Wei W, Ji Y, Tang Z, Huang X, Zhang W, Luo N. Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Predict Ki67 Discordance Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Samples.
J Magn Reson Imaging 2023;
57:85-94. [PMID:
35648113 DOI:
10.1002/jmri.28231]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Disagreement in assessments of Ki67 expression based on core-needle biopsy and matched surgical samples complicates decisions in the treatment of breast cancer.
PURPOSE
To examine whether preoperative breast MRI could be useful in predicting Ki67 discordance between core-needle biopsy and surgical samples.
STUDY TYPE
Retrospective.
POPULATION
Three hundred and sixty-five breast cancer patients with MRI scans and having both core-needle biopsy and surgical samples from 2017 to 2019.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE
3.0 T, T2-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation sequence, diffusion-weighted sequence using b-values 0/1000, dynamic contrast enhanced image by volume imaged breast assessme NT.
ASSESSMENT
We collected clinicopathologic variables and preoperative MRI features (tumor size, lesion type, shape of mass, spiculated margin, internal enhancement, peri-tumoral edema, intra-tumoral necrosis, multifocal/multicentric, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] minimum, ADC mean, ADC maximum, ADC difference).
STATISTICAL TESTS
K-means clustering, multivariable logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curve.
RESULTS
Sixty-one patients showed Ki67 discordance and 304 patients show Ki67 concordance according to our definition using K-means clustering. Multivariable regression analysis showed that the following parameters were independently associated with Ki67 discordance: peri-tumoral edema, odds ratio (OR) 2.662, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.432-4.948; ADCmin ≤ 0.829 × 10-3 mm2 /sec, OR 2.180, 95% CI 1.075-4.418; and ADCdiff > 0.317 × 10-3 mm2 /sec, OR 3.365, 95% CI 1.698-6.669. This multivariable model resulted in an AUC of 0.758 (95% CI 0.711-0.802) with sensitivity and specificity being 0.803 and 0.621, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Presence of peri-tumoral edema, smaller ADCmin and greater ADCdiff in preoperative breast MRI may indicate high risk of Ki67 discordance between core-needle biopsy and surgical samples. For patients with these MRI-based risk factors, clinicians should not rely on Ki67 assessment only from core-needle biopsy.
Collapse