Reconstruction of Desmoid Tumors: Case Series and Systematic Review

The Role of Reconstruction on Desmoid Tumor Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Technical Considerations

BACKGROUND

Desmoid tumors occur throughout the body, presenting as aggressive, locally invasive lesions that can impede quality of life. Many controversies remain regarding the optimal surgical treatment of desmoid. This article presents a systematic review and meta-analysis on surgical management, focusing on risk of recurrence and the utility of reconstruction within this unique patient population.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to search for articles. The clinical course of patients diagnosed with desmoid tumors and treated by our institution's multidisciplinary team was retrospectively reviewed over a 13-year period. Meta-analysis study findings were compared with our cohort.

RESULTS

From the systematic review, 10 studies with level of evidence III were found, which resulted in 981 patients. Twenty patients from our institution met the inclusion criteria for our study. In both our study cohort and the pooled results, recurrence was significantly higher in patients with positive microscopic margin after resection. In our study cohort, patients with recurrence had higher rates of positive margins compared with those without recurrence (83.3% vs 7.1%, P = 0.004), whereas the pooled study showed a difference of margin positivity of 50% vs 40% ( P = 0.01). No patients who underwent reconstruction in our study cohort had a recurrence during the study period.

CONCLUSION

In both our cohort and pooled results, recurrence was significantly higher in patients with positive margins after initial resection. Reconstruction was not found to be a risk factor for recurrence. Reconstruction following desmoid tumor resection should be considered a viable option if a large and aggressive resection is required to obtain negative margins.

The use of Permacol® biological mesh for complex abdominal wall repair

BACKGROUND

Complex abdominal wall repair (CAWR) remains challenging, especially in contaminated fields where the use of a synthetic mesh is associated with prohibitively complication rates. Consequently, biological mesh has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using Permacol® in patients who had CAWR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the files of patients who had CAWR using the Permacol® mesh. Analysis included patients' preoperative characteristics, procedural parameters, and early and late post-operative complications including mainly recurrence. A multivariate regression model was performed to determine factors that influence 24-months recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Between January 2009 and December 2018, 75 patients. The most common indication was hernia in a contaminated field (48.0%) and abdominal wall defect greater than 10 cm in diameter (36%). Overall, 44% of our patients were Centers for Disease Control (CDC) class II or III and 81.3% fall into category II or III according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) classification. Recurrence rate of our series was 9.3%. Complete fascial closure was achieved in 60 patients (80%). Upon univariate analysis complete fascial closure, posterior component separation, seroma drainage, BMI >30 kg/m2 and age >65 years, VHWD grade >2, DINDO CLAVIEN class > 2 affected the recurrence rate at 2 years follow up. When subcutaneous drains are placed prophylactically, recurrence rates drop from 38.7% (5/14) to 3.3% (2/61 patients) when drains are placed at the time of operation (p=0.02). Only fascial closure affected the 24-months recurrence rate on multivariate analysis (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Permacol® surgical implant use for CAWR is safe with a relatively low rate of hernia recurrence at 2 years. Prophylactic subcutaneous drain placement may reduce the risk of hernia recurrence. The presence of contaminated fields does not appear to influence hernia recurrence when Permacol® is used, in fact, the only factor that affects recurrence rate at 24-months on multivariate analysis is completeness of the fascial closure.

Conversion to Prepectoral Breast Implant Reconstruction after Chest Wall Resection for Desmoid Tumor

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Marginal versus segmental mandibulectomy for pediatric desmoid fibromatosis of the mandible - Two case reports and review of the literature

Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a rare, benign soft tissue neoplasm with high rate of local recurrence. Surgical management of DF in the head and neck can be challenging given the desire to balance the preservation of form and function with the need to minimize local recurrence by achieving complete resection. We present two contrasting cases which highlight the advantages of marginal mandibulectomy over segmental mandibulectomy in children with DF. We favor marginal mandibulectomy even with limited bone stock given the remarkable ability of children to generate new bone.