Pneumothorax Rate and Diagnostic Adequacy of Computed Tomography-guided Lung Nodule Biopsies Performed With 18 G Versus 20 G Needles: A Cross-Sectional Study

18F-FDG PET/CT anatomic and metabolic guidance in CT-guided lung biopsies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT as a metabolic guide in increasing the accuracy, diagnostic yield and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle lung biopsy (PNB).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective analysis of 340 consecutive patients with suspicious lung nodules, masses or extensive disease that underwent lung biopsy over a 3-year period. Patients were divided into three groups; those that had PET/CT prior to the biopsy, those that had PET-CT following the biopsy and those who did not undergo PET-CT. Correlation was made with the histopathological result.

RESULTS

353 PNBs were performed (median lesion size 30 mm, 7-120 mm) with overall diagnostic rate of 83.9 % (95.8 % malignant). Biopsy success rate was 88.8 % with PET-CT pre-PNB, versus 78.9 % of 175 PNB without PET-CT upfront (p < 0.01 Fisher exact test). Correct targeting to PET-CT-maximum activity area (MAA) was present in 87.1 %. Biopsy success rate was 88.8 % for PNBs targeting the PET-CT-MAA region and only 52.8 % for PNBs not targeting the PET-CT-MAA (p < 0.0001). PET-CT pre-PNB had higher rates of PET-CT-MAA targeting compared to PET-CT post PNB (91.0 % v 80.0 %, p = 0.01). The availability of PET-CT before the PNB lead to significantly increased biopsy success rates in patients with a mass (OR:7.01p = 0.004), compared to a nodule (p = 0.498) or multiple nodules (p = 0.163). Patients with a PET-CT pre-PNB underwent fewer PNB passes (mean 2.6 v 3.1, p < 0.0001 Mann Whitney U). Serious complications were less common in PET-CT pre-PNB group (4.5 % v 10.9 %, p < 0.05). Pre-PNB PET-CT performance improvement applied to all 3 radiologists and was greatest for masses and infiltrative abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Metabolic information provided by 18F-FDG PET/CT and PNB localisation to the PET-CT maximum activity region is associated with higher diagnostic biopsy rates especially in masses and appears to account for improved performance, less needle passes and complications when available pre-biopsy.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Incidentally Detected Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodule

Incidental pulmonary nodules are common. Although the majority are benign, most are indeterminate for malignancy when first encountered making their management challenging. CT remains the primary imaging modality to first characterize and follow-up incidental lung nodules. This document reviews available literature on various imaging modalities and summarizes management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected incidentally. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Percutaneous Transthoracic Lung Biopsy: Optimizing Yield and Mitigating Risk

ABSTRACT

Percutaneous computed tomography-guided transthoracic lung biopsy is an effective and minimally invasive procedure to achieve tissue diagnosis. Radiologists are key in appropriate referral for further workup, with percutaneous computed tomography-guided transthoracic lung biopsy performed by both thoracic and general interventionalists. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided transthoracic lung biopsy is increasingly performed for both diagnostic and research purposes, including molecular analysis. Multiple patient, lesion, and technique-related variables influence diagnostic accuracy and complication rates. A comprehensive understanding of these factors aids in procedure planning and may serve to maximize diagnostic yield while minimizing complications, even in the most challenging scenarios.

Pneumothorax after CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: A comparison between immediate and delayed occurrence

Background

In CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy (CTLB), pneumothorax can occur as a late complication (delayed pneumothorax). The incidence, risk factors, and clinical significance of delayed pneumothorax are not well known.

Objectives

To compare the risk factors for immediate and delayed pneumothorax after CTLB and to know their clinical significance.

Methods

Images and medical records of 536 consecutive patients who underwent CTLB were reviewed. All biopsies were performed as inpatient procedures. Follow-up chest radiographs were obtained at least twice at 4 h after procedure and before discharge. Risk factors for immediate and delayed pneumothorax were assessed based on patient-, lesion-, and procedure-related variables. Rates of chest tube insertion were also compared.

Results

Pneumothorax developed in 161 patients (30.0%) including 135 (25.2%) immediate and 26 (4.9%) delayed cases. Lesion size was an independent risk factor for both immediate and delayed pneumothorax (OR = 0.813; CI = 0.717–0.922 and OR = 0.610; CI = 0.441–0.844, respectively). While emphysema, lower lobe location, and long intrapulmonary biopsy track were risk factors (OR = 1.981; CI = 1.172–3.344, OR = 3.505; CI = 2.718–5.650, and OR = 1.330; CI = 1.132–1.563, respectively) for immediate pneumothorax, upper lobe location and increased number of pleural punctures were independent risk factors (OR = 5.756; CI = 1.634–20.274 and OR = 3.738; CI = 1.860–7.511, respectively) for delayed pneumothorax. The rate of chest tube insertion was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in delayed pneumothorax.

Conclusion

Pneumothorax tends to occur immediately after CTLB in patients with emphysema, lower lobe lesion, and long intrapulmonary biopsy track. Further attention and warnings are needed for those with multiple punctures of small lesions involving upper lobes due to the possibility of delayed development of pneumothorax and higher requirement for chest tube drainage.

Ultrasound- Versus CT-Guided Subpleural Lung and Pleural Biopsy: An Analysis of Wait Times, Procedure Time, Safety, and Diagnostic Adequacy

PURPOSE

To compare the wait times, safety, and diagnostic adequacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous lung biopsies with ultrasound (US) guidance for subpleural lung and pleural lesions.

METHODS

Consecutive CT- and US-guided biopsies performed at our institution between January 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Biopsy wait times, lesion size, degree of pleural contact, procedure duration, number of needle passes, complications, and pathologic diagnosis were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 158 biopsies of subpleural or pleural-based lesions were reviewed. Forty-three cases utilized US guidance, while 115 cases used CT, 41 with conventional CT (CCT), and 74 with cone-beam CT guidance (CBCT). Overall, the mean lesion maximum axial diameter and length of pleural contact for US-guided biopsies was greater than for CT (4.8 ± 2.6 cm vs 3.2 ± 1.9 cm and 4.0 ± 2.5 cm vs 2.6 ± 1.7 cm, respectively, P < .001). Wait times for US-guided biopsies were significantly shorter than CCT by 10.9 days on average while being equivalent to CBCT. Procedure time was shorter for lesions localized with US than CT (29.5 ± 16.4 minutes vs 37.6 ± 19.5 minutes, P = .007) despite CT using less needle passes per lesion (3.5 ± 1.1 vs 3.1 ± 0.8, P = .034). Sample adequacy was equivalent for both modalities (88% for US and 92% for CT). The frequency of pneumothoraces was similar between US (12%) and CT (15%).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound and CT guidance have similar safety and diagnostic adequacy for subpleural lung and pleural biopsies. Ultrasound guidance has shorter wait and procedure times.