1
|
Dammann E, Ording-Müller LS, Franchi-Abella S, Verhagen MV, McGuirk SP, Bokkers RPH, Clapuyt PRM, Deganello A, Tandoi F, de Ville de Goyet J, Hebelka H, de Lange C, Lozach C, Marra P, Mirza D, Kaliciński P, Patsch JM, Perucca G, Tsiflikas I, Renz DM, Schweiger B, Spada M, Toso S, Viremouneix L, Woodley H, Fischer L, Brinkert F, Petit P, Herrmann J. European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (3) postoperative imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:276-284. [PMID: 38285190 PMCID: PMC10830633 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05842-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of postoperative complications. So far, limited data is available regarding the best radiologic approach to monitor children after liver transplantation. OBJECTIVE To harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases. This paper reports the responses related to postoperative imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey. RESULTS All sites commence ultrasound (US) monitoring within 24 h after liver transplantation. Monitoring frequency varies across sites, ranging from every 8 h to 72 h in early, and from daily to sporadic use in late postoperative phases. Predefined US protocols are used by 73% of sites. This commonly includes gray scale, color Doppler, and quantitative flow assessment. Alternative flow imaging techniques, contrast-enhanced US, and elastography are applied at 31.8%, 18.2%, and 63.6% of sites, respectively. Computed tomography is performed at 86.4% of sites when clarification is needed. Magnetic resonance imaging is used for selected cases at 36.4% of sites, mainly for assessment of biliary abnormalities or when blood tests are abnormal. CONCLUSION Diagnostic imaging is extensively used for postoperative surveillance of children after liver transplantation. While US is generally prioritized, substantial differences were noted in US protocol, timing, and monitoring frequency. The study highlights potential areas for future optimization and standardization of imaging, essential for conducting multicenter studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Dammann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lil-Sofie Ording-Müller
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital: Oslo universitetssykehus Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Martijn V Verhagen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Simon P McGuirk
- Department of Radiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Reinoud P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Francesco Tandoi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Hanna Hebelka
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Charlotte de Lange
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecile Lozach
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Marra
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Piotr Kaliciński
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Organ Transplantation, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janina M Patsch
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giulia Perucca
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilias Tsiflikas
- Department of Radiology, University Clinic of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diane M Renz
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hannover Medical School: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernd Schweiger
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marco Spada
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Seema Toso
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals: Hopitaux Universitaires Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Loïc Viremouneix
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Helen Woodley
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Brinkert
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philippe Petit
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Marseille, France
| | - Jochen Herrmann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Groth M, Fischer L, Herden U, Brinkert F, Beime J, Deindl P, Adam G, Herrmann J. Impact of probe-induced abdominal compression on two-dimensional shear wave elastography measurement of split liver transplants in children. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2023; 195:905-912. [PMID: 37137318 DOI: 10.1055/a-2049-9369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of probe-induced abdominal compression of split liver transplants (SLT) in children on 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) values. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 11 children (4.7 ± 4.8 years) who had undergone SLT and SWE were evaluated retrospectively. Elastograms were obtained with probes placed in an epigastric, midline position on the abdominal wall, with no and slight compression, using convex and linear transducers. For each identically positioned probe and condition, 12 serial elastograms were obtained and the SLT diameter was measured. Liver stiffness and degree of SLT compression were compared. RESULTS Slight probe pressure resulted in SLT compression, with a shorter distance between the cutis and the posterior margin of the liver transplant than in the measurement with no pressure (curved array, 5.0 ± 1.1 vs. 5.9 ± 1.3 cm, mean compression 15 %± 8 %; linear array, 4.7 ± 0.9 vs. 5.3 ± 1.0 cm, mean compression 12 %± 8 %; both p < 0.0001). The median liver stiffness was significantly greater with slight pressure than with no pressure (curved transducer, 13.38 ± 3.0 vs. 7.02 ± 1.7 kPa, p < 0.0001; linear transducer, 18.53 ± 7.1 vs. 9.03 ± 1.5 kPa, p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION Slight abdominal compression can significantly increase SWE values in children with left-lateral SLT. To obtain meaningful results and reduce operator dependency in free-hand examinations, probe pressure must be controlled carefully. KEY POINTS · Probe-induced compression can increase elastography values in split liver transplants in children. · In free-hand examination, probe pressure must be controlled carefully. · Pressure loading can be determined indirectly by the anteroposterior transplant diameter. CITATION FORMAT · Groth M, Fischer L, Herden U et al. Impact of probe-induced abdominal compression on two-dimensional shear wave elastography measurement of split liver transplants in children. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 905 - 912.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Groth
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Section of Pediatric Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uta Herden
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Brinkert
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Beime
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Deindl
- Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Adam
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Herrmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Section of Pediatric Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|