Segmentation in Non-Small Cell Lung Tumors Using 18F-FDG PET/CT: Tips and Rules

Analytical performance validation of aPROMISE platform for prostate tumor burden, index and dominant tumor assessment with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. A pilot study

To validate the performance of automated Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (aPROMISE) in quantifying total prostate disease burden with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and to evaluate the interobserver and histopathologic concordance in the establishment of dominant and index tumor. Patients with a recent diagnosis of intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer underwent 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT for staging purpose. In positive-18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT scans, automated prostate tumor segmentation was performed using aPROMISE software and compared to an in-house semiautomatic-manual guided segmentation procedure. SUV and volume related variables were obtained with two softwares. A blinded evaluation of dominant tumor (DT) and index tumor (IT) location was assessed by both groups of observers. In histopathological analysis, Gleason, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) group, DT and IT location were obtained. We compared all the obtained variables by both software packages using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa coefficient (k) for the concordance analysis. Fifty-four patients with a positive 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were evaluated. The ICC for the SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, tumor volume (TV) and total lesion activity (TLA) was: 1, 0.833, 0.615, 0.494 and 0.950, respectively (p < 0.001 in all cases). For DT and IT detection, a high agreement was observed between both softwares (k = 0.733; p < 0.001 and k = 0.812; p < 0.001, respectively) although the concordances with histopathology were moderate (p < 0001). The analytical validation of aPROMISE showed a good performance for the SUVmax, TLA, DT and IT definition in comparison to our in-house method, although the concordance was moderate with histopathology for DT and IT.

SUVmax to tumor perimeter distance: a robust radiomics prognostic biomarker in resectable non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of novel geometric variables obtained from pre-treatment [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT with respect to classical ones in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Retrospective study including stage I-III NSCLC patients with baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT. Clinical, histopathologic, and metabolic parameters were obtained. After tumor segmentation, SUV and volume-based variables, global texture, sphericity, and two novel parameters, normalized SUVpeak to centroid distance (nSCD) and normalized SUVmax to perimeter distance (nSPD), were obtained. Early recurrence (ER) and short-term mortality (STM) were used as end points. Univariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression with respect to ER and STM were performed.

RESULTS

A cohort of 173 patients was selected. ER was detected in 49/104 of patients with recurrent disease. Additionally, 100 patients died and 53 had STM. Age, pathologic lymphovascular invasion, lymph nodal infiltration, TNM stage, nSCD, and nSPD were associated with ER, although only age (aOR = 1.06, p = 0.002), pathologic lymphovascular invasion (aOR = 3.40, p = 0.022), and nSPD (aOR = 0.02, p = 0.018) were significant independent predictors of ER in multivariate analysis. Age, lymph nodal infiltration, TNM stage, nSCD, and nSPD were predictors of STM. Age (aOR = 1.05, p = 0.006), lymph nodal infiltration (aOR = 2.72, p = 0.005), and nSPD (aOR = 0.03, p = 0.022) were significantly associated with STM in multivariate analysis. Coefficient of variation (COV) and SUVmean/SUVmax ratio did not show significant predictive value with respect to ER or STM.

CONCLUSION

The geometric variables, nSCD and nSPD, are robust biomarkers of the poorest outcome prediction of patients with NSCLC with respect to classical PET variables.

KEY POINTS

• In NSCLC patients, it is crucial to find prognostic parameters since TNM system alone cannot explain the variation in lung cancer survival. • Age, lymphovascular invasion, lymph nodal infiltration, and metabolic geometrical parameters were useful as prognostic parameters. • The displacement grade of the highest point of metabolic activity towards the periphery assessed by geometric variables obtained from [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT was a robust biomarker of the poorest outcome prediction of patients with NSCLC.