1
|
Laxague F, Fnais N, Son HY, Alzahrani F, Mymryk JS, Barrett JW, Tay KY, Leung A, Theurer J, Nichols AC, Palma DA. Outcomes for potentially Resectable patients undergoing primary chemoradiation treatment for T1-T2 HPV Negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2024. [PMID: 38779999 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transoral surgical resectability (TOS) is a prognostic factor for patients with HPV+ T1-2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) disease undergoing radiotherapy (RT), but it is unclear whether this holds for HPV-negative (HPV-) patients. We aimed to compare outcomes of potential TOS-candidates vs. non-TOS candidates, among patients who underwent RT/CRT for early T-stage HPV- OPSCC. METHODS For patients treated with RT/CRT for early T-stage HPV-negative OPSCC between 2014 and 2021, pretreatment imaging was reviewed by four head-and-neck surgeons, masked to clinical outcomes, to assess primary-site suitability for TOS. Extracapsular extension (ECE) was assessed by a head-and-neck neuroradiologist. We compared outcomes based on surgical resectability relating to: (1) the primary site tumor alone, and (2) the primary site plus the absence/presence of ECE (overall assessment). Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS Seventy patients were included in the analysis. The primary site was TOS-favorable in 46/70 (66%). Based on the overall assessment, 41/70 (58.6%) were TOS-favorable. The 3-year OS, DSS and PFS for primary site TOS-favorable versus unfavorable were OS: 76.9% versus 37.4%; DSS: 78.1% versus 46.2%, PFS: 69.9% versus 41.3%, (log-rank test = 0.01, 0.03, 0.04; respectively). Additionally, patients with an overall assessment of TOS favorability demonstrated better survival outcomes compared with TOS-unfavorable patients (OS: 77.3% vs. 46.2%; DSS: 78.2% vs. 56.5%, PFS: 72.3% vs. 42.1%, log-rank test = 0.01, 0.04, 0.01; respectively). CONCLUSION Patients with TOS-favorable HPV-negative early T-stage OPSCC have superior survival outcomes than TOS-unfavorable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Laxague
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Aleman of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Naif Fnais
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hee Young Son
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Busan, South Korea
| | - Faisal Alzahrani
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Joe S Mymryk
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - John W Barrett
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Keng Yow Tay
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Leung
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Theurer
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony C Nichols
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A Palma
- Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oberhelman N, Bruening J, Jackson RS, Van Abel KM, Sumer B, Holsinger FC, Chan JYK, Gross ND, Clayburgh DR, Andersen PE, Li RJ. Comparison of da Vinci Single Port vs Si Systems for Transoral Robotic-Assisted Surgery: A Review With Technical Insights. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 150:165-171. [PMID: 38127360 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.3994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Importance Transoral robot-assisted surgery (TORS) continues to have a major role in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. As new iterations of robotic technology are increasingly utilized, it is important to share learning experiences and clinical outcomes data, to optimize technical efficiency and clinical care. Observations This was a retrospective review of a large academic institution's initial clinical use of the da Vinci Single Port (SP) compared with the da Vinci Si (Si) system. A total of 205 TORS cases were reviewed: 109 in the SP group (November 22, 2018, through September 30, 2020), and 96 in the Si group (January 1, 2016, through November 12, 2018). Both groups had comparable operative times, rates of postoperative pharyngeal hemorrhage, length of hospital stay, and duration of nasogastric feeding tube use. There was no difference in pathological characteristics, rates of positive margins, or indications for or time to initiation of adjuvant therapy between the groups. The collective experience of 6 faculty members-who have trained 139 TORS surgeons for the SP system rollout-was compiled to provide a summary of learning experiences and technical notes on safe and efficient operation of the SP system. Conclusions and Relevance This Review found that the functional and oncologic outcomes were comparable between TORS cases performed with the Si and SP systems, and they had similar complication rates. Recognized advantages of the SP over the Si system include the availability of bipolar-energized instruments, a usable third surgical arm, and improved camera image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Oberhelman
- Department of Surgery, Section Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jennifer Bruening
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Ryan S Jackson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Kathryn M Van Abel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, the University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas
| | - F Christopher Holsinger
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jason Y K Chan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
| | - Neil D Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Daniel R Clayburgh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Peter E Andersen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Ryan J Li
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brahmbhatt S, Overfield CJ, Rhyner PA, Bhatt AA. Imaging of the Posttreatment Head and Neck: Expected Findings and Potential Complications. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2024; 6:e230155. [PMID: 38276904 PMCID: PMC10825710 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Interpretation of posttreatment imaging findings in patients with head and neck cancer can pose a substantial challenge. Malignancies in this region are often managed through surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and newer approaches like immunotherapy. After treatment, patients may experience various expected changes, including mucositis, soft-tissue inflammation, laryngeal edema, and salivary gland inflammation. Imaging techniques such as CT, MRI, and PET scans help differentiate these changes from tumor recurrence. Complications such as osteoradionecrosis, chondroradionecrosis, and radiation-induced vasculopathy can arise because of radiation effects. Radiation-induced malignancies may occur in the delayed setting. This review article emphasizes the importance of posttreatment surveillance imaging to ensure proper care of patients with head and neck cancer and highlights the complexities in distinguishing between expected treatment effects and potential complications. Keywords: CT, MR Imaging, Radiation Therapy, Ear/Nose/Throat, Head/Neck, Nervous-Peripheral, Bone Marrow, Calvarium, Carotid Arteries, Jaw, Face, Larynx © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneh Brahmbhatt
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd,
Cannaday Building and Davis Building, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Cameron J. Overfield
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd,
Cannaday Building and Davis Building, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Patricia A. Rhyner
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd,
Cannaday Building and Davis Building, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Alok A. Bhatt
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd,
Cannaday Building and Davis Building, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2023; 2023:7487306. [PMID: 36816366 PMCID: PMC9931478 DOI: 10.1155/2023/7487306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Objective Radiofrequency coblation (RFC) is a relatively new method that has opened up new perspectives in treating oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study was designed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of RFC-assisted transoral surgery (RFC-TOS) for primary OPSCC. Methods Sixty-nine cases of OPSCC from February 2005 to November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 31 in the RFC-TOS group and 38 in the open surgery group. No difference was observed in demographic and oncological characteristics. Results The significance between the RFC-TOS group and the open surgery group was proved in intraoperative bleeding volume (34.10 ± 10.10 ml vs. 193.68 ± 21.00 ml, P < 0.001), durations of surgery (79.58 ± 8.45 min vs. 217.87 ± 17.65 min, P < 0.001), time to resume oral feeding (1.64 ± 0.41 d vs. 11.58 ± 1.41 d, P < 0.001), duration of hospitalization (7.84 ± 0.66 d vs. 15.66 ± 1.62 d, P < 0.001), and the total costs (22846.22 ± 1821.55¥ vs. 41792.24 ± 4150.86¥, P < 0.001). The rates of 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-yeardisease-specific survival (DSS), and 5-year local control rate (LC) were 69.1%, 71.7%, and 75.7%, respectively, in the RFC-TOS group and 71.0%, 73.4%, and 73.7% in the open surgery group (P > 0.05). Conclusions RFC-TOS is a feasible alternative transoral approach for OPSCC. The reported perioperative and oncologic outcomes are satisfactory.
Collapse
|