lesion count, type, localisation, and SUVmax. Reference standard was histopathology and/or follow-up imaging.

Results

Whole-body early-phase PET/CT detected 93 prostate cancer lesions in 33 patients. Late-phase PET/CT detected two additional lesions in two patients, both local recurrences. In total, there were 57 nodal, 28 bone, and 3 lung metastases, and 7 local recurrences. Between early- and late-phase PET/CT, lymph node metastases showed a significant increase of SUVmax from 14.5 ± 11.6 to 21.5 ± 17.6 (p = 0.00007), translating to a factor of + 1.6. Benign lymph nodes in the respective regions showed a significantly lower increase of SUVmax of 1.4 ± 0.5 to 1.7 ± 0.5 (p = 0.0014, factor of + 1.2). Local recurrences and bone metastases had a SUVmax on late-phase PET/CT that was + 1.7 and + 1.1 times higher than the SUVmax on early-phase PET/CT, respectively.

Conclusion

In patients with BCR following radical prostatectomy, an additional abdomino-pelvic late-phase ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan performed after emptying the urinary bladder may help to detect local recurrences missed on standard whole-body ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Lymph node metastases show a higher SUVmax and a stronger increase of SUVmax than benign lymph nodes on late-phase PET/CT, hence, biphasic ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT might help to distinguish between malignant and benign nodes. Bone metastases, and especially local recurrences, also demonstrate a metabolic increase over time.

Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions

Background

To date, the results of studies into the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) in the diagnosis of malignant prostate lesions have been inconsistent, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods cannot be accurately judged.

Methods

Articles were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Wan Fang Medical Network, PubMed, Excerpta Medica data BASE (EMBASE), Medline, and Cochrane database. The keywords used in the search were: ⁶⁸Ga-prostate specific membrane antibody (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA), PET/CT, prostate lesions, prostate adenocarcinoma, bone metastasis, and BS.

Results

Ultimately, 3 publications were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 215 patients were considered in the 3 articles that met the inclusion criteria. All of the included articles were small sample studies, with sample sizes ranging from 28 to 113 cases. In this study, from the 3 randomized controlled trials, only 2 (66.67%) randomized controls described the correct randomized allocation method, and only 1 (33.33%) described the hidden allocation scheme in detail. The highest sensitivity for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 0.96, with 95% CI: 0.87, 1.00, and the highest specificity was 1.00, with 95% CI: 0.96, 1.00. The highest sensitivity and specificity of BS were 0.92 with 95% CI: 0.81, 0.98 and 0.96 with 95% CI: 0.78, 1.00, respectively. The results of meta-analysis of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve (AUC) =0.826 and standard error (SE) (AUC) =0.0425. The results of meta-analysis of BS diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the SROC curve (AUC) =0.714 and SE (AUC) =0.0034.

Discussion

The meta-analysis showed that ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT has clear advantages over BS in the diagnosis of bone metastases of malignant prostate tumors, and could improve the diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases.

Validating Modern NRG Oncology Pelvic Nodal and Groupe Francophone de Radiothérapie Urologique Prostate Bed Contouring Guidelines for Post-Prostatectomy Salvage Radiation: A Secondary Analysis of the LOCATE Trial

PURPOSE

We used the patterns of recurrence on ¹⁸F-fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) in patients enrolled in the LOCATE trial after prostatectomy to evaluate how well the most recent NRG Oncology and Groupe Francophone de Radiothérapie Urologique (GFRU) contouring recommendations encompassed all sites of recurrence in the prostate fossa and pelvic nodes in comparison to former Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommendations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy with a positive finding within the prostate fossa or pelvic nodes on ¹⁸F-fluciclovine PET/CTs were identified from the LOCATE patient population. Areas of gross disease were delineated. Prostate fossa contours were delineated using both the 2010 RTOG consensus guidelines and the recently published 2020 GFRU consensus guidelines. Pelvic nodes were contoured with both the 2009 RTOG consensus guidelines and the 2020 NRG consensus guidelines. The performance of the contouring guidelines was assessed by determining what proportion of gross recurrent lesions were encompassed completely or marginally.

RESULTS

Of the 213 patients within the LOCATE trial, 45 patients were eligible for analysis with positive ¹⁸F-fluciclovine PET findings. Of the 30 total prostate fossa recurrences, the 2010 RTOG contour covered 20 (67%) and missed or marginally covered 10 (33%). The 2020 GFRU contour covered 27 recurrences (90%), and missed or marginally covered 3 (10%). Of the 43 total nodal recurrences, the 2009 RTOG pelvic nodal contour covered 29 nodes (67%), and missed or marginally covered 14 (32%). The 2020 NRG pelvic nodal contour covered 43 nodes (100%), with no misses or marginal coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

This secondary analysis of the LOCATE trial exemplifies the improved coverage of the latest prostate fossa contouring recommendations from the GFRU. Similarly, it also validates the updated 2020 NRG pelvic nodal contouring guidelines by demonstrating improved coverage of recurrent disease in this patient population.

18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT performance in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

A systematic literature review of the performance of 18Fluorine-fluciclovine PET/CT for imaging of men with recurrent prostate cancer was performed.

METHODS

Scientific literature databases (MEDLINE, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Libraries) were searched systematically during Oct 2020 using PRISMA criteria. No limit was put on the date of publication. Prospective studies reporting a patient-level 18F-fluciclovine detection rate (DR) from ≥25 patients with recurrent prostate cancer were sought. Proceedings of relevant meetings held from 2018 through Oct 2020 were searched for abstracts meeting criteria.

RESULTS

Searches identified 321 unique articles. In total, nine articles (six papers and three conference abstracts), comprising a total of 850 patients met inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 6) relied on ASTRO-Phoenix Criteria, EAU-ESTRO-SIOG, and/or ASTRO-AUA guidelines to identify patients with biochemical recurrence. Patients' PSA levels ranged from 0.02-301.7 ng/mL (median level per study, 0.34-4.10 ng/mL [n = 8]). Approximately 64% of patients had undergone prostatectomy, but three studies focused solely on post-prostatectomy patients. Adherence to imaging protocol guidelines was heterogeneous, with variance seen in administered activity, uptake and scan times. Overall patient-level DR varied between studies from 26% to 83%, with 78% of studies reporting a DR > 50%. DR was proportional to PSA, but even at PSA < 0.5 ng/mL DR of up to 53% were reported. Prostate/bed DR (n = 7) ranged from 18% to 78% and extra-prostatic rates (n = 6) from 8% to 72%. Pelvic node and bone lesion DR ranged from 8% to 47% and 0% to 26%, respectively (n = 5). 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT was shown to impact patient management and outcomes. Two studies reported 59-63% of patients to have a management change post-scan. A further study showed significant increase in failure-free survival following 18F-fluciclovine-guided compared with conventional imaging-guided radiotherapy planning.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT shows good performance in patients with recurrent prostate cancer leading to measurable clinical benefits. Careful adherence to recommended imaging protocols may help optimize DR.

Head-to-head comparison of [68 Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 in dynamic PET/CT evaluation of the same group of recurrent prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

This study was prospectively designed to evaluate the early dynamic organ distribution and tumor detection capability of [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-P16-093, which was compared with [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 in the same group of recurrent prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

Twenty patients with recurrent prostate cancer were enrolled. In 2 consecutive days, each patient underwent a 60-min dynamic PET/CT scan after intravenous administration of 148-185 MBq (4-5 mCi) [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-PSMA-617, respectively. Following a low-dose CT scan, serial dynamic PET scans were performed from head to proximal thigh at 9 time points (30 s/bed at 4, 7, 10, 13, and 16 min; 1 min/bed at 20, 30, and 45 min; and 2 min/bed at 60 min). Standardized uptake values were measured for semi-quantitative comparison.

RESULTS

[⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT revealed a significantly higher tumor uptake at 4 min (SUVmax 7.88 ± 5.26 vs. 6.01 ± 3.88, P < 0.001), less blood pool retention at 4 min (SUVmean 5.12 ± 1.16 vs. 6.14 ± 0.98, P < 0.001), and lower bladder accumulation at 60 min (SUVmean 31.33 ± 27.47 vs. 48.74 ± 34.01, P = 0.042) than [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 scan. Significantly higher [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-P16-093 uptakes were also observed in the parotid gland, liver, spleen, and kidney. Besides, [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-P16-093 exhibited a better detectability of tumor than [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 (366 vs. 321, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

[⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-P16-093 showed advantages over [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 with higher tumor uptakes, tumor-to-blood pool ratio and detection capability, less blood pool, and bladder accumulation in recurrent prostate cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

[⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT Imaging in the Same Group of Prostate Cancer Patients (NCT04796467, Registered 12 March 2021, retrospectively registered) URL of registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04796467.

PET/CT-Based Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Impact on Treatment Management and Future Directions

Biochemical recurrence is a clinical situation experienced by 20 to 40% of prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Prostate bed (PB) radiation therapy (RT) remains the mainstay salvage treatment, although it remains non-curative for up to 30% of patients developing further recurrence. Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) using prostate cancer-targeting radiotracers has emerged in the last decade as a new-generation imaging technique characterized by a better restaging accuracy compared to conventional imaging. By adapting targeting of recurrence sites and modulating treatment management, implementation in clinical practice of restaging PET/CT is challenging the established therapeutic standards born from randomized controlled trials. This article reviews the potential impact of restaging PET/CT on changes in the management of recurrent prostate cancer after RP. Based on PET/CT findings, it addresses potential adaptation of RT target volumes and doses, as well as use of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). However, the impact of such management changes on the oncological outcomes of PET/CT-based salvage RT strategies is as yet unknown.

Positivity Rate of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer Recurrence at PSA Levels Below 1 ng/mL

PURPOSE

Early and precise localization of recurrent prostate cancer lesions after local therapy facilitates optimal disease management. Here, we present results from a single-center study to evaluate the utility of [¹⁸F]fluciclovine PET/CT to localize prostate cancer recurrence in patients with PSA <1 ng/mL.

PROCEDURES

Data from men who underwent [¹⁸F]fluciclovine PET/CT (August 2016-March 2020) for suspected recurrent prostate cancer and who had a PSA value <1ng/mL were retrospectively reviewed. The number of positive scans (positivity rates, PR) was calculated for the whole body, prostate/bed, and extraprostatic regions (pelvic or extrapelvic lymph nodes, bones, and soft tissue). PR were stratified by pre-scan PSA.

RESULTS

Data from 113 patients were included. In total, 98 (87%) were post-prostatectomy and 15 (13%) had received non-surgical primary therapy. Twenty patients (18%) were receiving ADT at the time of the scan, 91 (81%) were not, and ADT status was not known for 2 (1.8%) patients. The overall PR at PSA <1ng/mL was 59% (67/113). For the prostate/bed, it was 35% (40/113), and for extraprostatic locations, it was 37% (42/113). At PSA >0-<0.2, 0.2-<0.5, and 0.5-<1 ng/mL, the overall PR was 43% (10/23), 70% (35/50), and 55% (22/40), respectively. In the prostate/bed, these were 13% (3/23), 50% (25/50), and 30% (12/40), respectively, and in extraprostatic lesions were 30% (7/23), 44% (22/50), and 33% (13/40), respectively. Pelvic lymph nodes were the most common site for extraprostatic lesions (29/113, 26%). PR in extrapelvic lymph nodes, bone, and soft tissue were 8.0%, 12%, and 3.5%, respectively. Soft tissue lesions comprised lung nodules (n=3) and a perirectal mass implant (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite low PSA values, more than half of patients had positive [¹⁸F]fluciclovine PET/CT findings. Patients with low PSA levels may demonstrate suspicious findings outside of the pelvis, including abdominal lymph nodes and metastatic disease to bones and lungs.

PET Imaging for Prostate Cancer

The role of PET imaging with ¹¹C-choline and ¹⁸F-fluciclovine in evaluating patients with prostate cancer (PCa) has become more important over the years and has been incorporated into the NCCN guidelines. A new generation of PET radiotracers targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is widely used outside the United States to evaluate patients with primary PCa and PCa recurrence. PET imaging influences treatment planning and demonstrates a significantly higher disease detection rate than conventional imaging such as computed tomography and MR imaging. Early data indicate that using PET radiotracers such as ¹⁸F-fluciclovine and PSMA improves patient outcomes. 68-Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT were recently approved by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use. Other PSMA radiotracers, including fluorinated variants, will likely gain FDA approval in the not-too-distant future.

Prostate cancer: Molecular imaging and MRI

The role of molecular imaging in initial evaluation of men with presumed or established diagnosis of prostate cancer and work up of biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease is rapidly evolving due to superior diagnostic performance compared to anatomic imaging. However, variable tumor biology and expression of transmembrane proteins or metabolic alterations poses a challenge. We review the evidence and controversies with emphasis on emerging PET radiopharmaceuticals and experience on clinical utility of PET/CT and PET/MRI in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Salvage Radiotherapy Management Decisions in Postprostatectomy Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer Based on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Guidance

Imaging with novel PET radiotracers has significantly influenced radiotherapy decision making and radiation planning in patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). The purpose of this analysis was to report the final results for management decision changes based on 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT findings and determine whether the decision change trend remained after completion of accrual. Methods: Patients with detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after prostatectomy were randomized to undergo either conventional imaging (CI) only (arm A) or CI plus 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT (arm B) before radiotherapy. In arm B, positivity rates on CI and 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT for detection of recurrent PCa were determined. Final decisions on whether to offer radiotherapy and whether to include only the prostate bed or also the pelvis in the radiotherapy field were based on 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT findings. Radiotherapy decisions before and after 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT were compared. The statistical significance of decision changes was determined using the Clopper-Pearson (exact) binomial method. Prognostic factors were compared between patients with and without decision changes. Results: All 165 patients enrolled in the study had standard-of-care CI and were initially planned to receive radiotherapy. Sixty-three of 79 (79.7%) patients (median PSA, 0.33 ng/mL) who underwent 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT (arm B) had positive findings. 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT had a significantly higher positivity rate than CI did for the whole body (79.7% vs. 13.9%; P < 0.001), prostate bed (69.6% vs. 5.1%; P < 0.001), and pelvic lymph nodes (38.0% vs. 10.1%; P < 0.001). Twenty-eight of 79 (35.4%) patients had the overall radiotherapy decision changed after 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT; in 4 of 79 (5.1%), the decision to use radiotherapy was withdrawn because of extrapelvic disease detected on 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT. In 24 of 75 (32.0%) patients with a final decision to undergo radiotherapy, the radiotherapy field was changed. Changes in overall radiotherapy decisions and radiotherapy fields were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Overall, the mean PSA at PET was significantly different between patients with and without radiotherapy decision changes (P = 0.033). Conclusion:18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT significantly altered salvage radiotherapy decisions in patients with recurrent PCa after prostatectomy. Further analysis to determine the impact of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT guidance on clinical outcomes after radiotherapy is in progress.

Optimal Time Point for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging in the Assessment of Suspected Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the Bladder of Postprostatectomy Patient

ABSTRACT

A 77-year-old man with prostate cancer had prostatectomy and hormonal therapy and underwent pelvic MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT during clinical follow-up. A pelvic MRI scan showed suspected metastasis along the posterior wall of urinary bladder. The 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was acquired in a dual-time point fashion, at 60 minutes and 110 minutes postinjection. At 60 minutes postinjection, the known bladder wall lesion showed lower than urine background uptake. On 110 minutes delayed images, the bladder wall lesion showed avid PSMA uptake, much higher than the urine background, increased PSMA uptake by the tumor over time, and improved contrast in the lesion.

Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Introduction

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography-(PSMA-PET) imaging facilitates dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy (DE-SRT) with simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) for PET-positive lesions in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we aimed to compare toxicity rates of DE-SRT with SIB to conventional SRT (C-SRT) without SIB and to report outcome.

Materials and Methods

We evaluated 199 patients who were treated with SRT between June 2014 and June 2020. 101 patients received DE-SRT with SIB for PET-positive local recurrence and/or PET-positive lymph nodes. 98 patients were treated with C-SRT to the prostate bed +/− elective pelvic lymphatic pathways without SIB. All patients received PSMA-PET imaging prior to DE-SRT ([68Ga]PSMA-11: 45.5%; [18F]-labeled PSMA: 54.5%). Toxicity rates for early (<6 months) and late (>6 months) gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities rectal bleeding, proctitis, stool incontinence, and genitourinary (GU) toxicities hematuria, cystitis, urine incontinence, urinary obstruction, and erectile dysfunction were assessed. Further, we analyzed the outcome with disease-free survival (DFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response.

Results

The overall toxicity rates for early GI (C-SRT: 2.1%, DE-SRT: 1.0%) and late GI (C-SRT: 1.4%, DE-SRT: 5.3%) toxicities ≥ grade 2 were similar. Early GU (C-SRT: 2.1%, DE-SRT: 3.0%) and late GU (C-SRT: 11.0%, DE-SRT: 14.7%) toxicities ≥ grade 2 were comparable, as well. Early and late toxicity rates did not differ significantly between DE-SRT versus C-SRT in all subcategories (p>0.05). PSA response (PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml) in the overall group of patients with DE-SRT was 75.0% and 86.4% at first and last follow-up, respectively.

Conclusion

DE-SRT showed no significantly increased toxicity rates compared with C-SRT and thus is feasible. The outcome of DE-SRT showed good results. Therefore, DE-SRT with a PSMA-PET-based SIB can be considered for the personalized treatment in patients with recurrent PC.

Incorporating PSMA-Targeting Theranostics Into Personalized Prostate Cancer Treatment: a Multidisciplinary Perspective

Recent developments in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted diagnostic imaging and therapeutics (theranostics) promise to advance the management of primary, biochemically recurrent, and metastatic prostate cancer. In order to maximize the clinical impact of PSMA-targeted theranostics, a coordinated approach between the clinical stakeholders involved in prostate cancer management is required. Here, we present a vision for multidisciplinary use of PSMA theranostics from the viewpoints of nuclear radiology, medical oncology, urology, and radiation oncology. We review the currently available and forthcoming PSMA-based imaging and therapeutics and examine current and potential impacts on prostate cancer management from early localized disease to advanced treatment-refractory disease. Finally, we highlight the clinical and research opportunities related to PSMA-targeted theranostics and describe the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in this space.

Prostate Cancer Theranostics: From Target Description to Imaging

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is the investigation of choice for imaging prostate cancer. Demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy, PSMA-PET/CT detects disease at very early stages of recurrence, where the chances of a definitive cure may be at their greatest. A number of PSMA-radioligands are in established clinical routine, and there are currently only limited data and no single tracer can clearly be advocated over the others at present. Further clinical trial data, comparing and contrasting radiotracers and reporting outcome-based data are necessary to further increase the implementation of this very promising imaging modality.

Focal unspecific bone uptake on [18F]-PSMA-1007 PET: a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the distribution, frequency, and quantitative parameters of a potential pitfall in prostate cancer imaging

Purpose

Improved logistics and availability led to a rapid increase in the use of [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 for prostate cancer PET imaging. Initial data suggests increased uptake in benign lesions compared to [⁶⁸ Ga]-PSMA-11, and clinical observations found increased unspecific bone uptake (UBU). We therefore investigate the frequency and characteristics of UBU in [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 PET.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 PET scans from four centers for the presence of UBU, defined as a focal mild-to-moderate uptake (SUV_max < 10.0) not obviously related to a benign or malignant cause. If present, up to three leading UBUs were quantified (SUV_max), localized, and correlated to clinical parameters, such as age, PSA, injected dose, Gleason score, tumor size (T1–T4), and type of PET scanner (analog vs. digital). Additionally, clinical and imaging follow-up results and therapeutic impact were evaluated.

Results

UBUs were identified in 179 out of 348 patients (51.4%). The most frequent localizations were ribs (57.5%) and pelvis (24.8%). The frequency of UBUs was not associated with PSA, Gleason score, tumor size, age, or the injected [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 dose. UBUs were significantly more frequent in images obtained with digital PET/CT scans (n = 74, 82%) than analog PET/CT scans (n = 221, 40.3%) (p = .0001) but not in digital PET/MR (n = 53, 51%) (p = .1599). In 80 out of 179 patients (44.7%), the interpretation of UBUs was critical for therapeutic management and therefore considered clinically relevant. For 65 UBUs, follow-ups were available: three biopsies, three radiotherapies with PSA follow-up, and 59 cases with imaging. After follow-up, UBUs were still considered unclear in 28 of 65 patients (43%), benign in 28 (43%), and malignant in nine (14%) patients.

Conclusion

UBUs occur in two-thirds of patients imaged with [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and are significantly more frequent on digital PET scanners than analog scanners. UBUs should be interpreted carefully to avoid over-staging.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05424-x.

18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT imaging versus conventional imaging alone to guide postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer (EMPIRE-1): a single centre, open-label, phase 2/3 randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Molecular imaging is increasingly used to guide treatment decisions and planning in prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the role of ¹⁸F-fluciclovine-PET/CT in improving cancer control compared with conventional imaging (bone scan and either CT or MRI) alone for salvage postprostatectomy radiotherapy.

METHODS

In EMPIRE-1, a single-centre, open-label, phase 2/3 randomised controlled trial, patients with prostate cancer with detectable PSA after prostatectomy and negative conventional imaging (no extrapelvic or bone findings) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to radiotherapy directed by conventional imaging alone or to conventional imaging plus ¹⁸F-fluciclovine-PET/CT. Computer-generated randomisation was stratified by PSA concentration, adverse pathology indicators, and androgen deprivation therapy intent. In the ¹⁸F-fluciclovine-PET/CT group, radiotherapy decisions were rigidly determined by PET findings, which were also used for target delineation. The primary endpoint was 3 year event-free survival, with events defined as biochemical or clinical recurrence or progression, or initiation of systemic therapy, using univariate and multivariable analyses in patients who received radiotherapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01666808 and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

From Sept 18, 2012, to March 4, 2019, 165 patients were randomly assigned, with median follow-up of 3·52 years (95% CI 2·98-3·95). PET findings resulted in four patients in the ¹⁸F-fluciclovine-PET/CT group having radiotherapy aborted; these patients were excluded from survival analyses. Median survival was not reached (95% CI 35·2-not reached; 33% of 81 patients had events) in the conventional imaging group compared with not reached (95% CI not reached-not reached; 20% of 76 patients) in the ¹⁸F-fluciclovine-PET/CT group, and 3 year event-free survival was 63·0% (95% CI 49·2-74·0) in the conventional imaging group versus 75·5% (95% CI 62·5-84·6) for ¹⁸F-fluciclovine-PET/CT (difference 12·5; 95% CI 4·3-20·8; p=0·0028). In adjusted analyses, study group (hazard ratio 2·04 [95% CI 1·06-3·93], p=0·0327) was significantly associated with event-free survival. Toxicity was similar in both study groups, with the most common adverse events being late urinary frequency or urgency (37 [46%] of 81 patients in the conventional imaging group and 31 [41%] of 76 in the PET group), and acute diarrhoea (11 [14%] in the conventional imaging group and 16 [21%] in the PET group).

INTERPRETATION

Inclusion of ¹⁸F-fluciclovine-PET into postprostatectomy radiotherapy decision making and planning significantly improved survival free from biochemical recurrence or persistence. Integration of novel PET radiotracers into radiotherapy decisions and planning for prostate cancer patients warrants further study.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute, Blue Earth Diagnostics, and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.

Oligodendroglioma in 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common cancers affecting men worldwide, with a high recurrence rate after therapy. 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-fluciclovine are PET imaging tracers for the detection of recurrence sites in PC patients. 68Ga-PSMA-11 is a membrane antigen overexpressed by tumor cells, whereas 18F-fluciclovine targets increased amino acid transporter in the membrane of cancer cells. We report a case of an 83-year-old man with known oligodendroglioma and biochemically recurrent PC who shows a high focal 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-fluciclovine uptake in the brain.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET in Prostate Cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiopharmaceuticals are playing a large role at the time of initial staging and biochemical recurrence for localizing prostate cancer, as well as in other emerging clinical settings. PSMA PET has demonstrated increased detection rate compared with conventional imaging and has been shown to change management plans in a substantial percentage of cases. The aims of this narrative review are to highlight the development and clinical impact of PSMA PET radiopharmaceuticals, to compare PSMA to other agents such as fluorine 18 fluciclovine and carbon 11 choline, and to highlight some of the individual PSMA PET agents that have contributed to the advancement of prostate cancer imaging.

18F-Fluciclovine PET for Assessment of Prostate Cancer with Histopathology as Reference Standard: A Systematic Review

The PET tracer ¹⁸F-fluciclovine (Axumin) was recently approved in the United States and Europe for men with suspected prostate cancer recurrence following prior treatment. This article summarizes studies where systematic sector-based histopathology was used as reference standard to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the tracer ¹⁸F-fluciclovine PET in patients with prostate cancer.

18F-Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis

Background: to explore the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-Fluciclovine positron-emission tomography (PET) in prostate cancer (PCa), considering both primary staging prior to radical therapy, biochemical recurrence, and advanced setting. Methods: A systematic web search through Embase and Medline was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies performed from 2011 to 2020 were evaluated. The terms used were “PET” or “positron emission tomography” or “positron emission tomography/computed tomography” or “PET/CT” or “positron emission tomography-computed tomography” or “PET-CT” and “Fluciclovine” or “FACBC” and “prostatic neoplasms” or “prostate cancer” or “prostate carcinoma”. Only studies reporting about true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) findings of 18F-fluciclovine PET were considered eligible. Results: Fifteen out of 283 studies, and 697 patients, were included in the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for diagnosis of primary PCa was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80–0.86), the specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74–0.80). The pooled sensitivity for preoperative LN staging was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.39–0.73) and specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94–1.00). The pooled sensitivity for the overall detection of recurrence in relapsed patients was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63–0.73), and specificity of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60–0.75). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed promising results in term of sensitivity and specificity for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT to stage the primary lesion and in the assessment of nodal metastases, and for the detection of PCa locations in the recurrent setting. However, the limited number of studies and the broad heterogeneity in the selected cohorts and in different investigation protocols are limitation affecting the strength of these results.