Incidence of Radioembolization-Induced Liver Disease and Liver Toxicity Following Repeat 90Y-Radioembolization: Outcomes at a Large Tertiary Care Center

Recommendations for the management of yttrium-90 radioembolization in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: a multidisciplinary review

PURPOSE

Strategies for the treatment of liver metastases from colon cancer (lmCRC) are constantly evolving. Radioembolization with yttrium 90 (Y-90 TARE) has made significant advancements in treating liver tumors and is now considered a potential option allowing for future resection. This study reviewed the scientific evidence and developed recommendations for using Y-90 TARE as a treatment strategy for patients with unresectable lmCRC.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary scientific committee, consisting of experts in medical oncology, hepatobiliary surgery, radiology, and nuclear medicine, all with extensive experience in treating patients with ImCRC with Y-90 TARE, led this project. The committee established the criteria for conducting a comprehensive literature review on Y-90 TARE in the treatment of lmCRC. The data extraction process involved addressing initial preliminary inquiries, which were consolidated into a final set of questions.

RESULTS

This review offers recommendations for treating patients with lmCRC using Y-90 TARE, addressing four areas covering ten common questions: 1) General issues (multidisciplinary tumor committee, indications for treatment, contraindications); 2) Previous process (predictive biomarkers for patient selection, preintervention tests, published evidence); 3) Procedure (standard procedure); and 4) Post-intervention follow-up (potential toxicity and its management, parameters for evaluation, quality of life).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the insights of the multidisciplinary committee, this document offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects involved in the management of Y-90 TARE. It synthesizes recommendations for applying Y-90 TARE across various phases of the treatment process.

AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 14.a: Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization

Radioembolization using Yttrium-90 (90 Y) microspheres is widely used to treat primary and metastatic liver tumors. The present work provides minimum practice guidelines for establishing and supporting such a program. Medical physicists play a key role in patient and staff safety during these procedures. Products currently available are identified and their properties and suppliers summarized. Appropriateness for use is the domain of the treating physician. Patient work up starts with pre-treatment imaging. First, a mapping study using Technetium-99m (Tc-99m ) is carried out to quantify the lung shunt fraction (LSF) and to characterize the vascular supply of the liver. An MRI, CT, or a PET-CT scan is used to obtain information on the tumor burden. The tumor volume, LSF, tumor histology, and other pertinent patient characteristics are used to decide the type and quantity of 90 Y to be ordered. On the day of treatment, the appropriate dose is assayed using a dose calibrator with a calibration traceable to a national standard. In the treatment suite, the care team led by an interventional radiologist delivers the dose using real-time image guidance. The treatment suite is posted as a radioactive area during the procedure and staff wear radiation dosimeters. The treatment room, patient, and staff are surveyed post-procedure. The dose delivered to the patient is determined from the ratio of pre-treatment and residual waste exposure rate measurements. Establishing such a treatment modality is a major undertaking requiring an institutional radioactive materials license amendment complying with appropriate federal and state radiation regulations and appropriate staff training commensurate with their respective role and function in the planning and delivery of the procedure. Training, documentation, and areas for potential failure modes are identified and guidance is provided to ameliorate them.

Evaluation of results after 112 radioembolizations with 90Y-microspheres

AIM

To determine the results of radioembolization transarterial (TARE), in the treatment of liver tumors, a retrospective evaluation was performed after 112 TARE with ⁹⁰Y-microspheres administered in 82 patients in a single hospital, analyzing efficacy and safety, after a follow-up greater than or equal to 1 year post-TARE in all patients, and evaluating the possible relationship between treatment response and patient survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have administered 57 single TARE and 55 multiple TARE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (53), liver metastases (25) and cholangiocarcinoma (4), with prior multidisciplinary evaluation, clinical, angiographic and gammagraphic (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT with ^99mTc-MAA), multicompartment model (MIRD equations), post-TARE screening (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT), clinical and radiological follow-up, tumor response evaluation (mRECIST criteria) and Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine progression-free survival and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Therapeutic intention was palliative (82%) and as bridge to liver transplantation/surgical resection (17%). We obtained response (R), complete or partial, in 65.9% of cases. One year after TARE 34.7% of patients with R and 19.2% of non-R were progression-free (p: 0.003), with OS of 80% for R and 37.5% for non-R (p: 0.001). Survival analysis showed median OS of 18 months (95% CI 15.7-20.3) for R and 9 months (95% CI 6.1-11.8) for non-R (p: 0.03). We found mild (27.6%) and severe (5.3%) side effects, all of them resolved, without higher incidence after multiple TARE.

CONCLUSION

TARE with ⁹⁰Y-microspheres, in appropriately selected patients with liver tumors, provides therapeutic efficacy and low rate of toxicity, with higher progression-free survival and OS in patients with TARE response compared to those who did not respond.

Predictive Factors for Adverse Event Outcomes After Transarterial Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres in Europe: Results from the Prospective Observational CIRT Study

BACKGROUND

Using data collected in the prospective observational study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy, the present study aimed at identifying predictors of adverse events (AEs) following transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres for liver tumours.

METHODS

We analysed 1027 patients enrolled between January 2015 and December 2017 and followed up for 24 months. Four hundred and twenty-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 120 with intrahepatic carcinoma (ICC), 237 with colorectal liver metastases and 248 with liver metastases from other primaries were included. Prognostic factors were calculated with a univariable analysis by using the overall AEs burden score (AEBS).

RESULTS

All-cause AEs were reported in 401/1027 (39.1%) patients, with AEs associated with TARE, such as abdominal pain (16.6%), fatigue (17%), and nausea (11.7%) reported most frequently. Grade 3 or higher AEs were reported in 92/1027 (9%) patients. Reports on grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal ulcerations (0.4%), gastritis (0.3%), radiation cholecystitis (0.2%) or radioembolization-induced liver disease (0.5%) were uncommon. Univariable analysis showed that in HCC, AEBS increased for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 (p = 0.0045), 1 tumour nodule (0.0081),  > 1 TARE treatment (p = 0.0224), no prophylactic embolization (p = 0.0211), partition model dosimetry (p = 0.0007) and unilobar treatment target (0.0032). For ICC,  > 1 TARE treatment was associated with an increase in AEBS (p = 0.0224), and for colorectal liver metastases, ECOG 0 (p = 0.0188), > 2 prior systemic treatments (p = 0.0127), and 1 tumour nodule (p = 0.0155) were associated with an increased AEBS.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that TARE is a safe treatment with low toxicity and a minimal impact on quality of life.

Number of Local Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Peri-Operative Outcomes after Liver Transplantation

The wait times for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) listed for liver transplant are longer than ever, which has led to an increased reliance on the use of pre-operative LRTs. The impact that multiple rounds of LRTs have on peri-operative outcomes following transplant is unknown. This was a retrospective single center analysis of 298 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent liver transplant (January 2017 to May 2021). The data was obtained from two institution-specific databases and the TransQIP database. Of the 298 patients, 27 (9.1%) underwent no LRTs, 156 (52.4%) underwent 1-2 LRTs, and 115 (38.6%) underwent ≥3 LRTs prior to LT. The patients with ≥3 LRTs had a significantly higher rate of bile leak compared to patients who received 1-2 LRTs (7.0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.014). Unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses demonstrated a significant association between the total number of LRTs administered and bile leak, but not rates of overall biliary complications. The total number of LRTs was not significantly associated with any other peri-operative or post-operative outcome measure. These findings support the aggressive use of LRTs to control HCC in patients awaiting liver transplant, with further evaluation needed to confirm the biliary leak findings.

EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds

Primary liver tumours (i.e. hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)) are among the most frequent cancers worldwide. However, only 10-20% of patients are amenable to curative treatment, such as resection or transplant. Liver metastases are most frequently caused by colorectal cancer, which accounts for the second most cancer-related deaths in Europe. In both primary and secondary tumours, radioembolization has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. The vast potential of personalized dosimetry has also been shown, resulting in markedly increased response rates and overall survival. In a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, the role of radioembolization will be subject to changes. Therefore, the decision for radioembolization should be taken by a multidisciplinary tumour board in accordance with the current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this procedure guideline is to assist the nuclear medicine physician in treating and managing patients undergoing radioembolization treatment. PREAMBLE: The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide among individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. These guidelines are intended to assist practitioners in providing appropriate nuclear medicine care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals taking into account the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set out in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. The practice of medicine involves not only the science but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognised that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

Repeated Transarterial Radioembolization Adverse Event and Hepatotoxicity Profile in Cirrhotic Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

The study aimed to evaluate the adverse event (AE) and hepatotoxicity profile, including radioembolization induced liver disease (REILD), following repeat radioembolization (RE) to the same or overlapping vascular territories in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and limited functional hepatic reserve/cirrhosis.

Methods

Nine patients (seven male and two female; median age, 66 years) with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent repeat RE (cycle 1 and cycle 2) between January 2012 and August 2019 were included. Patient demographics, clinical and treatment history, and pertinent laboratory values were recorded at baseline and post-treatment time points over a period of four months. Post-RE AE/hepatotoxicity was assessed, organized by type and frequency, and graded by severity according to the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0). To assess rudimentary comparisons for post-RE hepatotoxicity vs. factors of interest, Spearman's rank correlation/rho was calculated, and all relevant plots were constructed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed along with associated median survival time. All statistical analyses were performed with Stata v16.1.

Results

Following cycle 1, 22 objective AE were identified according to CTCAE v.5 (17 grade I, four grade II, and one grade III), with grade I, II, and III AE experienced by 78%, 33%, and 11% of patients, respectively. Following cycle 2, 19 objective AE were identified according to CTCAE v.5 (11 grade I, seven grade II, and one grade III), with grade I, II, and III AE experienced by 89%, 56%, and 11% of patients, respectively. A single patient developed REILD after cycle 1, which progressed to fatal REILD following cycle 2. Following cycle 2, an additional patient advanced from less severe hepatotoxicity to REILD. Following cycle 2, positive correlations between the higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD; rho=0.70) and Child-Pugh (rho=0.74) scores and degree of post-RE hepatotoxicity/REILD appear to emerge. Post-repeat RE median overall survival was 12.5 months.

Conclusion

Post-RE hepatotoxicity following repeat RE to the same or overlapping vascular territories in patients with limited functional hepatic reserve/cirrhosis is a common occurrence with variable severity ranging from transient laboratory derangement to fatal REILD. Lack of a consensus REILD definition and grading scale results in non-uniform reporting of incidence as well as clinical and laboratory features of the disease process. Strides aimed at improving clinical characterization, forming a more complete diagnostic definition, and establishing a uniform grading system with respect to REILD are of particular importance and would ultimately improve repeat RE patient selection and risk management. 

Role of Resin Microsphere Y90 Dosimetry in Predicting Objective Tumor Response, Survival and Treatment Related Toxicity in Surgically Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Retrospective Single Institution Study

Simple Summary

Colorectal liver metastases are difficult to treat, with only a minority of patients eligible for surgical resection. Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy is an alternative treatment currently used for patients who have progressed on chemotherapy. A technique called dosimetry allows clinicians to analyze how much radiation was delivered to target lesions post-treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship of various dosimetric parameters with objective tumor response, overall survival, and treatment related toxicity with the potential goal of optimizing Yttrium-90 treatment in this patient population. Additionally, other potential predictors of survival outcomes, including clinical and demographic factors, were also evaluated. We found that delivering a mean tumor dose ≥100 Gy when using resin microspheres was significantly associated with objective tumor response and prolonged overall survival. In this study, no mean non-tumoral liver dose threshold was found to predict treatment related toxicity.

Abstract

Purpose: To Evaluate the correlation between tumor dosimetric parameters with objective tumor response (OR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with surgically unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) undergoing resin-based Ytrrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (Y90 SIRT). Materials and Methods: 45 consecutive patients with CRLM underwent resin-based Y90 SIRT in one or both hepatic lobes (66 treated lobes total). Dose volume histograms were created with MIM Sureplan^® v.6.9 using post-treatment SPECT/CT. Dosimetry analyses were based on the cumulative volume of the five largest tumors in each treatment session and non-tumoral liver (NTL) dose. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate tumor dosimetric factors in predicting OR by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors at 3 months post-Y90. Additionally, ROC curve was used to evaluate non-tumoral liver dose as a predictor of grade ≥ 3 liver toxicity and radioembolization induced liver disease (REILD) 3 months post Y90. To minimize for potential confounding demographic and clinical factors, univariate and multivariate analysis of survival with mean tumor dose as one of the factors were also performed. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used for OS analysis from initial Y90 SIRT. Results: 26 out of 45 patients had OR with a median OS of 17.2 months versus 6.8 months for patients without OR (p < 0.001). Mean tumor dose (TD) of the five largest tumors was the strongest predictor of OR with an area under the curve of 0.73 (p < 0.001). Minimum TD, and TD to 30%, 50%, and 70% of tumor volume also predicted OR (p’s < 0.05). Mean TD ≥ 100 Gy predicted a significantly prolonged median OS of 19 vs. 11 months for those receiving TD < 100 Gy (p = 0.016). On univariate analysis, mean TD < 100 Gy, presence of any genomic mutation, presence of MAPK pathway mutation, bilobar hepatic metastases and diffuse metastatic disease (>10 lesions per liver lobe) were found to be predictors of shorter median OS. On multivariate analysis, mean TD < 100 Gy, presence of any genomic mutation, and diffuse hepatic metastatic disease were found to be independent predictors of shorter OS. Overall, six (13.3%) patients developed grade ≥ 3 liver toxicity post Y90 of whom two (4.4%) patients developed REILD. No dose threshold predicting grade ≥ 3 liver toxicity or REILD was identified. Conclusions: Mean TD ≥ 100 Gy in patients with unresectable CRLM undergoing resin-based Y90 SIRT predicts OR and prolonged OS.

Conventional Hepatic Volumetry May Lead to Inaccurate Segmental Yttrium-90 Radiation Dosimetry

OBJECTIVE

To compare radioembolization treatment zone volumes from mapping cone beam CT (CBCT) versus planning CT/MRI and to model their impact on dosimetry.

METHODS

Y90 cases were retrospectively identified in which intra-procedural CBCT angiograms were performed. Segmental and lobar treatment zone volumes were calculated with semi-automated contouring using Couinaud venous anatomy (planning CT/MRI) or tumor angiosome enhancement (CBCT). Differences were compared with a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Treatment zone-specific differences in segmental volumes by volumetric method were also calculated and used to model differences in delivered dose using medical internal radiation dosimetry (MIRD) at 200 and 120 Gy targets. Anatomic, pathologic, and technical factors likely affecting segmental volumes by volumetric method were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty segmental and 48 lobar CBCT angiograms and corresponding planning CT/MRI scans were included. Median Couinaud- and CBCT-derived segmental volumes were 281 and 243 mL, respectively (p = 0.005). Differences between Couinaud and CBCT lobar volumes (right, left) were not significant (p = 0.24, p = 0.07). Couinaud overestimated segmental volumes in 28 cases by a median of 98 mL (83%) and underestimated in 12 cases by median 69 mL (20%). At a 200 Gy dose target, Couinaud estimates produced median delivered doses of 367 and 160 Gy in these 28 and 12 cases. At a 120 Gy target, Couinaud produced doses of 220 and 96 Gy. Proximal vs. distal microcatheter positioning, variant arterial anatomy, and tumor location on or near segmental watersheds were leading factors linked to volumetric differences.

CONCLUSION

Use of CBCT-based volumetry may allow more accurate, personalized dosimetry for segmental Y90 radioembolization.

Therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: overview, clinical indications, and comparative outcome evaluation. Part two: noncurative intention

Locoregional therapies can be offered to hepatocellular carcinoma patients as a bridge to transplant, to downstage disease burden for transplant eligibility, or for disease control to prolong survival. Systemic therapies also play a large role in HCC treatment, occasionally in conjunction with other methods. This manuscript reviews the various treatment options for HCC with a historically noncurative intent.

Determination of Tumor Dose Response Thresholds in Patients with Chemorefractory Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Resin and Glass-based Y90 Radioembolization

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacies of glass and resin-based Yttrium-90 microspheres by comparing absorbed tumor dose (TD) with both tumor response (TR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with chemorefractory intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Post-Y90 treatment bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT of 38 consecutive patients receiving 45 treatments (21 resin microspheres, 24 glass microspheres) were analyzed retrospectively. MIM software v6.9.4 (MIM Software Inc, Cleveland, OH) was used to calculate targeted tumors' dose volume histogram. Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was used to evaluate tumor response 3 months post-treatment. Kaplan Meier estimation was used for survival analysis. T-test was used to compare the devices on various dosimetric parameters.

RESULTS

Thresholds for TD to predict TR with ≥ 80% specificity were as follows: mean TD (Resin: 78.9 Gy; Glass: 254.7 Gy), maximum TD (Resin: 162.9 Gy; Glass: 591 Gy), minimum TD (Resin: 53.7 Gy; Glass: 149.1 Gy). Microsphere type had no effect on survival from first Y90 (Resin: 11.2 mo; Glass 10.9 mo [p = 0.548]). In patients receiving resin microspheres, mean TD ≥ 75 Gy or maximum TD ≥ 150 Gy was associated with median OS of 20.2 mo compared to 6.5 mo for those receiving less (p = 0.001, 0.002, respectively). For patients treated with glass microspheres, those receiving a mean TD ≥ 150 Gy had a median OS of 14.6 mo vs. 2.6 mo for those receiving less (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

TD thresholds predictive of TR and OS differ significantly between glass and resin microspheres. However, microsphere type has no impact on survival in patients with chemorefractory ICC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, Retrospective Study.